FDA-approved Therapy Research Articles

A phase II randomized therapeutic optimization trial for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA): Rapid 1 trial.

TPS280 Background: Patients with advanced colorectal cancer after progressing through first line therapy, have several FDA-approved systemic therapies that are associated with clinical benefit for a substantive minority of patients. Current clinical practice is to trial these various treatments in a step-wise fashion using CT scans every 3 months to evaluate effectiveness. This process requires 3-4 months between therapeutic interventions from which the patient may ultimately derive no clinical benefit, may have a performance status decline; limiting the number of possible interventions and increases risk for physical and financial toxicity. An alternative to the traditional CT-scan guided approach for disease assessment is a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) intervention. The Signatera ctDNA assay which utilizes 16 truncal mutations derived from a patient’s tumor, can be assessed every 2 weeks for a rapid determination of the effectiveness of a systemic therapy. This may allow patients to be exposed to many treatments during a short time, limiting toxicity, allowing for a quicker determination of clinical benefit and personalization of treatment. The aim of this study will be to compare the traditional scan-driven approach vs an intervention guided by ctDNA assessments, both arms using a pre-specified order of chemotherapy treatments. Methods: This is a phase 2 randomized study of patients with refractory metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. Participants are eligible after progression or intolerance to first line chemotherapy or recurrence within 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin based chemotherapy. They must have RECIST measurable metastatic disease that is not eligible for definitive management. Tissue from the primary and/or metastatic deposit is required for Signatera NGS analysis and subjects must have measurable ctDNA at sampling. Participants must be ≥18 years old without major organ dysfunction and have an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2. Subjects with Microsatellite High, deficient in DNA mismatch repair genes, or BRAF V600E mutations are excluded. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to Arm A (ctDNA guided intervention) or Arm B (scan-guided control group). Patients in both arms will undergo systemic treatments in a standardized pre-specified order. Arm A will have ctDNA assessments every 2 weeks until an intervention shows a significant decrease, then every 4 weeks until Progressive Disease (PD) by scan or significant ctDNA increase. CT imaging will be performed every 12 weeks. Those in Arm B, will have CT imaging every 12 weeks and blood collected for post-hoc analysis every 4 weeks until PD by scan. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival and overall response. Exploratory analysis with be performed of the microbiome. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 78 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04786600 .

Prevalence and genomic landscape of BRAF alterations across gastrointestinal cancers.

806 Background: BRAF V600E mutations can lead to activation of the MEK/ERK pathway. The combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib was recently FDA-approved for use in these BRAF V600E altered unresectable or metastatic cancers. BRAF non-V600 alterations also increase phosphorylation of MEK and ERK and are potential candidates for MEK/ERK inhibitors. Here we examine the frequency of BRAF mutations and their genomic background across GI cancers. Methods: The Oncomap ExTra genomic profiling assay utilizes tumor-normal, whole-exome, whole-transcriptome DNA and RNA sequencing to identify somatic alterations in tumors. The assay detects single-nucleotide substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, alternative transcripts, and gene fusions. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) are also assessed. The frequency of BRAF and other gene alterations were identified across all GI cancers. Reported BRAF alterations were limited to those linked to an FDA approved therapy, clinical trial eligibility, and those deemed significant from review of the literature. Results: A total of 1927 patients with GI cancers were assayed between April 2018 to July 2022. The BRAF gene was mutated in 85 (4.4%) patients, which included 53 (2.8%) that were V600E and 32 (1.5%) that were non-V600, representing 37.6% of BRAF mutations. Colorectal and small bowel cancers had the highest frequencies of BRAF mutations at 7.6% and 7.1% respectively, and the frequency was lower in other GI cancers (0-2.3%). In addition to BRAF V600E, other mutations occurred across the kinase domain, including D594 (0.6%), K601E (0.3%), G466 (0.3%) and G469 (0.2%). BRAF fusions were found in 1 CRC and 2 pancreatic cancer cases. BRAF mutational status (altered versus not) was significantly associated with mutations in several other genes. In addition, BRAF status was significantly associated with TMB-high and MSI-high. Conclusions: Analysis of whole-exome and whole transcriptome sequencing data found actionable BRAF mutations in 4.4% of GI cancer patients, 37.6% of whom had BRAF mutations not at V600. Several biomarkers were significantly associated with BRAF alterations. Assays that are limited to DNA sequencing, or to targeted gene panels, may not detect mutations and fusions that could aid in therapy selection and prognosis. [Table: see text]

Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing of Drugs: Part 1: Off-Label Use—Patient Harms and Prescriber Responsibilities

Once medical drugs and devices are approved for marketing by the FDA they can legally be used for purposes and in ways other than the ones for which they have been tested and approved. However, it is illegal for manufacturers to advertise or promote such unapproved uses of the drugs and devices. Part 1 of this review focuses on off-label use of FDA-approved therapies. Part 2 addresses illegal off-label marketing of drugs and devices. While off-label use can be beneficial to patients, unless carefully undertaken off label use may undermine the important safety mission of the FDA, can expose patients to elevated risks without proven benefits (or possibly no benefit), and can reduce motivation of companies to study the safety and risks of off-label use of therapies. These problems are further amplified when off-label use occurs among very vulnerable patient populations such as the elderly, patients with mental health disorders, pregnant women and pediatric patients. This review considers ethical issues in off-label use, as well as important steps for physicians considering an off-label prescription of a drug or device.

Paving the Road for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy 80/20 Task Force Consensus on Challenges and Solutions to Improving Efficiency of Clinical Center Certification and Maintenance of Operations for Commercially Approved Immune Effector Cell Therapies

As the number and type of regulatory authority-approved cellular therapies grow, clinical treatment centers face a heavy burden of duplicative documentation around initial qualification, ongoing auditing, and reporting, with overlapping requirements from each manufacturer to ensure safe use of their specific product, which in the United States are stipulated under individual Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biologic License Applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) convened the 80/20 Task Force to consider challenges and potential solutions to these issues. The Task Force proposed that 80% of manufacturers' requirements for onboarding and ongoing operations of commercially available products could be standardized and streamlined. Task Force members interviewed dozens of stakeholders, including clinicians at large academic medical centers already using commercial and investigational immune effector cell (IEC) products, regulators, members of accrediting bodies and professional cellular therapy societies, and manufacturers of IEC therapies for oncologic indications. In November 2021, the Task Force organized and led virtual discussions in a public forum and at a private ASTCT 80/20 Workshop at the online AcCELLerate Forum, a cellular-therapy stakeholders' meeting organized by the ASTCT, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). At the workshop, approximately 60 stakeholders worked to identify and prioritize common challenges in onboarding and maintenance of operations at clinical sites for commercial FDA-approved and future IEC therapies and ways to streamline the process. It was agreed that standardization would improve efficiency of onboarding, allowing more cost-effective, sustainable growth of approved IEC therapies at treatment centers, and facilitate wider access while maintaining safety and clinical success. This early but extensive survey of stakeholders resulted in 5 overarching suggestions for both established and emerging treatment centers: (1) eliminate duplication in accreditation and auditing of clinical sites; (2) define expectations for the education about and management of CAR-T therapy toxicities to potentially replace product-specific REMS programs; (3) streamline current REMS education, testing, and data reporting; (4) standardize information technology (IT) platforms supporting enrollment, clinical site-manufacturer communication, and logistics of maintaining chain of identity/chain of custody across multiple transportation steps; and (5) encourage the use of universal nomenclature by cell therapy manufacturers. Future discussions need to engage a broader range of stakeholders, including administrators, pharmacists, nurses, data coordinators, surgeons, pathologists, and those developing promising cellular therapies for solid tumors, as well as teams from smaller academic or community cancer center settings. Continued collaboration with stakeholders outside of clinical sites will include accrediting bodies/auditors, established and emerging cell therapy companies, software developers, professional societies, and the patients who receive these therapies. Active dialog with government regulators remains essential. Such joint efforts are critical as the number of IEC therapies for myriad oncologic and nononcologic indications grows.

341 Dupilumab improves itch and skin lesions in adults with prurigo nodularis regardless of prior use of immunosuppressants or phototherapy: post-hoc results from PRIME and PRIME2 clinical trials

Abstract Dupilumab is the only FDA-approved systemic therapy for prurigo nodularis (PN), however, immunosuppressants (IS) and phototherapy have been used off-label for the treatment of this condition. Patients with prior IS/phototherapy treatment may represent a more severe and/or treatment-refractory population of patients with PN. Report post-hoc efficacy of dupilumab in patients with PN, with or without prior use of IS or phototherapy for PN. LIBERTY-PN PRIME and PRIME2 (NCT04183335 and NCT04202679) are randomized, 24-week, phase 3 studies in adults with PN that is inadequately controlled by topical prescription therapies or for whom those therapies are not advisable. Primary outcomes included a ≥4-point improvement in the weekly average of Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) from baseline to week 24, and an Investigator’s Global Assessment for PN stage (IGA PN-S) score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear) at week 24. Safety outcomes included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Among patients with PN, 8.0% reported prior use of phototherapy, and 36.7% reported prior use of IS; overall, 126 (dupilumab group, n = 62; placebo group, n = 64) patients with and 185 (dupilumab, n = 91; placebo, n = 94) patients without prior IS/phototherapy use were included. A larger proportion of patients with prior treatment vs. patients without prior treatment had severe disease, as measured by IGA PN-S (40.5% vs. 29.0%). The baseline WI-NRS score (SD) for overall patients with prior treatment was 8.6 (1.0) and for patients without prior treatment was 8.4 (1.0). At week 24, 67.7% vs. 15.6% of patients in the dupilumab vs. placebo groups with prior treatment (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 13.6 [3.7–49.7]; P < 0.0001), and 52.7% vs. 21.3% of patients without prior treatment (5.8 [2.4–14.0]; P < 0.0001) achieved improvement in WI-NRS. Similarly, 35.5% vs. 10.9% (3.1 [1.2–8.4]; P = 0.0162) of patients with and 53.8% vs. 21.3% (5.0 [2.3–10.8]; P < 0.0001) of those without prior treatment achieved IGA PN-S score of 0/1, respectively. TEAEs were reported by 43 (69.4%) vs. 34 (53.1%) patients (dupilumab vs. placebo groups) with and 54 (60.0%) vs. 55 (59.1%) without prior treatment, respectively. Patients treated with dupilumab experienced a greater and clinically meaningful improvement in itch and achieved skin that was clear/almost clear of nodules at week 24, regardless of prior use of IS/phototherapy for the treatment of PN. The incidence of TEAEs was generally consistent among patients with and without prior IS/phototherapy.

Insights into Asymmetric Liposomes as a Potential Intervention for Drug Delivery Including Pulmonary Nanotherapeutics

Liposome-based drug delivery systems are nanosized spherical lipid bilayer carriers that can encapsulate a broad range of small drug molecules (hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs) and large drug molecules (peptides, proteins, and nucleic acids). They have unique characteristics, such as a self-assembling bilayer vesicular structure. There are several FDA-approved liposomal-based medicines for treatment of cancer, bacterial, and viral infections. Most of the FDA-approved liposomal-based therapies are in the form of conventional "symmetric" liposomes and they are administered mainly by injection. Arikace® is the first and only FDA-approved liposomal-based inhalable therapy (amikacin liposome inhalation suspension) to treat only adults with difficult-to-treat Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease as a combinational antibacterial treatment. To date, no "asymmetric liposomes" are yet to be approved, although asymmetric liposomes have many advantages due to the asymmetric distribution of lipids through the liposome's membrane (which is similar to the biological membranes). There are many challenges for the formulation and stability of asymmetric liposomes. This review will focus on asymmetric liposomes in contrast to conventional liposomes as a potential clinical intervention drug delivery system as well as the formulation techniques available for symmetric and asymmetric liposomes. The review aims to renew the research in liposomal nanovesicle delivery systems with particular emphasis on asymmetric liposomes as future potential carriers for enhancing drug delivery including pulmonary nanotherapeutics.

New Onset Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Rapidly Improved with IL-36 Blockade

Generalized pustular psoriasis is a relatively rare variant of psoriasis characterized by diffuse eruption of sterile pustules on an erythematous background. Untreated flares can result in life-threatening complications including sepsis and organ failure. Generalized pustular psoriasis has historically proven challenging to treat with an unpredictable clinical course and paucity of reliably efficacious treatment options. Until recently, there have been no FDA-approved therapies for generalized pustular psoriasis in the United States. In September 2022, the IL-36 receptor antagonist spesolimab became the first FDA-approved treatment for generalized pustular psoriasis in adults. We present a case of generalized pustular psoriasis with complete and rapid response to spesolimab.

Mechanisms of Action of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease.

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is currently the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. However, its pathophysiological mechanism is complicated, and currently, it has no FDA-approved pharmacological therapies. In recent years, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has attracted increasing attention in the treatment of hepatic diseases. MSCs are multipotent stromal cells that originated from mesoderm mesenchyme, which have self-renewal and multipotent differentiation capability. Recent experiments and studies have found that MSCs have the latent capacity to be used for MAFLD treatment. MSCs have the potential to differentiate into hepatocytes, which could be induced into hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) with liver-specific morphology and function under appropriate conditions to promote liver tissue regeneration. They can also reduce liver tissue injury and reverse the development of MAFLD by regulating immune response, antifibrotic activities, and lipid metabolism. Moreover, several advantages are attributed to MSC-derived exosomes (MSC-exosomes), such as targeted delivery, reliable reparability, and poor immunogenicity. After entering the target cells, MSC-exosomes help regulate cell function and signal transduction; thus, it is expected to become an emerging treatment for MAFLD. In this review, we comprehensively discussed the roles of MSCs in MAFLD, main signaling pathways of MSCs that affect MAFLD, and mechanisms of MSC-exosomes on MAFLD.

An evaluation of the combination of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

ABSTRACT Introduction Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive, fatal neurodegenerative motor neuron disease. Despite the overwhelming need for effective therapeutics for ALS, riluzole and edaravone were the only two FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies prior to 2022. The randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled CENTAUR trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol (PB-TURSO) in persons with ALS (PALS), leading to its conditional approval in Canada in June 2022 and full approval in the USA in September 2022. Areas covered Herein, the authors provide a review of the pharmacology and clinical trials evaluating sodium phenylbutyrate and/or taurursodiol in PALS. Expert opinion The safety and tolerability of both PB and TURSO were previously demonstrated in small PALS trials. The phase 2 CENTAUR study and its open-label extension demonstrated the safety and efficacy of AMX0035 (a sachet containing a fixed co-formulation of 3 g of PB and 1 g of TURSO given twice daily) in PALS. A phase 3 PHOENIX trial (NCT05021536) will offer more insight into safety and efficacy of AMX0035. AMX0035 currently costs $ 158,000 annually in the US, which may become a financial barrier for PALS to receive the medication.

Re-emergence of Rift Valley fever: an update and preventive measures.

Re-emergence of Rift Valley fever: an update and preventive measures.

Abstract C018: Disparities in the access to non-small cell lung cancer´s target therapies in Chile

Abstract Comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels designed to identify the tumor mutational profile are becoming the standard care to prescribe target therapies in developed countries. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this approach significantly impacts the patient´s clinical results, measured as progression-free survival and/or overall survival, compared to conventional chemotherapies. However, as Latin American patients tend to experience more significant health disparities because of structural, sociodemographic, and psychosocial factors, in this work, our purpose is to measure the disparities in the access to NSCLC´s target therapies, specifically in Chile. DNAs and RNAs from 1643 NSCLC samples from Chile, Brazil, and Peru were sequenced to assess the mutational status in fifty-two cancer genes. After an NGS quality control, variants were called and annotated using the Variant Effect Predictor, Annovar, COSMIC, and OncoKB, to categorize somatic mutations. The following analysis focused on today’s actionable genes in NSCLC, with FDA-approved target therapies (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, MET, ERBB2, BRAF, ROS1, and RET). In this analysis, 46.5% of tumors evidenced driver mutations (764/1643); interestingly, from this subset, 86.9% showed one driver variant, 11.2% two drivers, 1.4% three drivers, and 0.5% evidenced between 4-6 driver mutations. However, 19.4% (495/1643) evidenced actionable variants. The most mutated genes and the most common actionable variants were 15.3% EGFR (37% EGFR L858R), followed by 4.9% KRAS (100% KRAS G12C), 4.5% ALK (95.4% EML4-ALK fusion), 3% MET (100% MET exon 14 skipping), and 2.3% ERBB2. Finally, 1.5% BRAF, 1% ROS1 gene fusions and 0.9% RET gene fusions. Considering the target therapies approved by Chile´s Instituto de Salud Publica until October 2021, and if all these patients were diagnosed in Chile, only 64% would receive a targeted drug. EGFR is the gene with more target therapies validated in Chile, although drugs against exon twenty insertion have not been approved yet. Chile does not account for any targeted treatment for patients with alterations in KRAS, MET, RET and ERBB2; although the FDA approved a specific drug against KRAS G12C very recently (May 28, 2021), different is the case of MET because the first inhibitor, crizotinib, was FDA approved four years ago. Interestingly, in 2021, two inhibitors against the most common MET alteration were FDA approved, but none have been approved in Chile yet. In Chile, almost all target therapies have been validated against EGFR, ALK, and BRAF; however, patients with KRAS, MET, RET, and ERBB2 cannot access specific drugs, so in these cases, the recommended therapeutic option is chemotherapy. It is important to note that the target drugs approval only ensures the availability of the drug in Chile. Still, few of the target drugs are part of financed drugs by the Chilean health system, so the question is, how could we increase the national access to existing target therapies? Citation Format: Solange V. Rivas, Evelin González, Alejandro Blanco, Carolina Ibáñez, Alejandro Corvalán, Marcelo Garrido, Gareth Owen, Katherine Marcelain, Ricardo Armisén. Disparities in the access to non-small cell lung cancer´s target therapies in Chile [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr C018.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel in the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is one of the three US FDA-approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). TRANSCEND is the landmark trial that led to the approval of liso-cel in the third-line setting for R/R diffuse LBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma grade 3B and transformed lymphoma. The TRANSFORM and PILOT studies evaluated the use of liso-cel in the second-line treatment of R/R LBCL. This review details the structure and manufacturing process of liso-cel that make it distinct from other approved chimeric antigen receptor constructs, outlines results from landmark trials of liso-cel in LBCL and discusses liso-cel toxicity.

Improving thymus implantation for congenital athymia with interleukin-7.

Thymus implantation is a recently FDA-approved therapy for congenital athymia. Patients receiving thymus implantation develop a functional but incomplete T cell compartment. Our objective was to develop a mouse model to study clinical thymus implantation in congenital athymia and to optimise implantation procedures to maximise T cell education and expansion of naïve T cells. Using Foxn1 nu athymic mice as recipients, we tested MHC-matched and -mismatched donor thymi that were implanted as fresh tissue or cultured to remove donor Tcells. We first implanted thymus under the kidney capsule and then optimised intramuscular implantation. Using competitive adoptive transfer assays, we investigated whether the failure of newly developed T cells to expand into a complete T cell compartment was because of intrinsic deficits or whether there were deficits in engaging MHC molecules in the periphery. Finally, we tested whether recombinant IL-7 would promote the expansion of host naïve T cells educated by the implanted thymus. We determined that thymus implants in Foxn1 nu athymic mice mimic many aspects of clinical thymus implants in patients with congenital athymia. When we implanted cultured, MHC-mismatched donor thymus into Foxn1 nu athymic mice, mice developed a limited T cell compartment with notably underdeveloped naïve populations and overrepresented memory-like T cells. Newly generated T cells were predominantly educated by MHC molecules expressed by the donor thymus, thus potentially undergoing another round of selection once in the peripheral circulation. Using competitive adoptive transfer assays, we compared expansion rates of T cells educated on donor thymus versus T cells educated during typical thymopoiesis in MHC-matched and -mismatched environments. Once in the circulation, regardless of the MHC haplotypes, T cells educated on a donor thymus underwent abnormal expansion with initially more robust proliferation coupled with greater cell death, resembling IL-7 independent spontaneous expansion. Treating implanted mice with recombinant interleukin (IL-7) promoted homeostatic expansion that improved T cell development, expanded the T cell receptor repertoire, and normalised the naïve T cell compartment. We conclude that implanting cultured thymus into the muscle of Foxn1 nu athymic mice is an appropriate system to study thymus implantation for congenital athymia and immunodeficiencies. T cells are educated by the donor thymus, yet naïve T cells have deficits in expansion. IL-7 greatly improves T cell development after thymus implantation and may offer a novel strategy to improve outcomes of clinical thymus implantation.

Racial or ethnic differences on treatment adherence and persistence among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases initiated with biologic therapies

BackgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease with the potential for significant morbidity in case of suboptimal treatment (e.g. low treatment adherence). In spite of immense research in IBD, literature on association of IBD with race/ethnicity is fragmented. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence and persistence among patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) initiated with biologic therapies.MethodsThis observational, retrospective study utilized the Optum Clinformatics (Optum) Extended Data Mart Socioeconomic Status (SES) database. Adult patients with ≥ 2 medical claims for CD or UC diagnosis, ≥ 1 medical or pharmacy claim for corresponding FDA-approved biologic therapy, and a ≥ 12-month pre-index (index date: date of the first biologic medical/pharmacy claim) continuous health plan enrollment were included. Treatment adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered of ≥ 80% and treatment persistence by the number of days from the index date to the biologics discontinuation date. Switching among biologics was allowed for both treatment adherence and treatment persistence. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence/persistence.ResultsAmong patients with CD (N = 1430) and UC (N = 1059) included, majority were White (CD: 80.3%, UC: 78.3%), followed by African Americans (AA; CD: 10.5%, UC: 9.7%). Among patients with CD, AA were significantly less likely to adhere to biologics (adjusted OR [95%CI]: 0.61 [0.38; 0.99]) and more likely to discontinue biologics earlier (adjusted HR [95%CI]: 1.52 [1.16; 2.0]) during the follow-up period compared to Whites, after adjusting for other patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Among patients with UC, no significant differences in the treatment adherence/persistence were observed between different races/ethnicities.ConclusionsPatients with CD were found to display racial differences in the treatment adherence and persistence of biologics, with significantly lower adherence and earlier discontinuation in AA compared to Whites. Such differences were not observed in patients with UC. Future studies are warranted to understand the possible reasons for racial differences, particularly in patients with CD.

High fat diet exacerbates long-term metabolic, neuropathological, and behavioral derangements in an experimental mouse model of traumatic brain injury

AimsTraumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes a serious public health concern. Although TBI targets the brain, it can exert several systemic effects which can worsen the complications observed in TBI subjects. Currently, there is no FDA-approved therapy available for its treatment. Thus, there has been an increasing need to understand other factors that could modulate TBI outcomes. Among the factors involved are diet and lifestyle. High-fat diets (HFD), rich in saturated fat, have been associated with adverse effects on brain health. Main methodsTo study this phenomenon, an experimental mouse model of open head injury, induced by the controlled cortical impact was used along with high-fat feeding to evaluate the impact of HFD on brain injury outcomes. Mice were fed HFD for a period of two months where several neurological, behavioral, and molecular outcomes were assessed to investigate the impact on chronic consequences of the injury 30 days post-TBI. Key findingsTwo months of HFD feeding, together with TBI, led to a notable metabolic, neurological, and behavioral impairment. HFD was associated with increased blood glucose and fat-to-lean ratio. Spatial learning and memory, as well as motor coordination, were all significantly impaired. Notably, HFD aggravated neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Also, cell proliferation post-TBI was repressed by HFD, which was accompanied by an increased lesion volume. SignificanceOur research indicated that chronic HFD feeding can worsen functional outcomes, predispose to neurodegeneration, and decrease brain recovery post-TBI. This sheds light on the clinical impact of HFD on TBI pathophysiology and rehabilitation as well.

Current Therapeutic Options and Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Alcoholic Liver Disease

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a globally prevalent chronic liver disease caused by chronic or binge consumption of alcohol. The therapeutic efficiency of current therapies for ALD is limited, and there is no FDA-approved therapy for ALD at present. Various strategies targeting pathogenic events in the progression of ALD are being investigated in preclinical and clinical trials. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising candidate for ALD treatment and have been tested in several clinical trials. MSC-released factors have captured attention, as they have the same therapeutic function as MSCs. Herein, we focus on current therapeutic options, recently proposed strategies, and their limitations in ALD treatment. Also, we review the therapeutic effects of MSCs and those of MSC-related secretory factors on ALD. Although accumulating evidence suggests the therapeutic potential of MSCs and related factors in ALD, the mechanisms underlying their actions in ALD have not been well studied. Further investigations of the detailed mechanisms underlying the therapeutic role of MSCs in ALD are required to expand MSC therapies to clinical applications. This review provides information on current or possible treatments for ALD and contributes to our understanding of the development of effective and safe treatments for ALD.

Targets for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive myeloid malignancy associated with high mortality rates (less than 30% 5-year survival). Despite advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning leukemogenesis, standard-of-care therapeutic approaches have not changed over the last couple of decades. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has shown remarkable clinical outcomes for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is now an FDA-approved therapy. Targeting of myeloid malignancies that are CD19-negative with this promising technology remains challenging largely due to lack of alternate target antigens, complex clonal heterogeneity, and the increased recognition of an immunosuppressive bone marrow. We carefully reviewed a comprehensive list of AML targets currently being used in both proof-of-concept pre-clinical and experimental clinical settings. We analyzed the expression profile of these molecules in leukemic as well normal tissues using reliable protein databases and data reported in the literature and we provide an updated overview of the current clinical trials with CAR T-cells in AML. Our study represents a state-of-art review of the field and serves as a potential guide for selecting known AML-associated targets for adoptive cellular therapies.

FDA Approved Treatments for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder in Clinical Practice: A Survey of Academic Neuroimmunologists

Objective To assess utilization and barriers to use of three recently FDA-approved treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) by academic neuroimmunologists. Background Since 2019, eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab have received FDA approval for the treatment of aquaporin-4 IgG positive (AQP4+) NMOSD after showing efficacy in reducing attack frequency. However, little is known regarding the adoption of these therapies into practice or barriers to their use. We conducted a survey of academic neuroimmunologists to identify current treatment practices. Design/Methods An electronic survey study was conducted of US neuroimmunologists. Recipients were identified on department websites of university-associated hospitals with affiliated neurology residencies. The survey was administered via email, and included questions regarding clinical background, patient cohort, treatment use in different scenarios, and barriers. The authors were blinded to the identity of respondents. Results 383 neuroimmunologists from 105 institutions were identified, of whom 33 from 18 states completed the survey. Nearly all (88%) reported treating patients with the newly FDA-approved therapies (NFTs). None reported discomfort discussing any NFT with their patients. Respondents reported uncommonly switching clinically stable patients to NFTs (69% never switch, 22% switch 1-25% of the time). For newly diagnosed AQP4+ NMOSD patients, NFT initiation rates varied (16% initiate none, 42% 1-25% of the time, 6.5% 25-50%, 19% 50-75%, 16% 75-100%). For patients with a relapse, responses were dichotomized regarding switching to NFTs - respondents either switch 75-100% of their patients (60%) or none or 1-25% (16%, 24% respectively). Nearly half (16/33) of respondents reported being unable to start NFTs, with insurance/cost issues being the most cited barrier. Conclusions Among academic neuroimmunologists, FDA-approved therapies for AQP4+ NMOSD are being utilized for newly diagnosed patients and those with disease recurrence, although individual practice patterns vary. The main perceived barriers to NFT use are insurance/cost-related issues.

Abstract B018: Novel therapeutics for targeting the aberrant nuclear export machinery in colorectal cancer

Abstract XPO1 is a nuclear export receptor responsible for exporting many key proteins critical for cell survival from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Recently, we identified a highly statistically significant hotspot mutation in XPO1 R749Q occurring in patients with colorectal cancer. Out of 96 patients identified to have XPO1 R749Q mutations, 27 (28%) were in colorectal cancer (CRC). 95% of XPO1 R749Q mutant CRC were tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H; >10 mut/Mb) and 0 were mis-match repair deficient (dMMR)/micro satellite instability-high (MSI-H). Co-mutation analysis showed that 95% of XPO1 R749Q CRC were POLE mutated, which was significantly enriched over XPO1 WT tumors. To investigate whether XPO1 R749Q might play a role in CRC biology, we have generated two different isogenic colorectal cancer cell lines bearing the XPO1 R749Q mutation (HCT116 and LS174T) using CRISPR-CAS9 to better understand the role of this aberrant XPO1 mutation on nuclear export and tumorigenesis. Immunofluorescence (IF) and Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM) super-resolution experiments showed that R749Q mutant cells had significantly increased localization of XPO1 in the cytoplasm of the XPO1 R749Q mutant cells when compared to wildtype (XPO1 WT) cells, particularly at the edge of the nuclear pores of the XPO1 R749Q mutant cells suggesting increased nuclear export. Mass spectrometry analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionated proteins confirmed that XPO1 R749Q mutant cells had increased export of proteins from the nucleus compared to XPO1 WT cells. Structural modeling using published structures of XPO1 bound to Ran-GTP predicted that XPO1 R749Q mutation increased affinity of the regulatory H9-loop of XPO1 to Ran, thus favoring increased shuttling and retention in the cytoplasmic compartment. Therefore, we hypothesize that XPO1 R749Q may represent a novel mechanism of nuclear export alteration involved with kinetic tuning of global transport. Despite the increased nuclear export function, XPO1 R749Q cells did not show a proliferative advantage. We thus set out to test whether XPO1 R749Q might be enriched in cancer as an adaptive response to chemotherapy treatment. Using a chemical compound library of >200 FDA-approved cancer therapies we observed a strong therapeutic resistance of XPO1 R749Q cells relative to XPO1 WT cells, specifically to chemotherapies used in the treatment of colon cancer, such as irinotecan. However, these cells remained sensitive to treatment with the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor. Mice xenografted with XPO1 R749Q mutant HCT116 cells showed moderate tumor response to selinexor or irinotecan monotherapies but prolonged tumor responses to combination therapy. Recent clinical data has shown POLE mutations to be a biomarker for response to PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade, especially in CRC. Since our genetic data identify POLE mutations commonly co-occurring with XPO1 R749Q in colon cancer, we are planning to test the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and selinexor to target both these mutations, as well as CRC tumors without these mutations. Citation Format: Tulasigeri M. Totiger, Sana Chaudhry, Skye Montoya, Monika Chojnacka, Gabriel Gaidosh, Jumana Afaghani, Maurizio Affer, Jenna Zabroski, Jacob Jahn, Vindhya Nawaratne, Ryan Notti, Ramiro Verdun, Daniel Bilbao, Josean Rodriguez, Justin Taylor. Novel therapeutics for targeting the aberrant nuclear export machinery in colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B018.

Increased Comorbidities and Hospitalizations Associated with Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease

Background: Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of disorders that share characteristic lymph node histopathology with heterogeneous symptoms. Unicentric Castleman disease (UCD) involves a single region of enlarged lymph nodes, localized symptoms, and is typically curable with excision. In contrast, multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) involves multiple regions of enlarged lymph nodes, systemic inflammation, cytopenias, and life-threatening multiorgan dysfunction. MCD can be associated with human herpesvirus-8 infection or is idiopathic (iMCD). Presentation is heterogeneous, and multiple clinical phenotypes exist, including iMCD patients who meet criteria for the most severe form of the disease, the TAFRO subtype (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fevers, reticulin fibrosis, organomegaly). Furthermore, iMCD is difficult to diagnose. Though there is an FDA-approved therapy (siltuximab) for iMCD, major unmet need exists as many patients do not receive this treatment and a subset of patients do not respond to siltuximab. To elucidate the burden of iMCD, we interrogated hospitalization and comorbidity data from patients with iMCD and UCD, as well as from a comparator group of patients who demonstrated iMCD-like features determined to result from a reactive process ('Other'). Methods: The ACCELERATE Natural History registry was leveraged to identify a cohort of 193 patients with a pathology report suggestive of CD. All patients were reviewed by a panel of expert CD physicians to confirm or reject a CD diagnosis. Following review, 85 patients were categorized as having iMCD - including 49 (58%) iMCD-TAFRO, 65 were UCD, and 43 patients were consistent with an inflammatory or reactive processes not reflective of iMCD (Other). Results: The mean (SD) age of patients was 39 (16) with a range of 1-75. Prior to diagnosis, the top 10 comorbidities found among both iMCD and UCD patients included common chronic diseases observed in the general US population, such as diabetes, hypertension, GERD, obesity, asthma, anxiety, and depression. Among UCD patients, the top common comorbidities remained unchanged after diagnosis. Among iMCD patients, however, a number of other comorbidities emerged as top-most common, such as acute renal failure (20%), pneumonia (11%), sepsis (8%), chronic kidney disease (8%), thrombotic microangiopathy (7%), acute cholecystitis (7%), and diverticulitis (6%). We also found that the iMCD patients spent a significantly longer time hospitalized in the 1st year following diagnosis (mean 34.3 days) compared to UCD (mean 14 days) (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference from patients with an Other diagnosis (22 days). We saw a similar trend in days hospitalized per year since diagnosis, with iMCD patients hospitalized for a significantly greater time than UCD (24.2 vs. 10.5 average days hospitalized per year of diagnosis, p<0.001). There was no difference with the Other group (16.2 days). iMCD patients also spent an average of 12.1 days hospitalized before the first iMCD-treating drug and 44.7 days after the administration of the first iMCD-treating drug. Further, a large proportion of iMCD patients required supportive interventions, such as dialysis (23.6%, n=20) and mechanical ventilation (16.5%, n=14). This compares to 7% (n=3) of Other patients and no UCD patients who required dialysis and 9.3% (n=4) of Other patients and 4.6% (n=3) UCD patients who required mechanical ventilation. Discussion: Overall, these data demonstrate that iMCD patients face a significant disease burden, even years after a diagnosis is rendered and treatment is initiated. While siltuximab can effectively control symptoms in a subset of iMCD patients, not all patients receive siltuximab and not all patients treated respond to siltuximab. We found that patients require hospitalization and costly intervention such as dialysis and mechanical ventilation for extended periods of time. These findings have real implications for patient healthcare costs and hospital systems. iMCD patients demonstrate relatively common comorbidities prior to diagnosis and subsequently develop life-threatening conditions such as acute kidney failure and sepsis following diagnosis. These data highlight the importance of continuing research into iMCD etiology, subgroups, treatments, and outcomes, to control the burden of disease and improve outcomes and prognosis for this severely ill group of patients. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal