Final Survival Research Articles

Final overall survival data from a randomized, open-label, phase II study of relacorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, in combination with nab-paclitaxel among patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Final overall survival data from a randomized, open-label, phase II study of relacorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, in combination with nab-paclitaxel among patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Exogenous Brassinolide Ameliorates the Adverse Effects of Gamma Radiation Stress and Increases the Survival Rate of Rice Seedlings by Modulating Antioxidant Metabolism

Gamma irradiation-based mutant creation is one of the most important methods for rice plant mutagenesis breeding and molecular biology research. Although median lethal dose irradiation severely damages rice seedlings, applying brassinolide (BR) can increase the survival rate of irradiated seedlings. In this study, we investigated the effects of soaking seeds in solutions containing different BR concentrations (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 5.0 μmol/L) and then spraying the resulting seedlings twice with 0.1 μmol/L BR. The combined BR treatments markedly decreased the superoxide anion (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and malondialdehyde contents but increased the chlorophyll content. An appropriate BR treatment of gamma-irradiated samples substantially increased the activities of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase as well as the proline, ascorbic acid, and glutathione contents in rice seedling shoots. The BR treatment also promoted the growth of seedlings derived from irradiated seeds and increased the shoot and root fresh and dry weights. Most notably, soaking seeds in 0.01 or 0.1 μmol/L BR solutions and then spraying seedlings twice with 0.1 μmol/L BR significantly increased the final seedling survival rate and decreased mutant loss. The study results suggest that exogenous BR treatments can protect rice seedlings from gamma irradiation stress by enhancing antioxidant metabolism.

Updated overall survival and ctDNA analysis in patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with lazertinib in the phase 1/2 LASER201 study.

Lazertinib is a potent, irreversible, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with significant efficacy in patients with EGFR T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is the final overall survival (OS) report from the phase 1/2 LASER201 study in patients with advanced NSCLC with disease progression on or after prior EGFR TKI therapy. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 20years, with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and previous therapy with EGFR TKI. Patients in this integrated analysis received oral lazertinib 240mg/day. Endpoints included efficacy and safety; exploratory analyses included associations between circulating EGFR-mutant tumor DNA (ctDNA) and efficacy parameters. This integrated analysis included 78 patients in Korea who received second- or later-line lazertinib. The median OS was 38.9months; estimated survival rates at 12, 24, and 36months were 89.5%, 73.9%, and 52.8%, respectively. The cumulative 12-month incidence of central nervous system progression was 9.4%. EGFR-mutant ctDNA was detected in 46 patients (62.2%) at baseline. The presence of ctDNA at baseline significantly predicted progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and OS. PFS, response rate, and DCR were significantly associated with EGFR-mutant ctDNA clearance at cycle 3; PFS and OS were significantly associated with ctDNA clearance at cycle 5. The safety profile of lazertinib 240mg/day was consistent with previous findings. Lazertinib is a promising treatment option for patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC following disease progression on prior EGFR-directed TKIs. Patients in LASER201 experienced prolonged OS, regardless of their EGFR mutation, brain metastases, or prior brain radiation status. Clearance of plasma EGFR mutations after lazertinib was associated with patient outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03046992.

OA08.03 Datopotamab Deruxtecan Vs Docetaxel in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Final Overall Survival from TROPION-Lung01

OA08.03 Datopotamab Deruxtecan Vs Docetaxel in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Final Overall Survival from TROPION-Lung01

PS1-3 RELAY: final overall survival with erlotinib+ramucirumab or placebo in untreated, EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC)

PS1-3 RELAY: final overall survival with erlotinib+ramucirumab or placebo in untreated, EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC)

Effect of Surgical Timing to Dental Health in Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting: Three-Dimensional Outcomes.

There are various opinions on the optimal timing for performing secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG). This study compared dental health and 3-dimensional outcomes according to the timing of SABG surgery. A retrospective chart review was performed in patients who underwent SABG between January 1996 and October 2020. Patients were divided into early SABG (6-8y old) and traditional SABG (9-13y old) groups. The final dental survival of the lateral incisor and canine teeth, survival of the bone graft, and maxillary growth were analyzed using plain radiographs and computed tomography with a 3-dimensional volumetric analysis tool. Thirty-six patients were divided into an early group (15 patients) and a traditional group (21 patients). Five patients had bilateral cleft lip, and 26 patients had unilateral cleft lip and palate; therefore, 36 alveolar clefts were analyzed in this study. Lateral incisor survival was significantly greater in the early group than in the traditional group (60% vs. 23.5%; P<0.05). Compared with that in the traditional group, graft success in the early group was greater (80% vs. 57.1%; P<0.05). Three-dimensional volumetric analysis revealed superior bone graft efficiency in the early group compared with the traditional group (55.2 vs. 38.5%; P<0.05). There was no significant difference in maxillary growth between the 2 groups. In our study, superior dental and clinical outcomes were observed in the early SABG group without any long-term complications or maxillary retrusion. Our institution cautiously indicated that SABG could be performed at an age earlier than the existing SABG performed after 9 years old.

Pilot-scale investigation of an advanced biofloc technology for treating Pacific white shrimp effluent: Performance and insight mechanisms

Biofloc technology (BFT) is extensively used in the treatment of water quality in intensive shrimp aquaculture systems. However, the rapid accumulation of biofloc in middle-to-late culture stages poses challenges for system management, impacting the economic yield of aquaculture operations. To address this issue, an advanced biofloc system (A-BS) that integrates a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) with BFT was constructed, and the biofloc system (BS) was used as a control group. During a 100-day pilot-scale operation, the A-BS group effectively regulated water quality and enhanced the growth rate of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). In the A-BS group, the average concentrations of ammonia, nitrite, chemical oxygen demand, and mixed liquor suspended solids were substantially reduced compared to those in the BS group, measuring 0.19, 0.55, 36.36, and 229 mg/L, respectively, across the middle-to-late culture stages. Notably, the final stocking density and survival rate of shrimp in the A-BS group, reached 7.04 kg/m3 and 81.22 %, surpassing those in the BFT group. Furthermore, microbial community and functional gene analyses revealed more in-depth insights into the related mechanisms. Bacterial abundance and diversity, as well as the presence of denitrification genes such as Unclassified_f_Rhodobacteraceae and Paracoccus, were markedly higher in the A-BS group than in the BS group. The integration of MBBR into A-BS significantly increased the abundance of amoA and nirK genes, which are crucial for water quality stability during later culture stages. This proof-of-concept investigation confirms that the MBBR–BFT coupling process in A-BS holds promise for advancing sustainable aquaculture practice and provides strategic guidance for the modernization of the industry.

Final Overall Survival Analysis of S1500: A Randomized, Phase II Study Comparing Sunitinib With Cabozantinib, Crizotinib, and Savolitinib in Advanced Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) signaling pathway plays a role in the pathogenesis of selected patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). In the phase II PAPMET trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02761057), cabozantinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved objective response rate compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced PRCC. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) analysis. In this multicenter, randomized phase II, open-label trial, 147 patients with advanced PRCC who have received up to one previous therapy (excluding vascular endothelial growth factor-directed agents) were assigned to sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, or savolitinib. Ultimately, savolitinib and crizotinib arms were closed because of futility. With a median follow-up of 17.5 months, the median OS was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to 28.1) with cabozantinib and 17.3 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 21.8) with sunitinib (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.36; P = .46). The OS landmark estimates for cabozantinib and sunitinib were 50% versus 39% at 24 months and 32% versus 28% at 36 months. In conclusion, we observed no significant difference in OS across treatment arms. Although cabozantinib represents a well-supported option for advanced PRCC, the lack of survival benefit underscores the need to develop novel therapies for this disease.

Niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

The phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported. Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical (overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient [HRd] population). Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cutoff date, 08Apr2024). Median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.23; P= 0.8834) for niraparib (n= 487) versus placebo (n;= 246). In the HRd (n= 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n= 249) populations, the OS HRs were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.71-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed. In patients with newly diagnosed aOC at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were twice as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile.

712MO Final overall survival (OS) from the phase III ATALANTE/ENGOT-ov29 trial evaluating atezolizumab (Atz) versus placebo with standard chemotherapy (Cx) plus bevacizumab (bev) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapse (PSR)

712MO Final overall survival (OS) from the phase III ATALANTE/ENGOT-ov29 trial evaluating atezolizumab (Atz) versus placebo with standard chemotherapy (Cx) plus bevacizumab (bev) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapse (PSR)

LBA67 Cabozantinib (C) plus atezolizumab (A) versus 2nd novel hormonal therapy (NHT) in patients (Pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Final overall survival (OS) results of the phase III, randomized, CONTACT-02 study

LBA67 Cabozantinib (C) plus atezolizumab (A) versus 2nd novel hormonal therapy (NHT) in patients (Pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Final overall survival (OS) results of the phase III, randomized, CONTACT-02 study

LBA29 Final overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) treated with niraparib (nir) first-line (1L) maintenance: Results from PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012

LBA29 Final overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) treated with niraparib (nir) first-line (1L) maintenance: Results from PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012

1788P Final overall survival analysis of JCOG1205/1206: Phase III study of irinotecan/cisplatin (IP) versus etoposide/cisplatin (EP) for completely resected high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung

1788P Final overall survival analysis of JCOG1205/1206: Phase III study of irinotecan/cisplatin (IP) versus etoposide/cisplatin (EP) for completely resected high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung

544P Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in microsatellite instability high (MSI)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final survival analysis and prognostic evaluation of GDF-15 in the phase II GERCOR NIPICOL study

544P Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in microsatellite instability high (MSI)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final survival analysis and prognostic evaluation of GDF-15 in the phase II GERCOR NIPICOL study

Final Analysis Data and Exploratory Biomarker Analysis of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib Monotherapy for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: The WJOG9717L Study

IntroductionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been the standard treatment for patients with NSCLC who have sensitive EGFR mutations. This study revealed final analysis survival data, biomarkers, and resistance mechanisms of osimertinib plus bevacizumab or osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced EGFR-positive nonsquamous NSCLC. MethodsWe previously reported the primary results of a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study comparing osimertinib plus bevacizumab with osimertinib monotherapy for this population. In this exploratory analysis using tissue and plasma samples, we evaluated gene profiles at baseline and disease progression or the last dose using targeted deep sequencing. ResultsThe median progression-free survival (PFS) by the blinded independent central reviewer was 22.1 months for the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.2 months for the osimertinib arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.864, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.549–1.359). The 3-year overall survival was not different between the two arms (osimertinib plus bevacizumab: 57.1%; osimertinib monotherapy: 65.0%; HR 1.271, 95% CI: 0.727–2.223). A total of 94 patients had assessable plasma samples at baseline, and 40 had assessable pretreatment tissue samples. EGFR mutations (76.6%) and TP53 mutations (44.7%) were detected in plasma samples at baseline. In patients with plasma TP53 mutations (n = 42), the median PFS by blinded independent central reviewer was 19.8 months for the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.2 months for the osimertinib arm (HR = 1.107, 95% CI: 0.534–2.297). ConclusionsThere was also no significant difference in the PFS between the two arms, even in patients with TP53 mutations.

Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Post-treatment Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Using Pre-treatment CT Images and Clinical Data.

The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a model for predicting post-treatment survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients using their CT images and clinical information, including various treatment information. We collected pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT images and clinical information including patient-related factors, initial treatment options, and survival status from 692 patients. The patient cohort was divided into a training cohort (n = 507), a testing cohort (n = 146), and an external CT cohort (n = 39), which included patients who underwent CT scans at other institutions. After model training using fivefold cross-validation, model validation was performed on both the testing cohort and the external CT cohort. Our cascaded model employed a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract features from CT images and derive final survival probabilities. These probabilities were obtained by concatenating previously predicted probabilities for each interval with the patient-related factors and treatment options. We utilized two consecutive fully connected layers for this process, resulting in a number of final outputs corresponding to the number of time intervals, with values representing conditional survival probabilities for each interval. Performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), the mean cumulative/dynamic area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (mC/D AUC), and the mean Brier score (mBS), calculated every 3months. Through an ablation study, we found that using DenseNet-121 as the backbone network and setting the prediction interval to 6months optimized the model's performance. The integration of multimodal data resulted in superior predictive capabilities compared to models using only CT images or clinical information (C index 0.824 [95% CI 0.822-0.826], mC/D AUC 0.893 [95% CI 0.891-0.895], and mBS 0.121 [95% CI 0.120-0.123] for internal test cohort; C index 0.750 [95% CI 0.747-0.753], mC/D AUC 0.819 [95% CI 0.816-0.823], and mBS 0.159 [95% CI 0.158-0.161] for external CT cohort, respectively). Our CNN-based discrete-time survival prediction model with CT images and clinical information demonstrated promising results in predicting post-treatment survival of patients with HCC.

Pomalidomide/Daratumumab/Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Final Overall Survival From MM-014

BackgroundPatients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have exhausted lenalidomide benefits require improved therapies. The 3-cohort phase 2 MM-014 trial (NCT01946477) explored pomalidomide in early lines of treatment for lenalidomide-exposed RRMM. In cohort B, pomalidomide plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (DPd) showed promising efficacy (median follow-up 28.4 months), as previously reported. Here, we report final overall survival (OS) in cohort B. MethodsPatients aged ≥ 18 years were treated in 28-day cycles: pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily from days 1 to 21; daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (cycles 1-2), days 1 and 15 (cycles 3-6), and day 1 (cycle ≥ 7); and dexamethasone 40 mg (age ≤ 75 years) or 20 mg (age > 75 years) orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The primary endpoint was ORR. OS and safety were secondary endpoints. ResultsAmong 112 patients enrolled, 85 (75.9%) had lenalidomide-refractory disease and 27 (24.1%) had lenalidomide-relapsed disease. At a median follow-up of 41.9 months (range, 0.4-73.1), median OS was 56.7 months (95% confidence interval, 46.5-not reached). Treatment-emergent adverse events related to, and leading to discontinuation of, pomalidomide, dexamethasone, or daratumumab occurred in 7 (6.3%), 9 (8.0%), and 6 (5.4%) patients, respectively. ConclusionWith long-term follow-up, our results show favorable OS with DPd. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports, with no new safety signals identified. IMiD agent-based therapy can still be considered in patients with RRMM who experience progressive disease on or after lenalidomide.

Befotertinib for patients with pretreated EGFR T790M mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC: Final overall survival results from a phase 2 trial

BackgroundIn the initial analysis of a pivotal phase 2 single-arm study (NCT03861156), befotertinib (D-0316) showed clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in pretreated patients with EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with brain metastases. MethodsEligible patients received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75–100 mg (cohort B) once daily until disease progression, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. The primary endpoint for the initial analysis was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee. OS and safety were secondary endpoints. Herein, we present the final OS and safety data. ResultsA total of 176 patients in cohort A and 290 patients in cohort B were finally enrolled. At data cutoff (May 31, 2023), the median duration of follow-up was 47.9 months (95 % CI: 47.1–48.3) in cohort A and 36.7 months (35.9–37.9) in cohort B. The median OS was 23.9 months (95 % CI: 21.1–27.2) in cohort A and 31.5 months (26.8–35.3) in cohort B. The median OS for patients with and without brain metastasis in cohort A was 18.6 months (95 % CI: 14.9–26.3) and 26.4 months (95 % CI: 23.0–29.0), respectively. In cohort B, these data was 23.0 months (95 % CI: 18.6–29.1) and 35.5 months (95 % CI: 29.3–NE), respectively. The safety profile of befotertinib remained consistent with previous data. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were 38.1 % in the cohort A and 50.3 % in the cohort B, and 22.2 % and 31.7 % were related to the study drug. ConclusionBefotertinib demonstrated a more profound OS benefit compared to other 3rd-generation EGFR TKI, despite that cross trial data comparison should be interpreted with caution. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with previously report data in pretreated patients with confirmed T790M mutation-positive NSCLC.

Should Palpable Nodes Be Exclusionary in Patients Who Are Otherwise Candidates for ACOSOG Z0011-Type Trials?

Palpable nodes were exclusionary in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011, while SINODAR-ONE excluded those with positive axillary nodes by palpation and ultrasound. To determine whether clinical nodal status should be exclusionary in those fulfilling pathologic criteria for ACOSOG Z0011 and similar trials, this study analyzed the accuracy and implications of clinical nodal positivity. Patients ≥ 18years old with cT1-T2, cN0-cN1, M0 breast cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2019. Subset characteristics of cN1 and cN0 were compared with respect to final pathologic nodal status and overall survival (OS). Of 57,823 patients identified, 77.0% were cT1 and 23.0% were cT2. Of the 93.9% of patients who were staged as cN0, 16.7% were pN1; of the remaining 6.1% staged as cN1, 9.6% were found to be pN0. Among cN1/pN0 patients, 14.9% underwent axillary dissection without sentinel node biopsy. There was no difference in adjusted OS for patients staged as cN0 versus cN1 who were found to be pN1 (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.37, p = 0.22), a finding that persisted on subset analysis in those with two positive nodes (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.33, p = 0.63). Clinical nodal stage does not affect OS in pN1 patients. Clinical nodal assessment can both overstage patients and result in unnecessary axillary surgery. These data suggest that cN1 patients who are otherwise candidates for a Z0011-like paradigm should still be considered eligible. Their final candidacy should be determined by surgical lymph node pathology and not preoperative clinical status.

The impact of Paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients - interim analysis of safety and immediate efficacy of a randomized control trial (C-HOC trial)

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the potential superiority of combining paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with sequential intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy over intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC, IVA and IVB high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube carcinoma (HGSOC). This interim analysis focuses on the safety and immediate efficacy of both regimens to determine the feasibility of the planned trial (C-HOC Trial).MethodsIn a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial, FIGO stage IIIC, IVA, and IVB HGSOC patients (FAGOTTI score ≥ 8 during laparoscopic exploration) unsuitable for optimal cytoreduction in primary debulking surgery (PDS) were randomized 2:1 during laparoscopic exploration. The Experiment Group (HIPEC Group) received one cycle of intraperitoneal neoadjuvant laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (paclitaxel) followed by three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin), while the Control Group received only three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Both groups subsequently underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS). The adverse effects of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and pathological chemotherapy response scores (CRS) after IDS were compared.ResultsAmong 65 enrolled patients, 39 HIPEC Group and 21 Control Group patients underwent IDS. Grade 3–4 chemotherapy-related adverse effects were primarily hematological with no significant differences between the two groups. The HIPEC Group exhibited a higher proportion of CRS 3 (20.5% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.000). R0 resection rates in IDS were 69.2% (HIPEC Group) and 66.7% (Control Group). R2 resection occurred in 2.6% (HIPEC Group) and 14.3% (Control Group) cases. No reoperations or postoperative deaths were reported, and complications were managed conservatively.ConclusionsCombining HIPEC with IV NACT in treating ovarian cancer demonstrated safety and feasibility, with no increased chemotherapy-related adverse effects or postoperative complications. HIPEC improved tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, potentially enhancing progression-free survival (PFS). However, the final overall survival results are pending, determining if HIPEC combined with IV NACT is superior to IV NACT alone.