Whether shellfish mariculture should be included in the blue carbon profile as a strategy to combat climate change has been controversial. It is highly demanding not only to provide calibration quantitation, but also to provide an ecosystem-based mechanism. In this study, we chose mussel farms as a case study to evaluate their contributions to carbon sinks and their responses to sedimentary carbon fixation and sequestration. First, we quantified the air–sea CO2 flux in the mussel aquacultural zone and observed a weak carbon sink (−0.15 ± 0.07 mmol·m−2·d−1) during spring. Next, by analyzing the carbon composition in the sediment, we recorded a noticeable and unexpected increase in the sedimentary recalcitrant carbon (RC) content in the mussel farming case. To address this surprising sedimentary phenomenon, a long-term indoor experimental test was conducted to distinguish the consequences of mussel engagement with sedimentary RC. Our observational data support the idea that mussel engagement promotes accumulation of RC in sediments by 2.5-fold. Furthermore, the relative intensity of carboxylic-rich alicyclic molecule (CRAM)-like compounds (recalcitrant dissolved organic matter (RDOM)) increased by 451.4 % in the mussel-engaged sedimentary dissolved organic matter (DOM) in comparison to the initial state. Mussel engagement had a significantly positive effect on the abundance of sedimentary carbon-fixing genes. Therefore, we definitively conclude that mussel farming is blue carbon positive and propose a new alternative theory that mussel farming areas may have high carbon sequestration potential via an ecologically integrated “3 M” (microalgae–mussel–microbiota) consortium. The “mussel pump” accelerates carbon sequestration and enhances climate-related ecosystem services.
Read full abstract