Since 1954, when brachioplasty was first addressed in the literature [1], several different techniques have been described [2 8]. With the current trends in bariatric surgery, the subject has reemerged, and modifications to the techniques and accessory therapies, such as liposuction, have evolved. Doctor Cannistra and his team present an alternative approach to the management of upper extremity contour deformities. In the literature, Aly describes a similar technique, with comparable reference points, incision site, and configuration [4]. Nevertheless, this article focuses on providing a standard way of delineating landmarks for preoperative marking, thus facilitating this task, especially for the inexperienced surgeon. This method aims to reduce the risk of overcorrection, decrease complications, and conceal the scar. The described procedure is for cases of massive weight loss in which skin ptosis attributable to tissue lipodystrophy is the main component of the problem, and minimal excess lipomatous tissue exists, or has been previously liposuctioned. Using this technique, the marking follows a standardized pattern, avoiding asymmetry. It is a simple and straightforward demarcation, with clear reference points, creating a final straight closure line. This type of closure has been questioned in the past due to the contractile tendency of the scar, and some authors prefer sinusoidal incisions [5]. At the level of the axilla, a Z-plasty is advised. In our experience, the Z-plasty gives good results by addressing contraction, shaping of the area, and reducing axillary ptosis. An early preoperative liposuction is used, providing assessment of skin retraction capacity and selecting the patients with true indications for surgery while minimizing the dissection and skin resection. The liposuction approach and technique are not described, but would be of interest for clarification. We agree with early staged liposuction to reduce the risk of dehiscence and to enhance the final cosmetic result. Another point for remark is the scar location because this is a strongly debated point. In this case, the authors prefer to place the suture line posterior to the medial bicipital groove to hide the scar on the frontal view. Other surgeons prefer to place it in the bicipital groove. In the picture submitted with the article, the patient s scar and part of the Z-plasty are visible. This particular point should be thoroughly discussed preoperatively with the patient, and it is our opinion that the patient should be the one to decide the location of the scar because both locations have drawbacks. Brachioplasty scars can be wide, raised, and visible in short-sleeved clothing regardless of location. The authors present a good number of patients (n = 50) over 6 years of experience. Unfortunately, only one of the patients preand postoperative results were included. We agree that the described technique is a simple way to approach a brachioplasty after massive weight loss. The results are acceptable, as is the complication rate.