Fluid CityRiver Gods in Rome and Contested Topography Charles Burroughs (bio) Introduction: Blurred Boundaries—Conceptual and Topographical Few major cities have undergone so thorough a transformation as early modern Rome, where a shrunken “gigantic cadaver”1 became a paradigmatic early modern theater of architectural magnificence, worthy of its ancient predecessor. No single site better exemplifies this transformation than the Campidoglio, the ancient Capitoline Hill, surmounted by a grand piazza bordered on three sides by palaces but open to the city on the fourth side where St. Peter’s dome, designed by Michelangelo for Pope Paul III (r. 1534–49), rises above the distant skyline. The same architect and patron played key roles in the sixteenth-century remodeling of the Campidoglio (Fig. 1), though the only building actually erected on the hill by the pope was not part of Michelangelo’s Capitoline ensemble. Early in his long pontificate, Paul saw to the construction of the Torre Farnese (or Paolina), a fortified residence designed with an eye to defense and domination, certainly not aesthetics. Until its demolition to make way for the Victor Emmanuel Monument (1885), the Torre Farnese was a looming presence on the hill, overlooking a city where by now numerous palaces exemplified the classicizing, formal language of the Renaissance, of which it showed hardly a trace.2 Nor could there be a stronger contrast with Michelangelo’s highly innovative and allusive designs for the civic palaces on the Campidoglio, though these were not realized until long after Paul’s death (the date of the design is a different issue, as noted below), or indeed with the same architect’s work, from 1546, on Paul’s own family palace, the Palazzo Farnese. It has recently been suggested that we should see the rustic character of the Torre Farnese, traditionally sometimes referred to as a villa, in a more positive light, and as [End Page 187] qualifying not just the traditional image of Rome but also prevailing notions of an urban/rural disjunction.3 This may be too large a claim for so undistinguished a building, but I will argue that it is applicable, in principle, to the remodeling of the Campidoglio, whatever the contrast in formal terms. If so, Michelangelo’s Campidoglio both drew on and helped to shape a wider setting—Rome itself—that already defied such binary stereotyping. Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. “The Roman Campidoglio ideally completed according to Michelangelo’s design,” Stefano Duperac (Etienne DuPérac), etching 1569, included in the Speculum Romanae Magnificentiae, published by Antoine Lafreri. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. 41.72(1.14). Courtesy the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. A related indeterminacy exists, moreover, in the visual rhetoric of the Campidoglio, embracing both the architectural framework and, emphatically, a number of sculptures prominently installed on the hill.4 I will focus especially on statues of river gods, specifically on a motif expressive of both stability (the river as enduring topographic identifier) and fluidity (the allusions to flowing hair [End Page 188] and water). Though such contradictions apply to all images of river gods, in the light of the complex history of this pair of statues they constitute a special case: one statue underwent a radical change of iconography, and both were subjected to a drastic shift of location and, presumably, meaning. The introduction of statues or related objects into a site as fraught with historical and political associations as the Campidoglio is certainly evidence of existing prestige, but they inevitably take on new significance, especially when integrated—as happened with the river gods—into a newly designed configuration likely to be expressive of current agendas. With its associations with ancient authority and ritual, as well as the municipal government in the city of the popes, the Campidoglio was a place of memory, or rather conflicting memories; as Kathleen Christian has eloquently pointed out, it was a site where civic and papal concerns and claims—sometimes competing, sometimes in balance—affected the course and nature of architectural or sculptural elaboration.5 Christian discusses an earlier period, but her characterization also applies to the sixteenth-century Campidoglio, seat of the medieval city republic, now increasingly hollowed out...
Read full abstract