Fellowship-trained Orthopaedic Surgeons Research Articles

Inter-Rater Reliability of Clinical Testing for Laxity After Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe clinical examination for laxity has been considered a mainstay in evaluation of the painful knee arthroplasty, especially for the diagnosis of instability. More than 10 mm of anterior-posterior (AP) translation in flexion has been described as important in the diagnosis of flexion instability. The inter-observer reliability of varus/valgus and AP laxity testing has not been tested. MethodsTen subjects with prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were examined by 4 fellowship-trained orthopedic knee arthroplasty surgeons. Each surgeon evaluated each subject in random order and was blinded to the results of the other surgeons. Each surgeon performed an anterior drawer test at 30 and 90 degrees of flexion and graded the instability as 0-5 mm, 5-10 mm or >10 mm. Varus-valgus testing was also graded. Motion capture was used during the examination to determine the joint position and estimate joint reaction force during the examination. ResultsInter-rater reliability (IRR) was poor at 30 and 90 degrees for both the subjective rater score and the measured AP laxity in flexion (k = 018-0.22). Varus-valgus testing similarly had poor reliability. Force applied by the rater also had poor IRR. ConclusionClinical testing of knee laxity after TKA has poor reliability between surgeons using motion analysis. It is unclear if this is from differences in examiner technique or from differences in pain or quadriceps function of the subjects. Instability after TKA should not be diagnosed strictly by clinical testing and should involve a complete clinical assessment of the patient.

Robot-assisted (RA) versus conventional total knee replacement: a 2-year clinical comparison

Background: Robotic-assisted (RA) technology is becoming increasingly popular in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to its improved alignment, accuracy, and precision compared with the conventional TKA. Despite reported benefits, disagreements exist regarding patient-reported outcomes and complication rates comparing RA TKA and conventional TKA. Thus, the purpose of the study is to report differences in patient outcomes and complication rates between patients who underwent RA versus conventional TKA. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed 239 primary knee arthroplasty cases (n=137 robot-assisted and n=102 conventional TKA) performed by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon from January 1, 2016 to February 26, 2019. The electronic medical record and patient outcomes database were reviewed for demographic characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities), patient-reported outcomes (Short Form Health Survey and Oxford Knee Score), 90-day complications, and revision rates. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in patient-reported outcomes between conventional versus RA groups at two time points: preoperative and 2-year. Differences remained insignificant after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities. There was no statistically significant difference between the conventional and RA groups in revision rates (0.7% and 1%, respectively; P=1.00) or complication rates (1.5% and 3.9%, respectively; P=0.406). Conclusions: There were no differences in 90-day complications, revisions, and patient-reported outcome scores between RA TKA and conventional TKA groups at short-term follow-up. Surgeons can expect similar clinical outcomes without an increase in complications while taking advantage of increased accuracy in alignment and component placement. Further long-term study of RA TKA outcomes is warranted. Level of Evidence: Level III.

How a VR Surgical Training Company Came About: Osso VR

An example of the valaue of VR Training: ““We’ve already started to see the benefits of our technology. For example, one fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon who was trying to transition from doing posterior to anterior hips did a case that took three hours and 30 minutes. He then did a 2-week Osso VR training involving 91 sessions and remote coaching. Following this, he did the same patient’s other hip, and that case only took one hour and 45 minutes!”

Did we do the right thing? The appropriateness of orthopedic operative interventions during the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Purpose:During the coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic elective surgeries were cancelled and operative indications curtailed to counteract shortages in resources. We aimed to review each orthopedic operative indication at an urban Level 1 Trauma Center inundated with COVID. We aimed to classify the appropriateness of each operative intervention and determine if exposure to COVID impacted morbidity or mortality.Methods:All orthopedic procedures between March 16, 2020 and May 16, 2020 were reviewed. The most urgent surgical indication for each procedure was classified by 2 fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeons and 2 senior residents. The appropriateness of the operative intervention was determined. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (AAOS) and American College of Surgeons (ACS) guidelines for surgery during the pandemic were considered.Results:Seventy-six surgical encounters were performed on 71 inpatients including 99 total procedures. No outpatient procedures were performed. Fifty-four of 71 patients were male. There was a mean age of 51.6 years. Of 71 patients, 41 presented to the emergency department without trauma activation with a mean time to presentation of 2.7 days post injury. The most urgent surgical indications included 18 hip fractures, 18 periarticular fractures, 17 open fractures, 7 severe infections, 5 pelvic fractures, 5 femoral shaft fractures, 3 spinal injuries, 1 tibial fracture, 1 tendon injury, and 1 clavicle fracture. Four procedures could have been delayed for conservative management without causing significant harm. Upon discharge 13/71 patients had tested positive for COVID, 41/71 had remained negative throughout their hospital stay, and 17/71 patients never were tested. Four patients contracted COVID in the hospital. There were 4 in hospital deaths, 2 attributed to hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID pneumonia.Conclusion:It was determined that 72/76 cases were considered appropriate in following guidelines of the AAOS and ACS. This highlights the value of halting outpatient procedures and limiting patient exposure to COVID. Comprehensive patient/provider discussions addressing the risks, benefits, alternatives to surgery, and the risk of exposure to respiratory illness are vital. It behooves the surgical team to follow established guidelines such as those of the AAOS and ACS when triaging orthopedic patients for a surgical admission.

Joint Hypermobility Is Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Iliopsoas Tendinitis After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

To determine whether increased joint hypermobility, quantified by the Beighton score, is associated with a greater incidence of iliopsoas tendinitis (IPT) in postoperative hip arthroscopy patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for labral repair and FAI from 2016 to 2020 for whom at least 12 months of follow-up data were available. The Beighton score was measured by a blinded, independent reviewer. IPT was clinically diagnosed by a sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon through physical examination. Patients with a diagnosis of IPT were matched at a 1:1 ratio to controls based on age, sex, and body mass index. Demographic characteristics, radiographs and advanced imaging, surgical characteristics, and corticosteroid injection therapy data were obtained via chart review. Statistical analysis was conducted using Mann-Whitney testing and binary logistic regression. Forty patients in whom postoperative IPT developed were identified and matched to 40 control patients in whom postoperative tendinitis did not develop. Increased joint hypermobility, quantified by the Beighton score, was associated with an increased risk of IPT. For each 1-point increase in the Beighton score, there was a 1.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.29; P < .001) increased odds of IPT development postoperatively. A high (≥4) versus low (<4) Beighton score was associated with an increased likelihood of tendinitis (odds ratio, 9.82; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-34.58; P < .001). However, there was no association between greater Beighton scores and patients' likelihood of receiving a corticosteroid injection (P= .173). Increased joint hypermobility, quantified by the Beighton score, is associated with an increased risk of IPT developing in the hip arthroscopy postoperative period in patients treated for FAI and labral pathology. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Advanced quantitative 3D imaging improves the reliability of the classification of acetabular defects.

Classifying complex acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) by means of conventional radiographs comes with significant limitations. Statistical shape modelling allows the virtual reconstruction of the native pelvic morphology, hereby enabling an analytic acetabular defect assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of advanced imaging augmented with analytic representations of the defect on (1) intra- and inter-rater reliability, and (2) up- or downscaling of classification scores when evaluating acetabular defects in patients undergoing revision THA. The acetabular defects of 50 patients undergoing revision THA were evaluated by three independent, fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Defects were classified according to the acetabular defect classification (ADC) using four different imaging-based representations, namely, standard radiographs, CT imaging, a virtual three-dimensional (3D) model and a quantitative analytic representation of the defect based on a statistical shape model reconstruction. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were quantified using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa scores, respectively. Up- and downscaling of classification scores were compared for each of the imaging-based representations and differences were tested. Overall inter-rater agreement across all imaging-based representations for the classification was fair (κ 0.29 95% CI 0.28-0.30). Inter-rater agreement was lowest for radiographs (κ 0.21 95% CI 0.19-0.22) and increased for other representations with agreement being highest when using analytic defect models (κ 0.46 95% CI 0.43-0.48). Overall intra-rater agreement was moderate (κ 0.51 95% CI 0.42-0.60). Intra-rater agreement was lowest for radiographs (κ 0.40 95% CI 0.23-0.57), and highest for ratings including analytic defect models (κ 0.64:95% CI 0.46-0.82). Virtual 3D models with quantitative analytic defect representations upscaled acetabular defect scores in comparison to standard radiographs. Using 3D CT imaging with statistical shape models doubles the intra- and inter-rater reliability and results in upscaling of acetabular defect classification when compared to standard radiographs. This method of evaluating defects will aid in planning surgical reconstruction and stimulate the development of new classification systems based on advanced imaging techniques.

The Intergluteal Fat Stripe in Patients With Hip Abductor Tears.

Background:With a hip abductor tendon tear, widening of the intergluteal space, or “fat stripe,” is a characteristic change seen in and around the gluteus medius and minimus.Purpose:To determine the relationship of the intergluteal fat stripe in hips with pathologic abductor tears compared with the contralateral side and to evaluate the association of fat stripe size with hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Of the 43 patients (42 female, 1 male; mean age, 56.6 years; range, 38-85 years) who underwent endoscopic gluteus medius repair, 19 met inclusion criteria of preoperative bilateral hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and 2-year follow up. A single board-certified fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon (J.F.), who was blinded to outcomes, evaluated the MRI scans to measure the intergluteal fat stripe on the operative and nonoperative sides. The 2-year postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) values were analyzed to determine their relationship to the size of the fat stripe. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t test, and associations were determined using Pearson product correlation as well as nonparametric measurements.Results:The size of the intergluteal fat stripe differed significantly between the operative and nonoperative sides. The area of the fat stripe on the operative side was 645.73 ± 513.09 mm2, and on the nonoperative side it was 313.47 ± 360.71 mm2, an average of 332.36 mm2 greater than the nonoperative side (P = .02). The width of the fat stripe was 9.10 ± 4.60 mm on the operative side and 5.15 ± 3.87 mm on the nonoperative side, 3.95 mm greater than the nonoperative side (P < .01). There was no correlation between the width or area of the fat stripe on the operative side and iHOT-12 or mHHS values at 2-year follow-up.Conclusion:The study findings indicated that the intergluteal fat stripe is significantly wider and has a significantly larger area in hips with abductor tears compared with unaffected hips. This did not correlate with 2-year patient-reported outcomes.

A cost analysis of ankle fractures treated by orthopedic surgeons with or without foot and ankle fellowship training at ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals.

Introduction:Ankle fractures are commonly treated by orthopedic surgeons. Fellowship versus non-fellowship training often adds a different perspective, use of specialty-specific implants, comfort with outpatient procedures, and may contribute to cost differences between surgeons. To assess the impact of fellowship training on the value of care provided, the difference in cost of ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation procedures between foot and ankle trained orthopedic surgeons and non-foot and ankle trained orthopedic surgeons over the past 10 years was retrospectively evaluated. We additionally evaluated the cost differences of ankle fracture open reduction internal fixations between hospitals, hospital-owned ambulatory surgery centers, and physician-owned ambulatory surgery centers. The study also assessed the costs effects of inpatient versus outpatient procedures and ankle open reduction internal fixation procedure volume of the surgeon observed within the timeframe of the study.Methods:Patient data was collected from electronic medical records and billing documents for patients who underwent an ankle open reduction internal fixation procedure performed by an orthopedic surgeon in our hospital system and local hospital-owned ambulatory surgery centers between the years 2010 and 2020. Data were also collected from a physician-owned ambulatory surgery center for patients who underwent an ankle open reduction internal fixation procedure performed by an orthopedic surgeon between the years 2015 and 2020. Statistical analyses were performed to observe potential cost differences among all variables.Results:Procedures performed by fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons were significantly less costly than those performed by non-foot and ankle trained orthopedic surgeons when performed at ambulatory surgery centers but not at hospitals. Procedures performed at ambulatory surgery centers were found to be significantly less costly than those performed at hospitals. In addition, it was noted that procedures performed at hospital-owned ambulatory surgery centers were less costly than physician-owned ambulatory surgery centers. It was also found that procedure cost decreased with an increase in surgeon volume.Conclusion:An ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation performed by a foot and ankle trained orthopedic surgeon in a hospital-owned ambulatory surgery center is the lowest cost option available, and an increase in volume of open reduction internal fixations is associated with a further decrease in cost when within our hospital system between the years 2010 and 2020.

Surgical Imbrication of Plantar Plate to Metatarsal Neck in the Setting of Lesser Toe Metatarsophalangeal Joint Instability

Category:Lesser Toes; Midfoot/ForefootIntroduction/Purpose:Persistent metatarsalgia refractory to non-operative therapy with accompanying plantar plate injury represents a common and challenging treatment problem. In previous studies, radiofrequency shrinkage has been used for the treatment of MTP joint instability secondary to low-grade plantar plate lesions.1 In the shoulder, this technique shows histological evidence of modest regenerative capacity but is also associated with several chronic sequelae including capsular stretching, nerve damage, recurrent instability, adhesive capsulitis, and thermally-induced chondrolysis.2-6 The purpose of this observational study was to examine the efficacy of surgical imbrication of the plantar plate to the metatarsal neck as a novel, cost-effective approach to repair Grade 0-1 plantar plate injuries. We sought to characterize patient-reported and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing this procedure.Methods:Patients from a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon (1/2017 - 12/2020) were screened by electronic medical record review. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, a pre-operatively measured Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score, a Grade 0 or 1 plantar plate tear discovered at time of surgery, and repair via surgical imbrication to the metatarsal neck. PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores were obtained from 14 enrolled patients (median age was 55 years; range: 40-69; 12 female) post-operatively at 6-9 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1-2 years.Basic demographic information and pertinent medical information were also obtained. Three fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons independently reviewed radiographs to assess reduction of the metatarsophalangeal joint, and joints were graded as reduced, subluxated, or dislocated. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared pre- and post-operative PROMIS scores. Changes in PROMIS scores were compared to numerical and categorical patient characteristics via univariate linear regressions and Mann- Whitney U-tests, respectively.Results:Median postoperative times to most recent PROMIS score and radiographs were respectively 13.0 months (95% confidence interval: 10.0-21.4) and 7.6 months (2.9-10.0). Median preoperative and most recent Physical Function scores were 39.5 (35-50) and 52.5 (41-62), respectively (p=0.003), and median Pain Interference scores changed from 61.0 (56-68) to 53.5 (39- 58) (p=0.002) (Fig. 1). Changes in PROMIS scores showed no association with BMI, age, preoperative opioid use, wound complications, concomitant dislocation, fibromyalgia, or mood disorder (p>0.10). Preoperatively, 9 second MTP joints were concentrically reduced, and 5 were subluxated (n=14). At 6 weeks post-operation, 13 joints remained reduced (n=14). At most recent measurement, all (n=10) joints were reduced (4 patients missing data). 9 of 14 patients underwent concomitant correction of hallux valgus at time of surgery.Conclusion:Patients with Grade 0-1 plantar plate injuries improved significantly in radiographic parameters and patient reported outcome scores following surgical imbrication of the plantar plate to the metatarsal neck. This procedure represents a novel, alternative approach that is both efficacious and cost-effective. Our work contributes valuable surgical outcomes data to a limited knowledgebase regarding pathophysiology and management for low-grade plantar plate lesions in MTP joint instability. Future work will involve larger, prospective studies to better understand outcomes of and indications for this approach.

Incidence of Operating Room Fires During Hand Surgical Procedures.

The purpose of the present study is to report the incidence of operating room fires during hand surgical procedures. The clinic and OR electronic medical records of seven fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons at a single, large practice were retrospectively reviewed. All upper extremity procedures performed between June 2014 to June 2019 in both hospital and surgery center settings were included in the review. Demographic data was collected. The incidence of operating room fires was determined. A total of 18,819 hand and upper extremity surgical procedures were included. There were 16,767 (89.1%) cases performed in a surgery center, while 2,052 (10.9%) of cases were performed in a hospital. There were 12,691 (67.4%) soft tissue procedures and 6,127 (32.6%) bony procedures performed. Chlorhexidine gluconate preparation solution was used in 9607 cases (51%). Chloraprep solution was used in 6280 cases (33.4%). Betadine was used in 2,932 cases (15.6%). One surgeon has monopolar electrocautery only available during cases. Five surgeons have bipolar available, and one has both mono and bipolar electrocautery available. There were no fires (0%) identified during the study period. The incidence of operating room fires during hand surgical procedures is extremely low. While hand surgeons can be reassured that the likelihood of an operating room fire is minimal, surgeons should not become complacent and should maintain a high level of vigilance to prevent these potentially devastating occurences.

Fifth Metatarsal Bunionette Correction Using a Stable Intramedullary Device

Category:Lesser ToesIntroduction/Purpose:Fifth metatarsal osteotomies for correction of a bunionette deformity are stabilized with a variety of techniques. The fifth metatarsal is a small bone with a unique blood supply and anatomy. Most of the described osteotomies are distal, making stable fixation technically demanding. The use of minimal incision surgery (MIS), also presents further challenges in the placement of stable fixation and current recommendations are to use either no fixation or intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation. Extensive translational osteotomies have not had documentation on healing as have first metatarsal osteotomies. This paper presents the results of 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons utilizing a new surgical implant that is both intramedullary and intramedullary. The patients were assessed with an endpoint of radiographic healing.Methods:A consecutive series of 21 de-identified patients who underwent a fifth metatarsal osteotomy for bunionette correction were radiographically followed until healing. Each patient was pre-operatively classified following the Coughlin classification of bunionette deformity. Postoperative radiographic assessments were made to include: 1. Bridging bone 2. The formation of medial bridging from the metatarsal head to the shaft. 3. Change in the 4-5 Intermetatarsal angle. Also, there was made a notation of complications: Time to weight-bearing, pain, and function were not assessed. There was only a small sample of patients that were treated with an isolated bunionette procedure. The other procedures were impactful and would skew the functional results. We also evaluated for hardware complaints that would need removal.Results:19 patients, 21 feet were evaluated with ages ranging from 51-77 years (Avg 63 years). 17 women and 2 men. Only one patient was a revision of prior surgery. Only 4 patients had an isolated bunionette correction. The other surgical procedures including; double osteotomy bunionectomy, distal metatarsal osteotomies (MIS), phalanx osteotomies of the great and lesser toes, Lapidus bunionectomy, first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. Coughlin grading; one Grade one, ten Grade 2, ten Grade 3. The average time to radiographic healing was 8 weeks. 5 patients underwent a traditional open incision and a chevron osteotomy with a saw, the remainder of the osteotomies were percutaneous transverse osteotomies performed with a 2x12mm Shannon burr.The mean 4-5 intermetatarsal angle improved from 10 degrees preoperatively to 3 degrees at follow-up. The amount of shift varied whether the lateral eminence was or was not excised. The numbers are not large and meaningful statistics are difficult to extrapolate.Conclusion:This is the first documented use of a novel surgical implant designed specifically for fifth metatarsal osteotomies used for bunionette correction. The implant is simple to use, provides for stability to prevent malunion and nonunions. It is low profile and has not caused irritation requiring removal in this pilot group. It is versatile and can be used with either an MIS approach and a transverse osteotomy or a classic open incision with a chevron osteotomy.

The Influence of Metatarsus Adductus Angle on Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fractures

Category:Trauma; Midfoot/ForefootIntroduction/Purpose:Previous studies have reported increasing metatarsus adductus angle (MAA) to be associated with delayed union and refracture following intramedullary screw fixation of fifth metatarsal Jones fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of MAA on postoperative course following intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures. We also sought to identify associations between elevated MAA and both fracture and patient characteristics.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of all Jones fractures treated with primary intramedullary screw fixation by 4 foot and ankle fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single institution from 1995 through 2015. Exclusion criteria included concomitant foot/ankle procedures and revision surgery. Charts were reviewed for patient and injury characteristics, implant, and postoperative course. Radiographs were examined for fracture classification, radiographic union, and MAA. MAA calculations were performed on standard weight-bearing digital radiographs using the traditional method, with the 5th metarso-cuboid joint as a reference. Based on severity of MAA, comparative and correlation analyses were performed. Primary outcomes were the number of surgical failures (defined as delayed union, nonunion, or refracture) and time to radiographic union, weight bearing, and pain resolution. Data was analysed using independent T test, one-way ANOVA, chi-square, and correlation analyses with significance defined as p<0.05.Results:59 feet in 58 patients were identified with a mean age of 30 years and average follow-up of 9.6 months. The pooled union rate was 96.6%. The mean MAA was 20.9 (SD 6.7). Eleven feet had MAA<15, 18 mild (MAA 15-20), 12 moderate (MAA 20- 25), 18 severe (MAA>25), and 1 unknown. 11 patients had failures (18.6%), which consisted of 7 delayed unions (11.9%), 2 delayed unions (3.4%), and 3 refractures (5.1%). Compared to the uncomplicated unions, there was no significant difference in mean MAA (24.3 vs. 20.1, p=0.16). Three of the 4 non-union or refracture patients had MAA>25. MAA was correlated with time to weight bearing (r=0.365, p=0.005), weight (r=0.503, p<0.001), BMI (r=0.280, p=0.03), and approached significance with age (r=0.230, p=0.082). No significant correlation was found with time to radiographic union.Conclusion:To our knowledge, this is the largest series investigating MAA in fifth metatarsal Jones fracture patients treated with intramedullary screw fixation. Our mean MAA is consistent with previous reports. We found an association between increased MAA and postoperative recovery time, given increased time to initiate weight bearing. We did not find significant associations with prolonged radiographic healing, age, nor failure. The prolonged time to weight bearing may reflect surgeon preference in patients with higher MAA. These results suggest that reported associations with MAA may not be as strong as previously thought.

The Lateral Drawer Test: A Novel Clinical Test to Assess Mortise Instability in Weber B Fibula Fractures

Category:Trauma; AnkleIntroduction/Purpose:Assessment of mortise stability is paramount in determining appropriate management of ankle fractures. While instability is readily apparent in bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures, determination of instability in the apparent isolated Weber B fibula fracture often requires further investigations such as stress radiography. While several authors have previously demonstrated poor predictive value of physical examination findings such as tenderness, ecchymosis and swelling with instability, no previous investigation has examined the ability of a translational test to determine deltoid ligament injury. The goal of this study is to test the validity of a novel clinical test, the lateral drawer test, in determining mortise instability in a cohort of patients with Weber B fibula fractures.Methods:Patients presenting with isolated fibula fractures were prospectively identified by an orthopaedic nurse practitioner or resident. Three views of the ankle as well as gravity stress views (GSV) were obtained. Prior to examining radiographs, two foot & ankle fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons (JYK, CPM) performed and graded the lateral drawer test. (Grade 0: no instability/symmetric to contralateral ankle, Grade I: translation < 5mm, Grade II: translation >= 5mm) While the surgeons were made aware of the presence of a Weber B fibula fracture, radiographs were not visualized prior to conducting the drawer test.Medial clear space (MCS) was measured. VAS pain scores were obtained before and after testing. The results of the lateral drawer test results were compared with radiographic measurements of MCS.Results:The study enrolled 57 consecutive patients with Weber B ankle fractures. Twenty-nine (51%) patients demonstrated radiographic instability with widening of the medial clear space >= 5 mm on GSV. When correlated with MCS measurement, the lateral drawer test demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84% for determining instability. There was a strong correlation between the lateral drawer test grade and amount of MCS widening (⍴=0.82, p<0.001). Patients tolerated the lateral drawer test well with an average increase of 0.8 points on the VAS pain scale after testing.Conclusion:The lateral drawer test demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for detecting instability in patients presenting with Weber B fibula fractures. While further validation is required in a larger cohort of patients, the lateral drawer test may offer an adjunct tool via physical examination to predict mortise stability.

Restoration of Hip Biomechanics after a Hemiarthroplasty for a Femoral Neck Fracture-Who Does It Better?

Introduction: The restoration of the preoperative biomechanics of the hip, in particular leg length and femoral offset, are critical in restoring normal function and diminishing the risk of dislocation following hip arthroplasty. This study compares the consistency of arthroplasty and non-arthroplasty orthopedic surgeons in restoring the normal biomechanics of the hip when performing a hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a femoral neck fracture. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative and postoperative digital radiographs of 175 hips that had a modular hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture at a Level 1 academic hospital. Fifty-two hips were treated by one of the three fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons (Group A), and 123 were treated by one of the nine non-arthroplasty fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons (Group B). Results: Patients in Group A were more likely to have their femoral offset restored to normal than patients in Group B, both with respect to under correcting the offset (p = 0.031) and overcorrecting the offset (p = 0.010). Overall, there was no difference in restoration of leg lengths between the two groups (p = 0.869). Conclusions: Following a hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture, the normal biomechanics of the hip are more likely to be restored by an arthroplasty-trained surgeon than by a non-arthroplasty-trained surgeon. Identifying the inconsistency of non-arthroplasty surgeons and, to a lesser degree, arthroplasty surgeons in restoring hip biomechanics is important for sensitizing surgeons to rectify this in the future with appropriate templating and femoral implant selection.

What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression After Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?

What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression After Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?

Cost Disclosure of Surgeon "Scorecards": Effects on Operating Room Costs for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Rising health care costs, coupled with an emphasis on cost containment, continue to gain importance. Surgeon cost scorecards developed to track case-based expenditures can help surgeons compare themselves with their peers and identify areas of potential quality improvement. Purpose: We sought to investigate what effect surgeon scorecards had on operating room (OR) costs in orthopedic surgery. Methods: Our hospital distributed OR cost scorecards to 4 adult reconstruction fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons beginning in 2012. The average direct per-case supply cost of procedures was calculated quarterly and collected over a 5-year period, and each surgeon's data were compared with that of their peers. All 4 surgeons were made aware of the costs of other surgeons at the 2-year mark. The initial 2 years of data was compared with that of the final 2 years. Results: The average direct per-case supply cost ranged from $4955 to $5271 for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and $5469 to $5898 for total hip arthroplasty (THA) during the initial 2-year period. After implementing disclosures, the costs for TKA and THA, respectively, ranged from $4266 to $4515 (14% annual cost savings) and from $5073 to $5727 (5% annual cost savings); 3 of the 4 surgeons said that cost transparency altered their practice. Conclusion: Our comparison suggests that orthopedic surgeons' participation in a program of operative cost disclosure may be useful to them; we found a possible association with reduced per-case costs for TKA and THA at our institution over a 5-year period. More rigorous study that incorporates the effects of the scorecards on patient outcomes is warranted.

Industry Payments to Adult Reconstruction-Trained Orthopedic Surgeons: An Analysis of the Open Payments Database From 2014 to 2019.

In recent time, there has been an increased push toward transparency in industry funding toward physicians. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act called for the creation of the Open Payments Database managed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. To our knowledge, there have been no studies evaluating the trends in payments among adult reconstruction fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to investigate trends in all payments to adult reconstruction-trained orthopedic surgeons from 2014 to 2019. Secondary outcomes included evaluating trends in yearly subpayment categories, regional variations, as well as characterizing the top 5 industry companies. A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database was performed to identify all payments to adult reconstruction-trained orthopedic surgeons. A total of 94,265 payments were made to 4911 surgeons accounting for a total of $258,865,231.20 during the study period. Our primary outcome was to assess the trend in median payment per year to individual surgeons. Secondary outcomes included evaluating payment trends with respect to subtype, location as defined by United States Census regions, as well as specifics concerning the top 5 companies. Over the study period, there was a nonsignificant increasing trend in median payment per surgeon (r= 0.49, P= .096). However, there was also a significantly increasing trend in the number of payments per year (r= 0.83, P= .014), as well as the number of surgeons receiving payments (r= 0.88, P= .019). With respect to subcategory payments, there were significantly increasing trends in the median payment per surgeon for education (1054%, r= 0.942, P < .001) and entertainment/food and beverage expenses (20.2%, r= 0.49, P= .020), as well as a significantly decreasing trend for median honoraria payments per surgeon (20.2%, r=-0.04, P= .005). No significant regional trends were identified. Of the top 5 companies, one demonstrated a significantly decreasing trend in median payment per surgeon (21.6%, r=-0.109, P < .001), whereas the others remained unchanged. In this study, we found a nonsignificant increasing trend in payments to adult reconstruction-trained surgeons as well as an increasing number of surgeons receiving payments. There were increasing trends in median payment per surgeon for education and entertainment expenses, but a decreasing trend for honoraria payments. No significant regional trends were identified. The majority of the top 5 companies had nonsignificant trends in their payments. Further studies are needed to characterize the disclosure of payments and the impact of industry payments on clinical outcomes. IV.

Smith-Petersen Versus Watson-Jones Approach Does Not Affect Quality of Open Reduction of Femoral Neck Fracture.

To compare immediate quality of open reduction of femoral neck fractures by alternative surgical approaches. Retrospective cohort study. Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. Eighty adults 18-65 years of age with isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or -B3 femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. Thirty-two modified Smith-Petersen anterior approaches versus 48 Watson-Jones anterolateral approaches for open reduction performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Reduction quality as assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. No difference was observed in the rate of acceptable reduction by modified Smith-Petersen (81%) versus Watson-Jones (81%) approach (risk difference null, 95% confidence interval -17.4% to 17.4%, P = 1.00) with 90.4% panel agreement (Fleiss' weighted κ = 0.63, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses did not identify a significant difference in the rate of acceptable reduction between approaches when stratified by Pauwels angle, basicervical or transcervical fracture location, or posterior comminution. The Smith-Petersen approach afforded a better reduction when preoperative skeletal traction was not applied (RR = 1.67 [95% CI 1.10-2.52] vs. RR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.08], P = 0.006). No difference was observed in the quality of open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults when a Watson-Jones anterolateral approach versus a modified Smith-Petersen anterior approach was performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PROMIS Milestones in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repair (233)

Objectives:Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has emerged as an effective tool in assessing post-operative outcomes in rotator cuff repair. PROMIS employs computer adaptive testing (CAT) in order to select specific items from a standard question bank based on previous patient responses. In turn, domain-specific PROMIS forms allow optimal tracking of outcomes in specific areas of patient recovery, such as upper extremity function (PROMIS-UE) for rotator cuff repair patients. The objective of this investigation is to analyze the PROMIS-UE CAT question bank to determine the point in recovery at which a patient is able to reach certain milestones and to elucidate the number of days – in increments of 30 (i.e., monthly) – it takes for patients who undergo rotator cuff repair to answer “with some difficulty” or “without any difficulty” for the five most frequently asked questions in the PROMIS-UE CAT questionnaire. Understanding these timepoints will improve clinical monitoring and counseling following surgery and provide standardized measures for appropriate activity progression and restriction.Methods:All patients who underwent rotator cuff repair by one of two sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons between 2/16/17 and 7/13/19 were included in this study. Post-operative PROMIS-UE CAT scores were reviewed with respect to individual item, response, and timing of response (with respect to number of days following surgery using 30-day increments). For each PROMIS-UE CAT item, the following five answer choices were available: “Without any difficulty”, “With a little difficulty”, “With some difficulty”, “With much difficulty”, and “Unable to do”. A task was considered achievable if the patient answered any answer with “Without any difficulty” or “With a little difficulty”. The percentage of patients in each 30-day group who answered with either of these responses was recorded. Chi-square tests were run between the number of days postoperatively the surveys were administered and patient responses to determine whether or not there were statistically significant differences between groups.Results:A total of 1,143 patient responses were included in the final analysis. The five most frequently asked questions in the PROMIS-UE CAT item bank, which were as follows: “Are you able to carry a heavy object (over 10 pounds /5 kg)?” (n=1143), “Are you able to put on and take off a coat or jacket?” (n=932), “Are you able to carry a shopping bag or briefcase?” (n=453), “Are you able to pour liquid from a bottle into a glass?” (n=675), and “Are you able to put on a shirt or blouse?” (n=578). The times at which greater than 50% of respondents answered either “Without any difficulty” or “With a little difficulty” are shown in Table 1. All five questions showed statistically significant associations between number of days postoperatively and patient responses (p<.0005).Conclusions:On average, patients undergoing rotator cuff repair achieved milestones measured by the five most commonly asked questions on the PROMIS-UE CAT by 1-4 months postoperatively. Patients also showed significant improvements in upper extremity function in the same time period. These findings can be utilized in post-operative monitoring, and patients who do not meet these milestones in the appropriate timepoints may require additional supportive care or treatment.

Radiographic detection of lateral plateau involvement in medial tibial plateau fractures (AO/OTA 41-B1.2, 1.3, 3.2 and 3.3).

To assess the accuracy of radiographs in detecting the lateral plateau involvement of medial tibial plateau fractures as well as describe the impact of CT on preoperative planning for this specific fracture morphology. Radiograph and CT imaging of patients with a Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures (AO/OTA 41-B1.2, B1.3h, B2.2. B3.2, and B3.3) between January 2013 and July 2017 were reviewed by three trauma fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons to identify fractures of the medial condyle with an intact anterolateral articular surface. Lateral plateau involvement was identified in 16 (37%) radiographs and 26 (61%) CT images (p = 0.051). Radiographic detection of lateral plateau involvement demonstrated a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 100%, and radiographs were able to predict the recommendation for surgical intervention for lateral plateau involvement with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 60% compared to recommendations based on CT imaging. Radiographs predicted a need for a separate surgical approach with PPV of 63% and NPV of 70% when compared to recommendations based on CT images. Radiographs are reliable in ruling in lateral plateau involvement of medial plateau fractures, but occult lateral articular extension may only be identified in CT imaging for some cases. Surgical planning may be impacted by CT imaging for this fracture morphology, but further study is warranted to evaluate the correlation between preoperative planning and clinical outcomes. III.