Female Orthopaedic Surgeons Research Articles

Gender Disparity of Orthopaedic Surgery Grand Rounds Speakers

Introduction Women are significantly underrepresented within orthopaedic surgery and academia. Limited opportunities to present at local and national conferences may impact professional advancement for women. The purpose of this study was to determine how often female orthopaedic surgeons presented at orthopaedic grand rounds between 2016-2021, if there was a difference between the types of presentations (technical vs non-technical) given by female and male speakers, and whether the COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of opportunities available for female orthopaedic surgeons to speak at orthopaedic grand rounds with the increase of online platforms. Methods A cross sectional study of 8 ACGME accredited orthopaedic residency programs, who are a part of COERG, was performed. Program directors were asked to describe the demographics of grand rounds speakers and the types of presentations given by those speakers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic from September 2016 to September 2021. Results Between September 2016-February 2020, 472 male (83.7%) and 92 (16.3%) female orthopaedic surgeons presented during grand rounds. There was no significant difference in the gender distribution of speakers from March 2020-September 2021 during which 81 men (79.4%) and 21 women (20.6%) presented (p=0.315). Men were more likely than women to present on technical topics before (p=0.006) and after the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.023). Conclusion Male orthopaedic surgeons more frequently present at grand rounds in comparison to female orthopaedic surgeons. This was unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic when online platforms were increasingly utilized. Male speakers were more likely to present on technical topics; whereas female speakers were more likely to present on non-technical topics. Understanding the gender disparity amongst orthopaedic grand rounds speakers is necessary for programs to re-evaluate and revise the methodology by which speakers are selected. This can allow for more balanced topic discussions and can foster female career advancement in academia.

Total knee arthroplasty reimbursement is declining overall and at a marginally faster rate amongst female orthopaedic surgeons: A Medicare analysis

BackgroundWhile the prevalence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing, reimbursement is declining. The purpose of this study was to determine how surgeon gender influences procedure volume, reimbursement, practice style, and patient demographics for TKAs nationally and regionally between 2013 and 2021. MethodsThe Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners database was queried from 2013 to 2021 for procedure volume, TKA reimbursement, surgeon characteristics, and patient demographics for any surgeon who performed at least ten primary TKAs per year. Statistical tests were conducted to analyze differences based on surgeon gender, geography, and year. ResultsOf the 2,415,802 TKAs performed between 2013 and 2021, 1.5 % were billed by female surgeons. The number of TKAs performed annually increased by 29.1 % for female surgeons and decreased by 2.6 % for male surgeons. Between 2013 and 2021, reimbursement for TKAs decreased by 23.9 % for male surgeons and 26.2 % for female surgeons. In 2021, male surgeons were reimbursed $1017 per TKA while female surgeons were reimbursed $964 (p = 0.049). Male surgeons performed more TKAs annually in 2021 (Male: 39.3, Female: 30.9, p < 0.001), more total billable services (Male: 4148.0, Female: 2719.3, p < 0.001), and more unique billable services (Male: 70.7, Female: 55.3, p < 0.001) than female surgeons. ConclusionsFemale representation among surgeons who perform TKAs is increasing nationally. However, male surgeons treat more patients, perform more total billable services, and perform more unique billable services than female surgeons. TKA reimbursement is decreasing at a faster rate for female surgeons than male surgeons, although this is likely due to geographical differences.

Female Orthopaedic Surgeons Are Less Represented as Head Team Physicians in Collegiate Athletic Programs

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) head team physicians (HTP), focusing on gender as it relates to divisional variability, medical specialty, and research productivity. MethodsIn December 2022, the NCAA member directory was utilized to obtain HTP information from the top 5 conferences within Divisions I, II, and III (DI, DII, DIII, respectively). Division I schools were selected from the previously established “Power 5” conferences. Divisions II and III used NCAA rankings. HTP data was collected from publicly available verifiable data sources. Data for gender, Scopus H-index, residency programs, and fellowship programs were collected. Mean, median, skewness, p-values, and odds ratio were calculated for analysis. ResultsOne hundred and eighty six NCAA institutions were evaluated: 69 DI (37%), 65 DII (35%), and 52 DIII (28%). DIII had the highest female representation (8; 16%). Out of the 67 orthopaedic surgery HTPs, 5 (7.5%) were female and 62 male (92.5%). There is a statistically significant difference in female orthopedic surgeon representation in the HTP field compared to males (p-value = 0.038, alpha = 0.05). Female orthopaedic surgeons have 38% lower odds of being represented as HTPs compared to males (p-value = 0.046, alpha = 0.05). Female HTPs in Divisions I and III had higher H-indexes than the overall average and median values for their respective divisons. ConclusionFemale HTPs are significantly less represented compared to males in the NCAA. Furthermore, female orthopaedic surgeons were found to have lower odds of being represented as HTPs compared to their male counterparts. For research productivity, female HTPs impacted the distribution as outliers in Divisions I and III.

Gender diversity in the National Joint Registry.

Our primary aim was to establish the proportion of female orthopaedic consultants who perform arthroplasty via cases submitted to the National Joint Registry (NJR), which covers England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and Guernsey. Secondary aims included comparing time since specialist registration, private practice participation, and number of hospitals worked in between male and female surgeons. Publicly available data from the NJR was extracted on the types of arthroplasty performed by each surgeon, and the number of procedures of each type undertaken. Each surgeon was cross-referenced with the General Medical Council (GMC) website, using GMC number to extract surgeon demographic data. These included sex, region of practice, and dates of full and specialist registration. Of 2,895 surgeons contributing to the NJR in 2023, 102 (4%) were female. The highest proportions of female surgeons were among those who performed elbow (n = 25; 5%), shoulder (n = 24; 4%), and ankle (n = 8; 4%) arthroplasty. Hip (n = 66; 3%) and knee arthroplasty (n = 39; 2%) had the lowest female representation. Female surgeons had been practising for a median of 10.4 years since specialist registration compared to 13.7 years for males (p < 0.001). Northern Ireland was the region with the highest proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons (8%). A greater proportion of male surgeons worked in private practice (63% vs 24%; p < 0.001) and in multiple hospitals (74% vs 40%; p < 0.001). Only 4% of surgeons currently contributing cases to the NJR are female, with the highest proportion performing elbow arthroplasty (5%). Female orthopaedic surgeons in the NJR are earlier in their careers than male surgeons, and are less involved in private practice. There is a wide geographical variation in the proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons.

Where are the women in spine surgery? A demographic study of the range of gender disparity in academic spine hospitals in the United States

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThere is a paucity of women in the field of academic spine surgery. In 2022, 20% of orthopedic surgery residents and 24% of neurosurgery residents were women, the lowest and third lowest of all medical specialties respectively. There exists a significant discrepancy in the number of women employed as adult spine surgeons at academic hospitals. PURPOSETo quantify the number of female attending spine surgeons at academic hospitals and identify institutions that based on faculty diversity are demonstrating inequity. STUDY DESIGNDescriptive. METHODSDemographic data was collected utilizing the 2023 to 2024 NASS Fellowship Directory in combination with publicly available information on faculty profiles from January 1, 2024 to January 30, 2024. Data collected included gender and training institutions (medical school, residency, and fellowship). Adult spine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons who perform adult spine surgery were included. RESULTSThere are 943 neurosurgical and orthopedic adult spine surgeons employed at 73 academic hospitals. The breakdown of orthopedic spine surgeons versus neurosurgeons is roughly equivalent, at 453 and 490, respectively. Among orthopedic spine surgeons, 19 out of 453 (4%) are female. Among neurosurgeons, 44 out of 490 (9%) are female. The number of female academic spine surgeons who are neurosurgeons is more than double that of orthopedic surgeons. Twelve out of the 19 (63%) female orthopedic spine surgeons, and 16 out of the 44 (36%) female neurosurgeons are employed at the program where they trained. Out of 45 larger academic spine hospitals with >10 faculty members, there were 15 without any female faculty. There is 1 academic hospital with ≥ 20 spine faculty, and zero women. CONCLUSIONThe number of women pursuing academic spine careers continues to lag behind present day demographics of training programs. These continued trends should prompt both individuals and institutions to support progress in gender disparity research.

699 Gender Inequality in Orthopaedic Radiation Protection: An Audit

Abstract Aim The literature demonstrates an increased prevalence of breast cancer in female orthopaedic surgeons compared to the population baseline. One contributor to this alarming statistic may be exposure to frequent low-dose radiation inherent to orthopaedics. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) has emphasised the importance of wearing lead aprons that provide adequate coverage, especially of the axillary region in women. To assess the availability of vests that fulfil such criteria, an audit of the lead aprons available at our local adult tertiary centre was undertaken. Method Lead protective equipment used by the orthopaedic theatres were documented by type, size, and brand. Data collection occurred prior to theatre activity requiring lead use, to ensure all equipment was present. Results 115 pieces of equipment were identified - 43 standard vests, 9 tabard gowns with side coverage, 4 tabard gowns without side coverage, 48 skirts and 11 thyroid covers. Vests, skirts, and tabard gowns ranged from XS (n=4), S (n=21), M (n=15), L (n=46), to XL (n=12), unidentifiable size (n=6). Vests, skirts and tabard gowns ranged from several different brands including Xenolite Male (n=45), Xenolite Female (n=29) and Kenex (n=23). No boleros, high axilla vests, or vests with wings/sleeves/axillary shields, were identified. Conclusions This audit demonstrated inadequate adherence to BOA recommendations and a lack of size diversity. With increasing numbers of women in orthopaedics, there is a need to raise more awareness and address this safety concern to mitigate a larger concerning trend.

Fertility and pregnancy complications in female orthopaedic surgeons.

While the number of female medical graduates continues to increase, only a few pursue an orthopaedic career. This is related to challenges regarding pregnancy and the peripartum period during orthopaedic training. To evaluate fertility, pregnancy-related complications and attitudes towards female orthopaedic surgeons in Israel. An electronic anonymous 34-question electronic web-based survey was sent to all Israeli female orthopaedic surgeons. Participation was voluntary. Questions were formulated to determine demographics, obstetrics medical history, teratogenic exposure, medical leave and breastfeeding parameters along with attitude towards pregnancy. Twenty-six orthopaedic surgeons complied with the survey, 68% of all registered female orthopaedic surgeons. Participants age was 39.5 (±8.8). The average number of children for a female orthopaedic surgeon was 2.2 (±1.4), with an average of 1.3 (±1.1) deliveries during residency. The average age for a first child was 31.1 (±3.7) years. Four surgeons required fertility treatments and six had abortions. Thirty-eight per cent experienced pregnancy complications. Most surgeons were exposed to radiation and bone cement during pregnancy. The average duration of maternity leave was 19.4 (±9.9) weeks and return to work was associated with cessation of breastfeeding. Seventy-six per cent of surgeons felt that pregnancy had negatively influenced their training, and 12% reported negative attitudes from colleagues and supervisors. Orthopaedic surgeons in Israel experience a delay in childbirth and higher rates of pregnancy complications. Most feel that their training is harmed by pregnancy. Programme directors should design a personalized support programme for female surgeons during pregnancy and the peripartum period.

Describing the women of orthopaedic surgery.

The purpose of this survey study was to examine the demographic and lifestyle factors of women currently in orthopaedic surgery. An electronic survey was conducted of practising female orthopaedic surgeons based in the USA through both the Ruth Jackson Society and the online Facebook group "Women of Orthopaedics". The majority of surveyed female orthopaedic surgeons reported being married (76.4%; 285/373) and having children (67.6%; 252/373). In all, 66.5% (247/373) were collegiate athletes; 82.0% (306/373) reported having no female orthopaedic surgeon mentors in undergraduate and medical school. Their mean height is 65.8 inches and average weight is 147.3 lbs. The majority of female orthopaedic surgeons did not have female mentorship during their training. Additionally, biometrically, their build is similar to that of the average American woman.

The Perspective of Brazilian Women Orthopaedic Surgeons on Gender Discrimination: Initial Insights to Understand Gender Bias in the Brazilian Healthcare System.

Despite the societal progress made in recent years, gender discrimination is still common in healthcare, especially in some surgical specialties such as orthopaedics. In Brazil, where the participation of women in the medical profession has been increasing, little is known about women's perceptions on the issue of gender discrimination. This study aims to examine women orthopaedic surgeons' experiences in dealing with conflict in the workplace and contextualize the impact that gender discrimination has had or currently has on their careers and well-being. As a secondary objective, the work seeks to understand whether there are differences in the perception of the issue among practicing women orthopaedic surgeons and those in training. For a cross-sectional qualitative study, a survey was distributed exclusively to 300 practicing orthopaedic surgeons and orthopaedists in training (residents and fellows). A total of 99 women participated in the survey, of whom 66 were practicing orthopaedic surgeons and 33 were orthopaedists in training. The study showed that women orthopaedic surgeons in training in Brazil have a lower number of publications and a moderate level of involvement in academic society activity. In addition, orthopaedic surgeons in training experience a statistically significantly higher number of conflicts in the workplace. The comments from the questionnaires highlighted the physical and psychological consequences arising from these situations of professional conflict, most frequently occurring with orthopaedic surgeons who are men. Our findings indicate that respondents expressed a feeling of inequality towards women in the workplace, ultimately reducing the level of job satisfaction among female orthopaedic surgeons, which may contribute to disinterest and abandonment of the specialty. The results of this work support recent evidence that there is an implicit and often overlooked bias against the participation of women and ethnic minorities in the orthopaedic community in Brazil.

Pregnancy and infertility in orthopedics: A review of the current state.

Orthopedic surgery continues to have one of the lowest rates of female trainees among all medical specialties in the United States. Barriers to pursuing a surgical residency include the challenges of family planning and work-life balance during training. A systematic literature search of articles published between June 2012 and December 2022 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed in January 2023 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis). Studies were included if they evaluated pregnancy and peripartum experience and/or outcomes amongst orthopedic surgeons or trainees. Eighteen studies were included. Up to 67.3% of female orthopedic surgeons and trainees and 38.7% of their male counterparts delayed childbearing during residency. The most reported reasons for this delay included career choice as an orthopedic surgeon, residency training, and reputational concerns among faculty or co-residents. Infertility ranged from 17.0% to 30.4% in female orthopedic surgeons and up to 31.2% suffered obstetric complications. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) resulted in 12.4%-56.3% of successful pregnancies. Maternity and paternity leaves ranged from 1 to 11weeks for trainees with more negative attitudes associated with maternal leave. Female orthopedic trainees and attending delay childbearing, experience higher rates of obstetric complications, and more stigma associated with pregnancy compared to their male colleagues. Program and institutional policies regarding maternity and paternity leave are variable across programs, and therefore, attention should be directed toward standardizing policies.

An In-Depth Analysis of Public and Private Research Funding in Orthopaedic Surgery from 2015 to 2021.

Understanding the trends and patterns of research funding can aid in enhancing growth and innovation in orthopaedic research. We sought to analyze financial trends in public orthopaedic surgery funding and characterize trends in private funding distribution among orthopaedic surgeons and hospitals to explore potential disparities across orthopaedic subspecialties. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of private and public orthopaedic research funding from 2015 to 2021 using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePORTER through the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research, respectively. Institutions receiving funds from both the NIH and the private sector were classified separately as publicly funded and privately funded. Research payment characteristics were categorized according to their respective orthopaedic fellowship subspecialties. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Mann-Kendall tests were employed. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Over the study period, $348,428,969 in private and $701,078,031 in public research payments were reported. There were 2,229 unique surgeons receiving funding at 906 different institutions. The data showed that a total of 2,154 male orthopaedic surgeons received $342,939,782 and 75 female orthopaedic surgeons received $5,489,187 from 198 different private entities. The difference in the median payment size between male and female orthopaedic surgeons was not significant. The top 1% of all practicing orthopaedic surgeons received 99% of all private funding in 2021. The top 20 publicly and top 20 privately funded institutions received 77% of the public and 37% of the private funding, respectively. Private funding was greatest (31.5%) for projects exploring adult reconstruction. While the amount of public research funding was more than double the amount of private research funding, the distribution of public research funding was concentrated in fewer institutions when compared with private research funding. This suggests the formation of orthopaedic centers of excellence (CoEs), which are programs that have high concentrations of talent and resources. Furthermore, the similar median payment by gender is indicative of equitable payment size. In the future, orthopaedic funding should follow a distribution model that aligns with the existing approach, giving priority to a nondiscriminatory stance regarding gender, and allocate funds toward CoEs. Securing research funding is vital for driving innovation in orthopaedic surgery, which is crucial for enhancing clinical interventions. Thus, understanding the patterns and distribution of research funding can help orthopaedic surgeons tailor their future projects to better align with current funding trends, thereby increasing the likelihood of securing support for their work.

Gender Disparity in Authorship Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.

Gender disparity remains pervasive in orthopaedic surgery, which affects the research pursuits of orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to characterize gender-related authorship trends of orthopaedic surgery residents, including evaluation of gender-concordant publication rates. An observational cross-sectional analysis of US orthopaedic surgery residency programs was performed. Information on residency programs and demographics of each cohort was collected. Publication metrics consisting of number of first and non-first author publications and H-indices were manually obtained for PGY-3 to PGY-5 residents attending the 25 programs ranked the highest for research output by Doximity. Gender of each resident and senior author was determined from institutional websites using photos, biographies, and preferred pronouns when available. A total of 532 residents, 169 (31.8%) female and 363 (68.2%) male, were included for authorship analysis. Of them, 415 (78%) had at least one first author publication, which did not vary significantly by gender. Female residents had disproportionately fewer first author publications compared with their representation (22% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.00001). Female residents averaged fewer first and non-first author publications compared with male residents (2.8 vs. 4.6, p = 0.0003; 6.4 vs. 10, p = 0.0001 respectively). Despite fewer publications overall, a greater subset of publications by female residents were written in collaboration with a female senior author compared with publications by male residents (p < 0.0001). Male residents had a higher average H-index of 5.4 vs. 3.9 among female residents (p = 0.00007). Despite similar rates of first author publication among male and female residents, female residents had fewer publications overall, lower H-indices, and disproportionately fewer first author publications than would be expected given their representation. Findings from this study suggest that gender disparity in orthopaedic surgery extends to differences in research productivity as early as in residency. This may have negative implications on the career advancement of female orthopaedic surgeons. Additional work is needed to identify and understand biases in research productivity and career advancement, to promote more equitable strategies for academic achievement. IV.

Understanding Financial Relationships Between Orthopedic Surgeons and Industry for Research.

This study sought to understand trends in industry payments for research awarded to orthopedic surgeons. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database was queried for the years 2016 to 2021 for industry payments for research. Financial analyses were performed to understand temporal trends and differences by orthopedic subspecialty and principal investigator characteristics such as sex. The threshold for statistical significance was set at .05. A total of 2014 orthopedic surgeons were identified, among whom 542 adult reconstruction (27%) and 460 sports medicine (23%) surgeons were major beneficiaries. Seventy-one female orthopedic surgeons comprised the minority (4%). Total research payments awarded during the study period aggregated to $266,633,592, with adult reconstruction ($88,819,047; 33%) and sports medicine ($57,949,822; 22%) receiving the highest amounts. Total research payments awarded trended upward yearly except for a decline in 2020 that subsequently rebounded (P<.001). Median annual research payment per orthopedic surgeon was $13,375. Median total industry payments per orthopedic surgeon differed between specialties (P <.001), with the highest amounts for adult reconstruction ($44,063) and sports medicine ($34,567) and the lowest amounts for hand ($12,052) and foot and ankle ($19,233). Median total payments did not differ significantly when stratified by sex (P=.276) and region (P=.906). Specialties in which the respective top three companies offered the majority of the research funding were musculoskeletal oncology (90%), pediatric orthopedics (66%), and shoulder and elbow (64%). These results can be used as a primer for orthopedic surgeons seeking to leverage industry relationships to fund translational research. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):172-178.].

Female representation in orthopedic surgery: where do we stand in Belgium ?

Female underrepresentation in Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology is a well-known issue worldwide, including in Belgium. Most of the literature comes from northern America. This two-part study aims to quantify the female workforce in orthopedic surgery in Belgium and assess the presence of unconscious biases among active orthopedic surgeons. Epidemiological data from national registries, orthopedic societies and universities in Belgium were analyzed. This included data on medical students, residents, active orthopedic surgeons and awards given by a Belgian orthopedic society. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to Belgian orthopedic surgeons, assessing their perceptions of gender stereotypes and potential unconscious biases. 90 participants responded with 70% of men and mean age was 36 years old. The data revealed that 12% of active orthopedic surgeons in Belgium were women in 2020. However, the representation f women was higher among residents, with a thirty percent distribution. In one university, women had a slightly higher chance of getting accepted in the orthopedic training then men. The questionnaire results indicated the presence of unconscious bias regarding subspecialties, which aligned with the actual distribution. Women tend to specialize more in upper limb surgery and pediatrics while men focus more frequently on lower limb surgery. The findings highlight the need for addressing the underrepresentation of women in orthopedic surgery and traumatology in Belgium. If the current rate of progress continues, it is projected that 30% of active orthopedic surgeons will be female by the year 2074. Identifying and addressing factors contributing to the underrepresentation, such as lack of mentorship, unconscious biases, visibility issues, and discrimination, is crucial for empowering future female orthopedic surgeons and fostering diversity in the field. Collaboration among European universities and orthopedic societies can play a vital role in reducing barriers and promoting gender equality in orthopedic surgery and traumatology.

An overview of occupational injuries among female orthopaedic surgeons

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess occupational injuries among female orthopaedic surgeons and compare these rates to their male counterparts. MethodsAn electronic survey was developed to assess occupational injuries among female orthopaedic surgeons. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for all survey items, and chi-squared tests and paired t-tests were used when appropriate. Results169 female orthopaedic surgeons completed this survey, the average age was 50 years old. MSK Injuries: Among the 169 responding surgeons, there were a total of 320 work-related musculoskeletal injuries. Non-MSK Occupational Injuries: Female orthopaedic surgeons experience social isolation at much higher rates than their male counterparts (53.8 % and 32.9 % respectively, p < 0.0001) as well as psychological distress since beginning practice (61.5 % and 55.3 % respectively). Additionally, female orthopaedic surgeons report higher rates of burnout (72.2 %, p = 0.01) compared to male orthopaedic surgeons (63.4 %). Female orthopaedic surgeons also sought out counseling from mental health professionals at higher rates than their male counterparts since beginning training (37.3 % and 28.6 % respectively, p = 0.02). 13.1 % of female respondents reported having been diagnosed with cancer since starting practice. Additionally, 94.6 % of female orthopaedic surgeons have experienced a finger stick and 16.1 % of female orthopaedic surgeons have experienced hearing loss since beginning practice. DiscussionThis study assesses the occupational injuries that affect female orthopaedic surgeons’ physical and mental well-being. We found that in comparison to male orthopaedic surgeons, the major differences were found in the psychological and emotional domains. Women reported experiencing burnout and social isolation as well as seeking professional counseling at significantly higher rates than males; however, both genders reported concerningly high numbers. This could suggest that more resources need to be made available to help orthopaedic surgeons cope with the stresses of their demanding profession, with a specific emphasis on reducing work-related stress among female orthopaedic surgeons.

Perception and Usage of Social Media Among Women in Orthopaedics.

The use of social media for marketing, education, and networking has increased among orthopaedic surgeons. Social media has played an important role in supporting women physicians and trainees, by allowing connections to be made across stages of training and geographic borders. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of female orthopaedic surgeons, fellows, residents, and medical students regarding their usage of social media. A 22-question anonymous survey regarding the perceptions of social media usage was distributed to 1,189 female members of Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society via e-mail in July 2022. Data collection lasted a total of 4 weeks, from July to August 2022. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. A total of 207 responses were received (17% response rate). The respondents comprised 90 orthopaedic surgeons (43%), 60 medical students (29%), 49 residents (24%), and eight fellows (4%). Ninety one percent of participants (189 of 207) reported having a social media account, with 23% (43 of 189) having separate 'personal' and 'professional' accounts. Less than half of all participants reported altering (51 of 189; 27%) or deleting (20 of 189; 11%) profiles for interviews. Fifty three percent of participants (109 of 207) 'agreed' that social media is a good way to network. Twenty eight percent of participants (58 of 207) feared gaining attention to their profile when engaging with professional accounts. Forty percent of participants (62 of 207) agreed that personal life events on social media can be considered unprofessional and should be kept on a private profile. Social media can be used to network professionally within orthopaedic surgery, connecting women at different levels of training. Although concerns about professionalism of social media accounts exist, this may be mitigated by maintaining a separate private account from a public, professional profile. Future guidelines regarding social media usage and how to maintain professionalism while being active on social media may be beneficial.

Intraoperative Radiation Exposure in Adolescent Idiopathic and Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Intraoperative imaging is often used to aid pedicle screw placement during scoliosis operations. Higher rates of cancer and death have been observed in orthopaedic surgeons and radiation technologists, including a fourfold higher rate of breast cancer in female orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate variability in intraoperative radiation during spinal fusions for both adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). A retrospective review of posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation for scoliosis performed by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons from 2017 to 2019 at a single institution was performed. Inclusion criteria included: a diagnosis of AIS or NMS and patients between 8 and 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria included: revision surgery, use of intraoperative navigation, and patients younger than 10 at the time of scoliosis onset within the AIS cohort. Data collected included: preoperative curve, body mass index (BMI), number of levels fused, number of Ponte osteotomies, and fluoroscopy time. One-way analysis of variance tests, Bonferroni post hoc tests, independent t tests, and Pearson correlations were utilized with significance determined at the 95% confidence level (a = 0.05). A total of 148 patients were included in the study. The average fluoroscopy time was 143 ± 67 seconds. Patients with NMS had higher average fluoroscopy times (193 ± 75 s) compared with patients with AIS (129 ± 58 s, P < 0.001). In patients with AIS, fluoroscopy time correlated to the patient's preoperative curve (r = 0.182, P = 0.050). Patients with AIS with fewer than 12 levels fused had significantly less radiation exposure than those with 12 or more levels fused (P = 0.01). When controlling for the number of levels fused, patients with AIS with higher BMIs had significantly greater fluoroscopy times (P = 0.001). In patients with NMS, fluoroscopy time negatively correlated with BMI (r = -0.459, P = 0.009) and positively correlated with a preoperative curve (r = 0.475, P = 0.007). Fluoroscopy times vary greatly during adolescent spinal fusions for scoliosis. Longer fluoroscopy times are correlated with: NMS diagnosis, larger preoperative curve, BMI, and number of levels fused. Surgeons' knowledge of factors affecting fluoroscopy time will increase awareness and may be the first step in decreasing intraoperative radiation risks. Level III; Therapeutic-a retrospective study.

Health Considerations for Female Orthopaedic Surgeons.

The number of female orthopaedic surgeons is increasing. They face unique health concerns, which include cancer risk, pregnancy and fertility problems, musculoskeletal issues, and mental health disorders. In 2010, a survey study showed a 2.9-fold increased prevalence of breast cancer in female orthopaedic surgeons, compared with women in the general US population. A follow-up study 13 years later showed a 3.97-fold higher prevalence of breast cancer in female orthopaedic surgeons compared with matched women in the US general population. Surveys on fertility have also reported that orthopaedic surgery is one of three surgical subspecialty fields with the highest rates of fertility difficulty. In addition, the rate of pregnancy loss in female surgeons was twice the rate compared with that of the general population. There is an increased risk of preterm delivery in female orthopaedic surgeons. Awareness, education, and preventive measures may help reduce these issues and thereby promote the recruitment, retainment, and success of female surgeons in orthopaedic surgery.

Diversity Within the Field of Orthopedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review.

Orthopedic surgery is among the least diverse specialties in medicine. This systematic review analyzes gender, racial, and ethnic diversity within orthopedic sports medicine and aims to raise awareness and provide guidance for future strategies that support underrepresented minorities in medicine (URMs) and women in joining the orthopedic sports medicine workforce. We hypothesize that at all tiers of training, there is a lack of gender, racial, and ethnic parity in academic rank, leadership positions, and research productivity. A search of all published literature in the English language from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, between January 1, 2010, and August 18, 2023, was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies presented demographics regarding diversity within orthopedic sports medicine and provided trends in applicants, attendings, leadership, and/or research. Bias was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) study checklist. Thirteen studies published between 2016 and 2023 with STROBE scores 15.5 to 21.5 (70.5% to 97.7%) met criteria, and pertinent data were extracted. The percent of female orthopedic sports medicine surgeons from 2010 to 2019 increased from 5% (n = 138) to 6% (n = 206) with a compound annual growth rate of 0.2% (r2 = 0.97; p < 0.001). Females and URMs are underrepresented at the highest levels of orthopedic sports medicine leadership including department chair (female: 0% [n = 0]), division chief (female: 4% [n = 4]; URM: 3% [n = 3]), and fellowship director (female: 3.3% [n = 3]; URM: 4.4% [n = 4]). Studies from prominent orthopedic sports medicine journals (American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, and Sports Health) show a 12.1% increase in female involvement in orthopedic sports medicine research from 1972 to 2018; however, this increase captures 59.3% (n = 2,953) females with degrees other than an MD. Although increasingly more females and underrepresented minorities are joining orthopedic sports medicine, the rate of diversification remains slow and current involvement in leadership and research is minimal. Targeted efforts aimed at increasing research opportunities and inspiring interest through mentorship for URMs and females in orthopedics is essential to drive change toward parity. Level IV. Systematic Review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reply to "Increased Prevalence of Breast and All-cause Cancer in Female Orthopedic Surgeons": Alcohol Consumption as a Possible Contributing Factor.

Reply to "Increased Prevalence of Breast and All-cause Cancer in Female Orthopedic Surgeons": Alcohol Consumption as a Possible Contributing Factor.