The subject of considerations contained in the article is the functioning of the institution of separation, introduced to the Family and Guardianship Code by the amendment of 1999. The analysis uses the results of empirical research (files) published in the literature on the adjudication of separation and its abolition – in the practice of Polish courts – and, above all, data statistics on the institution in question, published by the Central Statistical Office in the years 2000–2020. The considerations contained in the article allow for the formulation of several conclusions. Statistical data clearly show that the number of adjudicated separations is successively decreasing, while the number of divorces is increasing. More and more couples are therefore choosing divorce rather than separation as a way of resolving difficulties in marital life. However, the process described above applies primarily to couples of short duration. This group of married couples is not interested in the effort to maintain the marriage, rather they strive to end it quickly and “put their lives in order” again. The institution of separation, especially according to this group, is only a temporary solution, which ultimately leads to the dissatisfaction of the spouses with the legal situation between them. Based on the analysis made in the article, it can be concluded that there is a certain category of marriages for which the discussed institution meets the assumptions adopted by the legislator when it was adopted. This is evidenced by the practice of abolition of separation. Despite the decrease in the number of adjudicated separations, the number of abolished separations has remained at a similar level for years. The discussed institution will probably continue to evolve and “look for its proper place” in changing social contexts, implementing the legislator’s intention and related functions, including, in particular, helping married couples in crisis. In this context, according to the authors of the article, it would be worth considering various possibilities of institutional support for separated married couples, who are currently left to their own devices. Perhaps this is where the reasons for the process of decreasing the attractiveness of the separation institution, according to the opinion of the spouses, should be sought.