Normal 0 false false false IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Novel p reparation and characterization of sul f onated p olyvinyl alcohol (P VA )–trimethoxysilyl propanethiol (TMSP) membrane s for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) application ha ve been investigated . P reparation of sul f onated PVA-TMSP membrane was conducted by crosslinking step s using sol-gel method and a catalyst of concentrated HCl . T MSP concentrations were varied from 1% to 3%. The gel solution was cast on to the membrane metal plate to obtain membrane sheets. The membrane was then oxidized in H 2 O 2 concentrations of (10 - 30%) to convert the mercapto groups into sulfonate group . Investigations of the cross-linkin g process and the exist e nce of sulfonate group w ere conducted by i nfrared spectroscopy as shown for frequencies at 1140–1200 cm -1 and 1200–1145 cm -1 respectively. The scanning electron microscope – energy dispersive X-rays (SEM–EDX ) of the membrane s indicated that the distribution of silica particles from sol–gel reaction products was uneven due to the fast exchange rate of condensation. The degree of swelling decrease d as methanol concentrations increase for sul f onated PVA–TMSP membrane which opposed to ward the value of commercial Nafion membrane. The maximum value of ion exchange capacity o f the membrane was 1.82 mmol/g whereas the highest proton conductivity was 3.9 x 10 -4 Scm -1 . Therefore it can be concluded that the membrane was a potential candidate for application in DMFC. Normal 0 false false false IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Keywords: DMFC, fuel cell, nafion, PVA, TMSP
Read full abstract