Over the past two decades, research on psychosis has mainly focused on its neurobiological aspects. However, recent findings highlighted the fact that psychosocial factors may affect the risks and the clinical outcomes of psychoses like schizophrenia. In the field of psychopharmacology, the enthusiasm for new generation antipsychotics has been shown to be partially unfounded. In this context it has become necessary to reemphasise psychosocial treatments, which remain the cornerstone of the treatment of patients with severe mental disorders. Psychological recovery denotes the development of a fulfilling life and a positive sense of identity founded on hopefulness and self-determination. It has recently been recognised as an organising principle for the systems of care for the mentally ill that can replace paternalistic, illness-oriented services. Guidelines have been developed to facilitate the transformation of services according to this paradigm. Beyond organisation and training issues, treatment features should include a variety of services that support consumer self-sufficiency, encourage the utilisation of advance directives, provide culturally sensitive treatments, emphasise consumer choice, integrate treatment of co-occurring substance abuse, limit the use of coercive measures, address barriers to access, and provide family services and a full array of training opportunities. In Geneva psychiatric care is organised into sectors, which provide in- and out-patient facilities. This system allows communication between the various units involved in patient care. However, social constraints may hinder the recovery orientation we wish to implement. Firstly, the traditional social network helping people cope with their difficulties has been weakened, leading more individuals to turn to psychiatric or social facilities. Overcrowding of psychiatric facilities may result, thus forming barriers to the treatment of patients who should have priority. Secondly, social reciprocity is difficult to attain in our systems: patients receive assistance without being able to give something back (e.g. do jobs useful for the community). This prevents them from playing a role in society, thus challenging the basis of recovery, i.e. the goal of a fulfilling life and a positive sense of identity. Despite these limitations, some aspects of our care could be improved by considering recovery as an organising principle: Barriers to access should be overcome through increased clinician mobility. Indeed, some patients remain far from care due to their symptoms. Programmes like Assertive Community Treatment can overcome this problem. Additionally, goal assessment should be performed more systematically, particularly for patients with chronic conditions. Efforts should be made to increase motivation when necessary, as the lack of motivation in patients often accounts for their disabilities. In order to feature a wide array of services supporting consumer self-sufficiency, coordination should be fostered across services. Psychodynamic aspects of care should also be considered more thoroughly. Indeed, it is difficult to integrate both behavioural interventions and more psychoanalytically-oriented approaches.
Read full abstract