Abstract Background: Sarcoma is a malignant cancer that arises from transformed cells of mesenchymal origin. Sarcoma has the characteristics of low incidence and wide distribution of onset age. Sarcoma patients have poor prognosis and very limited selection of approved targeted drugs. Till now, the genomic features of sarcoma patients in China have not been well understood. Here we present the comprehensive genomic features of 202 sarcoma patients and compared mutations in different subtypes of sarcomas. Methods: Deep sequencing targeting 450 cancer genes was performed on FFPE and matched blood samples collected from 202 sarcoma patients. Based on the histology patients included 33 osteosarcoma (OS), 24 rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), 20 liposarcoma (LPS), 19 fibrosarcoma (FBS), 16 leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 14 Ewing’s sarcoma (ES), 11 hemangiosarcoma (HMS), 10 synovial sarcoma (SS), 9 chondrosarcoma (CDS), and 46 others in this study. Genomic alterations (GAs) including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions, copy number variations (CNV) and fusions were assessed. Results: Based on the deep sequencing results, there are 1219 somatic mutations detected in all 202 sarcomas, average 6.0 mutations per sample. The most common GAs of LPS, ES and SS’s are consistent with those mentioned in NCCN guidelines (MDM2 55%, EWSR1 78.6% and SS18 80%, respectively). OS, RMS and LMS shared the same most common GAs of TP53 (25%-50%). The second ranked common GAs were NCOR1 (24%), FRS2 (20.8%), ATRX (25%) genes, and the third ranked GAs were RB1 (24%), CDK4 (16.7%) and MAP2K4 (25%) genes. 161/202 patients (79.7%) harbored at least one actionable mutations which might benefit from FDA approved drugs or drugs were under investigation in clinical trials. All FBS, 93.8% LMS and 90.9% HMS have actionable mutations, however, only 10% SS and 35.7% ES have actionable mutations. 8 samples have CNV (including MDM2/4, EGFR and CCND1) which was related to hyper-progression of immunotherapy. All these 8 samples were bone tumor including 4 OS, 1 CDS, 2 ES and 1 fibrosarcoma of bone. Conclusions: Through the comprehensive genomic profiling, different types of sarcomas showed different characteristics of genomic alterations, and potential therapeutic targets may be identified for the patients. Further, NGS provides information on whether or not patients may have the potential hyper-progression of immunotherapy. Citation Format: Xinghua Song, Zuping Lian, YanBin Xiao, Kunpeng Bu, Ye Qiu, Tao Ji, Dan Liu, Angen Liu, Kai Wang. Comparison of mutations in different subtypes of sarcomas and its clinical implications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3421.
Read full abstract