Failed Fibrinolysis Research Articles

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials of Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Failed Fibrinolysis

Previous trials have suggested clinical benefit with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after failed fibrinolysis, but more recent, larger studies are conflicting. Therefore, we designed a meta-analysis to determine whether rescue PCI improves outcomes compared with conservative therapy in the setting of early failure of fibrinolysis. We searched MEDLINE for randomized trials by using the Medical Subject Heading terms "angioplasty," "myocardial infarction," "thrombolytic therapy," and "fibrinolysis." The inclusion criteria were (1) acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction initially treated with fibrinolytics, (2) randomization of patients with failed fibrinolysis to immediate PCI or conservative therapy, and (3) available short-term clinical outcome data. The primary end point was short-term mortality and secondary end points were thromboembolic stroke and heart failure. Numbers of events were tabulated for each trial and risk ratios (RRs) were computed. Five trials were included for analysis. The pooled RR estimates showed a 36% decrease in the risk of death in the rescue arm (RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.00, p=0.048) and a marginally significant 28% decrease in the risk of heart failure (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.01, p=0.06). We also found a marginally increased risk of thromboembolic stroke in the rescue arm (RR 3.61, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 14.27, p=0.07). In conclusion, rescue PCI in the setting of early fibrinolytic failure improves mortality, but this is tempered by a possible increase in the risk of thromboembolic stroke.

A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit Infarction (MERLIN) trial

A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit Infarction (MERLIN) trial

A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial

ObjectivesWe sought to compare emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with conservative treatment in patients with failed fibrinolysis complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BackgroundMost patients with STEMI receive fibrinolytic therapy and aspirin. The management of failed fibrinolysis is unclear. MethodsA total of 307 patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis were randomized to emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue PCI or conservative treatment. ResultsThirty-day all-cause mortality was similar in the rescue and conservative groups (9.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.7, risk difference [RD] 1.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −5.8 to 8.3). The composite secondary end point of death/re-infarction/stroke/subsequent revascularization/heart failure occurred less frequently in the rescue group (37.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.02, RD 12.7%, 95% CI 1.6 to 23.5), driven by less subsequent revascularization (6.5% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01, RD 13.6%, 95% CI 6.2 to 21.4). Re-infarction and clinical heart failure were less common in the rescue group (7.2% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.3, RD 3.2%, 95% CI −3.3 to 9.9; and 24.2% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.3, RD 5.7%, 95% CI −4.3 to 15.6, respectively). Strokes and transfusions were more common in the rescue group (4.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.03, RD 3.9%, 95% CI 0.5 to 8.6; and 11.1% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001, RD 9.8%, 95% CI 4.9 to 19.9, respectively). Left ventricular function at 30 days was the same in the two groups. ConclusionsRescue angioplasty did not improve survival by 30 days, but improved event-free survival, almost completely due to a reduction in subsequent revascularization. Rescue angioplasty was associated with more strokes and more transfusions and did not result in preservation of left ventricular systolic function at 30 days.

3620 MERLIN trial (Middlesbrough early revascularization to limit infarction): randomised trial of rescue angioplasty versus medical therapy for failed fibrinolysis complicating acute myocardial infarction

3620 MERLIN trial (Middlesbrough early revascularization to limit infarction): randomised trial of rescue angioplasty versus medical therapy for failed fibrinolysis complicating acute myocardial infarction

Interventional therapy after failed fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarct. Acute and long-term outcome of referral for rescue balloon angioplasty

The results from studies of coronary angioplasty after failed thrombolysis (rescue-PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction are contradictory. Long-term results were not presented till now. Therefore we analyzed the data from our registry of those patients whose acute and long-term results were available. Data of 49 patients were analyzed who had been admitted for rescue-PTCA from other hospitals. Thrombolysis had to be started < 6 hours (mean 2.7 hours) from onset of symptoms. Rescue-PTCA had to be completed within < 24 hours (mean 10.5 hours). 37 patients received streptokinase, seven rt-PA, three urokinase and two prourokinase. Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria were used to define failure of thrombolysis. The data of the acute results were from a prospective registry and the long-term results came from clinical follow-up visits and a questionnaire sent to the patients. Mean age of the patients was 48.5 years (38-78 years), 45 male, nine patients in cardiogenic shock (18%), infarct related artery (IRA): RCA 22x, LAD 21x, LCX 5x, CABG 1x, single vessel disease 27x, multiple vessel disease 22x. Acute results: Initial IRA-TIMI flow 0 in 28 patients, 1 in twelve patients, 2 in 9 patients; after rescue-PTCA TIMI flow 1 in one patient, 2 in two patients, 3 in 46 patients (procedural success 94%). Hospital mortality 8.2% (four patients), all in cardiogenic shock. Early reocclusion rate 10%. Bleeding complications 14%, no fatal complications. Long-term results: Observation period 2.5 years in 42 patients (0.5-6.5 years). Three more deaths. Total mortality 14% (7/49). Angiographic follow-up: Ejection fraction initially 50%; 53% after 3 months. Repeat revascularization in 43% (15/35): Re-PTCA in 8/35, surgery in 6/35 patients, 1x transplantation. 80% of the patients were free from angina or heart failure. Rescue-PTCA in acute myocardial infarction has a high procedural success rate with a low hospital mortality. It is the treatment of choice for patients in cardiogenic shock. Transportation to an interventional center is safe. The reintervention rate is comparably high. The long-term results are good.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition as an adjunct to rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition as an adjunct to rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis.

Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the RESCUE I, RESCUE II, and other contemporary clinical experiences

Background Prompt restoration of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow improves survival in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Fibrinolytic therapy fails to restore TIMI 3 flow within 90 minutes in 40% to 50% of patients. Because the results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for MI seem to be improving, a reevaluation of the role of PCI after fibrinolytic therapy for MI appears to be warranted. Methods and Results Data from all 9 randomized controlled trials (including new data from 4 trials) of rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus conservative therapy after fibrinolytic therapy (1456 patients), 4 contemporary registries of PCI in this setting (977 patients), and other germane studies are reviewed. PTCA after failed fibrinolysis (TIMI 0 to 1 flow) appears to reduce early severe heart failure (3.8% vs 11.7%, P =.04) and improve survival over 1 year in patients with moderate to large MI (92% vs 87%, P =.001) and possibly reduces early repeat MI (4.3% vs 11.3%, P =.08). Assessment of the possible benefit of PTCA for TIMI 2 flow is hampered by the small number of patients randomly assigned. Repeat MI may be decreased and left ventricular functional recovery enhanced. PTCA early after successful fibrinolysis is nearly always technically successful and may reduce repeat MI and hospital length of stay. However, it must be recalled that randomized trials from the 1980s suggested increased mortality rates with PTCA after restoration of TIMI 2 to 3 flow with fibrinolysis. Data from contemporary randomized studies of stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors suggest that PCI as performed today may yield better results than those reviewed. Conclusions These data suggest a probable benefit of rescue PTCA in several distinct scenarios and that the pivotal mid-1980s studies suggesting no benefit or harm for PTCA after fibrinolytic therapy may no longer be relevant. The role of mechanical intervention in the treatment of patients treated in these settings should be reassessed. (Am Heart J 2000;139:1046-53.)