172CIVIL WAR HISTORY the history of a process rather than a brief for the importance of a part of that process? Phillip S. Paludan University of Kansas Territorial Politics and Government in Montana, 1864-1889. By Clark C. Spence. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1976. Pp. x, 327. $11.50.) Montana territorial politics were dominated by small coalitions of appointed officials, elected representatives and businessmen. The leaders of these small coalitions, whether Democrat or Republican, "represented upper class interests but were broadly supported by the electorate, and they effectively controlled territorial politics, minimizing in the process the direct influence both of appointed officials and voters" (p. 2). Through the ministrations of the coalition leaders, mining, ranching, railroad and other key economic interests were nurtured and protected from the ravages of territorial voters and federal officials. Coalition leaders such as Samuel T. Hauser (Democrat), Martin Maginnis (Democrat), and Benjamin Potts (Republican) in time fashioned a "no-party" political arrangement which simply meant that regardless of whether the federal and territorial governments were guided by Democrats or Republicans , the needs of territorial interest groups could be protected. The territorial legislatures of Montana generally reflected the voting preferences of a Democratic voter majority. Territorial executive officers and the judiciary were, however, for the most part Republicans, which allowed the highly partisan frontier press to print scurrilous editorials about the corruption, the maladministration , the absenteeism and the favoritivism of their political opponents . Most appointees, non-residents of Montana Territory, were accused of being carpetbaggers, defeated eastern political hacks, impecunious and unskilled lawyers and individuals totally incompetent to discharge their duties. Even the federal appointees' descriptions of the worth of their fellow-officeholders were on occasion cutting. Governor Benjamin Potts described a territorial secretary as, "a low drunken fellow who would sell out the whole territory if he was left to discharge the duty of Governor" (p. 138). Intraparty feuds were as disruptive as the political warfare between the Democrats and Republicans so that no appointee or politician in Montana Territory escaped bitter attacks upon his record and his private life. For twenty-five years Montanans chafed under Congressional rule. Legislators complained endlessly about the disallowance of territorial laws, the inadequacy of the court system, the exploita- BOOK REVIEWS173 tion of Montana resources for the national benefit, the lack of adequate federal appropriations, taxation without representation and the intolerable burden of supporting recipients of the federal patronage system. Only statehood in 1889 stilled these complaints despite the fact that Montana, according to Clark Spence, was treated as well as any other territory. The political history of Montana Territory is presented by the author chronologically, except for analytical chapters which deal with the territorial legislature, judiciary, territorial officers and finance. The depth of Spence's research is exceptional. Manuscript collections, published documents, newspapers and secondary sources are skillfully blended together by lucid prose and the logical exposition of concepts. While the principal focus is Montana Territory, Spence relates its history to the nation and the politics and practices of the Gilded Age. This exemplary volume ranks with Earl S. Pomeroy, The Territories and the United States and Howard R. Lamar, Dakota Territory as an important contribution to our understanding of Western history. Donald J. Berthronc Purdue University Acres for Cents: Delinquent Tax Auctions in Frontier Iowa. By Robert P. Swierenga. (Westport, Ct.: Greenwood Press, 1976. Pp. xix, 262. $14.95.) Legal historians never cease to be amazed by the ingenuity of nineteenth -century lawmakers on the Upper Mississippi Valley frontier . Men were impatient to force the pace of economic development , and they devised a bewildering array of legal mechanisms to mobilize scarce capital resources and thus give leverage for productive effort. Willard Hurst, whose Law and Economic Growth (1964) is a veritable digest of such devices, aptly termed the process "bootstrap finance." Robert Swierenga's remarkable book on Iowa tax titles is an empirical study of perhaps the most disarming manifestation of midnineteenth -centuiy lawmaking along these lines. Between 1850 and 1880 Iowa farmers had an insatiable appetite for short-term capital, and demand far outstripped available supplies of credit at the legal interest limit. At the same time governmental units, with the farmers ' full support...