Approximately 900,000 adolescents are victims of maltreatment annually. Adolescents who experience maltreatment are at particular risk for negative emerging adulthood outcomes, such as homelessness, unemployment, substance use, and especially difficulty with relationships. Maltreatment can impact interpersonal relationships through disrupting an adolescent’s relationship with their caregiver and may have long-term relational effects. Furthermore, interpersonal responses to caregivers following maltreatment during adolescence are complex, varied, and have developmental significance. The purpose of this study was to identify typical profiles of caregiver-adolescent relationship quality among adolescents with a history of a Child Protective Services (CPS) investigation during adolescence. Secondary data came from the first wave of the second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II), a nationally representative longitudinal cohort of children and adolescents in the United States who were subjects of child abuse and/neglect investigations in 2008-2009. Latent class analysis (LCA) with continuous and categorical indicators was conducted to identify the profiles among adolescents (ages 14-17.5 years; mean 15.5, SD 0.7) from NSCAW II (n=364). The latent construct of caregiver-adolescent relationship quality was represented by two subconstructs: 1) caregiver-adolescent relationship, which included the adolescent’s feelings of relatedness, closeness, quality time, and open communication with caregiver and 2) maltreatment, which included the adolescent’s reports of having serious arguments with caregiver about behavior, non-violent discipline, verbal aggression, mild physical assault, and severe/very severe physical assault in the past year. Covariates included the adolescent’s age, adolescent’s race/ethnicity, and adolescent’s gender. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex survey design and unequal sampling probability. Four latent classes of caregiver-adolescent relationship quality were identified based on model fit statistics: positive relationship without maltreatment (39%), positive relationship with moderate maltreatment (30%), negative relationship with severe maltreatment (27%), and negative relationship without maltreatment (4%). The two classes with an overall negative relationship had similar relatedness and closeness means, but differed in the amount of quality time, where those that experienced severe maltreatment had more quality time together. The two classes with an overall positive relationship differed in the presence/absence of maltreatment, except they had similar proportions of having a serious argument about behavior. Findings provide a more nuanced understanding of caregiver-adolescent relationship quality for adolescents that have been subjects of maltreatment investigations. A third of the sample reported positive caregiver-adolescent relationships despite recent maltreatment which should be explored further especially given the implications for interpersonal functioning. This study highlights the heterogeneity in this vulnerable population and underscores the need for future work to understand the type of maltreatment, placement type, and caregiver characteristics that predict membership in each class.