Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type Research Articles

Early-Onset Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 With Some Atypical Features

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy cases with facial weakness before the age of 5 and signs of shoulder weakness by the age of 10 are defined as early onset. Contraction of the D4Z4 repeat on chromosome 4q35 is causally related to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1, and the residual size of the D4Z4 repeat shows a roughly inverse correlation with the severity of the disease. Contraction of the D4Z4 repeat on chromosome 4q35 is believed to induce a local change in chromatin structure and consequent transcriptional deregulation of 4qter genes. We present early-onset cases in the Polish population that amounted to 21% of our total population with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. More than 27% of them presented with severe phenotypes (wheelchair dependency). The residual D4Z4 repeat sizes ranged from 1 to 4 units. In addition, even within early-onset facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 phenotypes, some cases had uncommon features (head drop, early disabling contractures, progressive ptosis, and respiratory insufficiency and cardiomyopathy).

The muscular dystrophies.

With transition to the genetic era, the number of muscular dystrophies has grown significantly, but so too has our understanding of their pathogenic underpinnings. Clinical features associated with each muscular dystrophy still guide us to the diagnosis. However, improved diagnostic abilities refine and expand phenotypic and genotypic correlates. This article discusses the epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnosis of these disorders. Some important recent advancements include (1) a much greater understanding of the pathogenetic pathways underlying facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and myotonic dystrophy type 1; (2) the publication of diagnostic and treatment guidelines for Duchenne muscular dystrophy; and (3) further clarification of the many genetic muscle disorders presenting a limb-girdle pattern of weakness. Muscular dystrophies are genetic, progressive, degenerative disorders with the primary symptom of muscle weakness. Duchenne, Becker, facioscapulohumeral, and myotonic muscular dystrophies are most prevalent and tend to have distinctive features helpful in diagnosis. The limb-girdle, Emery-Dreifuss, and oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophies are less common but often may also be diagnosed on the basis of phenotype. Researchers hope to help patients with future discoveries effective in slowing or halting disease progression, reversing or preventing underlying mechanisms, and repairing previously damaged muscle.

The FSHD2 Gene SMCHD1 Is a Modifier of Disease Severity in Families Affected by FSHD1

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1) is caused by contraction of the D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4 to a size of 1-10 units. The residual number of D4Z4 units inversely correlates with clinical severity, but significant clinical variability exists. Each unit contains a copy of the DUX4 retrogene. Repeat contractions are associated with changes in D4Z4 chromatin structure that increase the likelihood of DUX4 expression in skeletal muscle, but only when the repeat resides in a genetic background that contains a DUX4 polyadenylation signal. Mutations in the structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1 (SMCHD1) gene, encoding a chromatin modifier of D4Z4, also result in the increased likelihood of DUX4 expression in individuals with a rare form of FSHD (FSHD2). Because SMCHD1 directly binds to D4Z4 and suppresses somatic expression of DUX4, we hypothesized that SMCHD1 may act as a genetic modifier in FSHD1. We describe three unrelated individuals with FSHD1 presenting an unusual high clinical severity based on their upper-sized FSHD1 repeat array of nine units. Each of these individuals also carries a mutation in the SMCHD1 gene. Familial carriers of the FSHD1 allele without the SMCHD1 mutation were only mildly affected, suggesting a modifier effect of the SMCHD1 mutation. Knocking down SMCHD1 in FSHD1 myotubes increased DUX4 expression, lending molecular support to a modifier role for SMCHD1 in FSHD1. We conclude that FSHD1 and FSHD2 share a common pathophysiological pathway in which the FSHD2 gene can act as modifier for disease severity in families affected by FSHD1.

Diagnostic clinique et moléculaire de la myopathie facioscapulo-humérale de type 1 (FSHD1) en 2012

IntroductionDiagnosis of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1) is supported by a suggestive clinical presentation and associated with a heterozygous contraction of the D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4q35. State of the artThe FSHD1 phenotype has a widely variable course with great inter- and intrafamilial heterogeneity. Three clinical forms can be distinguished: the classical phenotype associated with four to seven repeat units (RU) and a variable course, a severe infantile form with one to three RU, and a mild phenotype associated with borderline UR (8 to 10 RU). At the molecular level, for D4Z4 contraction to be pathogenic, it needs to occur on a specific chromosomal background, namely on the 4qA allelic variant of chromosome 4. In most cases, once FSHD is clinically suspected, the diagnosis can be genetically confirmed with a DNA test using Southern Blotting and hybridization to a set of probes. However, diagnosis of FSHD1 remains challenging. Firstly, some patients may present with an atypical phenotype with highly focal or unusual symptoms. Secondly, there are potential pitfalls in the genetic diagnosis of FSHD resulting in false positive or false negative results. In the absence of genetic confirmation, other investigations, mainly EMG and muscle biopsy, are needed to rule out another diagnosis. In cases with no clear diagnosis and a permissive chromosome without contraction, FSHD2 may be suspected. PerspectivesMolecular combing is a new technique which permits visualization and sizing of the D4Z4 repeat array on its genetic background on stretched single DNA fibers by fluorescence microscopy. This tool will improve genetic diagnosis in FSHD patients. ConclusionDiagnosis of FSHD1 is mainly supported by clinical features. Clinicians need to be aware of unusual presentations of this disease. The wide spectrum of intrafamilial variability and the lack of good correlation between genotype and phenotype present challenges for genetic counseling and prognostication. More studies are needed concerning penetrance and genotype–phenotype correlation.

Dystrophie musculaire facio-scapulo-humérale de type 2

IntroductionIn recent years, the advances of knowledge in clinical, genetic and epigenetic features of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) allowed the identification of two forms of FSHD, the classical autosomal dominant FSHD type 1, and FSHD type 2 characterized by an identical clinical phenotype but associated with a different (epi)genetic defect. State of the artIn the large majority of FSHD1 patients, the identification of D4Z4 pathogenic contraction on a permissive chromosome 4 is sufficient for diagnosis, while FSHD2 diagnosis is complicated by the fact that the genetic defect associated with this disease is not known yet and a complete D4Z4 genotype and a D4Z4 specific methylation test are required. Indeed, FSHD2 patients display a non-contracted D4Z4 allele on chromosomes 4, at least one permissive chromosome 4QA and a profound hypomethylation of both chromosomes 4 and 10. A common pathophysiological pathway has been hypothesized for FSHD1 and FSHD2 in order to explain the identical clinical phenotype and the highly similar epigenetic changes found in patients affected by these diseases. According to this hypothesis, chromatin relaxation – due to pathogenic D4Z4 contraction in FSHD1 patients, and to important hypomethylation of this locus in FSHD2 patients – would allow the last D4Z4 unit to encode for a toxic DUX4 transcript. This transcript would be stable only when encoded from a permissive chromosome 4 carrying a polyadenylation signal immediately distal to the last D4Z4 unit on chromosome 4. PerspectivesSince, to express clinical phenotype, FSHD2 patients have to carry both 4QA chromosome and hypomethylated D4Z4 on chromosomes 4 and 10, digenic transmission has been hypothesized for this disease. The identification of the gene(s) and the exact epigenetic pathway underlining this disease will be mandatory to increase the rate of diagnosis for FSHD2 patients and to confirm the hypothesis of a common FSHD1 and FSHD2 pathophysiological pathway involving DUX4 gene. ConclusionsThe identification, among patients carrying a FSHD phenotype, of FSHD2, a new disease with distinct (epi)genetic features but having a common pathophysiological pathway with FSHD1, suggests the possibility of developping new therapeutic strategies suitable for both diseases.

Coats Syndrome in Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy Type 1

Investigators at University of Rochester Medical Center, NY; Hopital Archet-CHU de Nice, France; and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, studied the frequency of Coats syndrome and its association with D4Z4 contraction size in 408 patients identified with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1).

Coats syndrome in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy type 1: frequency and D4Z4 contraction size.

To investigate the frequency of Coats syndrome and its association with D4Z4 contraction size in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1). We searched a North American FSHD registry and the University of Rochester (UR) FSHD research database, reviewed the literature, and sent surveys to 14 FSHD referral centers in the United States and overseas to identify patients with genetically confirmed FSHD1 with a diagnosis of Coats syndrome. Out of 357 genetically confirmed patients in a North American FSHD registry and 51 patients in the UR database, 3 patients had a self-reported history of Coats disease (0.8%; 95% confidence interval 0.2%-2.2%). In total, we identified 14 patients with FSHD with known genetic contraction size and Coats syndrome confirmed by ophthalmologic examination: 10 from our survey and 4 from the literature. The median age at diagnosis of Coats syndrome was 10 years (interquartile range 14 years). The median D4Z4 fragment size was 13 kilobases (kb) (interquartile range 1 kb). One patient was mosaic (55% 11 kb, and 45% 78 kb). Coats syndrome is a rare extramuscular complication of FSHD1 associated with large D4Z4 contractions. Closer surveillance for retinal complications is warranted in patients with D4Z4 fragments ≤15 kb.

Muscle regeneration and inflammation in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

The aim of this study was to investigate whether inflammation and regeneration are prominent in mildly affected muscles of patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1A (FSHD1A). Inflammation in muscle has been suggested by MRI studies in patients with FSHD1A. We analysed immunohistological and histological stains of muscle biopsies from 24 patients with FSHD1A, using 10 patients with Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) for comparison. Internalized nuclei were more prevalent in BMD (23.7 ± 10.8%) vs FSHD1A (6.3 ± 6.8%; P < 0.001), indicating more past regenerating fibres in BMD. Recently regenerating fibres, expressing neonatal myosin heavy chain and vimentin, did not differ significantly between patients with FSHD1A (1.1 ± 2.9%) and patients with BMD (1.8 ± 1.9%). Regeneration was not correlated with the number of KpnI restriction fragment repeats, an FSHD1A-defining genotype property within the D4Z4 locus, or overall disease severity in patients with FSHD1A. Macrophages were more prevalent in FSHD1A (0.50 ± 0.63 per mm(2) ) vs BMD (0.07 ± 0.07 per mm(2) ), whereas inflammatory T cells were equally infrequent. Macrophages were more prevalent in patients with FSHD1A and could be an important pathogenic mechanism for the initiation of the dystrophic process. Furthermore, regeneration was unrelated to genotype and disease severity in FSHD1A.

Digenic inheritance and Mendelian disease

Powerful genomic technologies, such as exome sequencing, are providing new insights into the genetics underlying Mendelian traits. A new study identifies a role for digenic inheritance and an epigenetic modifier in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2.

Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHD-permissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is characterized by chromatin relaxation of the D4Z4 macrosatellite array on chromosome 4 and expression of the D4Z4-encoded DUX4 gene in skeletal muscle. The more common form, autosomal dominant FSHD1, is caused by a contraction of the D4Z4 array, whereas the genetic determinants and inheritance of D4Z4 array contraction-independent FSHD2 are unclear. Here we show that mutations in SMCHD1 (structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1) on chromosome 18 reduce SMCHD1 protein levels and segregate with genome-wide D4Z4 CpG hypomethylation in human kindreds. FSHD2 occurs in individuals who inherited both the SMCHD1 mutation and a normal-sized D4Z4 array on a chromosome 4 haplotype permissive for DUX4 expression. Reducing SMCHD1 levels in skeletal muscle results in contraction-independent DUX4 expression. Our study identifies SMCHD1 as an epigenetic modifier of the D4Z4 metastable epiallele and as a causal genetic determinant of FSHD2 and possibly other human diseases subject to epigenetic regulation.

Exploring quantitative methods for evaluation of lip function

The objective was to explore quantitative methods for the measurement of lip mobility and lip force and to relate these to qualitative assessments of lip function. Fifty healthy adults (mean age 45 years) and 23 adults with diagnoses affecting the facial muscles (mean age 37 years) participated in the study. Diagnoses were Möbius syndrome (n=5), Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (n=6) and Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (n=12). A system for computerised 3D analysis of lip mobility and a lip force meter were tested, and the results were related to results from qualitative assessments of lip mobility, speech (articulation), eating ability and saliva control. Facial expressions studied were open mouth smile and lip pucker. Normative data and cut-off values for adults on lip mobility and lip force were proposed, and the diagnostic value of these thresholds was tested. The proposed cut-off values could identify all inviduals with moderate or severe impairment of lip mobility but not always the milder cases. There were significant correlations between the results from quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments. The examined instruments for measuring lip function were found to be reliable with an acceptable measuring error. The combination of quantitative and qualitative ways to evaluate lip function made it possible to show the strong relation between lip contraction, lip force, eating ability and saliva control. The same combination of assessments can be used in the future to study if oral motor exercises aimed at improving lip mobility and strength could have a positive effect on lip function.

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1A in Northwestern Tuscany: A Molecular Genetics-based Epidemiological and Genotype–Phenotype Study

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1A (FSHD1A) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder characterized by early involvement of facial and scapular muscles with eventual spreading to pelvic and lower limb muscles. A high degree of clinical variability with respect to age at onset, severity, and pattern of muscle involvement, both between and within families, is present. For this reason, diagnosis of FSHD1A can be sometimes difficult and molecular diagnosis is then necessary. A clinical and molecular genetic-based epidemiological investigation has been carried out in the territory of northwestern Tuscany in central Italy to calculate the prevalence rate of FSHD1A as of March, 2004. The molecular diagnosis has been based on the detection of large deletions of variable size of kpnI repeat units on chromosome 4q35. Results have been compared to those of a previous study conducted in the same area in 1981 (in the premolecular diagnosis era). The minimum prevalence rate was 4.60 x 10(-5) inhabitants, a value four times higher compared to our previous study. No significant correlation between fragment size and clinical severity has been observed. This study confirms in an Italian population a prevalence rate of FSHD1A similar to that observed in other populations. Furthermore, it underlines the usefulness of routine adoption of the genetic testing in confirming clinical suspicion of FSHD1A as well as in correctly diagnosing atypical and otherwise misclassified cases.