Fair Value Disclosures Research Articles

The Influence of Company Fundamentals and Director Characteristic towards Fair Value Measurement in the Indonesian Banking Industry

Fair value is part of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which attract attention of researchers due to its controversial issues. Studies investigating factors influencing opportunistic behaviour through fair value figures in developing countries are limited. This study aims to investigate the effect of company fundamental factors on fair value. This research applies multiple regression of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2022. The fundamental factors, as independent variables are return on equity (ROE), ratio of operating expense on operating income (OEOI), capital adequacy ratio (CAR) and the proportion of female directors. Meanwhile, the dependent variable is fair value through modelling calculation i.e. fair value level 3 inputs. This study found that only OEOI significant influence fair value level 3 inputs. Meanwhile, ROE, CAR, and the proportion of females in the board of directors does not significant influence on fair value level 3 inputs. The study implications Indonesian banking industries should prioritize fair value disclosure, especially at level 3, as it provides crucial information about a company's performance and condition, potentially enabling investors to evaluate its performance.

Value Relevance of Fair Value Measurement on Investment Property: Malaysian Evidence

Objective - This research investigates the disclosure practices for fair value measurement of investment property and examines the value relevance of fair value information reported by Malaysian public listed companies. Methodology/Technique - The study focuses on annual reports from 2018 of companies listed on the Main Market of Bursa Malaysia, excluding firms in the financial and unit trust sectors. The sample includes 71 companies that reported fair value gains on investment property. Findings - Findings reveal that none of the companies used Level 1 inputs, 51% used Level 2 inputs, 39% used Level 3 inputs, and 10% used a combination of Level 2 and 3 inputs. The regression analysis indicates that fair value gains are not significantly related to stock returns, suggesting that Malaysian investors do not find this information useful. However, net income before fair value gains is significantly related to share returns, highlighting the importance of traditional earnings metrics. Novelty - This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence from Malaysia, revealing a gap in the perceived usefulness of fair value disclosures and underscoring the continued relevance of traditional financial metrics for investors. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: M41, M49. Keywords: Fair Value Gain, Investment Property, Value Relevance, Disclosure Reference to this paper should be referred to as follows: Shaari, H. (2024). Value Relevance of Fair Value Measurement on Investment Property: Malaysian Evidence, Acc. Fin. Review, 9(1), 42 – 53. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2024.9.1(2)

The effect of key audit matters and management disclosures on auditors’ judgements and decisions: An exploratory study

We investigate how disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) and related management footnote disclosures on a subjective accounting estimate relating to fair value in the financial statement footnotes affect auditors' perceptions of their accountability and their subsequent adjustment decisions. In relation to accountability, a substitution effect is found between KAMs disclosures and footnotes. That is, auditors believe that they are less accountable either when they can report on the fair value estimates in KAMs disclosures, or when management has provided expanded fair value related footnotes. However, we find that when the fair value disclosure is considered by both KAMs and expanded footnotes it results in the auditor recommending a more conservative fair value adjustment decision. Overall, our results show that the requirement to disclose KAMs does make a real difference and interacts with management's disclosures to affect auditors' perceptions of accountability and their adjustment decisions.

The impact of directors' attributes on IFRS fair value disclosure: an institutional perspective

PurposeThe current study investigates the impact of directors' attributes on the extent of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) fair value disclosure requirements. The attributes investigated include directors' human capital (accounting qualification) and social capital (political association), directors' share ownership and the power distance between the chief executive officer (CEO) and the rest of the board members.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses disclosure analysis to measure the extent of compliance with the fair value disclosure requirements of IFRS. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is used to test the relationship between the disclosure score and directors' attributes. Data were collected from the annual reports and websites of the sample companies.FindingsContrary to conventional belief, this study's findings suggest that directors' social capital and the power distance between the CEO and the rest of the board act as more powerful factors than directors' human capital in explaining corporate mandatory disclosure. Specifically, the results indicate that powerful actors form a dominant coalition and co-opt influential constituents from the institutional domain to neutralize the effect of legal coercion and the accounting expertise of board members and Big Four audit firms on the extent of compliance with institutional (fair value) rules.Research limitations/implicationsThis study utilizes Oliver's (1991) framework of strategic response to institutional processes in the Bangladeshi context. Although the study provides new insights into corporate disclosure practices, findings are not generalizable due to different institutional settings in different countries. Therefore, future studies could replicate the approach in different institutional settings.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study will be of interest to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as it focuses on a developing country that has adopted IFRS 13 and other fair value-related standards relatively recently.Originality/valueThe disclosure analysis contained in this study represents the first comprehensive analysis of the extent of compliance with the fair value disclosure requirements of IFRS. Furthermore, this study considers the impact of directors' social capital and finds that it is a more powerful determinant of the extent of compliance with IFRS as compared to human capital.

European Real Estate Properties Valuation: Ten Years After Adopting IFRS 13

IFRS 13 had its mandatory implementation on January 1st, 2013. The new accounting standard, which represents one step closer to harmonization between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, aims to eliminate inconsistencies in fair value measurement and its related disclosures through the introduction of new reporting requirements, specifically for assets and liabilities with no active markets. Although these demands also encompass information concerning financial instruments, our focus was on the disclosure changes related to the fair value of investment properties, previously regulated solely by IAS 40. As investment properties comprise the majority of assets in the real estate industry, this sector was further examined. Through a statistical analysis of the sample companies’ annual reports for the periods immediately before and after the implementation of IFRS 13, the purpose of our descriptor-explanatory study was to investigate the level of compliance with IFRS 13 fair value disclosure requirements for investment properties in real estate companies in Europe. In order to answer this question, we first scrutinized the level of compliance with the new disclosure requirements brought up by the standard and then, intermediated by an adaptation of the model developed by Beretta & Bozzolan (2008), measured the disclosure quality for both periods considered. After data collection and analysis, our findings reveal that IFRS 13 does affect the disclosure quality of investment properties in real estate companies in Europe. Overall compliance is very high, while disclosure quality has increased since the implementation of IFRS 13. As a way to further broaden the research related to the more extensive disclosure requirements under IFRS 13, we suggest additional studies be undertaken where the point of view of the real estate companies could be explored. Moreover, it would be interesting to investigate whether the increased number of disclosures, both in relation to quantity and quality, is relevant from an analyst’s standpoint. Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-03-04 Full Text: PDF

The moderating impact of auditor industry specialisation on the relationship between fair value disclosure and audit fees: empirical evidence from Jordan

PurposeThis paper investigates the application of the product differentiation and shared efficiency approaches to understand the impact of the auditor industry specialisation (IS) on audit fees in relation to Fair Value Disclosures (FVD).Design/methodology/approachThe study uses 1,470 firm-year observations for the period 2005–2018 and is focused on Jordanian financial firms. Two competing theoretical approaches of IS proxied by audit fee-based measures were employed: firstly, the product differentiation approach measured using Market Share-based (MS) measure and secondly, the shared efficiency approach measured using Portfolio Share-based (PS) measure. The paper employs the Ordinary Least Squares regression to test the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets (using fair value hierarchy inputs) and audit fees.FindingsThe results suggest that the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets and audit fees is strengthened (weakened) when the client hires specialist auditors identified by MS (PS). This association varied across the fair value inputs. Level 1 assets were found to be only moderated by both scenarios positively (negatively) for MS (PS) experts. The results are robust after controlling the endogeneity of auditor self-selection.Practical implicationsThe results provide valuable insights for policymakers into challenges of auditing FVD. These insights present a valuable input for the development of FVD policies and practices as well as providing guidance for updating auditor prices. Additionally, the results provide a foundation for policymakers and regulators to introduce and update fair value auditing practices. The current findings are generalisable to other countries, including the Middle East and North Africa, and are particularly beneficial for those countries which have adopted the fair value model.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the theory by demonstrating the impact of the auditor industry expertise on post-implementation costs of FVD. The novelty of the study lies in introducing principle-based standards requirements of FVD to test the relationship. This approach is based on the IFRS disclosure requirements using data from the Jordanian financial sector to examine this relationship.

The Impact of Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 68 Application Guidelines for Banking Sector Issued by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK)

This study will discuss the impact of PSAK 68 application guidelines in banking sectors related to fair value measurement in Indonesia. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) issued the Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 68 application guidelines for the banking sector during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to support the implementation of PSAK 68 from Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI) regarding fair value measurement. The PSAK 68 application guidelines encourage banks to present financial statements that accurately represent the company's actual financial position and financial performance by measuring the fair value based on facts. This study uses qualitative methods by evaluating the application of fair value disclosure with the asset valuation of banking sector companies in Indonesia. This study concluded that the guidelines issued by OJK have an impact on banking entities in maintaining the company's financial position during the pandemic and can encourage the growth of the banking sector in a sustainable manner. Keywords: Banking sector, fair value measurement, financial performance, financial position, PSAK 68

Fair value accounting and audit fees: The moderating effect of the global financial crisis in Jordan

This article introduces new empirical evidence exploring the relationship between the introduction of Fair Value Disclosure (FVD) and audit fees, and the moderating effect of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on this relationship. This study is primarily motivated by the limited and inconclusive research on the monitoring costs resulting from FVD. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method using a sample of 222 Jordanian firms during 2005–2018 is applied. The analysis finds that a greater level of FVD is the major cause of high audit fees. Results are more pronounced for firms with larger proportions of subjective FVDs (Level 3 assets). A significant negative (positive) impact of the precrisis (post-crisis) period on the association between the proportion of fair-valued assets and audit fees is confirmed. The regression results confirm the negative effect of pre-crisis period on moderating the association between the all-fair value input levels (Levels 1, 2 and 3 assets) and audit fees. The post-crisis period has a significant positive effect only in relation to Level 1 assets. Findings of this study provide policymakers and standards setters with updated evidence originating from a non-Western setting about the post-implementation costs of FVD.

Assessing the value relevance of fair value measurements: a South African perspective

PurposeThis paper aims to explore whether fair value Levels 1 and 2 measurements are more value relevant than Level 3 fair value measurements in a less-active market. Specifically, this research addresses two objectives. Firstly, it examines the value relevance of fair value measures for each disclosure level of fair value. Secondly, it assesses the impact of corporate governance on the value relevance of less observable fair value disclosures (Levels 2 and 3).Design/methodology/approachDrawing insights from agency theorising, this research adopts a quantitative approach (regression analysis) that investigates data from a less active financial market (South Africa).FindingsContrary to agency theory suppositions, the results show that investors in a less active market value management inputs more than market (more transparent) information. The authors also observe that investors pay limited interest to corporate governance structures when pricing fair value measurement, implying that they rely on factors beyond corporate governance mechanisms.Originality/valueThe authors’ findings offer useful evidence to standard setters and preparers of financial information. While the International Accounting Standard Board suggests that investors value transparent financial information, the data shows that investors in less-active markets value management’s inputs more than those of the market.

Relevance of supplementary fair value disclosures under market uncertainty: Effects on audit fees and investors’ pricing

Fair value (FV) means the market value of an asset, which can be observed directly (Level 1), or indirectly (Level 2). In some cases, the FVs are not observable in the market and managers of companies estimate the valuation internally using statistical models based on the best information available. These are known as Level 3 FV. The measurement uncertainty is the highest for Level 3 FVs as they rely on managerial discretion, creating concerns about their representational faithfulness and relevance among auditors and investors. This concern is likely to be heightened in the wake of market uncertainty during 2020 caused by the COVID pandemic. Regulators (e.g., ASIC) suggested that disclosing supplementary information (i.e., beyond the minimum required by regulation) on FV can help mitigate such concerns. In this study, I examine the relevance of supplementary disclosures intended to improve the representational faithfulness and relevance of Level 3 FV by investigating their impacts on audit fees and investors’ valuation in the uncertain market condition of 2020. My sample comprises Level 3 investment properties held by Australian real estate companies. I find that managers of real estate companies increased supplementary FV disclosures during 2020. I document a negative association between supplementary disclosures and audit fees, implying that disclosures reduce the audit risk effect by signalling higher transparency. However, I find no incremental impact of disclosures on audit fees during the pandemic. Additionally, I find that investors’ pricing of FV increased with the increase in disclosures during the market uncertainty of 2020, while in the pre-uncertainty period, their pricing influence was not significant. The findings of this study inform regulators and other financial reporting stakeholders about the role of supplementary FV disclosures in mitigating the perceived audit risk for auditors and the faithful representation concerns for investors in a distressed market environment.

Abnormal Monitoring Costs Charged for Auditing Fair Value Model: Evidence from Jordanian Finance Industry

This article inspects the likely outcome of using the fair value (FV) concept on audit firms’ anomalous audit fees. The research performs fixed effects regression to evaluate the given hypotheses using data gathered by hand from 105 Jordanian publicly traded enterprises between 2005 and 2018. The study reveals that FV proxies have a favorable and substantial effect on the atypical audit fees paid by Jordanian enterprises. The findings are more evident for businesses with a higher percentage of subjective FVs (level 3 assets). This research gives current empirical information on the effects of adopting IFRS/IAS for policymakers and standard setters. The results contribute by offering recommendations on the factors that influence audit fees for auditors and clients. The present research updates the Fair Value Disclosure (FVD) auditing model and adds new empirical data to close a gap in the auditing literature. It adds to the limited and inconclusive audit price studies already available by examining the post-implementation of FVD. This research gives current empirical facts on the consequences of adopting an FV model in Jordan for policymakers and standard setters. Additionally, this investigation adds by offering information on the factors that influence audit fees for both auditors and clients. The findings provide regulatory authorities with information on observing and regulating the audit vocation as well as on auditing FVD activities.

Expected Loan Loss Provisioning: An Empirical Model

ABSTRACT The new accounting standard requires that financial institutions estimate expected credit losses on their loan portfolios. The predictability of long-term losses, however, remains an open question. We develop a model that predicts long-term loan losses and incorporates adjustments for macroeconomic forecasts. The model combines cross-sectional predictions with a high-dimensional dynamic factor model that tracks aggregate losses over the business cycle. The model predicts long-term losses out-of-sample with significantly greater accuracy than the Harris et al. (2018) model and several other alternatives. It is also more effective at detecting bank failures. We use the model to estimate the present value of expected losses and the expected loss overhang for a given bank-quarter. The estimated present values subsume information in reported allowances and in fair value disclosures about long-term losses; the evidence is also consistent with loss overhang distorting banks' decisions. The model provides a useful benchmark to study loan loss provisioning. JEL Classifications: G21; M40; M41.

Relevance of supplementary fair value disclosures under market uncertainty: effects on audit fees and investors’ pricing

PurposeConcerns relating to the representational faithfulness and, consequently, the relevance of fair value (FV) estimates are likely to be heightened in the wake of market uncertainty caused by the COVID pandemic. Therefore, this paper aims to study the relevance of supplementary disclosures intended to improve the representational faithfulness of FV estimates by examining their impacts on audit fees and investors’ valuation of FV adjustments in the uncertain market condition of 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe sample is comprising Australian real estate firms. The authors develop both weighted and unweighted disclosure indices based on supplementary disclosures related to Level 3 FVs under IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. The authors measure the levels of disclosure by the sample firms based on these indices from 2018 to 2020 and ascertain their effects on audit fees and the market value of FV adjustments on investment properties.FindingsThe authors find that real estate firms increased supplementary FV disclosures during 2020. The authors document a negative association between supplementary disclosures and audit fees, although the authors find no incremental impact of disclosures on audit fees during the pandemic. Additionally, the authors find that investors’ pricing of FV adjustments increased with the increase in disclosures during the market uncertainty of 2020, while in the pre-uncertainty period, their pricing influence was not significant.Originality/valueThe findings extend the understanding of the role of supplementary disclosures on Level 3 investment properties in mitigating the perceived audit risk for auditors and the faithful representation concerns for investors in a distressed market environment.

Loan Fair Value Disclosures and Deposit Flows

Loan Fair Value Disclosures and Deposit Flows

Value-relevance of reported changes in fair values and measurement-related fair value disclosures: evidence from the Australian real estate industry

PurposeThe paper aims to investigate the value-relevance of changes in fair values of investment property reported under International Accounting Standards (IAS) 40 and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 13.Design/methodology/approachMultivariate regression models are used to regress cumulative market-adjusted stock returns of real estate firms on changes in fair values, along with control variables and corporate governance variables, in order to examine the research question.FindingsUsing hand-collected data from the Australian Real Estate Industry (AREI), the authors find that changes in fair values of investment property are value-relevant for equity investors. The authors further find that using unobservable inputs in an active market (Level 3 inputs) does not diminish the information content of fair values. The authors document that properties valued exclusively by directors have a significantly reduced value-relevance, whereas property valuations made collectively by both directors and independent valuers have superior value-relevance, possibly owing to the combination of inside knowledge and externally imposed monitoring. Collectively, the findings suggest that in the real estate industry, where unobservable inputs are commonly used to determine fair values of properties, the fair values determined subjectively are perceived to be sufficiently informative and relevant.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors' findings have important implications for accounting standard-setters in considering whether an external valuation should be required and whether the extensive measurement-related fair value disclosure requirements are useful.Originality/valueThe study extends previous archival evidence and complements prior commentaries on experimental and analytical work in the Australian regulatory environment.

Fair value accounting: epistemic commitment and resistance

ABSTRACT This study responds to calls for additional research on how accounting prescriptions are being operationalised with a specific focus on fair value accounting by individual practitioners. Detailed interviews are carried out to evaluate how accountants understand and resist fair value accounting. The nature of resistance is used to distinguish between proponents of historical cost accounting and flexible adherents to fair value accounting. Contrary to expectations, the former do not reject fair value accounting outright but see it as playing a complementary role when fair value disclosures support historical cost accounting. Resistance is only evident when fair value movements are recognised in financial statements and takes the form of technical and conceptual objections. Departures from accounting standards are, however, avoided with the result that historical cost advocates are reluctant but obedient adopters of fair value accounting. Flexible adherents also resist fair value but the nature of their resistance is procedural or operational. Without a clear commitment to either regime, legalistic and superficial application of accounting standards becomes more common. Consequently, flexible adherents pose a greater risk to auditors, regulators and standard setters than do “dissidents” advocating for historical cost accounting. Overall, the study highlights the interconnection between the level of commitment to well-established accounting knowledge templates and resistance rather than treating these as separate theoretical perspectives. The results demonstrate that resistance is not specific to certain groups of accountants but is both dynamic and systemic. How resistance manifests itself has important implications for the understanding and application of accounting prescriptions.

Non-Professional Investors' Judgments of the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates—The Impact of Investor Mood

ABSTRACTWe study whether investor mood affects non-professional investors' judgments of the reliability of fair value estimates. In two experiments, we find that investor mood, which is a factor that is unrelated to the assessment of reliability across the fair value hierarchy, is associated with differences in the extent to which Level 1 fair values are perceived to be more reliable than Level 3 fair values. As mood becomes more positive, investors perceive greater differences in the extent to which Level 1 fair values are more reliable than Level 3 fair values. Importantly, we find that including brief definitions in the headings under which fair values are reported reduces the influence of mood over perceptions of reliability, and likely improves the effectiveness of fair value disclosures.

Relevance of Level 3 fair value disclosures and IFRS 13: a case study

This paper studies the relevance of Level 3 fair value disclosures in financial statements for equity analysts. The research also examines the impact that implementation of IFRS 13 Fair Value measurement had on the relevance of disclosures and disclosure practice. Semi-structured interviews with equity analysts and fair value disclosures of three listed real estate companies are used to analyse relevance of fair value disclosures. Equity analysts focus on cash flow and do not incorporate Level 3 fair values as an input in their valuation. These results indicate that Level 3 fair value measurements or fair value disclosures have little relevance or information value for analysts. However, the fair value disclosures appear to have to some extent confirmative value as they provide the analysts with comfort over their own fair valuation measurements and verify the credibility of management. The additional disclosure requirements implemented with IFRS 13 have scant relevance for equity analysts. The results provide evidence that standard setters, auditors and preparers of financial statements with significant Level 3 estimates should focus on predictive and forward-looking disclosures to evaluate future cash flows. Detailed disclosures about management valuation process and sensitivity analysis have limited relevance for the analysts. This study links together the analysts and disclosures literature and provides insights into relevance of fair value disclosures and understanding how analysts process and use fair value disclosures.

Fair Value Complexity and the Audit Risk

This paper checks if the auditors in an emergent context, where the fair value (FV) concept, its implementation and audit are relatively new, are aware of the estimation risk induced by the valuation process (the FV provider and FV disclosure), depending on the quality of internal control (IC). An experiment was applied to a group of auditors and master students, using two elements pertaining to FV reporting: “Valuation attributes and sensitivity of data”, respectively “Methods, assumptions and model”. This experiment revealed that: (1) FV audit risk is lower when the estimation is made by an external, instead of an internal valuator; (2) the master’s students, compared to more experienced professional auditors, manifest an overconfidence in the external Valuation Report in terms of valuation attributes, data availability and solutions adopted to test the sensitivity of value; (3) the audit risk is lower when the valuator is external and hence the auditors verify in detail the information provided in the Valuation Report as inputs and methods applied; (4) when IC is strong as quality, the verification of methods, assumptions and model induces for auditors a higher risk than the other FV disclosed component, valuation attributes and sensitivity of data, in the case of management estimation.

МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ОСНОВИ ОБЛІКУ ЗАПАСІВ: МІЖНАРОДНИЙ ТА НАЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ ВИМІР

The article highlights the main methodological principles of inventory accounting in the context of comparing the requirements of international and national standards. The essence of inventories and the criteria for their recognition are determined, the classification of inventories for accounting purposes, their evaluation at posting and disposal, the general requirements for the disclosure of accounting information about inventories in the financial statements. It has been found that national standards detail the groups of inventories in accounting, although they do not disclose the characteristics of such systematization. Also the most fully prescribed requirements for the recognition of inventories as assets in NP (S) BU 9; under IAS 2, the recognition of inventories is not explained in accounting, but is explained only in the context of their recognition as an expense. The same methodological approach is observed in national and international practice regarding the methods of valuation of inventories at disposal and determination of fair value of inventories, but it should be noted that for greater disclosure of fair value of inventories there is a separate international financial reporting standard 13 “Fair value measurement”. International standards, in contrast to national standards, require greater disclosure of inventory information in the financial statements, in particular in the notes to the financial statements. First of all, it concerns the disclosure of information on: the adopted accounting policy for choosing the method of valuation of inventories at their disposal; the carrying amount of inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell; the amount of inventories recognized as an expense during the reporting period; operations to restore write-offs and other credentials. Research in this direction allowed to illustrate the positive and negative aspects of the current standards of inventory accounting and led to further scientific research to improve the methodological foundations of inventory accounting.