The rise of China is one of the key trends in contemporary world politics. New China is not only a political and economic, but also an intellectual challenge. Today, the role and place of the PRC in international relations is one of the most popular topics in international discourse. Along with the general issues and problems of the “China in International Relations” bloc, certain regional directions of Beijing’s foreign policy are being actively studied and rethought. On the one hand, the idea of the goals and objectives of the external course of the state makes it possible to go deeper into the analysis of its regional directions. On the other hand, an integrated approach to the role of a particular region in the country’s foreign policy makes it possible to more accurately determine its place in the international arena. This judgment is also true in relation to China. In the context of the accelerated transformation of Chinese foreign policy, fixing trends in its individual areas is an important and at the same time difficult task. The Eurasian Strategy of the PRC is a large strategy proposed by China, based on the construction of the internal and external environment. Its main content is political communication, communication between objects, unhindered trade, financial cooperation and communication between people. This was of great importance for the participating countries. This article analyzes the theoretical and practical prerequisites for creating a strategy and examines its content in detail. Analyzing the available information, its significance lies not only in ensuring China’s economic security, social stability, economic development and response to the global situation. Through this strategy, China has contributed to profound changes in countries, and has also helped countries along the Belt and Road route to increase trade, invest, build infrastructure, and overcome poverty. China’s role in world and regional politics has grown significantly over the past few years, but Beijing’s future strategy is not clear and is the subject of fierce debate. As a reflection on the part of the scientific community, one can see, in particular, the growing interest in China-centered projects of the world order, attempts to find answers to questions about the future of Chinese foreign policy in traditional philosophical concepts. An analysis of the real state of affairs in China is significantly complicated by the weak permeability of the Chinese political space and the desire of the CPC leadership to limit the debate in Chinese society in every possible way.