Portuguese Studies vol. 32 no. 2 (2016), 125–27© Modern Humanities Research Association 2016 Introduction Portuguese and Brazilian Authoritarian States and Corporatism: Political Change and Institutional Practice Paula Borges Santos and Luciano Aronne de Abreu At a time when studies of the historical experiences of corporativism in the inter-war period have seen new developments in the academic world, both in Portugal and in Brazil, in differing fields such as History, Sociology and Political Science, this volume of Portuguese Studies brings together six articles which aim to explore some of the less-visited aspects of the origins and establishment of corporative projects in the course of the dictatorships in those two countries. Setting out from the observation that, in both cases, we witnessed the institutionalization of state corporativisms — that is, corporative projects in which the principal stimulus and initiatives were made by governmental authorities — academic analysis has been directed to two areas of discussion: on the one hand the ideological and juridical foundations of the two corporative ideologies, and on the other hand the problem of the nature, the functioning and the functionality of some of its institutions. This analytical position has in turn three aspects. Firstly, there is a need to rethink critically the descriptions contained in the main studies of historical corporativisms in Portugal and Brazil, and of their political and institutional dynamics. In effect, while these studies benefitted from being widely published and discussed, the truth is that later researches served largely to confirm the theses contained in them and to deepen certain elements. Frequently this led to the repetition of the results first presented, to the detriment of a sustained tendency towards new approaches. Hence there remain lacunae in our knowledge which deserve to be diagnosed and overcome. The choice of topics in this volume meets this concern. Secondly, there is an interest in overcoming a certain tension that arises in studies of the historical experiences of corporativism, namely of the association popularly made between this phenomenon (either as a doctrine or in its various manifestations) and the regimes of the so-called ‘fascist era’. To this end, it is necessary to avoid some of the generalizations made about the assimilation of the corporative ideal by succeeding regimes, which are common in the more ideological readings of the past, and to take care to deconstruct official and Authoritarian States and Corporatism 126 propagandistic discourses made by governments. In the same way, explanations of corporative processes made by their own doctrinal chiefs are to be rejected. We should be cautious, too, of reading historical reality through critiques of the systems, such as were made by opposition currents, or by those who, despite belonging to the establishment of these regimes, became disillusioned. The third aspect arises from the need to question the usefulness of the customary definition of political corporativism, in so far as it dogmatically states that corporative systems were based on the exclusion of any idea of representation by way of individual suffrage. As a reading of the articles gathered here will demonstrate, historical reality in Portugal and Brazil was more complex than that. There were compromises, adaptations of organicist and liberal ideas (in turn diffused by different means and assimilated in very different forms amongst the supporters of corporative projects), and above all neither country witnessed a total rejection of traditions of civil rights. The chronological boundaries to this volume, while not being identical for every article, cover the corporative projects in Portugal and Brazil from their first establishment up to their demise. In this way they capture both the continuities and the changes in their juridical and political foundations during the lifecycle of the institutions created and established in those countries. For Portugal this goes back to the period of the First Republic to explain how some organicist ideas from that time were spread and gained support from the political class of the time. Despite falling outside the periodization of the authoritarian state, a study of this period is fundamental to an understanding of how far criticism of the principles on which the democratic and liberal state were based had already advanced before the consolidation of the dictatorship. While the present volume provides heuristic...
Read full abstract