compound heterozygous [6,7]. The existence of many rare poly morphisms (and genetic modifiers) in the involved genes further complicates the genetic assessment of LQTS patients [8]. Many disease-causing mutations result in changes in the function of ion channels, for example, gating properties, and require highly specialized electrophysiological ana lysis for their characterization [1]. Such an ana lysis is not readily available and certainly not within a reasonable timeframe. Finally, small family sizes often preclude a certain assessment of disease segregation with the mutation in the pedigree. In reality, most of the mutations described in the literature as ‘disease causing’ have not been confirmed to be so in sensu stricto. For the individual patient, several benefits can be noted if a disease-causing mutation can be found. First, prognostic information can occasionally be gained from knowing the affected gene [9] or the location of the mutation within a specific gene [10]. Second, if the person decides to have children they may be analyzed genetically at birth, or for that matter prenatally, and necessary prophylactic treatment can be instituted prior to occurrence of symptoms, reducing the need for extensive clinical investigations in early childhood. Third, knowledge of the gene involved may also aid in the identification of behavioral risk factors and enable a more precise recommendation of lifestyle changes. Mutations in some genes have been demonstrated to be associated with specific arrhythmia-precipitating factors, for example, physical activity in KCNQ1 mutations and emotional distress in KCNH2 mutations [1]. Thus, the identification of a disease-causing mutation may obviate the need for indiscriminate banning of physical activities. Finally, as the effect of treatment differs between affected genes and mutations in some genes – for example, SCN5A – exhibit complex phenotypes, genotyping may assist in defining optimal treatment or suggest further clinical testing [11]. The latter Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a cardiac condition characterized by prolonged QT time on the ECG, representing delayed cardiac repolarization and a propensity for ventricular tachycardia. The disease has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 2500 and a clinical presentation that includes sudden death and syncope. Mutations in 12 genes have been demonstrated to cause the disease (LQTS1–12); all the genes code for either cardiac ion channels or proteins interacting with these channels [1]. Presently, LQTS genetic testing, performed by most laboratories, provides comprehensive open reading frame/splice site mutational ana lysis of the five most frequently affected LQTS-causing genes, that is, KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1 and KCNE2, via high-throughput DNA sequencing [2,3]. A disease-causing mutation can be identified in 50–70% of symptomatic LQTS cases and cascade screening is routinely performed in affected families [2,3]. This is important as 10% of LQTS gene carriers are asymptomatic and at risk of sudden death [4]; LQTS has been estimated to be responsible for up to 10% of sudden infant death syndrome and 5% of sudden adult death syndrome cases [5]. There is no doubt that the real evidence-based value of LQTS testing at present relates to cascade screening in families of people with symptomatic disease, exemplified by sudden death cases with an identified presumed disease-causing mutation. However, it should be noted that the diagnosis of LQTS in most cases is a clinical one – genetic testing can not replace careful clinical examination as a negative mutation finding does not rule out the condition. The genetics of LQTS is complicated, which is exemplified by the problems in ascertaining the clinical significance of novel mutations. These problems are not merely a consequence of allelic heterogeneity, but also due to the fact that most identified mutations are private, that is, specific for the examined family [1] and approximately 5% of LQTS cases are
Read full abstract