Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density T-score Research Articles

Fracture risk revisited: Bone mineral density T-score and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes.

To study the association between femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score and fracture risk in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study using the Danish National Health Service. BMD of the FN was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to study the association between FN BMD T-score and fractures in individuals with and without T2D separately, adjusted for age, comorbidities and comedication. The results from this analysis were used to estimate the 10-year absolute fracture risk. In total, there were 35,129 women (2362 with T2D) and 7069 men (758 with T2D). The FN BMD T-score was significantly associated with risk of any, hip and major osteoporotic fracture in men and women with [adjusted hazard risk ratios (aHR) women, hip: 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-2.00, incidence rate (IR) 8.7; aHR men, hip: 1.55; 95% CI 1.01-2.36, IR 4.6] and without T2D (aHR women, hip: 1.75; 95% CI 1.64-1.87, IR 7.0; aHR men, hip: 1.97, 95% CI 1.73-2.25, IR 6.3), and its ability to predict fracture risk was similar. Fracture IRs were not significantly different for individuals with or without T2D, nor was the estimated cumulative 10-year fracture risk. The FN BMD T-score was significantly associated with hip, non-spine and major osteoporotic fracture risk in men and women with and without T2D. Fracture risk for a given T-score and age was equal in individuals with and without T2D, as was the ability of the FN BMD T-score to predict fracture risk.

Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry-based measurement of bone mineral density in patients with severe motor and intellectual disability: An opportunity for patients with severe scoliosis and hip dislocation

PurposeRadiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) is an ultrasound technology currently used for the densitometric evaluation of osteoporosis and has been validated against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. However, the use of REMS for bone densitometry in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID) remains to be reported. This study aimed to investigate whether REMS technology can be used for densitometric evaluation of osteoporosis in patients with SMID with hip dislocation and severe scoliosis. MethodsSixty-five patients with SMID, who resided in a long-term care facility and received comprehensive medical and rehabilitation care, underwent REMS scans of the femoral neck and/or lumbar spine. Data regarding anthropometric parameters (height and weight), bone mineral density (BMD), clinical diagnostic classification, physical ability, presence of scoliosis and hip dislocation, and frontal radiographs of both hip joints were obtained. ResultsWe included 29 men and 34 women (mean age: 52.6 years). All patients underwent successful scanning at either the femoral neck (82.5 %) or lumbar spine (95.2 %). BMD measurements obtained using REMS revealed low values, with a mean BMD, T-score, and Z-score of 0.67 g/cm2, −2.39 standard deviation (SD), and − 1.38 SD, respectively, at the femoral neck and 0.66 g/cm2, −2.70 SD, and − 1.87 SD, respectively, at the lumbar spine. The average Cobb angle of the lumbar spine was 34.0°; furthermore, dislocation rates did not significantly differ between those with and without successful BMD measurements (p = 0.073). Lumbar BMD T-scores were significantly correlated with femoral neck BMD T-scores (p < 0.001, r = 0.530). ConclusionAll patients with SMID were able to undergo measurements of either spinal or femoral neck BMD; furthermore, 77.7 % of the patients underwent measurements at both the lumbar spine and femur. Our data suggest that REMS is useful for measuring BMD in patients with SMID who are residing in institutions.

Relationship Between Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Bone Mineral Density, Fracture Risk, and Bone Metabolism in Adults With Osteoporosis/Fractures

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH) D) levels with bone mineral density (BMD), fracture risk, and bone metabolism. MethodsThis multicenter cross-sectional study recruited menopausal females and males greater than or equal to 50 year old with osteoporosis/fractures between September 2016 and September 2021. Assessment included clinical data, 25(OH)D, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX), lateral thoracolumbar spine x-rays, and BMD. ResultsA total of 3003 individuals were stratified by 25(OH) D levels: 720 individuals (24%) <20 ng/mL, 1338 individuals (44.5%) 20 to 29 ng/mL, and 945 individuals (31.5%) ≥30 ng/mL. In unadjusted and multivariable models, BMD T-score, except spine, was significantly and positively associated with 25(OH)D levels. 25(OH) D levels were inversely associated with Fracture Risk Assessment Tool scores. Patients with 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL had significantly higher iPTH and bone turnover markers (P1NP and CTX) than patients with 25(OH)D ≧20 ng/mL in all models. When analyzing bone-related markers and BMD, total hip and femoral neck BMD T-scores were positively correlated with 25(OH)D concentrations and BMI but negatively correlated with iPTH, P1NP, CTX, and age. In multivariate models with all bone-related markers, only 25(OH)D levels were significantly associated with total hip and femoral neck BMD. ConclusionVitamin D deficiency is significantly associated with decreased total hip and femoral neck BMD and increased fracture risk as assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. In those with osteoporosis/fractures, vitamin D is implicated in the causal relationship between bone remodeling and BMD. Assessing vitamin D status is imperative for those at risk for osteoporosis/fractures.

Challenges of fracture risk assessment in Asian and Black women.

Bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk calculators (eg, the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX]) guide primary prevention care in postmenopausal women. BMD scores use non-Hispanic White (NHW) reference data for T-score classification, whereas FRAX incorporates BMD, clinical risk factors, and population differences when calculating risk. This study compares findings among Asian, Black, and NHW women who underwent osteoporosis screening in a US health care system. Retrospective cross-sectional study. Asian, Black, and NHW women aged 65 to 75 years who underwent BMD testing (with no recent fracture, osteoporosis therapy, metastatic cancer, multiple myeloma, metabolic bone disorders, or kidney replacement therapy) were compared across the following measures: femoral neck BMD (FN-BMD) T-score (normal ≥ -1, osteoporosis ≤ -2.5), high FRAX 10-year hip fracture risk (FRAX-Hip ≥ 3%), FRAX risk factors, and diabetes status. Among 3640 Asian women, 23.8% had osteoporosis and 8.7% had FRAX-Hip scores of at least 3% (34.5% among those with osteoporosis). Among 11,711 NHW women, 12.3% had osteoporosis and 17.2% had FRAX-Hip scores of at least 3% (84.8% among those with osteoporosis). Among 1711 Black women, 68.1% had normal FN-BMD, 4.1% had BMD-defined osteoporosis, and 1.8% had FRAX-Hip scores of at least 3% (32.4% among those with osteoporosis). Fracture risk factors differed by group. Diabetes was 2-fold more prevalent in Black and Asian (35% and 36%, respectively) vs NHW (16%) women. A large subset of Asian women have discordant BMD and FRAX scores, presenting challenges in osteoporosis management. Furthermore, FN-BMD and especially FRAX scores identified few Black women at high fracture risk warranting treatment. Studies should examine whether fracture risk assessment can be optimized in understudied racial minority populations, particularly when findings are discordant.

Risk factors for the comorbidity of osteoporosis/osteopenia and kidney stones: a cross-sectional study.

To evaluate whether low femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was associated with a higher risk of kidney stones, and identify risk factors for the comorbidity of osteoporosis/osteopenia and kidney stones. We analyzed individuals aged ≥ 20 years from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2020 data. Osteoporosis/osteopenia is defined as any T-score < -1.0 of femoral neck, total femoral, and mean lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD. Dietary intakes (sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, phosphorus, calcium/phosphorus, vitamin D (25OHD2+25OHD3)) and serum parameters (sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, bicarbonate, vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase (ALP)) were screened for identifying risk factors for the comorbidity. The prevalence of comorbidity of osteoporosis/osteopenia and kidney stones was 4.82%. Femoral neck BMD T-score was negatively associated with the prevalence of kidney stones (n=11,864). Dietary magnesium intake, serum phosphorus, and bicarbonate were negatively associated with the comorbidity prevalence, and serum ALP was positively associated with the comorbidity prevalence (n=6978). Additionally, there remain significant associations of dietary magnesium intake, serum ALP, and bicarbonate with not only femoral neck BMD T-score (n=11331), but also the prevalence of kidney stones (n=23,111) in general population. Furthermore, dietary magnesium intake was positively correlated to femoral neck BMD T-score in stone formers (SFs), while serum ALP was negatively correlated to femoral neck BMD T-score in SFs (n=1163). Low femoral neck BMD was closely associated with an increased risk of kidney stones. Low magnesium intake and increased serum ALP were associated with the increased risk of the comorbidity, as well as indicative of low femoral neck BMD T-score in SFs, which offered a clue to further clarify the mechanism leading to paradoxical calcification of bone resorption and kidney stones, and had the potential to perform personalized diagnostic workup for low BMD in SFs.

Romosozumab is associated with greater trabecular bone score improvement compared to denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Romosozumab significantly increases bone mineral density (BMD) and rapidly reduces fracture risk. Whether romosozumab can improve the spinal trabecular bone score (TBS) as a bone quality indicator merits further investigation. Data for postmenopausal women starting romosozumab or denosumab treatment at Severance Hospital, Korea, were analyzed. Romosozumab and denosumab groups were 1:1 matched using propensity scores, considering relevant covariates. Good responders were defined as those with TBS improvement of 5.8% or greater. Overall, 174 patients (romosozumab, n = 87; denosumab, n = 87) were analyzed. Matched groups did not differ in age (64years), weight, height, previous fracture (38%), lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD (T-score, -3.4 and -2.6, respectively), or prior bisphosphonate or selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) exposure (50%). The romosozumab group exhibited a greater increase in lumbar spine BMD (15.2% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001) and TBS (3.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.013) than the denosumab group. In patients transitioning from bisphosphonate or SERM, romosozumab users showed greater improvement in TBS compared to denosumab users (3.9% versus 0.8%, P = 0.006); the drug-naive group showed no significant difference (3.6% versus 2.7%, P = 0.472). The romosozumab group had a higher proportion of good responders than the denosumab group (33.3% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.024). Romosozumab therapy for 12months resulted in 3.8-fold higher odds of a good response in TBS than denosumab after covariate adjustment (adjusted odds ratio 3.85, p = 0.002). Romosozumab could improve bone mass and bone quality, measured by TBS, in postmenopausal osteoporosis, particularly as a subsequent regimen in patients previously taking anti-resorptive agents.

Association of geriatric nutritional risk index with the risk of osteoporosis in the elderly population in the NHANES.

Osteoporosis is common in the elderly, and malnutrition is considered a major risk factor for osteoporosis. This study investigated the relationship between the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) and osteoporosis based on a large cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We included 7405 older adults from NHANES (2005 to 2018) and divided them into the High-GNRI and Low-GNRI groups based on GNRI levels to compare the prevalence of osteoporosis among the two groups. A multi-factor logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether GNRI was an independent risk factor for osteoporosis. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was computed to investigate the linear relationship between geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and bone mineral density (BMD) T-score. Finally, a generalized additive model (GAM) revealed whether there was a non-linear relationship between GNRI and osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis was higher in the Low-GNRI group than those in the High-GNRI group (12.2% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.001). Similarly, the femoral neck BMD T-scores (-1.09 ± 1.42 vs. -0.91 ± 1.31; P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between Low-GNRI group and High-GNRI group in lumbar BMD T-scores (1.700 ± 1.69 vs 1.85 ± 1.72; P>0.05). The multi-factor logistic regression analysis identified low GNRI as an independent risk factor for osteoporosis (OR: 1.544; 95% CI: 1.179-2.022; P < 0.001). Besides, GNRI showed a positive linear correlation (P < 0.001) with femoral neck BMD T-scores in older adults, with a progressive trend towards higher BMD as GNRI increased. By contrast, there was no linear correlation between GNRI and lumbar BMD T-score (P = 0.978). Lastly, the dose response curve revealed the non-linear negative correlation between GNRI and the risk of osteoporosis in the elderly (non-linear P < 0.001). With the increase of GNRI, the risk of osteoporosis gradually decreased, especially when GNRI was greater than 100, the downward trend was more significant. GNRI is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis in the elderly and is negatively and non-linearly associated with the risk of osteoporosis in the elderly population.

Osteosarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus in post-menopausal women: a case-control study.

Osteosarcopenia has been defined as the concomitance of low bone density (osteopenia/osteoporosis) and sarcopenia. Osteoporosis is characterized by alterations in bone microarchitecture and decrease of bone mineral density (BMD), whereas sarcopenia is the progressive decrease of both muscle mass and function that increase the risk of falls. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with poor bone strength and muscle wasting. The aim of this study is to analyze the association between osteosarcopenia and T2DM in post-menopausal women (PMW). We performed an age matched case-control study (1:2 ratio), considering as cases PMW affected by T2DM, and PMW without T2DM as control group. For all patients a DXA evaluation to investigate bone density and body composition measures were performed. Moreover, we carried out muscle strength and performance assessments. Outcome measures were femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD T-scores, appendicular lean mass (ALM), handgrip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Data from both groups were analyzed and compared. Thirty-six PMW (12 T2DM vs 24 non-T2DM) were recruited. The frequency of osteosarcopenia was significantly higher in the T2DM group compared to controls (50% vs 17%; OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.05 to 23.79, p = 0.043). Handgrip strength was significantly lower in the T2DM group (10.09 ± 4.02 kg vs 18.40 ± 6.83 kg; p = 0.001). Post-menopausal women with T2DM have a 5 times higher risk to have osteosarcopenia compared to non-diabetic ones. Further studies on larger cohorts are required to confirm these findings.

Bisphosphonate Use for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Elderly Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia Receiving Prolonged Steroid Therapy: A Single Institute Retrospective Study.

Prednisolone, used as a standard initial treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), is an important risk factor for osteoporosis. To investigate the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) in elderly ITP patients receiving prolonged steroid therapy, associations between GIO prevention and the real-world data of score changes of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, FRAX® and the Garvan tool during the initial loading of prednisolone were examined. In our institute, 22 ITP patients aged ≥ 70 years received 0.5–1.0 mg/kg prednisolone for 2–3 weeks as the initial ITP treatment between 2014 and 2021. The femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DXA scan was entered into FRAX® to define the risk-adapted approach to bisphosphonate during the initial loading of prednisolone. Bisphosphonate was administered according to <−1.0 femoral neck BMD T-score measured by DXA scan. Worse scores of FRAX® and the Garvan tool were associated with bisphosphonate use for short-term fracture prevention in primary GIO; however, there were no incidents of fracture or significant differences in probabilities determined by FRAX® and the Garvan tool. During the initial loading of prednisolone, prescribing bisphosphonate might prevent the reduction in BMD in elderly patients with ITP receiving prolonged steroid therapy.

Utilizing machine learning for opportunistic screening for low BMD using CT scans of the cervical spine

BackgroundComputed Tomography (CT) scans of the cervical spine are often performed to evaluate patients for trauma and degenerative changes of the cervical spine. We hypothesized that the CT attenuation of the cervical vertebrae can be used to identify patients who should be screened for osteoporosis. MethodsA retrospective study of 253 patients (177 training/validation and 76 test) with unenhanced CT scans of the cervical spine and Dual-energy x-ray Absorbtiometry (DXA) studies within 12 months of each other was performed. Volumetric segmentation of C1-T1, clivus, and first ribs was performed to obtain the CT attenuation of each bone. The correlations of the CT attenuations between the bones and with DXA measurements were evaluated. Univariate receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses, and multivariate classifiers (Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Naïve Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) analyzing the CT attenuation of all bones, were utilized to predict patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores <-1. ResultsThere were positive correlations between the CT attenuation of each bone, and with the DXA measurements. A CT attenuation threshold of 305.2 Hounsfield Units (HU) at C3 had the highest accuracy (0.763, AUC=0.814) to detect femoral neck BMD T-scores ≤-1 and a CT attenuation threshold of 323.6 HU at C3 had the highest accuracy (0.774, AUC=0.843) to detect osteopenia/osteoporosis. The SVM classifier (AUC=0.756) had higher AUC than the RF (AUC=0.692, P=0.224), XGBoost (AUC=0.736; P=0.814), NB (AUC=0.622, P=0.133) and CT threshold of 305.2 HU at C3 (AUC=0.704, P=0.531) classifiers to identify patients with femoral neck BMD T-scores <-1. The SVM classifier (accuracy=0.816) was more accurate than using the CT threshold of 305.2 HU at C3 (accuracy=0.671) (McNemar's χ12=7.55, P=0.006). ConclusionOpportunistic screening for low BMD can be done using cervical spine CT scans. A SVM classifier was more accurate than using the CT threshold of 305.2 HU at C3.

Evaluation of the Discrepancy in Bone Mineral Density Between the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck Among Japanese Women According to Age

This study aimed to examine the age-specific individual discrepancy between lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in Japanese women and to compare the significantly different characteristics between the two bone sites. We found a higher prevalence rate of discordance between the two BMD T-score sites, and many patients had a lower LS BMD T-score than FN BMD T-score. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because our findings suggest that physicians should assess BMD more carefully in women who have a low body weight or body mass index and parental hip fracture history. For these patients, it is necessary to measure both the LS and FN BMD T-scores for calculating the fracture risk.

Incident Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetic Postmenopausal Women in Mainland China: Peking Vertebral Fracture Study.

Using data from the Peking Vertebral Fracture Study, we conducted a longitudinal cohort study to investigate the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the risk of incident fractures, especially of vertebral fractures (VFs), and we also examined the modifying effect of body mass index (BMI) on this association and the effect of bone mineral density (BMD) T-score as a risk factor for incident fractures in T2DM. Chinese postmenopausal women were enrolled (n = 982), among whom 186 had T2DM. Incident VFs were confirmed by lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine (T4-L5), while incident clinical non-VFs were self-reported. BMDs at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. T2DM and non-DM women were at similar risk for VFs (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.32-1.74), even adjusting for age, BMI, BMD, and previous fractures. Meanwhile, T2DM women had nearly twice the risk for non-VFs (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.11-3.35) compared with non-DM women. After stratifying by BMI, the risk of VFs remained similar between diabetics and non-diabetics despite their BMI status (p for interaction = 0.470), and the risk of non-VFs was positively associated with T2DM only in women with BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 (HR 3.59, 95% CI 1.68-7.65) (p for interaction = 0.065). Although LS BMD T-score was similarly and negatively associated with incident VFs both in T2DM (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.88) and non-DM women (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.82) (p for interaction = 0.430), the FN BMD T-score was not found to be significantly associated with either non-VFs or VFs among T2DM women. Comparing T2DM and non-DM women with similar fracture risks, the mean difference in LS T-score was - 0.36 (95% CI - 1.77 to 1.04) for VF, and difference in FN T-score was 1.61 (95% CI - 0.11 to 3.34) for non-VF. In conclusion, Chinese postmenopausal women with T2DM had a similar risk of incident VFs, but a significantly higher risk of incident non-VF, compared to women without DM. Higher BMI did not modify the effect of T2DM on risk of VFs, but it increased the association between T2DM and risk of non-VFs. LS BMD T-score was similarly and negatively associated with VF risk in T2DM and non-DM women and appear to be useful for clinical evaluation of VF risk.

Multiple sclerosis is associated with low bone mineral density and osteoporosis

To compare measures of bone mineral density (BMD) between people with and without MS. Using population-based administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified people with MS who received BMD screening and controls who received BMD screening matched 5:1 on age, sex, region of residence, and date of BMD screening. We determined the BMD T-scores for the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine and frequency of osteoporosis (defined as T-score -2.5 or lower). We compared the groups with respect to the femoral neck T-score using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, region, disability, continuity of care, recent previous fracture, falls history, medication use, and comorbidities. We compared the odds of osteoporosis between groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. We identified 783 MS cases who underwent BMD screening and 3,915 matched controls. The mean (SD) femoral BMD T-score was lower in MS cases (-1.48 [1.08]) than in matched controls (-1.12 [0.98], p < 0.001), and the prevalence of osteoporosis was higher among the MS cases (range across BMD sites: 16%-26%) vs controls (6%-15%). MS was associated with a lower femoral neck BMD T-score after accounting for covariates (β = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.17) and more than 2-fold increased odds of osteoporosis (covariate-adjusted OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.82-3.19). People with MS have lower BMD and a higher prevalence of osteoporosis compared with people of similar age and sex without MS. These findings indicate the importance of addressing bone health as part of comprehensive MS care.

High prevalence of vertebral fractures and low trabecular bone score in patients with fragility fractures: A cross-sectional sub-study of NoFRACT.

Norway has among the highest incidence rates of fractures in the world. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and trabecular bone score (TBS) provide information about fracture risk, but their importance have not been studied in Norwegian patients with fragility fractures. The objectives of this study were to examine the clinical characteristics of a cohort of women and men with fragility fractures, their prevalence of vertebral fractures using VFA and prevalence of low TBS, and explore the differences between the sexes and patients with and without vertebral fractures. This cross-sectional sub-study of the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT) included 839 patients with fragility fractures. Of these, 804 patients had bone mineral density (BMD) of the total hip, femoral neck and/or spine assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, 679 underwent concomitant VFA, 771 had TBS calculated and 696 responded to a questionnaire. Mean age was 65.8 (SD 8.8) years and 80.5% were women. VFA revealed vertebral fractures in 34.8% of the patients and 34.0% had low TBS (≤ 1.23), with no differences between the sexes. In all patients with valid measures of both VFA and TBS, 53.8% had either vertebral fractures, low TBS, or both. In the patients with osteopenia at the femoral neck, 53.6% had either vertebral fractures, low TBS, or both. Femoral neck BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 was found in 13.8% of all patients, whereas the corresponding figure was 27.4% using the skeletal site with lowest T-score. Women exhibited lower BMD at all sites and lower TBS than men (1.27 vs. 1.29), (all p < 0.05). Patients with prevalent vertebral fractures were older (69.4 vs. 64.0 years), exhibited lower BMD at all sites and lower TBS (1.25 vs.1.29) than those without vertebral fractures (all p < 0.05). Before assessment, 8.2% were taking anti-osteoporotic drugs (AOD), and after assessment, the prescription rate increased to 56.2%. More than half of the patients with fragility fractures had vertebral fractures, low TBS or both. The prescription of AOD increased seven fold from before assessment to after assessment, emphasizing the importance of risk assessment after a fragility fracture.

Preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

BackgroundOsteoporosis implies an increased risk of complications after orthopedic surgery. For the mostly elderly group of patients undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery (LSS), it is important to include skeletal health evaluation in the preoperative planning. The aim of this study was to assess spine and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) in LSS patients and to evaluate whether the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) can identify patients with reduced BMD levels in the spine.MethodsThe study involved 65 LSS patients and 53 patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA) for comparison. BMD was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the lumbar spine in three projections: anterior-posterior (AP), lateral and lateral-mid (the mid-portion of the vertebrae), and FN. The LSS patients filled out the FRAX questionnaire.ResultsIn the LSS group, 43% of the women and 8% of the men were classified as being osteoporotic/osteopenic by AP spine measurement. The corresponding proportions using the lateral spine T-score ≤ − 2.5 were 87% and 57%, respectively, and 82% and 53%, respectively, for the FN. The FN BMD T-score was significantly lower in the LSS group compared with the HOA group. The FRAX questionnaire identified 40% of the LSS patients with a moderate/high risk of sustaining an osteoporotic fracture within 10 years, with or without simultaneous FN BMD, while 71% of these patients were classified as being osteoporotic with DXA lateral spine measurement.ConclusionIt is common with osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients undergoing spine surgery, and the identification may influence the surgical treatment why the evaluation of BMD is important preoperatively. FRAX evaluation could not replace DXA measurement of the spine regarding the identification of osteoporosis patients in the preoperative planning phase.

Metformin and Lifestyle Interventions in DPP Do Not Have Long-Term Effects on Bone Density or Falls

Randomization to lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin (MET) in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) resulted in weight loss and reduced progression to diabetes. The long term effects of these interventions on bone mineral density (BMD) and falls, both associated with weight loss, are not known. We determined if ILS or MET was associated with prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia or history of falls in the DPP Outcome Study (DPPOS). During DPP, 3234 participants at high risk for diabetes were randomized to ILS, MET or PLB; 2779 continued in DPPOS and were offered modified group ILS. During DPPOS, ILS was offered additional lifestyle reinforcement semi-annually and MET received unmasked metformin. This analysis includes 1384 DPPOS participants who had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry hip scans at year 12 (Y12). Osteoporosis was defined as femoral neck BMD T-score ≤-2.5 and osteopenia as -2.5&amp;lt;T-score≤-1. Participants were asked at Y12 if they had a fall in the previous year. Outcomes were compared across the 3 treatment groups using Pearson’s chi- squared test. Associations between treatment and outcomes were assessed with logistic regression. Mean age at Y12 was 66.5 (±9.5) years. Mean time since DPP baseline was 15.6 (±0.7) years. Weight loss (DPP baseline to DPPOS Y12) did not differ across treatment groups (-4.4 kg ILS; -3.5 kg MET; -3.1 kg PLB; p=0.114). There were no differences across groups in the prevalence of osteoporosis in men (1.4% ILS, 1.3% MET, 0.7% PLB; p=0.836) or women (2.9% ILS, 2.9% MET, 3.1% PLB; p=0.983). Prevalence of osteopenia was also similar across groups. Prevalence of history of falls was similar across groups in men (16.0% ILS, 16.4% MET, 16.0% PLB; p=0.995) and women (25.7% ILS, 21.3% MET, 21.6% PLB; p=0.342). Prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia or history of falls did not differ between ILS or MET and PLB in men or women. In a cohort at high risk of diabetes, lifestyle intervention or metformin did not have long-term effects on bone density or falls. Disclosure A.V. Schwartz: None. Q. Pan: None. V. Aroda: Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., AstraZeneca, Calibra Medical, Eisai Inc., Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Theracos, Inc.. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Merck &amp; Co., Inc.. Other Relationship; Self; American Diabetes Association. Consultant; Self; ADOCIA. J.P. Crandall: None. A. Kriska: None. C.S. Piromalli: None. M. Temprosa: Other Relationship; Self; Merck KGaA. H. Florez: Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. D. Research Group: None.

The Vietnam Osteoporosis Study: Rationale and design

ObjectivesOsteoporosis and fracture impose a significant health care burden on the contemporary populations in developing countries. The Vietnam Osteoporosis Study (VOS) sought to assess the burden of osteoporosis and its comorbidities in men and women. MethodsThe study was designed as a population-based family investigation in which families were randomly recruited from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Individuals were assessed for bone health, including bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition and trabecular and cortical bone properties by pQCT (peripheral quantitative computed tomography). Fasting blood samples were obtained for the analysis of plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and bone turnover markers. Genomic DNA extraction from whole blood samples for further genetic and genomic analyses. ResultsWe have recruited more than 4157 individuals from 817 families. The average age of participants was 51, with approximately 45% of the individuals aged 50 years and older. Approximately 3% of participants were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2), and 21% were overweight. Notably, 11% of participants aged 40 years and older were diabetic. Among those aged 50 years and older, approximately 14% of women and 5% of men had osteoporosis (i.e., femoral neck BMD T-scores ≤ −2.5). There were modest correlations between volumetric BMD and areal BMD. ConclusionsVOS is a major bone research project in Vietnam aimed at comprehensively documenting the burden osteoporosis, its co-occurrence of chronic diseases, and their underlying etiologies. The Study will make important contributions to the literature of bone health worldwide.

Vertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women: a population-based study.

We aimed to describe the prevalence and develop a model for prediction of radiographic vertebral fractures in a large random sample of postmenopausal Chinese women. We enrolled 1760 women from an age-stratified random sample of postmenopausal women in Beijing, China. The presence of vertebral fracture was assessed by semi-quantitative grading of lateral thoracolumbar radiographs, risk factors by interview, bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur and lumbar spine by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and markers of bone turnover from a fasting blood sample. Associations of these factors were analyzed in logistic models and discrimination by areas of receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). The prevalence of vertebral fracture, ranged from 13.4% ages 50 to 59years old to 58.1% at age 80years or older. Older age, a history of non-vertebral fracture, lower femoral neck BMD T-score, body mass index (BMI), height loss, housework, and less than half an hour of outdoor activity were significantly associated with increased probability of having a vertebral fracture. A model with those seven factors had a similar AUC with or without BMD and performed better than a simple model with three factors. This study is from a true random sample of postmenopausal women in urban China with high response rate. The prevalence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women in Beijing increases from 13% under age 60 to over 50% by age 80years. A model with seven clinical risk factors with or without BMD is better than simple models and may guide the use of spine x-rays to identify women with vertebral fractures. More than half an hour of outdoor activity might correlate with lower risk of vertebral fracture in this population.

Psoriasis, fracture risk and bone mineral density: the HUNT Study, Norway.

An association between psoriasis and osteoporosis has been reported. To investigate, in a large prospective population-based Norwegian study, whether psoriasis is associated with increased risk of forearm or hip fracture; to investigate the cross-sectional association between psoriasis and bone mineral density (BMD) T-score in a subpopulation. Hospital-derived fracture data from Nord-Trøndelag County (1995-2013) were linked to psoriasis information, BMD measurements and lifestyle factors from the third survey of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006-08 (HUNT3); socioeconomic data from the National Education Database; and use of medication from the Norwegian Prescription Database. Among 48 194 participants in HUNT3, we found no increased risk of forearm or hip fracture in 2804 patients with self-reported psoriasis [overall age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio 1·03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·82-1·31]. No clear association was found between psoriasis and mean BMD T-score; overall age- and sex-adjusted differences in total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD T-scores were 0·02 (95% CI -0·11 to 0·14), 0·05 (95% CI -0·06 to 0·17) and 0·07 (95% CI -0·09 to 0·24), respectively. No clear association was found between psoriasis and prevalent osteoporosis in either total hip, femoral neck or lumbar spine; overall age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio was 0·77 (95% CI 0·54-1·10). Associations did not change substantially after adjustment for education, smoking, systemic steroid use and body mass index. We found no association between psoriasis and risk of fracture. The study did not indicate reduced BMD T-score or higher prevalence of osteoporosis among patients with psoriasis.

Impact of lumbar syndesmophyte on bone health as assessed by bone density (BMD) and bone texture (TBS) in men with axial spondyloarthritis

IntroductionPatients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) have an elevated incidence of osteoporosis and are at increased risk of pathological vertebral fracture. Evaluation of bone density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has its limits in fracture prediction, already known in this population. One hypothesis is that the presence of lumbar syndesmophyte could overestimate the spine bone mineral density (BMD). Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new texture measurement correlated with bone microarchitecture. Previous studies have shown that TBS is mildly impacted by osteoarthritis and thus could be a predictor of fracture better than spine BMD. We aimed to evaluate a male population of SpA with BMD and TBS measurement and see the impact of lumbar syndesmophytes. MethodTwo cohorts of SpA male patients (Lausanne, Sofia) with SpA disease, clinical and bone parameters (femoral neck and total spine BMD+spine TBS) were merged. We compared BMD and TBS results regarding to the presence/absence of syndesmophytes. ResultsOur study concerned 51 men [29 with lumbar syndesmophytes (L1 to L4,≥1), 22 without], fulfilling the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria. Mean age was 52.18 years old (no difference between the 2 groups) and mean body mass index (BMI) 27.47kg/m2 (29.12±0.67 with and 25.30±0.81 without, P=0.0006). For the overall population mean BMD T-score at the spine was −0.55±1.54, mean BMD T-score at the femoral neck −1.20±0.95 and mean lumbar spine TBS was 1.26±0.13. Regarding to the presence or the absence of syndesmophytes, mean spine BMD T-score was −0.07±1.63 and −1.18±1.16 (P=0.009 and 0.250 before and after adjustment for BMI), mean femoral neck BMD T-score was −1.37±0.93 and −0.97±0.94 (P=0.14 and 0.03 before and after adjustment for BMI) and mean TBS was 1.21±0.12 and 1.33±0.11 (P=0.001 and 0.06 before and after adjustment for BMI) respectively for SpA men with and without syndesmophytes. ConclusionOur results showed that SpA men with and without syndesmophytes have lower results compared to the normal population regarding hip BMD, spine TBS and spine BMD except for men with syndesmophytes who have a normal BMD spine T-score. These results suggest that TBS is not influenced by the syndesmophytes in opposite to spine BMD and could be measured in this population in addition to the neck BMD to assess the bone fragility.