Split liver transplantation was introduced to increase organ availability, but its inherent prolonged cold ischemia raises the risks of ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). For this reason, the split partial liver grafts are considered to be marginal grafts, which also occur for fatty liver grafts. These organs are highly vulnerable to IRI, which can lead to different types of organ failure (such as small-for-size syndrome) after transplantation. Under these conditions, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) techniques constitute a promising strategy to minimize the deleterious effects of IRI, as shown by Muller et al1 in the context of controlled donation after circulatory death. Besides, all trials using split liver grafts are excluded when applying HOPE. Thus, the communication by Mabrut et al2 is highly relevant for the field. Specifically, Mabrut et al2 proposed a surgical design that allows cold static preservation to be combined with HOPE in the setting of split liver preservation. This approach not only reduces the time of cold ischemia (and therefore injury sustained due to it) but also reduces the warm ischemic injury inherent to surgical manipulation that occurs in normothermic conditions when conventional split techniques are used for liver transplantation. In our opinion, it is noteworthy that the HOPE application has been extended to different pools of organs, improving their preservation. Here, we would like to highlight that there is still a window to further reduce cold ischemic injuries associated with surgical procedures, such as in split liver strategies. Based on our previous experimental works in rats, we have tested the benefits of a new preservation solution, for decreasing cold ischemic injuries during static and HOPE preservation using steatotic grafts and normal grafts.3,4 In addition, the use of a unique solution for both static preservation and HOPE—and especially when they are combined—would provide further benefit by facilitating the whole preservation period. In our group experience, the use of this solution/perfusate for cold static and dynamic preservation, containing polyethylene glycol 35 rather than hydroxyethyl starch and an increased concentration of glutathione, improves preservation in both strategies (eg, cold static and dynamic preservation).3,4 In addition, its use may prevent the proaggregating effects of hydroxyethyl starch and favor the mechanotransduction mechanisms inherent to HOPE, thereby protecting the glycocalyx and contributing to maintaining its integrity.5 Moreover, this new preservation solution has a lower viscosity as compared with University of Wisconsin or Belzer-MPS solutions, which facilitates rinsing the organ and HOPE procedures.3,5 This lower viscosity also helps to improve the glycocalyx preservation, which in turn promotes the microcirculation of the graft, as well as the generation of nitric oxide; notably, nitric oxide acts as a vasodilator, which is beneficial in steatotic grafts.3 All of these effects would be consistent with the relevance of solution/perfusate associated with the modulation of inflammation events existing in liver graft preservation procedures,3,4 which influence the graft outcome after transplantation. In addition, we would like to note that, presumably, the polyethylene-glycol-35–promoted mitochondrial protection and the induction of protective autophagy during hypothermic preservation are linked to the reduction of graft injury.3-5 In sum, we believe that the use of a single solution for split graft flushing, preservation, and perfusion by HOPE—such as Institut Georges Lopez 2—should be considered for reducing the deleterious effects of IRI and thereby maximizing the benefits of ex vivo liver splitting and the HOPE strategies reported by Mabrut et al2 for split liver transplantation purposes.
Read full abstract