Family Medicine Education Research Articles

Perceived Access and Appropriateness: Comparison of Teaching and Resident Family Physicians' Patients.

Teaching clinics aim to provide patients with care that is comprehensive, high quality, and timely. Since resident presence at the clinic is irregular, timely access to care and continuity remain challenging. The two main objectives of our study were to compare the experience of timely access by patients of family residents vs staff and to determine if there was a difference between resident and staff patients in reported appropriateness and patient-centeredness of the visit. This cross-sectional survey study was carried out in nine family medicine teaching clinics part of University of Montreal and McGill University Family Medicine Networks. Patients self-administered two anonymous questionnaires, before and after their consultation. We collected 1,979 preconsultation questionnaires. Teaching physician (staff) patients rated the usual wait time for an appointment as very good or excellent more frequently than resident patients (46% vs 35 %; P=.001). One out of five reported consulting another clinic in the last 12 months. Resident patients consulted elsewhere more often. In postconsultation questionnaires staff patients rated their visit experience better than resident physician patients and patients of second-year residents better than first-year residents. Although patients generally have a positive perception of access to care and adequacy of the consultations meet their needs, staff also face the challenge of providing better access to their patients. Finally, we found the patients' perceived visit-based patient centeredness was higher for visits of second-year than first-year resident physicians, supporting the impact of training efforts toward patient-centered best practices.

Promotion Committees and Attending Meetings Improve Promotion Rates for Early Career Faculty.

Academic promotion is an important goal in an academic physician's career trajectory. Understanding the factors that influence success in academic promotion is important in providing appropriate guidance and resources. The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) conducted a large omnibus survey of family medicine department chairs. Participants were asked about recent promotion rates within their department, as well as about whether their department had a promotion committee, whether faculty regularly met with the chair regarding preparation for promotion, whether faculty had been assigned mentors, and whether faculty attended national academic meetings. The response rate was 54%. Most chairs were male (66.3%), White (77.9%), and aged 50 to 59 (41.3%) or 60 to 69 (42.3%) years. Attendance at professional meetings was associated with a higher rate of assistant-to-associate professor promotions. Departments with a committee to help faculty with promotions had higher rates of promotion for both assistant-to-associate and associate-to-full professor levels than departments without a committee. Promotion was not associated with assigned mentorship, support from the chair, departmental or institutional sponsorship of faculty development regarding promotion, or annual assessments of progress toward promotion. Attendance at professional meetings and the presence of a departmental promotions committee may be helpful factors in achieving academic promotion. An assigned mentor was not found to be a helpful factor.

Snapshot of family medicine around the world: Introducing the global family medicine website.

To develop an interactive, living map of family medicine training and practice; and to appreciate the role of family medicine within, and its effect on, health systems across the world. A subgroup of the College of Family Physicians of Canada's Besrour Centre for Global Family Medicine developed connections with selected international colleagues with expertise in international family medicine practice and teaching, health systems, and capacity building to map family medicine globally. In 2022, this group received support from the Foundation for Advancing Family Medicine's Trailblazers initiative to advance this work. In 2018 groups of Wilfrid Laurier University (Waterloo, Ont) students conducted broad searches of relevant articles about family medicine in different regions and countries around the world; they conducted focused interviews and then synthesized and verified information, developing a database of family medicine training and practice around the world. Outcome measures were age of family medicine training programs and duration and type of family medicine postgraduate training. To approach the question of how delivery of the family medicine model of primary care can affect health system performance, relevant data on family medicine were collated-the presence, nature, duration, and type of training and role within health care systems. The website https://www.globalfamilymedicine.org now has up-to-date country-level data on family medicine practice around the world. This publicly available information will allow such data to be correlated together with health system outputs and outcomes and will be updated as necessary through a wiki-type process. While Canada and the United States only have residency training, countries such as India have master's or fellowship programs, in part accounting for the complexity of the discipline. The maps also identify where family medicine training does not yet exist. Mapping family medicine around the world will allow researchers, policy makers, and health care workers to have an accurate picture of family medicine and its impact using relevant, up-to-date information. The group's next aim is to develop data on parameters by which performance in various domains can be measured across settings and to display these in an accessible form.

Remodelling family medicine teaching at the University of Lausanne using a modified Delphi method

In the context of implementing a new framework for pre-graduate medical education in Switzerland (PROFILES) and the ongoing reform of the medical curriculum at the Faculty of Biology and Medicine of the University of Lausanne, we set out to determine the priority teaching themes of family medicine and to collect expert opinions about the most appropriate teaching methods for family medicine. Such data would contribute to the production of a coherent family medicine teaching programme encompassing its specificities as well as future challenges facing medicine in general. We mapped the current family medicine courses at the Faculty of Biology and Medicine to obtain an overview of current learning objectives and teaching content priorities. We classified and analysed the lessons using the PROFILES grid and the principles of family medicine described by the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA). Then we used a modified Delphi method with a selected panel of experts and two consensus rounds to prioritise objectives for family medicine teaching at the University of Lausanne. After choosing the top objectives/activities for family medicine, subgroups of experts then discussed what would be the best teaching methods for family medicine at the University of Lausanne. The mapping of family medicine teaching at the University of Lausanne showed that current teaching addresses most of the primary topics of family medicine education. The modified Delphi method allowed us to identify priority themes for teaching family medicine at the University of Lausanne: (1) take a medical history and clinical examination; (2) doctor-patient relationship / patient-centred care; (3) clinical reasoning; (4) interprofessional collaboration; (5) care planning/ documentation; (6) shared decision-making; (7) communication; (8) cost-effective care; (9) health promotion; (10) assessment of urgency. The discussion with the experts identified the strengths and weaknesses of the various teaching modalities in family medicine education. Teaching should be structured, coherent and show continuity. Clinical immersion and small group teaching were the preferred teaching modalities. This approach made it possible to create the guidelines for restructuring the family medicine teaching curriculum at the University of Lausanne.

Challenges Meeting Training Requirements in the Care of Children in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study.

In 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented numeric requirements for family medicine (FM) pediatric patient encounters. Impact on residency programs is unclear. We aimed to identify any difficulties faced by FM program directors (PDs) meeting these numeric requirements. Questions about pediatric training in family medicine residencies were included in a survey of PDs conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA). We performed univariate analysis of the demographic and program characteristics. We then used χ2 tests of independence to test for bivariate associations between these characteristics and our primary outcome: the most difficult ACGME pediatric care requirement to meet. Most programs reported the hospital as the primary location of training (n=131, 46%) and their family medicine practice (FMP) patient population consisted of over 20% pediatric patients (n=153, 56%). Over 80% of program directors reported challenges meeting FM requirements for the care of children. Challenges meeting pediatric requirements were associated with fewer than 20% FMP patients under 19 years of age (P<.0001), fewer than 50% of core FM faculty caring for sick children (P=.0128), and primary location of pediatric training in a family health center (P=.0006). Difficulty meeting ACGME requirements for the care of children in FM residency programs is common, especially for programs with fewer than 20% FMP patients under 19 years of age. Further research is needed to determine how best to assure FM resident competencies in the care of children and adolescents.

Dermoscopy Training in Family Medicine Residencies: A CERA Survey of Program Directors.

Diagnosing skin disorders is a core skill in family medicine residency. Accurate diagnosis of skin cancers has a significant impact on patient health. Dermoscopy improves a physician's accuracy in diagnosing skin cancers. We aimed to quantify the current state of dermoscopy use and training in family medicine residencies. We included questions on dermoscopy training in the 2021 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency program directors. The survey asked about access to a dermatoscope, the presence of faculty with experience using dermoscopy, the amount of dermoscopy didactic time, and the amount of hands-on dermoscopy training. Of 631 programs, 275 program directors (43.58% response rate) responded. Half of the responding programs (50.2%) had access to a dermatoscope, and 54.2% had a faculty member with experience using dermoscopy. However, only 6.8% of residents had 4 or more hours of didactics on dermoscopy over their entire training. Only 16.2% had 4 or more hours of hands-on dermoscopy use. Over half (58.9%) of programs planned to add more dermoscopy training. We did not find any correlations between the program's size/type/location and dermoscopy training opportunities. Despite reasonable access to a dermatoscope and the presence of at least one faculty member with dermoscopy experience, most family medicine residency programs provided limited dermoscopy training opportunities. Research is needed to better understand how to facilitate dermoscopy training in family medicine residencies.

Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide.

Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital. Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period. Based on the analysis of the Field Notes (n = 70 pre-test; n = 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%, z = 2.97, p = 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%, z = 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role. The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.

Race-Based Care and Beliefs Regarding the Etiology of Racial Differences in Health Outcomes

Physicians' perspectives regarding the etiology of racial health differences may be associated with their use of race in clinical practice (race-based practice). This study evaluates whether attributing racial differences in health to genetics, culture, or social conditions is associated with race-based practice. This is a cross-sectional analysis, conducted in 2022, of the Council of Academic Family Medicine Education Research Alliance 2021 general membership survey. Only actively practicing U.S. physicians were included. The survey included demographic questions; the Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) scale (higher scores imply greater race-based practice); and 3 questions regarding beliefs that racial differences in genetics, culture (e.g., health beliefs), or social conditions (e.g., education) explained racial differences in health. Three multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate the relationship between RACE scores and beliefs regarding the etiology of racial differences in health. Of the 4,314 survey recipients, 949 (22%) responded, of whom 689 were actively practicing U.S. physicians. In multivariable regressions controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, and practice characteristics, a higher RACE score was associated with a greater belief that differences in genetics (β=3.57; 95% CI=3.19, 3.95) and culture (β=1.57; 95% CI=0.99, 2.16)-in but not social conditions-explained differences in health. Physicians who believed that genetic or cultural differences between racial groups explained racial differences in health outcomes were more likely to use race in clinical care. Further research is needed to determine how race is differentially applied in clinical care on the basis of the belief in its genetic or cultural significance.

Perceived Value of Osteopathic Recognition.

In 2020 the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) became the sole accrediting body for osteopathic and allopathic residency programs, with an option for programs to apply for Osteopathic Recognition (OR) to distinguish their training in osteopathic principles and practice. There is limited research regarding this transition. The goal of our study was to assess the perceived value of OR and perceived difficulty of obtaining OR for family medicine residency programs. We performed analyses regarding the difficulty of obtaining OR status and the value of OR and Osteopathic Principles and Practice (OPP) using questions on the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) omnibus survey. Of the 280 program directors (PD) responding, 69 (24.6%) had OR status, 126 (45.0%) were considering applying or would apply if needed resources were available, and 85 (30.4%) were not considering OR. Of the 73 PDs reporting on experience with the OR process, 28 (38.4%) found it "very smooth," 30 (41.1%) found it "a little bumpy," and 15 (20.5%) found it "very bumpy"; 87.0% of PDs (60 of 69) with OR felt it had value in recruiting DO students and 31.8% (22/69) in recruiting MD students; 86.9% of programs with OR status perceived OPP to be somewhat or very valuable in enhancing patient satisfaction compared to 77% of those considering OR and 44.7% not considering OR. Program directors perceive value in OR status for recruiting and in osteopathic practice for patient care. Since 75.4% of responding program directors have or are interested in achieving OR status, further research is needed on its benefits and barriers.

Personal Financial Well-being of Family Medicine Residents and Residency Curricula: A CERA Study.

Personal financial wellness is a milestone in graduate medical education. Prior surveys addressing financial wellness have not included family medicine (FM) residents and to date, no literature has explored the relationship between perceived financial well-being and personal finance curriculum in residency. Our study aimed to measure the financial well-being of residents and its association with the delivery of financial curricula in residency and other demographics. Our survey was included in the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) omnibus survey sent to 5,000 FM residents. We use the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) financial well-being guide and scale to measure financial well-being and categorize into low, medium, and high ranges. Two hundred sixty-six residents (response rate of 5.32%) responded with a mean financial well-being score of 55.7 (SD 12.1), in the medium score range. Financial well-being was positively associated with any form of personal financial curricula in residency, year in residency, income and citizenship. Most residents 204 (79.1%) agreed/strongly agreed that personal financial curricula are important to their education, and 53 (20.7%) never received personal financial curricula. Personal financial well-being scores of family medicine residents are considered medium per the CFPB ranges we assigned. We find a positive and significant association with the presence of personal financial curricula in residency. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of different formats of personal finance curriculum in residency on financial well-being.

Baseline monitoring of atypical antipsychotics at a Family Medicine Teaching Unit (FMTU) in Ontario, Canada

Baseline monitoring of atypical antipsychotics at a Family Medicine Teaching Unit (FMTU) in Ontario, Canada

Learning Obstetrical Cervical Exam Skills : Development of a Novel Model to Demystify Blind Procedures.

Obstetric care is a core element in family medicine education. New interns typically learn the sterile cervical exam on the job by examining women in labor. This can be uncomfortable for patients and may increase the risk of infection. Simulated training could minimize these challenges, but manufactured models are expensive and not widely available in residency programs. We soughtto evaluate a simple, homemade sewn model using stretchy fabric and pipe cleaners that could improve teaching and acquisition of cervical examination skills and common obstetrical procedures. We used the model to teach cervical examination skills to students and new interns and assessed participant satisfaction. We evaluated examination accuracy by grading practice exams on the model before and after a workshop teaching obstetrical procedures including the sterile vaginal exam. We calculated satisfaction using summary statistics. We evaluated pre- and postscores for exam accuracy using pairedttests. Interns demonstrated a significant improvement in cervical exam skills using the model, and participants reported very high satisfaction with the workshop utilizing the model. We developed a simple, low-cost cervical exam model that was shown to be well-regarded by trainees and could be duplicated by other residency programs. This approach provides a unique and accessible way to offer hands-on simulation during obstetrical training. The model may improve trainees' understanding of the procedures which would lead to better experiences for obstetrical patients.

Adolescent medicine training in postgraduate family medicine education: a scoping review.

Adolescents and young adults require age-appropriate healthcare services delivered by clinicians with expertise in adolescent medicine. However, resident family physicians report a low perceived self-efficacy and under-preparedness to deliver adolescent medical care. We conducted a scoping review to map the breadth and depth of the current evidence about adolescent medicine training for family medicine residents. We followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework and searched seven electronic databases and key organizations' webpages from inception to September 2020. Informed by the CanMEDS-FM, we analyzed the extracted data concerning basic document characteristics, competencies and medical topics using numerical and qualitative content analysis. We included 41 peer-reviewed articles and six adolescent health competency frameworks (n=47). Most competencies taught in family medicine programs were organized under the roles of family medicine expert (75%), communicator (11.8%), and professional roles (7.9%). Health advocate and leader were rarely included (1.3%), and never scholar. The omission of multiple competency roles infamily medicine resident education on adolescents is insufficient for family physicians to deliver optimal care to adolescents. The combined efforts of family medicine stakeholders to address adolescent medicine competency gaps may positively impact the perceived competence reported by family medicine residents.

Examining the status of rural post-graduate family medicine education.

Rural populations in Canada are generally in worse health when compared to their urban counterparts. In 2014, the College of Family Physicians of Canada and the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada formed a joint Task force to advocate for improved health in rural communities. As a task force, they developed the Rural Road Map for Action. This paper uses the Rural Road Map for Action as a framework to examine the current state of family medicine's Post-Graduate Medical Education (PGME) in Canada. Surveys were sent to the programme directors of all English- and French-speaking post-graduate family medicine programmes. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse survey responses. Thirteen of 17 respondents completed the questionnaire. Despite on-going efforts, our results suggest that few programmes have equity and diversity admission's policies for rural and Indigenous students; a gap exists between the number of residents who are educated in rural areas and those who end up practising in rural areas; residents lack skills in Indigenous health; and more funded professional development opportunities are needed for rural physicians. Rural healthcare concerns are typically under-represented in PGME. The Rural Road Map for Action brings focus to the specific healthcare needs of rural areas, highlighting a recruitment and retention strategy that aligns education, practice, policy and research activities. Medical schools and national physician organisations need to continue to advocate for the health of rural communities through increasing the rural physician workforce and providing appropriate training for rural practice.

Comparison of patients' perceptions of family physicians' patient-centeredness between virtual and in-person clinical encounters: A cross-sectional study.

A clinician's patient-centeredness is a core construct of quality healthcare and is associated with several positive patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare patient-perceived patient centeredness between in-person and virtual clinical encounters during the coronavirus pandemic. Participants completed an online anonymous questionnaire pertaining to a recent clinical encounter. Patients of an academic family medicine teaching clinic scheduled for either an in-person or a virtual clinical encounter were recruited by phone over a two-month period. Using the patient-centered clinical method as a conceptual framework, patient-perceived patient centeredness was measured by the Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire-Revised (PPPC-R), consisting of 18 items that reflect three factors (healthcare process, context and relationship, and roles). The sample consisted of 72 participants. There was no difference in the PPPC-R scores between participants who received in-person and those who received virtual care. However, the mean ranks for the PPPC-R total score and for all three factors were higher for participants who saw a family physician compared to participants who saw a family medicine learner. Family physicians provided similar quality healthcare, measured through a patient-perceived patient-centeredness lens, via both virtual and in-person appointments. These results support sustaining virtual care when deemed appropriate by both patient and clinician.

Use of telehealth for cancer screening in primary care during COVID-19: an analysis of the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance Survey 2022

Use of telehealth for cancer screening in primary care during COVID-19: an analysis of the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance Survey 2022

Stakeholder Participation and Cross-Sectoral Cooperation in a Quality Circle on Community-Based Teaching: Results of a Qualitative Interview Study.

Community-based learning in family medicine practices is an increasingly important part of the medical curriculum internationally. It is widely regarded as one solution to healthcare system needs, such as training and retaining a workforce willing to work in primary care. However, the perspectives of community-based medical educators and representatives from university-based medical education are rarely integrated. To improve teaching quality and promote exchange between those two sectors of medical education, the Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care at Tübingen University started a quality circle in family medicine teaching involving stakeholders from both sectors in 2018. The study aims to describe how the participants of this specific QC describe the cross-sectoral cooperation and participation of stakeholders in the quality management of community and university medical education. After an observed meeting of the quality circle, semi-structured interviews were conducted with n=12 participants of the quality circle. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory. According to the participants, the quality circle provides a dynamic continuity which allows participants to navigate known barriers to transsectoral collaboration in the quality management of community-based medical education. The quality circle is perceived as an instrument for quality improvement that offered continuity and direction. At the same time, it allows for enough freedom and flexibility for the involved stakeholders to creatively work together on quality management and be inspired by their experiences. The quality circle has the potential to facilitate collaboration between the two teaching settings, form a creative community, and give medical students an active role in educational quality management.

Focused practice in family medicine

To determine factors associated with having a focused practice among a sample of family medicine graduates in Canada and to assess the characteristics of FPs with focused practices and the range of services provided by these FPs in relation to the full scope of office-based care. Secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from the 2013-2014 Western Family Medicine Resident Follow-Up Survey. Western University in London, Ont. Western University family medicine residency graduates who completed the program between 1985 and 2012. Physician and practice characteristics and the clinical services that survey participants provide. Completion of postgraduate third-year (PGY3) training was associated with having a focused practice. Focused practice FPs were more likely to be remunerated by fee-for-service, alternative payment plans, or alternative funding plans compared with non-focused practice FPs, who were more likely to participate in group payment models. Focused practice FPs appeared to be a heterogeneous group who were distinguished by being either an office-based focused practice FP (OBFFP) or a non-office-based focused practice FP (NOBFFP). Office-based focused practice FPs were less likely than NOBFFPs to have completed PGY3 training and more likely to work under a fee-for-service or group payment model. Further, the OBFFP group offered a greater variety of primary care services than the NOBFFP group, but offered less variety than non-focused practice FPs. Completion of PGY3 training and payment through certain remuneration models were both associated with focused practice. Important differences exist between OBFFPs and NOBFFPs. The overall service provision of focused practice FPs was centred on specialized areas, especially among those practising in non-office-based settings. Novel findings from this study provide insights for family medicine education, work force planning, and policy making in the Canadian health system.

Outcomes of a US-Sino family medicine leadership program

Background and objectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of a two- week US-Sino Family Medicine Leadership Symposium for medical educators from China and how participants have integrated their learning into their teaching and practice of medicine.MethodsTeaching topics emphasized principles of family medicine, teaching methods, assessment, and curriculum development. Each cohort received a wide range of practical, didactic and hands-on learning experiences. Online surveys were distributed anonymously to participants from the 2013–2019 cohorts to assess learner opinion and learner behavior change as a result of the leadership symposium. Quantitative measures assessed their level of integration of the topics into teaching and clinical practice and their satisfaction in the areas of teaching and leadership. They were also asked to provide qualitative feedback regarding incorporation of the content into their work.ResultsThe survey response rate was 47.6% (39/82). Respondents stated that they incorporated topics such as basic interviewing skills and information on the patient-centered medical home into their teaching in China. The most applied clinical skills they were able to incorporate into their clinical environment in China included: Breaking Bad News, Simulations Sessions with practice, One-Minute Preceptor, and Interprofessional Education.ConclusionsResults indicate that participants have demonstrated behavior changes that have led to the incorporation of the content into teaching and clinical practice. We demonstrated effectiveness of the curriculum in cultivating the teaching and practice of family medicine. The program appears to be a positive experience that has led to embracement of the roles as trainer and leader. 100% of the participants who completed the survey felt that the program improved patient confidence in their ability as a family doctor. Future assessment on barriers to their progress as teachers and leaders in family medicine would be helpful to explore.

Implementation of the Principles of Family Medicine in Modern Family Medicine Education Needing System-Specific Approaches.

Family medicine is a key specialty in primary healthcare worldwide. Medical students and residents learn family medicine in medical schools and hospitals. Modern family medicine education curricula have changed because of the increase in the number of organ specialists. Family physicians have more comprehensive training in patients, medicine, and social issues than in the past. Family physicians need to adapt to changing circumstances, but he needs to practice comprehensive and holistic medicine, as most of the time, family physicians are the first point of contact both in urban and rural setup. In 1979, McWhinney proposed nine principles of family medicine to which family physicians should adhere when providing care to patients in their communities. A review of and reflection on these principles has clarified that the principles should be more emphasized and practiced. Besides, respectful approaches by different family physicians are essential. To adapt to changing healthcare conditions, family medicine education can focus more on person-centered care and healthcare systems as system-specific specialists, respect the differences in healthcare provision between urban and rural areas, and motivate medical students and residents to become family physicians.