Fentanyl Infusion Research Articles

Influence of intravenous fentanyl or dexmedetomidine infusions, combined with lidocaine and ketamine, on cardiovascular response, sevoflurane requirement and postoperative pain in dogs anesthetized for unilateral mastectomy

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of constant rate infusions (CRI) of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine, combined with lidocaine and ketamine, on cardiovascular response during surgery, sevoflurane requirement and postoperative pain in dogs undergoing mastectomy. Study designProspective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial. AnimalsA total of 29 female dogs with mammary tumors. MethodsPremedication consisted of intramuscular acepromazine and morphine. General anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol and maintained with sevoflurane. Dogs were randomized to be administered intravenous DLK [dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg–1 loading dose (LD) and 1 μg kg–1 hour–1; lidocaine 2 mg kg–1 LD and 3 mg kg–1 hour–1; ketamine 1 mg kg–1 LD and 0.6 mg kg–1 hour–1; n = 14] or FLK (fentanyl 5 μg kg–1 LD and 9 μg kg–1 hour–1; same doses of lidocaine and ketamine; n = 15) during anesthesia. Cardiorespiratory variables and end-tidal sevoflurane (Fe′Sevo) were recorded during surgery. The number of dogs administered ephedrine to treat arterial hypotension [mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg] was recorded. Meloxicam was administered to both groups. Postoperative pain and rescue analgesia requirement were assessed for 24 hours using the short form of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale. Data were compared using a mixed effects model or a Mann–Whitney test. ResultsMore dogs required ephedrine in FLK than in DLK (67% versus 7%). Heart rate was not significantly different between groups, whereas lower values of MAP (p ≤ 0.01) and Fe′Sevo (p = 0.018) were observed in FLK than in DLK. Rescue analgesia was administered to 2/15 dogs in FLK and 0/14 dogs in DLK. Conclusions and clinical relevanceBased on the cardiovascular response during surgery, intraoperative infusions of FLK and DLK provided adequate antinociception. Infusion of DLK provided greater stability of blood pressure. Both protocols resulted in minimal need for additional analgesia within 24 hours postoperatively.

Anesthesia based on fentanyl infusion for patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Is it a safe technique?

Anesthesia based on fentanyl infusion for patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Is it a safe technique?

Comparison of the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative analgesia and intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing spine surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Opioids form the basis of perioperative pain management but are associated with multiple side effects. In opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), several non-opioid drugs or neuraxial/regional blocks are used as substitutes for opioids. Ketamine, a N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, provides intense analgesia. However, there is a shortage of literature on the effects of ketamine-based OFA on hemodynamics (HD) and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 60 adult patients. The patients in Group OFA (n = 30) received OFA with ketamine and ketofol (1:5) infusion, and those in Group OBA (n = 30) received opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) with fentanyl and propofol infusion. The postoperative pain-free period, pain scores, rescue analgesia, intraoperative HDs, and postoperative complications were assessed. The mean pain-free period in Group OFA (9.86 ± 1.43 hr) was significantly higher than that in Group OBA (6.93 ± 1.93 hr) (P = 0.002). During the postoperative 48 hours, the total requirement of fentanyl was considerably lower in Group OFA (P < 0.05). There was a significantly higher incidence of hypertension in Group OFA (46%) and hypotension (43%) in Group OBA (43%), respectively. Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) was more common in Group OBA at the 2nd and 6th hr (P = 0.046 and P = 0.038). OFA with ketamine and ketofol provided adequate postoperative analgesia with a lower incidence of PONV after spine surgery. However, hypertension in the ketamine group and hypotension in the propofol group required fine titration of the infusion rate of drugs during the intraoperative period.

Impact of a Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Infusion in Septic Dogs: Preliminary Study.

The purpose of this study was to determine if a continuous rate infusion (CRI) of dexmedetomidine decreases vasopressor requirements in septic dogs undergoing surgery. Vital parameters, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, vasopressor requirement, and 28-day mortality were recorded. Dogs were randomly divided into two groups: a dexmedetomidine (DEX) (1 mcg/kg/h) group and a control group (NaCl), which received an equivalent CRI of NaCl. Dogs were premedicated with fentanyl 5 mcg/kg IV, induced with propofol, and maintained with sevoflurane and a variable rate fentanyl infusion. DEX or NaCl infusions were started 10 min prior to induction. Fluid-responsive hypotensive patients received repeated Ringer's lactate boluses (2 mL/kg) until stable or they were no longer fluid-responsive. Patients that remained hypotensive following fluid boluses received norepinephrine at a starting dose of 0.05 mcg/kg/min, with increases of 0.05 mcg/kg/min. Rescue adrenaline boluses were administered (0.001 mg/kg) if normotension was not achieved within 30 min of starting norepinephrine. The NaCl group received a significantly higher dose of norepinephrine (0.8, 0.4-2 mcg/kg/min) than the DEX group (0.12, 0-0.86 mcg/kg/min). Mortality was statistically lower in the DEX group (1/10) vs. the NaCl group (5/6). Results of this study suggest that a 1 mcg/kg/h CRI of dexmedetomidine decreases the demand for intraoperative vasopressors and may improve survival in septic dogs.

Intraoperative Isoflurane End-Tidal Concentration during Infusion of Fentanyl, Tramadol, or Fentanyl-Tramadol Combination in Cats.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the end-tidal concentration of isoflurane required, clinical parameters, intraoperative antinociceptive effect, and postoperative analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy, receiving fentanyl, tramadol, or fentanyl/tramadol. Sixty-six cats in three groups, were premedicated with dexmedetomidine and infused with one of the following treatments: fentanyl, tramadol, or fentanyl/tramadol combination. Anesthesia was induced with alfaxolone and maintained with isoflurane, titrated to keep heart rate, respiratory rate and systolic arterial pressure within target values recorded at endotracheal intubation. An intraoperative cumulative scale was performed. Postoperatively, a short form of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Feline was used at 2, 12, and 24 h. The groups were similar for age, weight, dose of dexmedetomidine, and alfaxalone administered. A greater reduction in the end-tidal isoflurane fraction was observed with the combined fentanyl/tramadol infusion than with either fentanyl or tramadol alone. No differences in the end-tidal isoflurane fraction were found between fentanyl or tramadol alone. Hemodynamic stability associated with minimal cardiopulmonary changes, low response to noxious intraoperative stimulation, and low postoperative pain scores were also observed with the fentanyl/tramadol combination. The fentanyl/tramadol combination provided a reduction in the end-tidal isoflurane fraction compared with fentanyl or tramadol alone.

Monitoring of general anesthesia by qCON and qNOX indices versus conventional clinical parameters in urological surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Background: Awareness during anesthesia is a major anesthetic concern. Depth of anesthesia is commonly assessed in clinical practice by the patient’s clinical signs and symptoms such as blood pressure, heart rate variability, and body movement. At present, many studies have focused on qCON monitoring for sedative depth, but only a few studies have focused on qNOX monitoring for analgesic depth. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of qCON and qNOX versus commonly used vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate in monitoring the anesthetic depth and analgesia. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients of either sex and of ASA Physical status I &amp; II, scheduled for urogenital surgeries, were selected and randomly placed into two groups. Group A was monitored by conventional clinical technique and Group B was monitored by qCON and qNOX indices. The primary outcome was the total dose of propofol and fentanyl required to maintain the depth of anesthesia and analgesia. The secondary outcomes were propofol and fentanyl adjustment frequency, infusion duration, and quality of recovery from anesthesia. Results: Results showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean dose of both propofol (P=0.000) and fentanyl (P=0.006), adjustment frequency of both propofol (P=0.000) and fentanyl (P=0.010), time required to voluntary eye-opening (P=0.000) and extubation time (P=0.000) and visual analog scale score (P=0.000). There was no statistically significant difference found in infusion duration (P=0.317) and Ramsay Sedation Score (P=0.709) between the groups. Conclusion: Using the qCON and qNOX indices, an anesthesiologist can monitor the depth of anesthesia and analgesia more effectively and can adjust the anesthetic or analgesic drug dosing in a better possible way with lesser requirement of drugs than with conventional clinical monitoring.

Comparison of Changes in Cortisol Levels in the Blood of Patients Undergoing Craniotomy Using Continuous Infusion Lidocaine and Fentanyl

Background and Objectives: Craniotomy is a surgical procedure that involves part of the skull, temporarily removing it to expose the brain and carrying out intracranial procedures. The surgery can be considered as the standard model for assessing cortisol as a stress response. Cortisol in the blood can cause hemodynamic and physiological changes in the body such as increased heart rate, increased blood pressure, and also increased blood sugar levels. Some literature showed that continuous infusion of fentanyl and lidocaine - has an effect in maintaining the responses to stress, namely the level of cortisol in the blood. The aim aimed to determine the comparison of changes in cortisol levels in the bloodpatients undergoing craniotomy using continuous infusion lidocaine and continuous infusion fentanyl. Subject and Method: This research used a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a pre-test and post-test with a control group design. This study divided the samples into 2 groups. Continuous infusion of lidocaine and continuous infusion of fentanyl were then checked for cortisol levels in the patient's blood before and after undergoing craniotomy. Results: The result of 28 samples that underwent craniotomy, 6 samples were excluded, so the total number of samples analyzed was 22 samples. Differences in mean cortisol levels before and after surgery in the lidocaine and fentanyl groups were 193.90 nmol/L and 153.90 nmol/L respectively with a P value of 0.021. Conclusion: In the study, it was found that cortisol levels increased in both fentanyl and lidocaine groups after a craniotomy. There is a significant difference between the two groups of fentanyl and lidocaine, where statistically the fentanyl group was better at maintaining blood cortisol levels after craniotomy than the lidocaine group.

Efficacy of erector spine plane block in two different approaches to lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective pilot study.

Erector spine plane block (ESPB) has been widely used in spinal surgery, although there are variable data about its efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ESPB in elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery patients with two different surgical approaches. Retrospectively, 45 elective lumbar transpedicular fusion (TPF) surgery patients undergoing open surgery with different approaches [posterior transforaminal fusion approach (TLIF) or combined posterior and anterior approach (TLIF+ALIF)] were divided into 2 groups: general anesthesia (GA, n = 24) and general anesthesia combined with ESPB (GA + ESPB, n = 21). The primary outcome was to analyze the efficacy of ESPB in two different surgical approaches in terms of pain intensity in the first 48 h. Secondary: Fentanyl-free patients and opioid consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Comparative analysis was performed (SPSS® v. 28.0) (p < 0.05). Out of 45 patients (27 female), 21 received GA + ESPB and 24 received GA. The average age was 60.3 ± 14.3 years. Chronic back pain before the operation was registered in 56% of patients. ESPB was performed in 17 TLIF and in 4 TLIF+ALIF patients. ESPB significantly reduced pain intensity at rest in both surgical approaches 48 h after surgery (p < 0.05). The need for postoperative fentanyl infusion was significantly lower in the group treated with GA + ESPB in both surgical approaches than in those who only received GA (29% vs. 77% in TLIF and 0% vs. 80% in TLIF+ALIF); p = 0.01 and p = 0.004. Additionally, we observed that ESPB provides a good analgesic effect for up to 6.8 ± 3.2 h in the TLIF and 8.9 ± 7.6 h in the TLIF+ALIF approaches. Consequently, ESPB reduced the initiation of the fentanyl compared to GA alone, with a mean difference of 3.2 ± 4.2 h in the TLIF subgroup (p = 0.045) and 6.7 ± 5.3 h in TLIF +ALIF (p = 0.028). Only in the TLIF+ALIF approach, ESPB reduced the total fentanyl consumption compared to those with GA (1.43 ± 0.45 mg/24 h vs. 0.93 ± 0.68 mg/24 h; p = 0.015). ESPB significantly reduced pain at rest after surgery, the number of patients requiring immediate postoperative fentanyl analgesia, and total fentanyl consumption in both surgical approaches, particularly in TLIF+ALIF. However, the application of ESPB does not always provide completely sufficient analgesia.

Intravenous infusion of lidocaine as a component of opioid-free anesthesia in thoracic surgery: prospective randomized single-center observational study

BACKGROUND: The possibility of reducing doses of narcotic analgesics during the perioperative period is widely discussed in modern scientific literature. This direction is called opioid-free anesthesia and is used in abdominal surgery, oncology, gynecology, and other areas. Publications on the use of opioid-free anesthesia in thoracic surgery are scarce.&#x0D; OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine infusion as a component of anesthesia in thoracic surgery.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients who underwent open lobectomy or pneumonectomy were examined. Depending on the analgesic component, patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (n=30) received intravenous infusion of lidocaine, group 2 (n=30) received epidural block, and group 3 (n=30) had fentanyl infusion. Blood pressure, heart rate, cortisol, and blood serum glycemia levels were measured. The intensity of postoperative pain syndrome and the need for promedol, tramadol, and sanitation fibrobronchoscopy were assessed. Arterial hypotension and frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded. The length of stay of the patients in the intensive care unit and hospital was recorded.&#x0D; RESULTS: Cortisol levels did not differ between groups (p=0.26). The glucose level in the epidural block group was significantly lower than that in other groups (p=0.011). A significant increase in mean blood pressure and heart rate was observed in the opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). The lowest severity of pain 6 h after surgery was observed in the epidural blockade and lidocaine groups (p 0.001). Perioperative hypotension was more common in the epidural analgesia group (p=0.045). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the opioid anesthesia group (p=0.004). In the fentanyl infusion group, sanitary fibrobronchoscopy was more often required to eliminate atelectasis (p=0.039). The number of bed days spent in the ICU was significantly higher in the opioid analgesic group (p=0.002); however, no significant differences were noted between the groups regarding the number of days spent in the hospital (p=0.228).&#x0D; CONCLUSION: Opioid-free anesthesia based on intravenous lidocaine infusion, as a component of anesthetic management in thoracic surgery, provides sufficient perioperative stability of hemodynamic and neuroendocrine status, has a pronounced analgesic effect, with less opioid consumption on the first day after surgery, and helps reduce the length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital.

Comparison of intravenous ketamine and fentanyl sedation in duration of mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit

Background and aims: To compare the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients receiving ketamine compared to fentanyl for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit. Methods: One hundred and six patients requiring mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive continuous intravenous infusion of either ketamine (1 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.4 to 0.8 mg/kg/h) or fentanyl (1mcg/kg bolus followed by 0.3-0.5 mcg/kg/min) with the dose titrated to achieve Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of 0 to -1 and Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) score of 3 to 7. The primary outcome was the duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were sedation score, analgesia score and need of vasopressors. Results: The mean duration of ventilation was 2.5±0.6 days and 2.2±1.0 days (p=0.1) in patients receiving ketamine and fentanyl respectively. More patients required vasopressors: 27 (50.9%) vs 9 (17%) in patients receiving fentanyl compared to ketamine (p&lt;0.05). There were no significant changes in hemodynamic variables after the initiation of the study drug in both the groups. Infusion was discontinued for adverse effects in seven (13%) patients in both the groups. Conclusion: When compared with fentanyl, continuous ketamine infusion was tolerated similarly by critically ill adults, with similar duration of mechanical ventilation. Ketamine sedation was associated with decreased requirement for vasopressors.

Anesthetic Challenges during Endobronchial Brachytherapy: A Case Report.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It may present as airway obstruction in a patient with endobronchial masses. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) has been shown to provide palliative therapy. It is the insertion of a radioactive material near the mass to reduce tumor size, thereby improving airway obstruction. This is the first case of EBBT done in our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. A 53-year-old male, 60 kg, ASA Physical Status 2 for hypertension, smoker, malignancy, and previous pulmonary tuberculosis patient, presented with a cough and dyspnea. An endobronchial mass almost obstructing the right mainstem bronchus was seen on a computed tomography (CT) scan. He was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and underwent radiotherapy and erlotinib chemotherapy. On repeat CT scan, there was no noted decrease in the size of the mass. EBBT was suggested, and a multi-disciplinary team was formed for the planned procedure. Pulmonology, radiation oncology, and anesthesiology teams were identified, and thorough planning was done prior to the actual procedure. Three fractions of EBBT were done under sedation using midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine infusion. Lidocaine spray and transtracheal block were also performed as adjuncts prior to sedation. The procedure went as planned, and points for improvement were discussed for subsequent fractions. Due to persistent cough and discomfort from the catheter, additional ipratropium nebulization for minimization of secretions, and oral dextromethorphan for cough suppression were incorporated. After each fraction, the patient was monitored post-procedure for any side effects both from the radiotherapy and anesthetic technique. Qualitative reduction in mass size was noted in subsequent fractions. The patient was able to complete 3 fractions and was advised to follow-up after a month. EBBT is an emerging palliative and treatment modality for lung cancer, especially for intraluminal masses. Anesthetic considerations will depend on each case's characteristics such as airway anatomy, patient comfort and capacity, and procedural requirements. Conscious sedation with topical anesthesia is an adequate and appropriate anesthetic option, especially in cases where severe airway obstruction may compromise ventilation if airway reflexes are blunted. A multidisciplinary approach with different services and stakeholders is important for the proper planning, execution, and management of such patients.

Remi-fent 1—A pragmatic randomised controlled study to evaluate the feasibility of using remifentanil or fentanyl as sedation adjuncts in mechanically ventilated patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of conducting a prospective randomised controlled trial (pRCT) comparing remifentanil and fentanyl as adjuncts to sedate mechanically ventilated patients. DesignSingle-center, open-labelled, pRCT with blinded analysis. SettingAustralian tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). ParticipantsConsecutive adults between June 2020 and August 2021 expected to receive invasive ventilation beyond the next day and requiring opioid infusion were included. Exclusion criteria were pregnant/lactating women, intubation >12 h, or study-drug hypersensitivity. InterventionsOpen-label fentanyl and remifentanil infusions per existing ICU protocols. OutcomesPrimary outcomes were feasibility of recruiting ≥1 patient/week and >90 % compliance, namely no other opioid infusion used during the study period. Secondary outcomes included complications, ICU-, ventilator- and hospital-free days, and mortality (ICU, hospital). Blinded intention-to-treat analysis was performed concealing the allocation group. Results208 patients were enrolled (mean 3.7 patients/week). Compliance was 80.6 %. More patients developed complications with fentanyl than remifentanil: bradycardia (n = 44 versus n = 21; p < 0.001); hypotension (n = 78 versus n = 53; p < 0.01); delirium (n = 28 versus n = 15; p = 0.001). No differences were seen in ICU (24.3 % versus 27.6 %,p = 0.60) and hospital mortalities (26.2 % versus 30.5 %; p = 0.50). Ventilator-free days were higher with remifentanil (p = 0.01). ConclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility of enrolling patients for a pRCT comparing remifentanil and fentanyl as sedation adjuncts in mechanically ventilated patients. We failed to attain the study-opioid compliance target, likely because of patients with complex sedative/analgesic requirements. Secondary outcomes suggest that remifentanil may reduce mechanical ventilation duration and decrease the incidence of complications. An adequately powered multicentric phase 2 study is required to evaluate these results.

Comparison of cardiorespiratory effects and perioperative analgesia efficacy of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl continuous infusion during ovariohysterectomy in propofol-anesthetized dogs

The present study aimed to compare the cardiorespiratory, perioperative analgesic and blood gas analysis of the constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl in 16 female dogs undergoing to elective ovariohysterectomy. The dogs were premedicated with morphine (0.5 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (5 µg/kg) or acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg), both intramuscularly (IM), in GDEX or GFEN, respectively. After anesthesia induction with propofol intravenously (IV), animals of GFEN received bolus of fentanyl (2.5 µg/kg) IV followed by continuous rate infusion (CRI) (10 µg/kg/h) and the GDEX received bolus of saline solution 0.9% (corresponding volume of fentanyl) followed by CRI of dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg/h) and anesthesia was maintained with propofol (0.22 mg/kg/min). In the end of surgery all animals were evaluated using the Glasgow composite measure pain scale (GCPS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data was compared with a statistical p value &gt; 0,05. The mean heart rate was statistically lower in GDEX when compared to GFEN (p = 0.0498): 54.25 ± 3.919 and 88.38 ± 8.766 beats per minute, respectively. Opposed, the average mean blood pressure was statistically higher in GDEX when compared to GFEN (p = 0.0021): 99.38 ± 8.551 and 80.75 ± 11.12 mmHg, respectively. The GDEX and GFEN, in the firsts 4 and 2 postoperative hours, respectively, presented values significantly higher than baseline in the GCPS, occurring analgesic rescues for both groups. It is concluded that both drugs in the proposed rates were safe and efficient for nociceptive control during intraoperative, however, failed to promote efficient postoperative analgesia.

Perioperative Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Caudal Epidural Analgesia in Newborns: A Case Series in a Tertiary Medical Center.

Background Caudal epidural anesthesia technique is a relevant method for postoperative analgesia in newborns, allowing for the reduction of drug-induced respiratory depression. The threading of a catheter is, however, uncommon in clinical practice. Our main purpose was to describe our experience regarding caudally inserted epidural catheters in neonates undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods We included every full-term neonate undergoing surgery under combined caudal epidural-general anesthesia from 2017 to 2022 in our institution. After induction of general anesthesia, an ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection was performed, and an epidural catheter was inserted for perioperative analgesia. An epidural bolus of ropivacaine was administered to every patient before the surgical incision, and an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.05% was administered for 24 hours. Results Retrospectively obtained data included six full-term neonates with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II to IV. Intraoperatively, good analgesia was achieved without hemodynamic instability or need for additional systemic opioids after induction. At the end of surgery, five of the six neonates were extubated without adverse respiratory events. Postoperatively, effective analgesia was achieved in four cases with an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.05%, at a rate between 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg/h, and intravenous paracetamol. Epidural pain control was not successful in one neonate, and thus an intravenous fentanyl infusion was added. The sixth neonate remained intubated for prolonged mechanical ventilation due to surgical complications, and thus an intravenous fentanyl infusion was introduced for sedation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), not allowing to evaluate the effectiveness of the epidural infusion alone. No other complications related to the epidural catheters were reported. Conclusion Continuous caudal epidural analgesia may be a valuable technique with a low risk of complications, decreasing the incidence of respiratory adverse events in this patient population. Although more cases are needed for a stronger conclusion, it has become a useful analgesic strategy for major abdominal surgery in neonates in our institution.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Programmed Intermittent Bolus vs. Continuous Infusion of Ropivacaine and Fentanyl in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgery.

Programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) is a novel method of intermittent drug delivery commonly employed in labor epidural analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of PIB over continuous infusion (CI) for postoperative analgesia following upper limb surgeries distal to the mid-humerus level using ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG-IBPB). The USG-IBPB was performed on a total of 30 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery distal to the mid-humerus level. The patient-controlled regional analgesia pump delivered a combination of 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL fentanyl via a perineural catheter as PIB in group I and as a CI in group II. The primary outcome measure was overall drug consumption, and secondary outcomes included pain scores, patient satisfaction, sensory and motor blockade, and adverse effects. The PIB group exhibited significantly lower overall drug consumption (306.20 ± 13.07 mL vs. 323.73 ± 11.79 mL; P = 0.001), a reduced need for patient-controlled analgesia boluses (3.87 ± 2.67 vs. 7.13 ± 2.36; P = 0.001), and higher patient satisfaction (91.93 ± 10.09 vs. 78.67 ± 17.57; P = 0.017) compared to the CI group. Pain scores at rest were significantly lower at the 24-hour mark (P = 0.007), and on movement, lower scores were observed after 1, 24, and 36 hours (P = 0.031, P = 0.031, and P = 0.011, respectively). Sensory block, motor block, and adverse effects were similar between the two groups. PIB demonstrated superior efficacy in postoperative analgesia compared to the CI technique for upper limb surgeries distal to the mid-humerus level. Therefore, PIB may be considered an effective alternative to CI for optimal postoperative pain management.

Spontaneous Ventilation Combined with Double-Lumen Tube Intubation during Thoracic Surgery: A New Anesthesiologic Method Based on 141 Cases over Three Years.

Non-intubated thoracic surgery has not achieved widespread acceptance despite its potential to improve postoperative outcomes. To ensure airway safety, our institute has developed a technique combining spontaneous ventilation with double-lumen tube intubation (SVI). This study aimed to verify the feasibility and limitations of this SVI technique. For the SVI method, anesthesia induction involves fentanyl and propofol target-controlled infusion, with mivacurium administration. Bispectral index monitoring was used to ensure the optimal depth of anesthesia. Short-term muscle relaxation facilitated double-lumen tube intubation and early surgical steps. Chest opening preceded local infiltration, followed by a vagal nerve blockade to prevent the cough reflex and a paravertebral blockade for pain relief. Subsequently, the muscle relaxant was ceased. The patient underwent spontaneous breathing without coughing during surgical manipulation. Between 10 March 2020 and 28 October 2022, 141 SVI surgeries were performed. Spontaneous respiration with positive end-expiratory pressure was sufficient in 65.96% (93/141) of cases, whereas 31.21% (44/141) required pressure support ventilation. Only 2.84% (4/141) of cases reversed to conventional anesthetic management, owing to technical or surgical difficulties. Results of the 141 cases: The mean maximal carbon dioxide pressure was 59.01 (34.4-92.9) mmHg, and the mean lowest oxygen saturation was 93.96% (81-100%). The mean one-lung, mechanical and spontaneous one-lung ventilation time was 74.88 (20-140), 17.55 (0-115) and 57.73 (0-130) min, respectively. Spontaneous ventilation with double-lumen tube intubation is safe and feasible for thoracic surgery. The mechanical one-lung ventilation time was reduced by 76.5%, and the rate of anesthetic conversion to relaxation was low (2.8%).

Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine Versus Fentanyl in Patients With Long Bone Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.

Aim and background In most emergency departments (ED), opioids are the primary analgesic agents for trauma patients. However, safe alternative drugs are required because of possible adverse effects. Ketamine, an anesthetic agent, provides satisfactory analgesia at low doses and is an alternative drug that has begun to be used in numerous areas with fewer side effects. This study aimed to compare low-dose ketamine and fentanyl infusions in terms of their pain-relieving effects and observed adverse effects in patients presenting to the ED with isolated long bone fractures. Materials and methods This single-center observational study was conducted in the ED of the Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital between August 2018 and December 2019. Patients diagnosed with isolated long bone fractures who were administered low-dose ketamine or fentanyl rapid infusions for pain relief were included in the study. Patient pain scores were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) with a standard horizontal 10-centimeter line. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the changes in pain at 30 and 60 min after medication administration for each group. Results A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Ketamineinfusion was administered to 48% (n=48) of the patients as a pain reliever. After 60 min of observation, pain was significantly reduced in both study groups. However, the pain scores at baseline (p=0.319), 30 min (p=0.631), and 60 min (p=0.347) after treatment were similar in both groups. In terms of the observed adverse effects, dizziness was more common in the ketamine group (p=0.010). Conclusion The results of this study showed that low-dose ketamine infusion (0.3 mg/kg/h) had a similar effect to fentanyl infusion (1 mcg/kg/h) as a pain reliever in patients with isolated long bone fractures in the ED.

Effect of Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvant to Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraoperative Cranial Nerve Monitoring in the Patients Undergoing Posterior Fossa Craniotomies-A Randomized Quadruple Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Objectives Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is used during surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Addition of adjuvant may minimize suppression of potentials by reducing doses of propofol. We studied the effect of addition of ketamine or dexmedetomidine to propofol-fentanyl-based TIVA on corticobulbar motor evoked potential (CoMEP) in patients undergoing posterior fossa surgeries. Materials and Methods Forty-two patients were assigned to three groups ( n = 14 each), Group S-saline, Group D-dexmedetomidine (0.25 μg/kg/h), and Group K-ketamine (0.25 mg/kg/h). Patients received propofol and fentanyl infusions along with study drugs. CoMEPs were recorded from muscles innervated by cranial nerves bilaterally at predefined intervals (T baseline , T 2 , T 3 , T 4 , and T 5 ). Effect on amplitude and latency of CoMEPs was assessed. Results A significant fall in CoMEP amplitude was observed across all analyzed muscles at time T 4 and T 5 in saline and dexmedetomidine group as compared with ketamine group, p -value less than 0.05. A significant increase in latency was observed at T4 and T5 among groups ( p -value, D vs. K = 0.239, D vs. S = 0.123, and K vs. S = 0.001). Conclusion Both ketamine and dexmedetomidine provide and allow effective recording of CoMEPs. Ketamine emerges as a better agent especially when prolonged surgical duration is expected as even propofol-fentanyl-based TIVA adversely affects CoMEPs when used for long duration.

Continuous Fentanyl Infusion in Newborns with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia: Background, Aims, and Study Protocol for Time-Concentration Profiles.

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care for newborns with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Discomfort and pain during treatment are common and may affect the therapeutic efficacy of TH. Opioid sedation and analgesia (SA) are generally used in clinical practice, and fentanyl is one of the most frequently administered drugs. However, although fentanyl's pharmacokinetics (PKs) may be altered by hypothermic treatment, the PK behavior of this opioid drug in cooled newborns with HIE has been poorly investigated. The aim of this phase 1 study protocol (Trial ID: FentanylTH; EUDRACT number: 2020-000836-23) is to evaluate the fentanyl time-concentration profiles of full-term newborns with HIE who have been treated with TH. Newborns undergoing TH receive a standard fentanyl regimen (2 mcg/Kg of fentanyl as a loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion-1 mcg/kg/h-during the 72 h of TH and subsequent rewarming). Fentanyl plasma concentrations before bolus administration, at the end of the loading dose, and 24-48-72-96 h after infusion are measured. The median, maximum, and minimum plasma concentrations, together with drug clearance, are determined. This study will explore the fentanyl time-concentration profiles of cooled, full-term newborns with HIE, thereby helping to optimize the fentanyl SA dosing regimen during TH.

Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine Infusion Combination with Ketamine versus Fentanyl for Analgesia for Positioning of Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients with Proximal Femoral Fracture

Abstract Background One of the main objectives of anesthesia is to alleviate the patient’s pain and agony, by ensuring the performance of surgical procedures without any discomfort. Spinal anesthesia is preferred in anesthesia of fracture femur surgeries. But the problem is positioning of the patient for spinal anesthesia as the patient is in agony and pain. In our study we chose dexmedetomidine for this goal. We preferred to add an adjuvant to limit side effects of dexmedetomidine and to control pain beside sedation. 70 patients with proximal femoral fracture were blinded and randomized divided into two groups dexmedetomidine ketamine (k) and dexmedetomidine fentanyl (f) each group has 45 patients. There is significant better analgesic effect and sedation of k group than f group. But no significant difference on hemodynamics and postoperative complications. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic effect of combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl and dexmedetomidine infusion for the pain caused by postural changes for spinal anesthesia in patients with proximal femoral fracture. Patients and Methods We aimed by our study to compare the analgesic effect of combination of (ketamine and dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl and dexmedetomidine infusion for the pain caused by postural changes for spinal anesthesia in patients with proximal femoral fracture and we applied our study on 70 patients will be divided into two equal groups: Group k: will receive 1mg/kg of intravenous ketamine with loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes and Group F : will recieve 1 μg/kg of intravenous fentanyl with loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. then dexmedetomidine infusion only will continued at 0.6 μg/kg/h for following 20 minutes, and titrated at rate of 0.2 to 0.6 μg/kg/h until the end of surgery. Results The results of this study revealed that the pain score in lateral position was significally lower in k group than f group (0-1 vs 2-3); p &amp;lt; 0.001. and pain score during hip flexion was significally lower in k group than f group (0-1 vs 2-3 ) respectively p &amp;lt; 0.001. sedation level was much higher in k group than f group (3-4 vs 2-3) p value 0.023. But both groups shows equivalent effect on hemodynamics after dexmedetomidine administration. hypotension, Bradycardia and desaturation was common i in both groups. Regarding post operative complications no significant difference between both groups while incidence of delirium in k group (17.1%) is higher in comparison to f (11.4%) group but not significally difference. Conclusion the combination of dexmedetomidine ketamine is a good choice for analgesia of the pain during spinal anesthesia in elderly with fracture femur but need further assessment for dosage and regimen of administration and for better evaluation of the hemodynamic effects