Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations in gynaecology. Subtotal hysterectomy may lead to complete relief of symptoms while sexual and bladder function may be less affected, compared with total hysterectomy. Many comparative studies have been published, as well as a decision analysis. According to the latest reports, the earlier proposed benefits of subtotal hysterectomy have not been substantiated, and complications following both procedures seem to be more or less comparable. In this case report, we present a complication which, to our knowledge, never before occurred following subtotal hysterectomy but is known as a rare complication of both vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. A 49 year old woman visited the outpatient department of our hospital with menorrhagia resulting in anaemia. She had a history of angina pectoris, severe abuse of alcohol and psychiatric problems. Transvaginal sonography showed uterine fibroids. She was initially treated with lynestrenol, which failed to relieve her symptoms. She then received goserelin, also without success. A subtotal hysterectomy was performed without complication. A reversed conal biopsy, as suggested in literature in order to prevent persistent menstruation, was not performed. The woman went home one week later. Two weeks after discharge she attended the outpatient department complaining of abdominal discomfort and vaginal discharge and bleeding. Transvaginal sonography showed an echodense mass measuring 6 5 8 cm, thought to be an abscess or an organising haematoma, situated at the top of the cervix. Amoxycillin was started, after which her fever decreased. The pelvic mass also decreased, and drainage was not performed. Two weeks later, her fever and abdominal discomfort had fully disappeared. On speculum examination, a polyp protruded from the external os of the cervix. On close inspection, this structure seemed to be the fimbrial part of a uterine tube. Pulling of the structure resulted in pain on the left side of the lower abdomen. Under regional anaesthesia, the uterine tube was resected transvaginally as proximally as possible, 5 cm from the fimbrial end (Fig. 1). The proximal part of the uterine tube retracted via the cervical canal into the abdomen. Finally, the external os was securely closed. The woman recovered from this operation without any problems and was discharged later that day. Pathological examination of the excised tissue confirmed that it was a uterine tube. One year later she has had no complaints.