Feasibility Of Cytoreductive Surgery Research Articles

Feasibility of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced peritoneal surface tumors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A single-institution experience.

Background and objectivesCytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex treatment used in selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. HIPEC procedures are time and resource intensive. The primary aim of this analysis was to compare the experience of treating advanced abdominal tumors with CRS‐HIPEC before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic.MethodsPatients included in this analysis received CRS‐HIPEC at a single center during either a prepandemic (March 18, 2019–March 17, 2020) or pandemic (March 18, 2020–February 5, 2021) interval. A retrospective chart review was performed.ResultsOur analysis included 67 patients: 30 (45%) treated prepandemic and 37 (55%) treated during the pandemic. Median age at the time of operation was 58 years (interquartile range: [49–65]); 53% of patients were women. Patients treated during the pandemic presented with higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores with 32% (n = 12) having a PCI > 20 at the time of surgery (p = 0.01). Five patients had delays in surgery due to the pandemic. Rates of overall postoperative morbidity, reoperation, and readmission were not different between the cohorts.ConclusionsDespite presenting with more extensive disease, patients treated with CRS‐HIPEC during the height of the COVID‐19 pandemic had comparable perioperative outcomes to patients treated prepandemic.

Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review

The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.

Feasibility of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei in a rural hospital in India

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy provides the only chance for long-term survival for selected patients diagnosed with a variety of peritoneal neoplasm, either primary or secondary to digestive or gynecologic malignancies. Conventionally HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy) is performed by open (Coliseum Technique) or closed method using a machine having roller pump and heat exchanger to maintain the flow of chemotherapy solution and it’s temperature (410-430C). The present article is about sharing our technique of delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy and its outcome in a remote place in India where HIPEC machine is not available.

Ovarian cancer: imaging in treatment selection and planning with FIGO update

The International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) has recently revised the staging of ovarian cancer [1]. It includes a revision of the stage III patients and allotment to stage IIIA1 is based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes without intraperitoneal dissemination, because an analysis of these patients indicates that their survival is significantly better than those who have intraperitoneal dissemination [1]. The FIGO staging system for ovarian cancer is surgically based. It does not formally include imaging but the FIGO committee encourages the use of imaging techniques if available to assess the important prognostic factors such as disease resectability and lymph node status. The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer has been comprehensive staging laparotomy and primary optimal surgical cytoreduction followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) as a suitable alternative is supported by multicenter randomized controlled trials [2]. Imaging is therefore of paramount importance in helping triage patients for appropriate management by accurately evaluating the extent and anatomical location of peritoneal spread, which in turn dictates the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery and predicts the likelihood of optimal primary cytoreduction. Optimal cytoreductive surgery (residual disease <1 cm) is a very strong predictor of survival, and even after the threshold for optimal cytoreduction has been reached, it is important to remove as much of the residual tumor as possible. CT is the primary imaging modality used to stage ovarian cancer. It is complimentary to surgical staging identifying possible sites of unsuspected disease such as pelvic peritoneum, paraaortic nodes, diaphragm and chest [3,4]. The thorax frequently harbors undiagnosed pleural disease at the time of the initial diagnosis which is likely to affect survival even in cases of optimal debulking [5,6]. Accurate imaging helps guide the surgeon to areas of disease that may be difficult to identify surgically. Relative criteria for non-optimally resectable disease have been developed [7]. They include lymph node enlargement above the renal hilum, presence of abdominal wall invasion, parenchymal liver and subcapsular liver metastases, peritoneal implants of >2 cm along the diaphragm, lesser sac, porta hepatis, intersegmental fissure, gall bladder fossa, gastrosplenic, gastrohepatic ligament and small bowel mesentery. However, it is important to realize that these criteria may vary and will depend on the aggressiveness of the surgical procedure and on the performance status of the patient. Therefore, they should only be used as a basis for a multidisciplinary consensus. It is important to note that upper abdominal disease and pleural metastases can be surgically resected, but this requires careful planning as it involves a team of surgeons (e.g. liver surgeons for hepatic resection). There has been a growing awareness of the potential of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in improving the mapping of the extent of ovarian cancer [8,9]. There is also growing evidence that FDG-PET/CT may play a role in pre-operative staging of patients with advance ovarian cancer [10].

0299: Are There Medical Co-Morbidities that Predict the Feasibility of Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

0299: Are There Medical Co-Morbidities that Predict the Feasibility of Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

Feasibility of Peritonectomy Associated with Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease characterized by a complete redistribution of mucin within the peritoneal cavity. It can be classified into three histologic groups: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis, and an intermediate group. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery requiring peritonectomy procedures associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, a technique that combines hyperthermia and high drug doses administered locally. Twenty-seven patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (19 males and 8 females) were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial. Twenty-two cases underwent cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, and 6 received debulking surgery only. One patient was operated on twice for disease recurrence. All patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis presented serous ascites, whereas all but one patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis or in the intermediate group presented mucinous ascites. Cytoreductive surgery was performed with peritonectomy procedures. The closed abdomen technique was adopted for intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion using a preheated polysaline perfusate containing cisplatin (25 mg/m2/L) plus mitomycin-C (3.3 mg/m2/L) through a heart-lung pump at a mean flow of 600 mL/min for 60 mins from the hyperthermic phase (42.5 degrees C). All but one of the patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 2 of the 3 patients in the intermediate group were optimally cytoreduced. Patients with serous ascites (all patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis and 1 patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis) were considered ineligible for treatment because of tumor diffusion. The morbidity rate was 22%. There was one case of treatment-related mortality 30 days after treatment. The following conclusions can be drawn from this phase II clinical trial: 1) patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from undifferentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis), with complete distribution into the peritoneal cavity, are not eligible for the cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion technique; 2) the presence of serous ascites would seem to exclude patients from the treatment; 3) cytoreductive surgery associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion is the most suitable approach for patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and in the intermediate group.

Malignant mixed müllerian tumors of the ovary. Experience with surgical cytoreduction and combination chemotherapy

The role of surgical cytoreduction and combination chemotherapy for malignant mixed müllerian tumors (MMMT) of the ovary was evaluated. A retrospective review of 27 women with ovarian MMMT treated from 1980 to 1990 was performed. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages for the 27 women were 1 Stage I, 3 Stage II, 17 Stage III, and 6 Stage IV. Only 10 of the 23 patients with Stage III or IV disease were cytoreduced optimally. With respect to postoperative therapy, 3 women received no treatment, 6 were treated with whole abdomen radiotherapy, 1 received melphalan, and 17 received chemotherapy incorporating a platinum agent (3), doxorubicin (4), or both (10). The significant prognostic factors were stage (P < 0.001) and, for women with Stage III or IV disease, the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery (P = 0.03). The four patients in Stages I or II remained disease free after an interval of at least 5 years. The median and 5-year survival rates for patients with Stages III or IV disease was 18 months and 8%, respectively. Patients in Stage III or IV for whom optimal cytoreduction was not possible had a 2-year survival of 14%, whereas optimal cytoreduction was associated with a 52% 2-year survival. Median survival for the 14 women with Stage III or IV ovarian MMMT treated with combination chemotherapy was 25 months and nine women achieved progression free intervals of greater than 18 months. Aggressive surgical cytoreduction followed by combination chemotherapy may result in improved progression free intervals for women with advanced ovarian MMMT. However, a major improvement in prognosis for this rare malignancy has not yet been achieved.

Prognosis of ovarian cancer developing in the residual ovary

Elective oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease in women during their fifth decade is an important issue for both gynecologist and patient. It has been suggested that cancer developing in the residual ovary has a worse prognosis than the national average (L. McGowan, Obstet. Gynecol. 69, 386, 1987). In an effort to corroborate such finding, 36 women with epithelial ovarian cancer developing in the residual ovary after prior hysterectomy were compared to a group of 121 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and no previous surgery. Analysis was made of age, stage at diagnosis, feasibility of cytoreductive surgery, and survival in both groups. Only age distribution was found to be significantly different between the two groups of patients (P less than 0.001). Neither FIGO staging or quality of cytoreductive surgery showed a statistically significant difference between both groups. At 3 years, 41% of the subjects with cancer in the residual ovary were alive, compared to 42% in the group without previous hysterectomy. The corresponding figures for 5-year survival are 34 and 27%, respectively (P = 0.939). On the basis of our findings we conclude that the overall prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer developing in the residual ovary does not appear to be any worse than that reported for ovarian cancer in general.

Prognosis of ovarian cancer developing in the residual ovary

Elective oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease in women during their fifth decade is an important issue for both gynecologist and patient. It has been suggested that cancer developing in the residual ovary has a worse prognosis than the national average (L. McGowan, Obstet. Gynecol. 69, 386, 1987). In an effort to corroborate such finding, 36 women with epithelial ovarian cancer developing in the residual ovary after prior hysterectomy were compared to a group of 121 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and no previous surgery. Analysis was made of age, stage at diagnosis, feasibility of cytoreductive surgery, and survival in both groups. Only age distribution was found to be significantly different between the two groups of patients ( P < 0.001). Neither FIGO staging or quality of cytoreductive surgery showed a statistically significant difference between both groups. At 3 years, 41% of the subjects with cancer in the residual ovary were alive, compared to 42% in the group without previous hysterectomy. The corresponding figures for 5-year survival are 34 and 27%, respectively ( P = 0.939). On the basis of our findings we conclude that the overall prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer developing in the residual ovary does not appear to be any worse than that reported for ovarian cancer in general.