Filling Pressure Research Articles

Effect of Elevated Left Ventricular Diastolic Filling Pressure on the Frequency of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

We investigated the relation between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed transesophageal echocardiography to examine LAA thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and to measure LAA emptying flow velocity in consecutive 376 patients with AF. We estimated diastolic filling pressure as the ratio of early transmitral flow velocity (E) to mitral annular velocity (e') on transthoracic echocardiogram. E/e' ratio in 28 patients (7.4%) with LAA thrombi was higher than that in patients without thrombus (18.3 ± 9.3 vs 11.4 ± 5.9, p <0.0001). The fourth quartile of E/e' (>13.6) consisted of 19 patients with thrombi and had a higher prevalence of thrombi than the others (p <0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis selected E/e' ≥13 as an independent predictor of LAA thrombus with an odds ratio of 3.50 (1.22 to 10.61) in addition to LA dimension and ejection fraction. Increased quartile of E/e' was negatively associated with LAA flow velocity and positively with rate of SEC. In conclusion, increased diastolic filling pressure is associated with a higher rate of LAA thrombus in AF, partly through blood stasis or impaired LAA function.

Use and Limitations of E/e' to Assess Left Ventricular Filling Pressure by Echocardiography

Measurement of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is useful in decision making and prediction of outcomes in various cardiovascular diseases. Invasive cardiac catheterization has been the gold standard in LV filling pressure measurement, but carries the risk of complications and has a similar predictive value for clinical outcomes compared with non-invasive LV filling pressure estimation by echocardiography. A variety of echocardiographic measurement methods have been suggested to estimate LV filling pressure. The most frequently used method for this purpose is the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e'), which has become central in the guidelines for diastolic evaluation. This review will discuss the use the E/e' ratio in prediction of LV filling pressure and its potential pitfalls.

Correlation between N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Doppler Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a population prevalence of about 1%. Natriuretic peptide level is elevated in patients with AF with diastolic dysfunction even with a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level and Doppler echocardiographic parameters for diastolic function have shown correlation with LV filling pressures. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between echocardiographic parameters and serum NT-proBNP in patients with AF with preserved LV ejection fraction.MethodsWe examined transthoracic echocardiography and NT-proBNP levels in the patients with AF and patients with sinus rhythm. Blood samples were taken for serum NT-proBNP measurements within 24 hours of echocardiographic examination. The group 1 was the patients with sinus rhythm (n = 30, mean age 68 ± 13 years) and the group 2 was the patients with AF (n = 33, mean age 70 ± 14 years).ResultsThe group 2 patients had significantly higher mitral E, E' (lateral annulus), E/E' (septal annulus), left atrial (LA) volume index, LA size, pulmonary vein diastolic velocity, and NT-proBNP level than those of group 1 patients (p < 0.05). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve showed a NT-proBNP had good diagnostic power for E/E' (septal annulus) > 15 in patients with AF at cutoff value of 433 pg/mL.ConclusionNT-proBNP level is well correlated with Doppler echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function in patients with AF and preserved LV ejection fraction. NT-proBNP level more than 433 pg/mL may suggest elevated LV filling pressure in patients with AF.

Can Strain and Strain Rate Useful in Assessing Left Ventricular Filling Pressure?

Can Strain and Strain Rate Useful in Assessing Left Ventricular Filling Pressure?

Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Can Be Detected by Cardiac MRI and Correlates with Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Can Be Detected by Cardiac MRI and Correlates with Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

Left Atrial Distensibility and E/e' for Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Patients With Stable Angina - A Comparative Echocardiography and Catheterization Study -

Although E/e' (the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity) is widely used to measure left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP), its accuracy is questionable in coronary artery disease patients. Echocardiograms and LVFP were obtained from 174 patients with stable angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade I-II) who had received interventions for angiography-confirmed coronary stenosis. Compared with single-vessel groups, the multiple-vessel group exhibited lower mitral annular velocities, higher LVFP, and stronger correlations between E/regional e' and LVFP. Additionally, stronger correlations between E/regional e' and LVFP existed in patients with systolic dysfunction or lower variation of myocardial performance index (MPI) among anterior, inferior and lateral borders of mitral annulus. Average e' was not superior to any regional e' for assessing LVFP by the E/e' method. E/e' and left atrial (LA) ejection fraction (EF) correlated linearly with LVFP, but the correlation between LA distensibility and LVFP was logarithmical. Compared with E/e', LA distensibility and LAEF were superior for identifying high LVFP. E/e' is not completely satisfactory for assessing LVFP in patients with stable angina, especially those with single-vessel disease, preserved systolic function or high MPI variation. For identifying high LVFP, LA distensibility and LAEF are better than E/e'.

Usefulness of Soluble Endoglin as a Noninvasive Measure of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Heart Failure

Usefulness of Soluble Endoglin as a Noninvasive Measure of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Heart Failure

Diagnosis and Management of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in the Hypertensive Patient

The progression of hypertensive involvement toward heart failure includes myocardial fibrosis and changes of left ventricular (LV) geometry. In the presence of these abnormalities, diastolic abnormalities occur and are defined as LV diastolic dysfunction (DD). They include alterations of both relaxation and filling, precede alterations of chamber systolic function and can induce symptoms of heart failure even when ejection fraction is normal. The prevalence of heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) increased over time whereas the rate of death from this disorder remained unchanged. In this view, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management of DD and HFNEF in hypertensive patients is a growing public health problem. DD may be asymptomatic and identified occasionally during a Doppler-echocardiographic examination. This tool has gained, therefore, important clinical position for diagnosis of DD. Comprehensive assessment of diastolic function should be done not by a simple classification of DD progression but by estimating the degree of LV filling pressure (FP), a true determinant of symptoms and prognosis. This can be obtained by different ultrasound maneuvers/tools but the ratio between transmitral E velocity and pulsed tissue Doppler-derived early diastolic velocity (E/e' ratio) is the most feasible and accurate. The identification of left atrial enlargement may be useful in uncertain cases. The recommended management of DD in hypertensive patients should correspond to blood pressure (BP) lowering and to the attempt of reducing LV mass and normalizing LV geometry. Prospective studies with well-defined entry criteria are needed to establish whether this approach could reflect a better prognosis.

Usefulness of Soluble Endoglin as a Noninvasive Measure of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Heart Failure

Progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction induces expression of the cytokine transforming growth factor-β1. Endoglin (CD105) is a transforming growth factor-β1 co-receptor that is released into the circulation as soluble endoglin (sEng). The objective of the present study was to assess the serum levels of sEng in patients with heart failure and to identify the predictive value of sEng for detecting elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressures (LVEDPs). We measured the sEng levels in 82 consecutive patients with suspected LV dysfunction referred for determination of left heart filling pressures using cardiac catheterization. Among these subjects, the sEng levels correlated with the LVEDP (R = 0.689; p <0.0001), irrespective of the LV ejection fraction. Using a receiving operating characteristic curve, the sEng levels predicted an LVEDP of ≥16 mm Hg with an area under the curve of 0.85, exceeding the measured area under the curves for both atrial and brain natriuretic peptide, currently used biomarkers for heart failure diagnosis (atrial natriuretic peptide 0.68 and brain natriuretic peptide 0.65; p <0.01 vs sEng). In 10 subjects receiving medical therapy guided by invasive hemodynamic monitoring for heart failure, decreased a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was associated with a reduced sEng level (R = 0.75, p = 0.008). Finally, compared to 25 healthy controls, the sEng levels were elevated in subjects with suspected LV dysfunction (3,589 ± 588 vs 4,257 ± 966 pg/ml, respectively, p <0.005) and correlated directly with the New York Heart Association class (R = 0.501, p<0.001). In conclusion, circulating levels of sEng are elevated in patients with increased LVEDP and New York Heart Association class, irrespective of the LV ejection fraction. sEng levels also decreased in association with a reduced cardiac filling pressure after diuresis. These findings have identified circulating sEng as a sensitive measure of elevated left heart filling pressures.

Systolic and Diastolic Myocardial Mechanics in Patients with Cardiac Disease and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Impact of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

There are few data on the impact of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure on systolic and diastolic myocardial mechanics in patients with cardiac disease and preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (≥ 50%). Patients referred for cardiac catheterization underwent comprehensive echocardiography within 20 minutes of catheterization. Strain and strain rate in longitudinal, radial, and circumferential directions and torsion were measured in systole and diastole. LV preatrial contraction pressure (pre-A) was measured and averaged over 10 cardiac cycles. Sixty patients were studied (mean age, 55.3 ± 8.9 years). The 30 patients with LV pre-A ≥ 15 mm Hg had significantly lower longitudinal systolic strain and radial, circumferential, and torsional systolic strain rates than the 30 patients with LV pre-A < 15 mm Hg (P < .05 for all). Similar findings were seen for diastolic variables. There were significant correlations between several systolic and diastolic variables in multiple directions and LV pre-A. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of systolic and diastolic speckle-tracking parameters included LVEF and LV pre-A, depending on the specific parameter analyzed. In patients with preserved LVEF and cardiac disease, several systolic and diastolic myocardial mechanical parameters significantly correlate with LV filling pressure. These data highlight the notion that patients with preserved LVEF and elevated LV filling pressures have significant abnormalities in systolic function as detected by speckle imaging, findings that may challenge the concept of "isolated diastolic dysfunction." The extent of systolic and diastolic abnormalities in these patients may shed light on the mechanics of heart failure with preserved LVEF.

Letter by Shroff Regarding Article, “Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure With Exercise”

To the Editor: The article by Holland et al1 is an important study describing abnormal diastolic function, specifically elevated E/e′, as an additional tool in the armamentarium of the cardiologist for prognostication following exercise echocardiography. Some additional information, however, will be helpful in order to better understand the pathophysiology …

Use of Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure To Reveal Unsuspected Mismatch in Right-Left Sided Filling Pressure Elevation

Use of Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure To Reveal Unsuspected Mismatch in Right-Left Sided Filling Pressure Elevation

Left Ventricular Diastolic Size in Patients with Normal Ejection Fraction and Elevated Left Filling Pressures

To evaluate the left-ventricular diastolic chamber size in patients with a normal ejection fraction and elevated left-sided filling pressures. The consensus view that patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and elevated left-sided filling pressures have a normal left ventricular diastolic size is a point of controversy. We reviewed the coded database of echocardiographic studies performed at one institution between July 2007 and July 2008. We performed a retrospective descriptive study of 35 patients with normal ejection fraction (> or = 55%) and elevated left-sided filling pressures. We looked at their left ventricular internal diastolic diameter (LVIDD). Our population had a high prevalence of hypertension (100%), obesity (63%), diabetes (40%), chronic kidney disease (51%), coronary artery disease (25%), anemia (43%), and left ventricular hypertrophy (65%). Clinical diagnosis of heart failure was documented in 63% of the patients. LVIDD was mildly increased in comparison to a normal historical population: 4.85 + or - 0.5 cm for females, 5.3 + or - 0.5 cm for males, as compared to 4.6 + or - 0.3 cm for normal females (P = 0.045) and 5 + or - 0.4 cm for normal males (P < 0.001). However, the distribution of the indexed LVIDDs in these patients was comparable to the normal population (2.6 + or - 0.4 cm/m(2) for the study population, as compared to 2.7 + or - 0.2 cm/m(2) for the normal population, P = 0.16). In a population of patients with a normal LVEF and high left ventricular filling pressures, the indexed LV diastolic size is not increased in comparison to a normal population. (Echocardiography 2010;27:501-504).

The Utility of Tissue Doppler Imaging for the Noninvasive Determination of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients With Septic Shock

Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) is an important indicator of volume status in septic patients. Although it requires invasive pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC), a noninvasive method to assess PAWP would be clinically useful in this select patient population. Diastolic indices using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) may provide an accurate estimate of PAWP. To determine whether echocardiographic Doppler assessment is accurate in estimating PAWP in patients with septic shock. A retrospective chart review was performed of 320 patients admitted with a diagnosis of septic shock from 2007-2008. Of the total patient population, 40 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, having undergone both TTE and PAC within 4 hours. Spectral Doppler indices including peak early (E) and late (A) transmitral velocities, E/A ratio, and E-wave deceleration time were measured. Tissue Doppler indices including S', E' and A' velocities were determined. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure values measured invasively were compared to the dimensionless index of E/E' in each patient. The mean age was 68 +/- 12 years with 28 males (70%). On echo assessment, 28% of patients had evidence of mild left ventricular diastolic dysfunction while 17% of patients had moderate diastolic dysfunction. Pulmonary artery wedge pressures ranged from 7 to 31 mm Hg with a mean of 18 +/- 5 mm Hg. The mean E/E' was 11 +/- 8. Linear regression analysis between PAWP and E/E7apos; demonstrated a strong correlation (r = .84, P < .05). Tissue Doppler indices using TTE is a feasible and strong predictor of PAWP in patients with septic shock.

Filling Pressures and Collagen Metabolism in Hypertensive Patients With Heart Failure and Normal Ejection Fraction

This study was designed to evaluate the association between circulating biomarkers of collagen metabolism and elevated left-sided filling pressures (FPs), as assessed from elevated estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (ePCWP), in hypertensive patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction. Echocardiography was performed and ePCWP was calculated from the formula ePCWP=1.90+1.24(maximum early transmitral flow velocity in diastole:tissue Doppler early mitral annulus velocity). The biomarkers of collagen synthesis (carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I) and degradation (matrix metalloproteinase [MMP] 1 and tissue inhibitor of MMP-1 [TIMP-1]) were analyzed by ELISA methods. Seventy-eight patients with normal FPs (ePCWP < or =15 mm Hg) and 78 with elevated FPs (ePCWP >15 mm Hg) were included. Compared with controls, the levels of the 3 biomarkers were increased in the 2 groups of patients. The MMP-1:TIMP-1 ratio, an index of MMP-1 activity, was increased in patients with normal FPs and unchanged in patients with elevated FPs. Patients with elevated FPs exhibited higher TIMP-1 levels and a lower MMP-1:TIMP-1 ratio than patients with normal FPs. ePCWP was independently associated with TIMP-1 (r=0.349; P<0.001) and the MMP-1:TIMP-1 ratio (r=-0.240; P<0.01) in all of the patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that a cutoff value of TIMP-1 of 1557 ng/mL provided 64% sensitivity and 67% specificity for predicting elevated FPs with a relative risk of 3.71 (95% CI: 1.91 to 7.22). These findings suggest that, in hypertensive patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction and elevated FPs, collagen synthesis predominates over degradation because of a relative excess of TIMP-1. This imbalance can facilitate myocardial fibrosis, which, in turn, may contribute to the elevation of FPs in these patients.

The Relationship of Right- and Left-Sided Filling Pressures in Patients With Heart Failure and a Preserved Ejection Fraction

Although right-sided filling pressures often mirror left-sided filling pressures in systolic heart failure, it is not known whether a similar relationship exists in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eleven subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction underwent right heart catheterization at rest and under loading conditions manipulated by lower body negative pressure and saline infusion. Right atrial pressure (RAP) was classified as elevated when >or=10 mm Hg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) when >or=22 mm Hg. If both the RAP and the PCWP were elevated or both not elevated, they were classified as concordant; otherwise, they were classified as discordant. Correlation of RAP and PCWP was determined by a repeated measures model. Among 66 paired measurements of RAP and PCWP, 44 (67%) had a low RAP and PCWP and 8 (12%) a high RAP and PCWP, yielding a concordance rate of 79%. In a sensitivity analysis performed by varying the definition of elevated RAP (from 8 to 12 mm Hg) and PCWP (from 15 to 25 mm Hg), the mean+/-SD concordance of RAP and PCWP was 76+/-10%. The correlation coefficient of RAP and PCWP for the overall cohort was r=0.86 (P<0.0001). Right-sided filling pressures often reflect left-sided filling pressures in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, supporting the role of estimation of jugular venous pressure to assess volume status in this condition.

Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure With Exercise

The estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure from the ratio of transmitral and annular velocities (E/e') after exercise echocardiography may identify diastolic dysfunction in patients who complain of exertional dyspnea. This study sought to determine the relative contributions of exercise E/e' and ischemia to outcomes in patients referred for exercise echocardiography. Rest and exercise E/e' were obtained in 522 patients referred for exercise echocardiography, who were followed for cardiovascular death and hospitalization over a median of 13.2 months. Exercise E/e' >2 SD from normal was used to denote raised LV filling pressure with stress (n=75), and ischemia (n=250) was identified by inducible wall motion abnormalities. There were 65 cardiovascular hospitalizations during the follow-up period. Survival analysis showed patients without ischemia and with normal exercise E/e' to have a better prognosis than those with ischemia, with or without raised exercise E/e' (P=0.003) and the outcomes of patients with isolated raised exercise E/e' and isolated ischemia to be similar. Exercise E/e' was most valuable in patients with normal resting E/e'; those with elevation with exercise had a worse outcome than those with normal exercise E/e' (P=0.014). Exercise capacity (hazard ratio, 0.893; P=0.008), exercise wall motion score index (hazard ratio, 1.507; P<0.001), and exercise E/e' >14.5 (hazard ratio, 2.988; P=0.002) were independent predictors of outcome. The addition of exercise E/e' to exercise capacity and wall motion score index resulted in an increment in model power to predict adverse outcome (P=0.006). Exercise E/e' is associated with cardiovascular hospitalization, independent of and incremental to inducible ischemia.

The Relationship of Right- and Left-Sided Filling Pressures in Patients With Heart Failure and a Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background— Although right-sided filling pressures often mirror left-sided filling pressures in systolic heart failure, it is not known whether a similar relationship exists in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results— Eleven subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction underwent right heart catheterization at rest and under loading conditions manipulated by lower body negative pressure and saline infusion. Right atrial pressure (RAP) was classified as elevated when ≥10 mm Hg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) when ≥22 mm Hg. If both the RAP and the PCWP were elevated or both not elevated, they were classified as concordant; otherwise, they were classified as discordant. Correlation of RAP and PCWP was determined by a repeated measures model. Among 66 paired measurements of RAP and PCWP, 44 (67%) had a low RAP and PCWP and 8 (12%) a high RAP and PCWP, yielding a concordance rate of 79%. In a sensitivity analysis performed by varying the definition of elevated RAP (from 8 to 12 mm Hg) and PCWP (from 15 to 25 mm Hg), the mean±SD concordance of RAP and PCWP was 76±10%. The correlation coefficient of RAP and PCWP for the overall cohort was r =0.86 ( P &lt;0.0001). Conclusions— Right-sided filling pressures often reflect left-sided filling pressures in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, supporting the role of estimation of jugular venous pressure to assess volume status in this condition.

Left Atrial Distensibility and Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Acute Versus Chronic Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Echocardiograms and left ventricular (LV) filling pressure were obtained from 95 patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and 16 patients with acute severe MR. All patients underwent catheterization for preoperative examinations and LV filling pressure measurements. A total of 52 age-, gender- and co-morbidity-matched patients with negative coronary angiographic results served as the controls. Echocardiography, including assessment of left atrial (LA) distensibility, was performed simultaneously. LA distensibility correlated logarithmically with the LV filling pressure. However, the early-diastolic mitral inflow velocity divided by the early-diastolic mitral annular velocity (mitral E/E') correlated linearly with the LV filling pressure. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed that LV filling pressure correlated positively with the maximum and minimum indexed LA volume, as well as the E/E', but the LV filling pressure correlated negatively with LA distensibility, LA ejection fraction, and LV ejection fraction. However, the MR regurgitation volume was associated only with the maximum and minimum indexed LA volume. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that LA distensibility was not inferior to E/E' for identifying a LV filling pressure >15 mm Hg. However, to identify acute severe MR, LA distensibility was superior to E/E'. In conclusion, LA distensibility, as is E/E', is a valuable diastolic parameter. In patients with severe MR, it offers adequate power to assess the LV filling pressure and to identify acute severe MR.

Do Additional Echocardiographic Variables Increase the Accuracy of E/e′ for Predicting Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Normal Ejection Fraction? An Echocardiographic and Invasive Hemodynamic Study

There are few data on adding left atrial volume index (LAVi) or pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP) to the ratio of early mitral inflow to mitral annular velocity (E/e') for the estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in patients with preserved LV ejection fractions (LVEFs) (>50%). Patients underwent echocardiography within 20 minutes of cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic variables were compared with invasively measured LV preatrial contraction pressure (pre-A). Of the 122 patients studied (mean age, 55 +/- 9 years; mean LVEF, 61 +/- 6%), 67 (55%) were women, 108 (88%) had hypertension, and 79 (65%) had significant coronary artery disease at catheterization. E/e' was significantly correlated with pre-A (R = 0.63, P < .0001) compared with LAVi (R = 0.49, P < .001) and PAP (R = 0.48, P < .001). E/e' > 13 had sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 93% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.82; P < .0001), LAVi > 31 mL/m2 had sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 76% (AUC, 0.80, P < .001), and PAP > 28 mm Hg had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 64% for pre-A > 15 mm Hg (AUC, 0.77, P < .001). Adding LAVi >31 mL/m2 for E/e' = 8 to 13 significantly increased the accuracy of E/e' > 13 alone (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 88%; AUC, 0.89; P = .01 for comparison). However, adding PAP > 28 mm Hg for E/e' = 8 to 13 did not significantly increase the accuracy of E/e' > 13 alone (AUC, 0.82; sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 72%; P = NS for comparison). In patients with preserved LVEFs, adding LAVi > 31 mL/m2 to E/e' (when E/e' was in the gray zone, but not when E/e' was >13) significantly increased the accuracy of E/e' alone for the estimation of LV filling pressure. These data support the notion of using several, rather than any single, Doppler echocardiographic parameter for the accurate assessment of LV diastolic function.