Field Output Factor Measurements Research Articles

Uncertainty of scintillator-based field-output factor measurements in MR-Linacs with the two-channel chromatic stem removal technique

Current international protocols such as the IAEA/AAPM TRS-483 for small field dosimetry do not include recommendations for measurements in strong magnetic fields as found in MR-Linacs (i.e. megavoltage x-ray radiotherapy units with built-in magnetic resonance imaging). A EURAMET research project was therefore launched to support the traceability of such measurements and to contribute to the metrological basis for future recommendations. Given the high degree of water equivalence and the small size of fiber-coupled plastic scintillators, one objective of the project was to study the suitability of this detector type for dosimetry in MR-Linacs and to demonstrate their use in a clinical environment. This manuscript reports results of that work. A protocol for measuring field output factors with plastic scintillation detectors was developed. The protocol is based on calibration of the scintillators directly in a water phantom positioned in the MR-Linac rather than in a water-equivalent solid phantom as has been a common technique for conventional linacs. A detailed uncertainty budget was established involving all known sources of uncertainty including the systematic influence of light attenuation through the fiber when measuring in different field sizes. The protocol was used to measure field output factors at five MR-Linac’s (four Viewray MRIdian’s and one Elekta Unity). The protocol showed a high level of robustness leading to a less than 0.3 % deviation between field output factors calculated based on calibration data obtained before or after the field-output factor measurements. The correction for light attenuation was less than 0.4 % for all fields measured but showed a systematic offset, with larger corrections needed for small field sizes.This robustness of the protocol was further demonstrated by the closeness of agreement (agreement within uncertainty) for field-output factor measurements with two different scintillators (BCF-12 and BCF-60) for square fields (size: 0.83 cm x 0.83 cm or larger) in four nominally identical Viewray MRIdian's. To test the accuracy of the scintillator measurements, the system was used for characterization of a PTW 60019 micro diamond detector in a Viewray MRIdian. Scintillator based correction factors for output factor measurements with the micro diamond detector were found to be in agreement with independent Monte-Carlo computations. The study therefore supports that plastic scintillation detectors are an excellent option for measuring field output factors in MR-Linacs.

Evaluation of radiation detectors for the determination of field output factors in Leksell Gamma Knife dosimetry using 3D printed phantom inserts

The Leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and Icon™ have a unique geometry, containing 192 60Co sources with collimation for field sizes of 4 mm, 8 mm, and 16 mm. 4 mm and 8 mm collimated fields lack lateral charged particle equilibrium, so accurate field output factors are essential. This study performs field output factor measurements for the microDiamond, microSilicon, and RAZOR™ Nano detectors.3D printed inserts for the spherical Solid Water® Phantom were fabricated for microDiamond detector, the microSilicon unshielded diode and the RAZOR™ Nano micro-ionisation chamber. Detectors were moved iteratively to identify the peak detector signal for each collimator, representing the effective point of measurement of the chamber.In addition, field output correction factors were calculated for each detector relative to vendor supplied Monte Carlo simulated field output factors and field output factors measured with a W2 scintillator. All field output factors where within 1.1 % for the 4 mm collimator and within 2.3 % for the 8 mm collimator.The 3D printed phantom inserts were suitable for routine measurements if the user identifies the effective point of measurement, and ensures a reproducible setup by marking the rotational alignment of the cylindrical print. Measurements with the microDiamond and microSilicon can be performed faster compared to the RAZOR™ Nano due to differences in the signal to noise ratio. All detectors are suitable for field output factor measurements for the Leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and Icon™.

Effect of Detector Orientation and Influence of Jaw Position in the Determination of Small-field Output Factor with Various Detectors for High-energy Photon Beams

Background: Accurate dose measurements are difficult in small fields due to charge particle disequilibrium, partial source occlusion, steep dose gradient, and the finite size of the detector. Aim: The study aims to determine the output factor using various detectors oriented in parallel and perpendicular orientations for three different tertiary collimating systems using 15 MV photon beams. In addition, this study analyzes how the output factor could be affected by different configurations of X and Y jaws above the tertiary collimators. Materials and Methods: Small field output factor measurements were carried out with three detectors for different tertiary collimating systems such as BrainLab stereotactic cones, BrainLab mMLC and Millennium MLC namely. To analyze the effect of jaw position on output factor, measurements have been carried out by positioning the jaws at the edge, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from the tertiary collimated field. Results: The data acquired with 15 MV photon beams show significant differences in output factor obtained with different detectors for all collimating systems. For smaller fields when compared to microDiamond, the SRS diode underestimates the output by up to -1.7% ± 0.8% and -2.1% ± 0.3%, and the pinpoint ion chamber underestimates the output by up to -8.1% ± 1.4% and -11.9% ± 1.9% in their parallel and perpendicular orientation respectively. A large increase in output factor was observed in the small field when the jaw was moved 0.25 cm symmetrically away from the tertiary collimated field. Conclusion: The investigated data on the effect of jaw position inferred that the position of the X and Y jaw highly influences the output factors of the small field. It also confirms that the output factor highly depends on the configuration of X and Y jaw settings, the tertiary collimating system as well as the orientation of the detectors in small fields.

Small field output factor measurement and verification for CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy and radiosurgery system using 3D polymer gel, ionization chamber, diode, diamond and scintillator detectors, Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation

The dosimetry of small fields has become tremendously important with the advent of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery, where small field segments or very small fields are used to treat tumors. With high dose gradients in the stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy treatment, small field dosimetry becomes challenging due to the lack of lateral electronic equilibrium in the field, x-ray source occlusion, and detector volume averaging. Small volume and tissue-equivalent detectors are recommended to overcome the challenges. With the lack of a perfect radiation detector, studies on available detectors are ongoing with reasonable disagreement and uncertainties. The joint IAEA and AAPM international code of practice (CoP) for small field dosimetry, TRS 483 (Alfonso et al., 2017) provides guidelines and recommendations for the dosimetry of small static fields in external beam radiotherapy. The CoP provides a methodology for field output factor (FOF) measurements and use of field output correction factors for a series of small field detectors and strongly recommends additional measurements, data collection and verification for CyberKnife (CK) robotic stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery system using the listed detectors and more new detectors so that the FOFs can be implemented clinically. The present investigation is focused on using 3D gel along with some other commercially available detectors for the measurement and verification of field output factors (FOFs) for the small fields available in the CK system. The FOF verification was performed through a comparison with published data and Monte Carlo simulation. The results of this study have proved the suitability of an in-house developed 3D polymer gel dosimeter, several commercially available detectors, and Gafchromic films as a part of small field dosimetric measurements for the CK system.

Efficient dose-rate correction of silicon diode relative dose measurements.

Silicon diodes are often the detector of choice for relative dose measurements, particularly in the context of radiotherapy involving small photon beams. However, a major drawback lies in their dose-rate dependency. Although ionization chambers are often too large for small field output factor (OF) measurements, they are valuable instruments to provide reliable percent-depth dose (PDD) curves in reference beams. The aim of this work is to propose a practical and accurate method for the characterization of silicon diode dose-rate dependence correction factors using ionization chamber measurements as a reference. The robustness of ionization chambers for PDD measurements is used to quantify the dose-rate dependency of a diode detector. A mathematical formalism, which exploits the error induced in percent-depth ionization (PDI) curves for diodes by their dose-rate dependency, is developed to derive a dose-rate correction factor applicable to diode relative measurements. The method is based on the definition of the recombination correction factor given in the addendum to TG 51 and is applied to experimental measurements performed on a CyberKnife M6 radiotherapy unit using a PTW 60012 diode detector. A measurement-based validation is provided by comparing corrected PDI curves to measurements performed with a PTW 60019 diamond detector, which does not exhibit dose-rate dependence. Results of dose-rate correction factors for PDI curves, off-axis ratios (OARs), tissue-phantom ratios, and small field OFs are coherent with the expected behavior of silicon diode detectors. For all considered setups and field sizes, the maximum correction and the maximum impact of the uncertainties induced by the correction are obtained for OARs for the 60 mm collimator, with a correction of 2.5% and an uncertainty of 0.34%. For OFs, corrections range from 0.33% to 0.82% for all field sizes considered, and increase with the reduction of the field size. Comparison of PDI curves corrected for dose-rate and for in-depth beam quality variations illustrates excellent agreement with measurements performed using the diamond detector. The proposed method allows the efficient and precise correction of the dose-rate dependence of silicon diode detectors in the context of clinical relative dosimetry.

Small Field Output Factor Measurement and Verification for Cyberknife Robotic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery System Using 3D Polymer Gel, Ionization Chamber, Diode, Diamond and Scintillator Detectors, Gafchromic Film and Monte Carlo Simulation

Small Field Output Factor Measurement and Verification for Cyberknife Robotic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery System Using 3D Polymer Gel, Ionization Chamber, Diode, Diamond and Scintillator Detectors, Gafchromic Film and Monte Carlo Simulation

Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors

There are well established dosimetry reference standards for broad beams; however, there are no reference standards that can be used for both broad and small fields. The variation of the equivalent square fields and field output factors in small static photon fields when using a synthetic diamond, an electron diode, and ionization chambers (pin point, semiflex, and liquid filled) was investigated over time. Data from this study were compared to the data from other hospitals in the country and standard data sets, i.e., the British Journal of Radiology Supplement No. 25 of 1996 (BJR25) and the Radiological Physics Centre (RPC) 2012 data. The results showed that reliance on one detector and one measurement session, could yield incorrect field output factors (FOFs) for small fields. At least one of the detectors should be a solid state type with published field output correction factors and at least three measurement sessions should be performed for each FOF data point. Comparing measured data with published datasets, like RPC, will assist in verifying data. BJR25 datasets should not be used for Sclin ≤4 cm.

Feasibility study of using Stereotactic Field Diode for field output factors measurement and evaluating three new detectors for small field relative dosimetry of 6 and 10MV photon beams.

This study assesses the feasibility of using stereotactic field diode (SFD) as an alternate to gaf chromic films for field output factor (FF) measurement and further evaluating three new detectors for small field dosimetry. Varian 21EX linear accelerator was used to generate 6 and 10 MV beams of nominal square fields ranging from 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 10 × 10 cm2. One passive (EBT3 films) and five active detectors including IBA RAZOR diode(RD), SFD, RAZOR nanochamber (RNC), pinpoint chamber (PTW31023), and semiflex chamber (PTW31010) were employed. FFs were measured using films and SFD while beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) distribution were acquired with active detectors. Polarity (kpol) and recombination (ks) effects of ion chambers were determined and corrected for output ratio measurement. Correction factors (CF) of RD, RNC, and PTW31023 in axial and radial orientation were also measured. Stereotactic field diode measured FFs have shown good agreement with films (with difference of <1%). RD and RNC measured beam profiles were within 3% deviation from the SFD values. Variation in kpol with field size for RNC and PTW31023 was up to 4% and 0.4% (for fields ≥ 1 × 1 cm2), respectively, while variation in ks of PTW31023 was <0.2 %. The maximum values of CF have been calculated to be 5.2%, 2.0%, 13.6%, and 25.5% for RD, RNC, PTW31023‐axial, and PTW31023‐radial respectively. This study concludes that SFD with appropriate CFs as given in TRS 483 may be used for measuring FFs as an alternate to EBT3 films. Whereas RD and RNC may be used for beam profile and PDD measurement in small fields. Considering the limit of usability of 2%, RNC may be used without CF for FF measurement in the smallfields investigated in this study.

Measurement of the small field output factors for 10 MV photon beam using IAEA TRS-483 dosimetry protocol and implementation in Eclipse TPS commissioning

Dosimetry of small fields (SF) is vital for the success of highly conformal techniques. IAEA along with AAPM recently published a code of practice TRS-483 for SF dosimetry. The scope of this paper is to investigate the performance of three different detectors with 10 MV with-flatting-filter (WFF) beam using TRS-483 for SF dosimetry and subsequent commissioning of the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS version-13.6) for SF data. SF dosimetry data (beam-quality TPR 20,10(10), cross-calibration, beam-profile, and field-output-factor (F.O.F)) measurements were performed for PTW31006-pinpoint, IBA-CC01 and IBA-EFD-3G diode detectors in nominal field size (F.S) range 0.5 × 0.5cm2 to 10 × 10 cm2 with water and solid water medium using Varian Truebeam linac. However, Eclipse-TPS commissioning data was acquired using IBA-EFD-3G diode, and absolute dose calibration was performed with FC-65G detector. The dosimetric performance of the Eclipse-TPS was validated using TLD-LiF chips, IBA-PFD, and IBA-EFD-3G diodes. Dosimetric performance of the PTW31006-pinpoint, IBA-CC01, and IBA-EFD-3G detectors was successfully tested for SF dosimetry. The F.O.Fs were generated and found in close agreement for all F.S except 0.5 × 0.5cm2. It is also found that TPR20,10(10) value can be derived within 0.5% accuracy from a non-reference field using Palmans equation. Cross-calibration can be performed in F.S 6 × 6 cm2 with a maximum variation of 0.5% with respect to 10 × 10cm2. During profile measurement, the full-width half-maxima (FWHM) of F.S 0.5 × 0.5cm2 was found maximum deviated from the geometric F.S. In addition, Eclipse-TPS was commissioned along with some limitations: F.O.F below F.S 1 × 1cm2 was ignored by TPS, PDD and profiles were dropped from configuration below F.S 2 × 2 cm2, and F.O.F which does not satisfy the condition 0.7 < A/B < 1.4 (A and B are FWHM in cross-line and in-line direction) have higher uncertainty than specified in TRS-483. Validation tests for Eclipse-TPS generated plans were also performed. The measured dose was in close agreement (3%) with TPS calculated dose up to F.S 1.5 × 1.5cm2.

A novel extrapolation method using OSL detectors for very small field output factor measurement for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Appropriate methods for the determination of very small X-ray beam output factors are essential to ensure correct clinical outcomes for stereotactic radiosurgery. To date, substantial work has been performed in identifying and quantifying suitable dosimeters for relative output factor (ROF) measurements including recent IAEA published recommendations. In this work, we provide a novel method using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) with different effective sizes of the readout area to determine ROFs. This involves applying an extrapolation technique to assess ROFs for 6MV SRS X-ray beams with field diameters ranging from 4 to 30mm as defined by the Brainlab SRS cones. By combining the use of multiple sized OSLDs and water droplets to remove air gaps located around the OSLD detectors, both volume averaging and density variation effects were minimised to estimate ROFs for an extrapolated zero volume detector. The measured results showed that for a 4mm diameter cone, the ROF was 0.660 ± 0.032 (2SD) as compared to 0.661 ± 0.01 and 0.651 ± 0.018 for the PTW 600019 microDiamond detector and Gafchromic EBT3 film respectively. Whilst the uncertainties were larger than conventional detectors, the technique shows promise and improvements in accuracy may be obtained by higher quality manufacturing techniques. Based on these results, using OSLDs with different effective sizes of readout area and an extrapolation technique shows promise for use as an independent verification tool for very small X-ray field ROFs in the clinical department.

Small field dosimetry correction factors for circular and MLC shaped fields with the CyberKnife M6 System: evaluation of the PTW 60023 microSilicon detector

The PTW 60023 microSilicon is a new unshielded diode detector for small-field photon dosimetry. It provides improved water equivalence and a slightly larger sensitive region diameter in comparison to previous diode detectors in this range. In this study we evaluated the correction factors relevant to commissioning a CyberKnife System with this detector by Monte Carlo simulation and verified this data by multi-detector measurement comparison. The correction factors required for output factor determination were substantially closer to unity at small field sizes than for previous diode versions (e.g. = 0.981 at 5 mm field size which compares with corrections of 5%–6% with other stereotactic diodes). Because of these differences we recommend that corrections to small field output factor measurements generated specifically for the microSilicon detector rather than generic data taken from other diode types should be used with this new detector. For depth-dose measurements the microSilicon is consistent with a microDiamond detector to <1% (global), except at depths <10 mm where the diode gives a significantly lower measurement, by 6%–8% at the surface. For profile measurements, the microSilicon requires negligible corrections except in the low dose region outside the beam, where it underestimates off-axis-ratio (OAR) for small fields and overestimates for large fields. Where this effect is most noticeable at the largest field size and depth (115 mm × 100 mm and 300 mm depth) the microSilicon overestimates OAR by 2.3% (global) in the profile tail. This is consistent with other unshielded diodes.

Quantifying the ionization quenching effect in organic plastic scintillators used in MV photon dosimetry

Miniature organic plastic scintillators attached to optical fiber cables have found important uses in medical dosimetry, in particular for small-field dosimetry and field output factor measurements in megavoltage linear accelerator beams. Plastic scintillators are well suited for these applications due to their high degree of water equivalence and their small size. Plastic scintillators, however, are known to suffer from ionization quenching, meaning that the light production per absorbed dose decreases if the dose deposition is caused by low energy electrons. As MV beams also lead to dose deposition by low energy electrons, ionization quenching will also affect, for example, field output factor measurements in MV beams if the fraction of dose delivered by low energy electrons changes with field size or beam quality. While the influence of ionization quenching on scintillator dosimetry in beams of heavy charge particles or kV x-ray has been subject to much research, the effect in MV beams is less well studied, and it is often implicitly assumed that there is no effect. The purpose of this work therefore was to quantify the influence of ionization quenching on plastic scintillators, specifically BCF-60, for the two application in MV photon dosimetry: (i) field output factor measurements for field sizes from 0.5×0.5 cm2 to 10×10 cm2 for a 6 MV beam and (ii) ionization chambers beam quality correction factor (kQ-factors) measurements for beams between 4 MV and 15 MV at a fixed 10×10 cm2 field size. The quenching was quantified using Monte Carlo modelling of the MV beams, a variation of Birks formalism that accounted for the detailed dose deposition by secondary electrons, and quenching parameters established previously using experiments in kV x-ray beams. This enabled the computation of the light yield in a “quenching free” scintillator and therefore a computation of a correction factor due to ionization quenching. Ionization quenching was found to have a small but statistically significant influence on both of the studied applications: (0.6±0.2)% for the field output factor measurements between 0.5×0.5 cm2 and 10×10 cm2 and about (2±0.4)% for the kQ-factor application for beams between 4 MV and 15 MV. The modelling results were in agreement with experimental measurements. The results support that the ionization quenching effect has a small effect on field-output factor measurements and it can probably be neglected during clinical measurements. For direct scintillator-based measurements of beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers, ionization quenching is larger and this effect needs to be accounted for if anyone wants to measure or verify ionization chamber kQ-factors using organic plastic scintillators.

A method of measuring the field output factor based on daisy–chaining

Objective improve the accuracy of the measurement results by using the field output factor measurement method based on daisy-chaining. Methods The Varian Edge Accelerator 6 MV X-ray data were measured using the IBA CC13 ionization chamber, IBA CC01 ionization chamber, IBA Razor semiconductor detector, IBA EFD semiconductor detector and Gafchromic EBT3 film, respectively. Results Compared with the daisy-chaining measurement method, the results obtained by the conventional measurement method using CC13 were smaller. The deviation value was 16.71% in the 1 cm × 1 cm field. The measurement results in a larger field via CC01 were bigger with a deviation of 8.39% in the 40 cm × 40 cm filed. The measurement results via Razor in a larger field were larger with a deviation of 9.40% in the 40 cm × 40 cm field. The measurement results were similar between EFD and Razor with a deviation of 9.14% in the 40 cm × 40 cm field. The results of the film measurement were equivalent to those obtained from the daisy-chaining method in a field of> 1 cm × 1 cm with a deviation within 1.60%, whereas the deviation was increased to 3.13% in the 1 cm × 1 cm field. The results were consistent with daisy-chaining measurement if the 3 cm × 3 cm or 4 cm × 4 cm fields were selected as the intermediate fields with the maximum deviation of 0.29%. Conclusions For the detectors with changing response along with the field size, daisy-chaining measurement method can be utilized to extend the measurement range and improve the accuracy of the measurement results. Key words: Daisy-Chaining; Output factor; Measurement method

A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) have jointly published a new code of practice (CoP), TRS483, for the dosimetry of small static photon fields used in external beam radiotherapy. It gave recommendations on how to perform reference dosimetry in nonstandard machine-specific reference (msr) fields and measure field output factors in small fields. The purpose of this work was to perform a dosimetric evaluation of the recommendations given in this CoP. All measurements were done in a Varian TrueBeam™ STx linear accelerator. Five ionization chambers were used for beam quality measurements, four Farmer type ionization chambers for performing reference dosimetry and two diodes for performing field output factor measurements. Field output factor measurements were done for fourteen field sizes (ranging from 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm). Beam energies used were: 6 MV WFF, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV WFF, and 10 MV FFF. Where appropriate, results from this study were compared with those obtained from the recommendations given in the IAEA TRS398 CoP, AAPM TG51 and TG51 Addendum protocols. Beam quality measurements show that for all beam energies and for equivalent square msr field sizes ranging from 4 cm × 4 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm, agreement between calculated and measured values of TPR20,10 (10) was within 0.6%. When %dd(10,10)X was used as beam quality specifier, the agreement was found to be within 0.8%. Absorbed dose to water per unit monitor unit at the depth of maximum dose zmax in a beam of quality Q, Dw,Qzmax/MU, was determined using both %dd(10,10)X and TPR20,10 (10) as beam quality specifiers. Measured ratios of Dw,Q (zmax )/MU, determined using the two approaches, ranged between 0.999 and 1.000 for all the beam energies investigated. Comparison with TRS398, TG51 and TG51 addendum protocols show that depending on beam energy, the mean values of the ratios TRS398/TRS483, TG51/TRS483, and TG51 Addendum/TRS483 of Dw,Q (zmax )/MU determined using both approaches show excellent agreement with TRS398 CoP (to within 0.05%); agreement with TG51 and TG51 addendum was to within 0.3% for all four beam energies investigated. Field output factors, determined using the two methods recommended in the TRS483 CoP, showed excellent agreement between the two methods. For the 1 cm collimator field size, the mean value of the field output factor obtained from an average of the two detectors investigated was found to be 2% lower than the mean value of the uncorrected ratio of readings. For beams with and without flattening filters, the values of Dw,Q (zmax )/MU obtained following the new CoP are found to be consistent with those obtained using TRS398, TG51 and TG51 addendum protocols to within 0.3%. Field output factors for small beams can be improved when the correction factors for different detectors included in TRS483 are appropriately incorporated into their dosimetry.

Correction factors for diode and diamond detectors in the measurement of small field output factors, using film dosimetry as reference

The accurate measurement of field output factors at small field sizes typically encountered in SRS and IMRT is challenging. In this study we measured detector output ratios for small fields using a range of detectors and orientations, we then calculated correction factors for each detector using film dosimetry as reference to obtain field output factors. The calculated correction factors were compared to the ones from TRS 483. Detectors used were: EBT3 Gafchromic film, PTW semiflex 31010 chamber, PTW pinpoint 31016 chamber, PTW diamond (used in two different orientations) and PTW SRS 60018 diode. Photon beam energies were 6 MV flat and 7 MV FFF with square field sizes from 0.5 to 10.0 cm side. Semiflex and pinpoint chambers agreed well with film down to 2.0 cm field size but under-responded by up to 40% at 0.5 cm field size. At 0.5 cm field size, diamond with stem parallel to beam axis under-estimated field output factors by up to 6.2%; diamond with stem perpendicular to beam axis over-estimated field output factors by up to 1.5% and diode over-estimated field output factors by up to 6.5%. Calculated correction factors, in general, agreed with and confirmed those given in TRS 483 film is an acceptable alternative to Monte Carlo simulation for deriving correction factors for solid state detectors. For field sizes smaller than 1.0 cm, diamond detector with stem perpendicular to beam axis was the most adequate for field output factor measurement, although not recommended in TRS 483.

EP-1946: Effect of small field (SF) output factor (OF) measurements on FSBRT VMAT plans

EP-1946: Effect of small field (SF) output factor (OF) measurements on FSBRT VMAT plans

Effects of inaccurate small field dose measurements on calculated treatment doses

Given the difficulty and potential time- or financial-costs associated with accurate small field dosimetry, this study aimed to establish the clinical necessity of obtaining accurate small field output factor measurements and toevaluate the effects on planned doses that could arise if accurate measurements are not used in treatment planning dose calculations. Isocentre doses, in heterogeneous patient anatomy, were calculated and compared for 571 beams from 48 clinical radiotherapy treatments, using a clinical radiotherapy treatment planning system, with reference to two different sets of beam configuration data. One set of beam configuration data included field output factors (total scatter factors) from precisely positioned and response-corrected diode measurements and the other included field output factors measured using a conventional technique that would have been better suited to larger field measurements. Differences between the field output factor measurements made with the two different techniques equated to 14.2% for the 6[Formula: see text]6mm[Formula: see text] field, 1.8% for the 12[Formula: see text]12mm[Formula: see text] field, and less than 0.5% for the larger fields. This led to isocentre dose differences of up to 3.3% in routine clinical fields smaller than 9mm across and and up to 11% in convoluted fields smaller than 15mm across. If field widths smaller than 15mm are used clinically, then accurate measurement (or-remeasurement) of small field output factors in the treatment planning system's beam data is required in order to achieve dose calculation accuracy within 3%. If such measurements are not completed, then errors in excess of 10% may occur if very small,narrow, concave or convoluted treatment fields are used.

EP-1486: Evaluation of detectors response for small field output factor measurement using Gafchromic film

EP-1486: Evaluation of detectors response for small field output factor measurement using Gafchromic film

Determination of output factor for 6 MV small photon beam: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation technique and microDiamond detector

In order to improve the life's quality for a cancer patient, the radiation techniques are constantly evolving. Especially, the two modern techniques which are intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are quite promising. They comprise of many small beam sizes (beamlets) with various intensities to achieve the intended radiation dose to the tumor and minimal dose to the nearby normal tissue. The study investigates whether the microDiamond detector (PTW manufacturer), a synthetic single crystal diamond detector, is suitable for small field output factor measurement. The results were compared with those measured by the stereotactic field detector (SFD) and the Monte Carlo simulation (EGSnrc/BEAMnrc/DOSXYZ). The calibration of Monte Carlo simulation was done using the percentage depth dose and dose profile measured by the photon field detector (PFD) of the 10×10 cm2 field size with 100 cm SSD. Comparison of the values obtained from the calculations and measurements are consistent, no more than 1% difference. The output factors obtained from the microDiamond detector have been compared with those of SFD and Monte Carlo simulation, the results demonstrate the percentage difference of less than 2%.

Determination of small field output factors in 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free photon beams using various detectors

The study aimed to determine appropriate detectors for output factor measurement of small fields in 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free photon beams using five different detectors. Field sizes were varied between 0.6 × 0.6 and 4.0 × 4.0 cm2. An indirect method (daisy-chaining) was applied to normalize the output factors. For the smallest field size, the variations of output factors compared among the detectors were 13%. Exradin A16 had the lowest output factor and increasing in sequence with CC01, microDiamond, microLion and EDGE detectors, respectively, for both energies. The similarity between CC01 and microDiamond output factor values were within 1.6% and 1% for all field sizes of 6 and 10 MV FFF, respectively. EDGE and microLion presented the highest values while ExradinA16 gave lowest values. In conclusion, IBACC01, Exradin A16, microLion, microDiamond and EDGE detectors seem to be the detectors of choices for small field output factor measurement of FFF beams down to 1.6 × 1.6 cm2. However, we could not guarantee which detector is the most suitable for output factor measurement in small field less than 1.6 × 1.6 cm2 of FFF beams. Further studies are required to provide reference information for validation purposes.