Outlook Conservation agriculture: Systems thinking for sustainable farming by Jeffrey Mitchell, Ron Harben, Garrison Sposito, Anil Shrestha, Daniel Munk, Gene Miyao, Randy Southard, Howard Ferris, William R. Horwath, Eric Kueneman, Judee Fisher, Monte Bottens, Phil Hogan, Robert Roy, Jim Komar, Dwayne Beck, Don Reicosky, Michelle Leinfelder-Miles, Brenna Aegerter, Johan Six, Tom Barcellos, Dino Giacomazzi, Alan Sano, Jesse Sanchez, Mike Crowell, John Diener, Darrell Cordova, Trevor Cordova and Jerry Rossiter C alifornia is an unquestioned global leader in the productivity of its farms and the diversity and quality of its crops. However, there are significant threats to the sustainability of the state’s agricultural systems. The scarcity of water has received great attention in recent years, but that is just one of many concerns. Fossil fuel use, carbon emissions, nitrate pollution of groundwater, labor cost and availability, air pollution and loss of soil fertility all present challenges to the long-term viability of farming in California. Conservation agriculture can help to address all of these issues. Fundamentally, conservation agriculture is about “kindly use” of the land, to quote farmer-essayist Wendell Berry. It is based on three principles: reducing soil disturbance (tilling less, or not at all), retaining crop residues on the soil surface year-round and fostering crop and soil biodiversity. By designing farming systems around these principles, our work has shown that farmers can save water, store more carbon in the soil, burn less fossil fuel, cut labor costs, lower dust emissions and increase profits. Despite conservation agriculture’s promise, how- ever, its adoption has been slow in California. In the Midwest and Great Plains regions, conservation ag- riculture is practiced on more than 30% of cropland, • Water: No-till, surface mulching practices and in- creases in soil organic matter can reduce soil wa- ter evaporation by 4 to 5 inches annually (Klocke et al. 2009; Mitchell, Singh et al. 2012; van Donk et al. 2010) and increase soil water storage ca- pacity by the equivalent of roughly 2 inches (Franzluebbers 2010; Hudson 1994). If applied on a significant amount of California’s roughly 8.5 million acres of irrigated lands, these measures could reduce statewide irrigation demand by millions of acre-feet. • Cost: By limiting tractor passes and other opera- tions, reduced-tillage practices cut production costs by $100 to $150 per acre across a range of crops grown in California (Mitchell, Carter et al. 2012; Mitchell, Klonsky et al. 2012). http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.edu • APRIL–JUNE 2016 53 Ron Harben In 2010, CASI held a public education event on cover crops for farmers and private sector, UC and NRCS participants at the UC ANR West Side Research and Extension Center in Five Points. compared with less than 5% of annual cropland in California. As founders and members of the Conservation Agriculture Sustainability Innovation center (CASI), we are partnering with California farmers and equipment makers to develop conser- vation agriculture practices and technologies that are effective and appropriate for the state’s produc- tion systems, and to build networks to help their adoption. The magnitude of the benefits possible with con- servation agriculture is striking. A few examples: