Family Bystanders Research Articles

Impact of Shared Decision-Making on Family Satisfaction With Intensive Care Services: 'Share With Care' has a New Meaning in ICU.

Background: Physician's clinical inputs and informed bystander opinions are essential for successful intensive care unit (ICU) patient outcomes. There is insufficient data regarding the impact of shared decision-making on treatment outcomes and family satisfaction in Indian ICU settings. We aimed to determine the effect of shared decision-making factors on family satisfaction with ICU services. Patients and Methods: Family bystanders of 336 ICU patients with a stay >72 hours were conveniently surveyed across 13 months prospectively using Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24 Revised (FS-ICU 24R) questionnaire. We analyzed the responses to determine shared decision-making factors impacting family satisfaction. Results: Univariate analysis of ten variables of FS-ICU 24R questionnaire decision-making subscale revealed that consistency of information (OR 8.71, P < 0.001), honesty of information (OR 7.04, P < 0.001), and frequency of communication with doctors (OR 6.25, P < 0.001) were associated with highest odds of family involvement and satisfaction. Multivariable logistic regression showed that consistency of information (adjusted OR 3.85, P < 0.001) and frequent doctor communication (adjusted OR 2.22, P = 0.02) were independent predictors associated with family satisfaction. The number of decision-makers (P = 0.463) or family's prior ICU experience (P = 0.430) was not associated with family satisfaction. Conclusion: A consistent and honest effort to cater to the family's information needs and frequent physician-bystander interaction is essential for family's satisfaction with ICU services. This even outweighs other decision-making factors such as number of decision-makers and their prior ICU experience. Incorporating shared decision-making in counseling should be a continuing practice.Trial registry name: Clinical Trials Registry - India.Registration number: CTRI/2022/09/045571.

Family's Perceived Needs and Satisfaction with Intensive Care Services: A Questionnaire-based Prospective Observational Study.

Holistic intensive care management involves the treatment of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) as well as catering to family psychosocial needs helping in bettering satisfaction/perception of care. There is scarce data in the Indian intensive care setting regarding the same, especially in times of increasing end-of-life practices. Our study aimed to determine the factors impacting family perception/satisfaction with intensive care. A total of 336 family bystanders of patients in ICU with more than 72 hours of stay were surveyed using family satisfaction in the ICU 24 revised (FS-ICU 24R) questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the significant factors associated with the satisfaction among bystanders of ICU patients were the treatment of patient's physical symptoms like pain/breathlessness (Adjusted OR 3.73, p = 0.003), ICU staff's approach to family's need consideration (Adjusted OR 4.44, p < 0.001), concern and care towards patients' family (Adjusted OR 2.67, p = 0.023). Participation in patient care, ICU waiting room atmosphere, and emotional support are the other factors independently associated with satisfaction with ICU care. Family satisfaction was not associated with the patient's survival (p = 0.331, Chi-square test) or the length of ICU (p = 0.328, Chi-square test) and hospital stay (p = 0.865, Chi-square test). Treatment of a patient's physical symptoms like pain, approach to family's needs consideration, and concern/care towards the patient's family are independent factors associated with optimal satisfaction among family members of ICU patients, which even takes precedence over the survival outcomes or length of ICU stay. Atri V, Bhatt MT, Chaudhuri S, Mitra A, Maddani SS, Ravindranath S. Family's Perceived Needs and Satisfaction with Intensive Care Services: A Questionnaire-based Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):483-494.

Place-provider-matrix of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitationand outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide observational cross-sectional analysis.

This study aims to test the association between the place-provider-matrix (PPM) of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Adult patients with OHCA with a cardiac etiology from 2012 to 2017 in Korea were analyzed, excluding patients who had unknown information on place, type of bystander, or outcome. The PPM was categorized into six groups by two types of places (public versus home) and three types of providers (trained responder (TR), family bystander, and layperson bystander). Outcomes were survival to discharge and good cerebral performance category (CPC) of 1 or 2. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between PPM group and outcomes with adjustment for potential confounders to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (reference = Public-TR). A total of 73,057 patients were analyzed and were categorized into Public-TR (0.6%), Home-TR (0.3%), Public-Family (1.8%), Home-Family (79.8%), Public-Layperson (9.9%), and Home-Layperson (7.6%) groups. Compared with the Public-TR group, the AORs (95% CIs) for survival to discharge were 0.61 (0.35-1.05) in the Home-TR group, 0.85 (0.62-1.17) in the Public-Family group, 0.38 (0.29-0.50) in the Home-Family group, 1.12 (0.85-1.49) in the Public-Layperson group, and 0.42 (0.31-0.57) in the Home-Layperson group. The AORs (95% CIs) for good CPC were 0.58 (0.27-1.25) in the Home-TR group, 0.88 (0.61-1.27) in the Public-Family group, 0.38 (0.28-0.52) in the Home-Family group, 1.20 (0.87-1.65) in the Public-Layperson group, and 0.42 (0.30-0.59) in the Home-Layperson group. The OHCA outcomes of the Home-Family and Home-Layperson groups were worse than those of the Public-TR group. This finding suggests that OHCA occurring in private places with family or layperson bystanders requires a new strategy, such as dispatching trained responders to the scene to improve CPR outcomes.

Effect of awareness time interval for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on outcomes: A nationwide observational study

PurposeAwareness of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is critically important for bystanders to receive early instruction of dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) as well as to call for ambulance services. This study aimed to determine the association between awareness time interval and outcomes. MethodsEMS-treated, witnessed, adult (≥18 years old) OCHAs with presumed cardiac etiology between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed, excluding patients with unknown awareness time factors and outcomes. The main exposure was awareness time interval (ATI), defined as the time from the witnessed event to calling for ambulance. Patients were categorized into five groups according to ATI: Group 1 (0–1 min), Group 2 (2−3 min), Group 3 (4−5 min), Group 4 (6−30 min) and Group 5 (31−60 min). The primary outcome was good neurological recovery defined as cerebral performance category 1 or 2 (good CPC). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes by ATI group (reference = Group 1) and by one-minute delay. We compared the effect size of ATI on outcomes across three witness groups (Layperson, Family, and Unknown). ResultsA total of 36,809 OHCAs were analyzed. The AOR (95% CI) by one-minute ATI delay was 0.91 (0.90–0.92) for good CPC. The AORs (95% CIs) for outcomes compared with Group 1 were 0.98 (0.88–1.09) for Group 2, 0.64 (0.56–0.74) for Group 3, 0.30 (0.26–0.35) for Group 4, and 0.10 (0.05–0.20) for Group 5. In the Family bystander group, AORs (95% CIs) compared with Group 1 were significantly decreased by delay of ATI; 1.04 (0.88–1.11) for Group 2, 0.63 (0.81–0.83) for Group 3, and 0.31 (0.31–0.40) for Group 4 and 5. In Layperson-witnessed OHCAs, however, the AORs were significantly higher in the delayed awareness groups (Group 2 and Group 3). ConclusionA longer ATI in witnessed adult OHCAs was associated with poor neurological recovery. A one-minute delay in ATI was associated with a 9% decrease of good neurological recovery, and the effect was significantly increased in Family-witnessed OHCAs.

Dispatcher assistance makes significantly better incidence of shockable rhythm for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the residence with family bystander

Purpose: Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a considerable quality is essential for making incidence of shockable rhythm on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). The present study was conducted to test our hypothesis that dispatcher assisted CPR improve the incidence of shockable rhythm for the patients in the residence with family bystander.

Elderly out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has worse outcomes with a family bystander than a non-family bystander

BackgroundA growing elderly population along with advances in equipment and approaches for pre-hospital resuscitation necessitates up-to-date information when developing policies to improve elderly out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. We examined the effects of bystander type (family or non-family) intervention on 1-month outcomes of witnessed elderly OHCA patients.MethodsData from a total of 85,588 witnessed OHCA events in patients aged ≥65 years, which occurred from 2005 to 2008, were obtained from a nationwide population-based database. Patients were stratified into three age categories (65–74, 75–84, ≥85 years), and the effects of bystander type (family or non-family) on initial cardiac rhythm, rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and 1-month outcomes were assessed.ResultsThe overall survival rate was 6.9% (65–74 years: 9.8%, 75–84 years: 6.9%, ≥85 years: 4.6%). Initial VF/VT was recorded in 11.1% of cases with a family bystander and 12.9% of cases with a non-family bystander. The rate of bystander CPR was constant across the age categories in patients with a family bystander and increased with advancing age categories in patients with a non-family bystander. Patients having a non-family bystander were associated with significantly higher 1-month rates of survival (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.19–1.33) and favorable neurological status (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.34–1.60).ConclusionsElderly patient OHCA events witnessed by a family bystander were associated with worse 1-month outcomes than those witnessed by a non-family bystander. Healthcare providers should consider targeting potential family bystanders for CPR education to increase the rate and quality of bystander CPR.