In this issue, there are an assortment of articles for our readership—a book review, two forum articles, and two scholarly papers. Hazel Beh reviews one of the classic books of our time— Legal aspects of law in architecture, engineering, and construction by Justin Sweet and Marc Schneier, now in its 7th edition. Hazel brings out that this book is not only a “national book” and textbook as the authors humbly mention but a permanent, longterm reference book “that will become a trusted, well-worn and dog-eared companion in the library of lawyers, architects, engineers and contractors long after graduation.” The text is found to be impressive in its thoroughness and comprehensiveness. In my opinion, this book is a historical contribution to construction law. We then have a forum article by none other than Justin Sweet himself, who gives advice on how engineers should approach and manage matters of law. Sweet asserts that postcompletion claims are a common feature of the contracting landscape these days, and the engineer in a design team who does not take time to familiarize himself with legal matters may find himself swept off his feet. Given that the legal training of engineers is extremely limited, if not deficient, engineers have a lot to learn about the proper applications of law. Sweet’s article is followed by Evan Caplicki’s, who shows how design/builders may not make unilateral changes to contract agreements. While we generally appreciate that owners carry responsibility for changing designs after construction has started, so it is with contractors and design/builders, as well. The law applies equally in a fair and equitable contract to both parties. Unilateral changes to contracts create disorder and disturbance. Again, it is evident that our engineers and builders fail to recognize apparently simple tenets and principles of law. In some way, Evan’s article brings order and discipline to the issue and helps to spread the understanding of common contracting law. This brings me to an important issue facing judges, lawyers, and engineers—that of order versus disorder. Inasmuch as scientists seek to fathom chaos and disorder in the universe, lawyers and judges seek to bring order to a society, in contrast to letting it seep into uncontrolled disorder. A civilization needs some semblance of order to survive. There is no doubt, as we look around ourselves, that the implementation of law has been widespread and precise over the decades. To think that women did not have franchise in the United States till the 20th century, and women in Kuwait earned their franchise only this year and it was only through the application of law and brave sheriffs that the wild West was tamed in the 19th century. These are examples in a mountain of evidence that legal applications in this world seek more and more to be fair to people in a nondiscriminatory way. Having said that, we also realize that law is not perfect by any means, which is strikingly similar to the fact that no known natu-
Read full abstract