Objectives: While vasectomy is cheaper, more effective and safer than female sterilization methods, it remains vastly underutilized by health care providers. This disparity may be due to a shortage of vasectomy providers. The following survey determined interest in vasectomy provision, vasectomy training and attitudes toward vasectomy among family planning specialists. Methods: Members of the US-based network of family planning physicians were surveyed from November 2015 through January 2016, using the family planning Listserv, which includes all clinical members within the Family Planning Fellowship. Perspectives on barriers to vasectomy provision were collected. Results: Nearly 60% (n=178) of fellowship providers responded to the survey. Nearly 90% of respondents desired training on vasectomy counseling, and 58% desired procedural training. Attitudes regarding vasectomy were positive, and 57% of respondents endorsed vasectomy as their preferred sterilization method for couples desiring permanent contraception. While 62% reported counseling about vasectomy at least most of the time, less than 5% of respondents had performed at least one vasectomy in the year preceding the survey. Barriers to counseling and provision included a lack of exposure to vasectomy during medical training, concerns about ob-gyns risking their licenses by providing services for men, concerns about insurance coverage for vasectomy and belief that men are not interested in vasectomy for contraception. Desire for training was associated with being male and receiving residency training in family medicine. Conclusions: The majority of family planning providers desire more training on vasectomy counseling and vasectomy provision. Formalized training opportunities through the family planning fellowship may help to address this interest.