Familial Aggregation Of Cancer Research Articles

Sex-specific familial aggregation of cancers in Finland

Despite the fact that the effect of sex on the occurrence of cancers has been studied extensively, it remains unclear whether sex modifies familial aggregation of cancers. We explored sex-specific familial aggregation of cancers in a large population-based historical cohort study. We combined cancer and population registry data, inferring familial relationships from birth municipality-surname-sex (MNS) combinations. Our data consisted of 391,529 incident primary cancers in 377,210 individuals with 319,872 different MNS combinations. Cumulative sex-specific numbers of cancers were compared to expected cumulative incidence. Familial cancer risks were similar between the sexes in our population-wide analysis. Families with concordant cancer in both sexes exhibited similar sex-specific cancer risks. However, some families had exceptionally high sex-specific cumulative cancer incidence. We identified six families with exceptionally strong aggregation in males: three families with thyroid cancer (ratio between observed and expected incidence 184.6; 95% credible interval (95% CI) 33.1–1012.7, 173.4 (95% CI 65.4–374.3), and 161.4 (95% CI 29.6–785.7), one with stomach (ratio 14.4 (95% CI 6.9–37.2)), colon (ratio 15.5 (95% CI 5.7–56.3)) cancers and one with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ratio 33.5 (95% CI 17.2–207.6)). Our results imply that familial aggregation of cancers shows no sex-specific preference. However, the atypical sex-specific aggregation of stomach cancer, colon cancer, thyroid cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in certain families is difficult to fully explain with present knowledge of possible causes, and could yield useful knowledge if explored further.

EP03.01-012 Characterization of Lung Cancer in Patients With High Familial Aggregation of Cancer: Preliminary Data From the SCAN Study

In patients with lung cancer, familial aggregation of cancer has been described. However, the clinical/molecular profile of lung tumors associated has not been characterized. We aimed to describe the profile of patient/tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high-familial aggregation of cancer.

Cancer patterns in nasopharyngeal carcinoma multiplex families over 15 years.

Genetic and environmental factors are important determinants of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). NPC is associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Studies have reported familial aggregation of NPC, but evidence has been mixed for elevated rates of cancers other than NPC. The authors reassessed their previous evaluation of familial aggregation of cancer in 348 high-risk Taiwanese multiplex families with 2 or more NPC cases enrolled between 1980 and 2003. Participants were linked to the Taiwan National Cancer Registry and National Death Registry to identify cancers. In all, 2590 individuals contributed 37,959 person-years over an average of 15 years of follow-up; 314 incident cancers were identified. The authors computed multiple primary standardized incidence ratios (MP-SIRs) to evaluate the overall risk and the risk of infection-associated, EBV-associated, and individual cancers. The overall MP-SIR was 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.38). The exclusion of excess NPC risk led to an overall MP-SIR of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.98-1.25). Similarly, the risk of cancers associated with infectious agents was driven by the excess in NPC, and its exclusion led to an MP-SIR of 1.22 (95% CI, 0.99-1.48) for infection-associated cancers and to an MP-SIR of 1.18 (95% CI, 0.72-1.82) for EBV-associated cancers. The authors observed a significant excess of second cancers among NPC cases (oral cancer, mouth cancer, tongue cancer, gum cancer, nasal cavity cancer, bone cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma). This reassessment of the largest NPC multiplex family study confirms the presence of NPC coaggregation within families in Taiwan but does not provide evidence for a broader familial syndrome involving NPC and other tumors. Among NPC cases, elevated rates of secondary cancers, mostly at the, head and neck and hematopoietic cancers suggest radiation treatment effects on subsequent cancer risk.

Angiosarcoma of the Breast and Familial Aggregation of Cancer: Case Series of 12 Patients and Literature Review

Breast sarcomas are histologically heterogeneous non-epithelial malignant tumours derived from mesenchymal cells, arising from mammary connective tissue. They are rare, representing less than 1% of all breast cancers..

Angiosarcoma of the breast and familial aggregation of cancer: Case series of 12 patients and literature review

Angiosarcoma of the breast and familial aggregation of cancer: Case series of 12 patients and literature review

Familial aggregation of early-onset cancers.

This registry‐linkage study evaluates familial aggregation of cancer among relatives of a population‐based series of early‐onset (≤40 years) cancer patients in Finland. A cohort of 376,762 relatives of early‐onset cancer patients diagnosed between 1970 and 2012 in 40,538 families was identified. Familial aggregation of early‐onset breast, colorectal, brain and other central nervous system (CNS) cancer and melanoma was explored by standardized incidence ratios (SIR), stratified by relatedness. Gender‐, age‐ and period‐specific population cancer incidences were used as reference. Cumulative risks for siblings and offspring of the proband up to age ≤40 years were also estimated. Almost all early‐onset cancers were sporadic (98% or more). Among first‐degree relatives, SIR was largest in colorectal cancer (14, 95% confidence interval 9.72–18), and lowest in melanoma (1.93, 1.05–3.23). Highest relative‐specific SIRs were observed for siblings in families, where also parent had concordant cancer, 90 (43–165) for colorectal cancer and 29 (11–64) for CNS cancer. In spouses, all SIRs were at population level. Cumulative risk of colorectal cancer by age 41 was 0.98% in siblings and 0.10% in population, while in breast cancer the corresponding risks were 2.05% and 0.56%. In conclusion, early‐onset cancers are mainly sporadic. Findings support high familial aggregation in early‐onset colorectal and CNS cancers. Familial aggregation in multiplex families with CNS cancers was mainly attributed to neurofibromatosis and in colorectal cancer to FAP‐ and HNPCC‐syndromes. The pattern of familial aggregation of early‐onset breast cancer could be seen to support very early exposure to environmental factors and/or rare genetic factors.

Risk of pancreatic cancer associated with family history of cancer and other medical conditions by accounting for smoking among relatives.

Family history (FH) of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been associated with an increased risk of PC, but little is known regarding the role of inherited/environmental factors or that of FH of other comorbidities in PC risk. We aimed to address these issues using multiple methodological approaches. Case-control study including 1431 PC cases and 1090 controls and a reconstructed-cohort study (N = 16 747) made up of their first-degree relatives (FDR). Logistic regression was used to evaluate PC risk associated with FH of cancer, diabetes, allergies, asthma, cystic fibrosis and chronic pancreatitis by relative type and number of affected relatives, by smoking status and other potential effect modifiers, and by tumour stage and location. Familial aggregation of cancer was assessed within the cohort using Cox proportional hazard regression. FH of PC was associated with an increased PC risk [odds ratio (OR) = 2.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-4.06] when compared with cancer-free FH, the risk being greater when ≥ 2 FDRs suffered PC (OR = 3.88; 95% CI: 2.96-9.73) and among current smokers (OR = 3.16; 95% CI: 2.56-5.78, interaction FHPC*smoking P-value = 0.04). PC cumulative risk by age 75 was 2.2% among FDRs of cases and 0.7% in those of controls [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.42; 95% CI: 2.16-2.71]. PC risk was significantly associated with FH of cancer (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.13-1.54) and diabetes (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.52), but not with FH of other diseases. The concordant findings using both approaches strengthen the notion that FH of cancer, PC or diabetes confers a higher PC risk. Smoking notably increases PC risk associated with FH of PC. Further evaluation of these associations should be undertaken to guide PC prevention strategies.

DNA DAMAGE IN TUMOR CELLS AND PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER PATIENTS ASSESSED BY THE COMET ASSAY

To evaluate the level DNA damage in tumor cells and PBLs of endometrial cancer (EC) patients with regard to clinical and morphological characteristics of the patients. DNA damage was assessed in 106PBLs samples and 42samples of tumor cell suspension from EC patients by comet assay. PBLs from 30healthy women were used as control. The level of DNA damage was expressed as the percentage of DNA in the comet tails (% tail DNA). It was revealed that the amount of DNA damage in PBLs of EC patients was 2.2times higher in comparison with that of healthy donors (8.3 ± 0.7and 3.7 ± 0.4% tail DNA, respectively) (p < 0.05). In this study, no association between the levels of DNA damage in endometrial tumor cells and PBLs was observed (r = 0.11; p > 0.05). The amounts of DNA damage both in tumor cells and PBLs were not related to the degree of tumor differentiation as well as the depth of myometrial invasion, but depended on the body mass index (BMI) of EC patients: high level of lesions was observed in patients with elevated BMI values. Furthermore, the level of DNA damage in tumor cells was associated to familial aggregation of cancer and was significantly higher in endometrial cells from patients with family history of cancer vs that from EC patients with sporadic tumors (32.3 ± 2.9and 22.8 ± 1.8% tail DNA, respectively) (p < 0.05). It was also found that for women who had high level of DNA damage in PBLs, the risk of EC was greater (odds ratio value of 3.5) compared to those with low level of such lesions. Genome instability that appears as an increased level of DNA damage in tumor cells and PBLs of EC patients is associated with BMI and family history of cancer and can reflect a predisposition to cancer.

Determining the familial risk distribution of colorectal cancer: a data mining approach.

This study was aimed to characterize the distribution of colorectal cancer risk using family history of cancers by data mining. Family histories for 10,066 colorectal cancer cases recruited to population cancer registries of the Colon Cancer Family Registry were analyzed using a data mining framework. A novel index was developed to quantify familial cancer aggregation. Artificial neural network was used to identify distinct categories of familial risk. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer were calculated for each category. We identified five major, and 66 minor categories of familial risk for developing colorectal cancer. The distribution the major risk categories were: (1) 7% of families (SIR = 7.11; 95% CI 6.65-7.59) had a strong family history of colorectal cancer; (2) 13% of families (SIR = 2.94; 95% CI 2.78-3.10) had a moderate family history of colorectal cancer; (3) 11% of families (SIR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.12-1.36) had a strong family history of breast cancer and a weak family history of colorectal cancer; (4) 9 % of families (SIR = 1.06; 95 % CI 0.96-1.18) had strong family history of prostate cancer and weak family history of colorectal cancer; and (5) 60% of families (SIR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.65) had a weak family history of all cancers. There is a wide variation of colorectal cancer risk that can be categorized by family history of cancer, with a strong gradient of colorectal cancer risk between the highest and lowest risk categories. The risk of colorectal cancer for people with the highest risk category of family history (7% of the population) was 12-times that for people in the lowest risk category (60%) of the population. Data mining was proven an effective approach for gaining insight into the underlying cancer aggregation patterns and for categorizing familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Correlation between the germline methylation status in ERβ promoter and the risk in prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Familial aggregation of cancer may reflect an overall contribution of inherited genes or a shared mechanism for the manipulation of gene function. DNA methylation in the promoter regions is considered to be a mechanism through which tumor suppressor genes are inhibited, which will lead to tumorigenesis and tumor progression. To evaluate the association between the methylation status in the promoter of estrogen receptor (ER) β,possibly a tumor suppressor gene specific for prostate cancer, and the risk in prostate cancer in a Chinese population, a case-control study that included 56 sporadic prostate cancer cases and 60 healthy controls was conducted. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of all the subjects for analyzing the methylation status of the ERβ promoter by methylation-specific PCR, which was verified by bisulfite genomic sequencing PCR. A significant difference was observed in the methylation frequencies of the ERβ promoter between cancer patients (12/56, 21.4%) and healthy controls (5/60, 8.3%). Prostate cancer (PC-3 and DU-145) and prostatic epithelial (RWPE-1) cell lines were treated with various concentrations of the methyltransferase inhibitor 5-Aza-2'-dC. Expression of ERβ was detected at both transcriptional and translational levels. As a result, both mRNA and protein of ERβ were elevated following treatment with increasing concentrations of the demethylating agent. Taken together, our results support the conclusion that abnormal methylation of the ERβ promoter may increase genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer.

Analysis of Heritability and Shared Heritability Based on Genome-Wide Association Studies for Thirteen Cancer Types.

Studies of related individuals have consistently demonstrated notable familial aggregation of cancer. We aim to estimate the heritability and genetic correlation attributable to the additive effects of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for cancer at 13 anatomical sites. Between 2007 and 2014, the US National Cancer Institute has generated data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for 49 492 cancer case patients and 34 131 control patients. We apply novel mixed model methodology (GCTA) to this GWAS data to estimate the heritability of individual cancers, as well as the proportion of heritability attributable to cigarette smoking in smoking-related cancers, and the genetic correlation between pairs of cancers. GWAS heritability was statistically significant at nearly all sites, with the estimates of array-based heritability, hl (2), on the liability threshold (LT) scale ranging from 0.05 to 0.38. Estimating the combined heritability of multiple smoking characteristics, we calculate that at least 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14% to 37%) and 7% (95% CI = 4% to 11%) of the heritability for lung and bladder cancer, respectively, can be attributed to genetic determinants of smoking. Most pairs of cancers studied did not show evidence of strong genetic correlation. We found only four pairs of cancers with marginally statistically significant correlations, specifically kidney and testes (ρ = 0.73, SE = 0.28), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and pediatric osteosarcoma (ρ = 0.53, SE = 0.21), DLBCL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (ρ = 0.51, SE =0.18), and bladder and lung (ρ = 0.35, SE = 0.14). Correlation analysis also indicates that the genetic architecture of lung cancer differs between a smoking population of European ancestry and a nonsmoking Asian population, allowing for the possibility that the genetic etiology for the same disease can vary by population and environmental exposures. Our results provide important insights into the genetic architecture of cancers and suggest new avenues for investigation.

Abstract 2765: Evaluation of family history of cancer in first-degree relatives and increased cancer risk: A multinational study

Abstract Family history of cancer is a known risk factor for several of the more prevalent cancer types. However, familial aggregation of cancer may not follow the genetic linkage pattern seen with most inherited cancer syndromes. In these instances, clustering may be due to unknown hereditary genetic mutations or to an aggregation of environmental risk factors and such clustering may still confer a significant risk. We assessed the association between family history of cancer in first-degree relatives and cancer risk among 9,122 cancer cases and 76,537 controls in a multinational study. Analyses also included evaluation of breast, colon and prostate cancer risk associated with family history of these respective cancer types. Cases were verified by physician diagnosis and all study participants were administered an in-depth survey to ascertain various demographic and lifestyle factors as well as a complete family history of cancer among first-degree relatives. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between family history of cancer and cancer risk. Among all subjects, the odds ratio (OR) for individuals with a family history of cancer was 1.79 [95% confidence interval = 1.7-1.9] after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking pack years and ethnicity. Additionally, a greater cancer risk was associated with increasing number of first-degree relatives with a history of cancer. Ethnic groups studied included Caucasian-Americans, African-Americans, Hispanic/Latinas and Caucasian-Polish. All ethnic groups showed a significant association between family history of cancer and cancer risk with the highest adjusted OR of 2.65 [95% confidence interval = 2.0-3.6] among the Hispanic/Latina group. Further analyses indicated that family history of colon, breast and prostate cancer was significantly associated with an increased risk of these respective cancer types across studied ethnic groups. In particular, the adjusted ORs for breast, colon and prostate cancer risk in the Caucasian-Polish group were at least double the overall adjusted ORs for each cancer type. Our study shows that family history of cancer is a significant predictor of cancer risk especially among certain ethnic groups. In addition, family history of cancer can represent both a genetic predisposition and/or environmental exposure and risk associated with familial clustering of cancer. Citation Format: Laxmi Modali, Teresa A. Lehman, Ramakrishna Modali, Luke D. Ratnasinghe. Evaluation of family history of cancer in first-degree relatives and increased cancer risk: A multinational study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2765. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2765

Risk of cancer in relatives of patients with myotonic dystrophy: a population‐based cohort study

Myotonic dystrophies (DM) are autosomal dominantly inherited neuromuscular disorders caused by unstable nucleotide repeat expansions. DM and cancer have been associated, but the pathogenesis behind the association remains unclear. It could relate to derived effects of the DM genotype in which case non-DM relatives of DM patients would not be expected to be at increased risk of cancer. To elucidate this, a population-based cohort study investigating risk of cancer in relatives of DM patients was conducted. DM was identified using the National Danish Patient Registry and results of genetic testing. Information on cancer was obtained from the Danish Cancer Registry. A population-based cohort of 5 757 565 individuals with at least one relative was established using the Danish Family Relations Database based on kinship links in the Danish Civil Registration System. Familial aggregation of cancer was evaluated by (incidence) rate ratios (RRs) comparing the rate of cancer amongst relatives of patients with DM from 1977 to 2010 (exposed) with the rate of cancer amongst persons with a relative of the same type but without DM (non-exposed). In first-degree relatives of individuals with DM the adjusted RR of cancer was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.71-1.12) overall, and in stratified analyses 0.68 (0.37-1.12) before age 50 and 0.96 (0.74-1.23) at age 50 or older. The present study does not support an increased risk of cancer in non-DM relatives of DM patients suggesting that cancer and DM are associated through derived effects of the DM genotype.

GALNT12is Not a Major Contributor of Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X

Previous evidence indicates that mutations in the GALNT12 gene might cause a fraction of the unexplained familial colorectal cancer (CRC) cases: GALNT12 is located in 9q22-33, in close proximity to a CRC linkage peak; and germline missense variants that reduce the enzymatic activity of the protein have been identified in CRC patients, some of them with familial CRC history. We hypothesized that mutations in GALNT12 might explain part of the high-risk families grouped as familial CRC type X (fCRC-X), that is, Amsterdam-positive families with mismatch repair proficient tumors. We sequenced the coding regions of the gene in 103 probands of fCRC-X families, finding no functionally relevant mutations. Our results rule out GALNT12 as a major high CRC susceptibility gene. Additional studies are required to provide further evidence about its role as a moderate/low susceptibility gene in familial aggregation of cancer.

Familial aggregation of childhood and adult cancer in the Utah genealogy

A small proportion of childhood cancer is attributable to known hereditary syndromes, but whether there is any familial component to the remainder remains uncertain. We explored familial aggregation of cancer in a population-based case-control study using genealogical record linkage and designed to overcome limitations of previous studies. Subjects were selected from the Utah Population Database. We compared risk of cancer in adult first-degree relatives of children who were diagnosed with cancer with the risk in relatives of children who had not had a cancer diagnosed. We identified 1,894 childhood cancer cases and 3,788 controls; 7,467 relatives of cases and 14,498 relatives of controls were included in the analysis. Relatives of children with cancer had a higher risk of cancer in adulthood than relatives of children without cancer [odds ratio (OR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.56]; this was restricted to mothers and siblings and was not evident in fathers. Familial aggregation appeared stronger among relatives of cases diagnosed before 5 years of age (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.95) than among relatives of cases who were older when diagnosed (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.98-1.51). These findings provide evidence of a generalized excess of cancer in the mothers and siblings of children with cancer. The tendency for risk to be higher in the relatives of children who were younger at cancer diagnosis should be investigated in other large data sets. The excesses of thyroid cancer in parents of children with cancer and of any cancer in relatives of children with leukemia merit further investigation.

Familial risk in pediatric cancer and implications for practice.

9561 Background: Using a unique genealogical resource, the Utah Population Database, we examined risk of cancer in 1st- through 3rd-degree relatives of 4,482 pediatric cancer cases ≤18 years old diagnosed between 1966 and 2009. We quantified cancer risk in relatives of children with cancer in order to determine evidence of a familial aggregation of cancer, identify high-risk pedigrees, and inform counseling protocols for genetic testing and screening. Methods: We estimated cancer risk in relatives of pediatric cases compared to random population controls matched 5:1 on sex, birth year, and birthplace. Odds ratios were calculated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for number of biological relatives, their degree of relatedness, and their person-years at risk. We included all relatives of cases and controls with followup who linked to a pedigree of ≥2 generations; this approach has been shown to lead to unbiased risk estimates. As observations within families are non-independent, a robust variance estimator for cluster-correlated data was incorporated. Results: Mostly siblings, 1st-degree relatives (N=49 affected) of pediatric cases were at 2-fold increased risk of being diagnosed at age&lt;19 with cancer themselves (p&lt;10-4); siblings of cases diagnosed at age&lt;5 had a 4-fold risk of pediatric cancer (p&lt;10-7). Likewise, 2nd-degree relatives (N=61 affected) and cousins (N=105 affected) of cases had a ~2-fold risk of childhood cancer (p&lt;10-4). Proband siblings were at increased risk for leukemia, brain tumor, epithelial neoplasia, and bone cancer. While 1st-degree relatives of pediatric cases had a slight increased risk of adult-onset cancer, when they do develop cancer they exhibit a 50% increased risk of a Li-Fraumeni Syndrome-related tumor diagnosis (N=142 affected relatives; p&lt;10-4). Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence of familial aggregation of cancer and suggest a higher percent of pediatric cancers are related to hereditary syndromes than are adult cancers. We encourage a 3-generation family history be collected and routinely updated for all pediatric cancer patients, and those children with family histories of early-onset cancer be referred for genetic counseling and early surveillance when appropriate.

Familial Aggregation of Urinary Tract and Bone Tumors: Searching for a Syndrome

Positive family anamnesis is an important risk factor for cancer, and therefore further investigations need to be done if familial aggregation of cancer is observed. Due to a rare combination of urinary tract and bone tumors occurring in the family presented herein we hypothesized a hereditary predisposition and thus, Li-Fraumeni syndrome was considered to be the most likely differential diagnosis. To confirm Li-Fraumeni syndrome, we set out to investigate this case by analyzing the tumor suppressor gene p53. However, taking into account all the diagnostic results obtained, Li-Fraumeni syndrome could not be confirmed, but there is still uncertainty regarding a definitive diagnosis.

Diagnostic microarray test for a genetic predisposition to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)

Colorectal cancer (CC), due to its frequency and social costs is a subject of extensive screening programs (colonoscopy and new developments) in several countries, including Poland. Relatively common and defined genetic predispositions to different forms of CC make genetic screening an attractive alternative, not only in families with positive CC history. Optimal testing strategy should be acceptable for subjects, high-throughput and cost-effective in mutation detection. CBDNA Ltd. Company has developed and validated prototype diagnostic microarray test for genetic predisposition to nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). The test includes 169 selected mutations (point mutations and short insertions/deletions) in 5 genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, CHEK2 and NOD2. Total of 36 patients with CC, six of them fulfilling modified Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, and the rest with less evident familial aggregation of cancers were included in the pilot study. Altogether 6 different mutations in 9 patients were identified (25%) within the group. The effectiveness of genetic screening using the microarray method was similar to other molecular, but more expensive and time-consuming methods.

An epidemiological reappraisal of the familial aggregation of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Studies on familial aggregation of cancer may suggest an overall contribution of inherited genes or a shared environment in the development of malignant disease. We performed a meta-analysis on familial clustering of prostate cancer. Out of 74 studies reporting data on familial aggregation of prostate cancer in unselected populations retrieved by a Pubmed search and browsing references, 33 independent studies meeting the inclusion criteria were used in the analysis performed with the random effects model. The pooled rate ratio (RR) for first-degree family history, i.e. affected father or brother, is 2.48 (95% confidence interval: 2.25–2.74). The incidence rate for men who have a brother who got prostate cancer increases 3.14 times (CI:2.37–4.15), and for those with affected father 2.35 times (CI:2.02–2.72). The pooled estimate of RR for two or more affected first-degree family members relative to no history in father and in brother is 4.39 (CI:2.61–7.39). First-degree family history appears to increase the incidence rate of prostate cancer more in men under 65 (RR:2.87, CI:2.21–3.74), than in men aged 65 and older (RR:1.92, CI:1.49–2.47), p for interaction = 0.002. The attributable fraction among those having an affected first-degree relative equals to 59.7% (CI:55.6–63.5%) for men at all ages, 65.2% (CI:57.7–71.4%) for men younger than 65 and 47.9% (CI:37.1–56.8%) for men aged 65 or older. For those with a family history in 2 or more first-degree family members 77.2% (CI:65.4–85.0%) of prostate cancer incidence can be attributed to the familial clustering. Our combined estimates show strong familial clustering and a significant effect-modification by age meaning that familial aggregation was associated with earlier disease onset (before age 65).

Cancer patterns in nasopharyngeal carcinoma multiplex families in Taiwan

Genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in the etiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a tumor known to be closely associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Studies have reported familial aggregation of NPC and have suggested the possible aggregation of NPC and other cancers. We evaluated familial aggregation of cancer in 358 high-risk families with two or more NPC cases enrolled in a NPC genetics study in Taiwan. Participants were linked to the Taiwan National Cancer Registry to identify incident cancers diagnosed after study enrollment (started in 1996) and before December 31, 2005, or death. In total, 2,870 individuals from the NPC Multiplex Family Study contributed 15,151 person-years over an average of 5.3 years of follow-up. One hundred ten incident cancers were identified. Multiple-primary standardized incidence ratios (MP-SIRs) were computed to evaluate overall cancer risk associated with infectious agents and with other tumors. The overall MP-SIR was 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1-1.6), which was largely explained by an excess in NPC (MP-SIR = 15; 95% CI: 10-23). Exclusion of incident NPC diagnoses led to an overall MP-SIR of 1.0 (95% CI: 0.83-1.3). Similarly, the observed excess risk of cancers associated with infectious agents (MP-SIR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5-2.6) was driven by the excess in NPC; exclusion of NPC cases led to a reduced MP-SIR that did not differ from 1.0. Analysis of the largest NPC multiplex family study to date confirms the presence of coaggregation of NPC within families in Taiwan but does not provide evidence for a broader familial syndrome involving NPC and other tumors.