This article uses ethnographic interviews to examine the production of Filipino traditional dance in three separate settings in the Filipino American community: community associations , student ethnic organizations, and professional dance companies. Participants in each setting have used tradition making to pursue different cultural purposes: nostalgia in community associations; the celebration of ''cultural identity in student ethnic organizations; and a technically distinct cultural representation among professional dance companies. At issue is the social construction of and the negotiation of appropriate cultural resources to reproduce the past in the present , that is, a living tradition in each cultural context. Anselm Strauss's (1963, 1978) concept of the negotiated order is used to analyze the static and dynamic qualities of tradition making and to better understand the social construction of local authenticity in each setting. selection of what constitutes tradition is always made in the present: the content of the past is modified and redefined according to a modern significance. Linnekin, Defining Tradition If we recognize that all cultural traditions are constructed , then the goal of presenting authentic traditions can be understood as primarily a rhetorical strategy. Lu and Fine, The Presentation of Ethnic Authenticity This article looks at the social reproduction and reenactment of a cultural tradition. Conventionally, the reproduction of a cultural tradition relies the presumed past existence of a symbolically significant set of cultural practices, for example, culturally meaningful activities, rituals, objects, values, and ideas, that constitute an important community focus and have been codified in such a way that they can be passed on or handed down from an earlier generation to a more contemporary one. How easily such an ostensibly straightforward social * Direct all correspondence to: Samuel Gilmore, School of Social Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697; e-mail : sgilmore@uci.edu. Sociological Perspectives, Volume 43, Number 4, pages S21-S41. Copyright © 2000 by Pacific Sociological Association. All rights reserved. Send requests for permission to reprint to: Rights and Permissions, University of California Press, Journals Division, 2000 Center St., Ste. 303, Berkeley, CA 94704-1223.
Read full abstract