Extrahepatic Metastases Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors as a second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A real-world study from a single center.

e16165 Background: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a second-line treatment in patients with pretreated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with advanced HCC who had received regorafenib treatment in our hospital from January 2020 to November 2023 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity were the secondary end points. Results: Forty-five patients were included with a median age of 61 (31-83) years. Thirty-two patients (71.1%) were in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C. Twenty-three patients (51.1%) had extrahepatic metastasis. ICIs were applied to 30 patients (66.7%) at the use of regorafenib. Local treatments were applied to 17 patients (37.8%). The median OS was 14.5 (11.3, 26.4) months in all patients. Regorafenib plus ICIs had a longer survival than regorafenib alone (20.5 [11.6, NA] vs 11.3 [3.0, 13.9] months, P = 0.019). Local treatment had no obvious effect. The median PFS was 6.8 (4.5, 11.7) months in all patients. The median PFS was 9.7 (4.6, 14.5) months in regorafenib plus ICIs that was longer than regorafenib alone with 3.0 (2.0, 8.0) months. Local treatment only showed a trend of prolongation (11.8 [2.5, 22.6] vs 4.7 [3.5, 9.7] months, P = 0.059). The 1-year OS and PFS were 43.2% and 20.0%, respectively. ORR and DCR was 29.0% and 71.0% according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash/itching (41.3%), hand-foot syndrome (19.6%), and anorexia (13.0%). Grade≥3 TRAEs occurred in 8.9% (4/45) of the patients and hypertension (4.4%) had the highest proportion. Conclusions: Regorafenib plus ICIs therapy is an effective promising regimen regardless of first-line treatments in advanced HCC. Combined with local treatment only showed a trend of PFS, further prospective research is needed.

TACE-HAIC combined with donafenib and immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A retrospective analysis.

e16174 Background: The probability of Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is relatively large and the long-term survival of this part of patients is poor. Systemic therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy are widely used in HCC patients with PVTT. We want to explore the efficacy and safety of TACE plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with Donafenib, anti-PD-1 antibody in uHCC patients with PVTT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients who were diagnosed as uHCC with PVTT and received the treatment of TACE plus HAIC combined with Donafenib, anti-PD-1 antibody as first-line therapy from Dec 2021 to Jun 2023 in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progress free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Of 106 patients included in the analysis, all of them received first-line treatment of TACE (embolization of pirarubicin hydrochloride 40mg, iodized oil 10-20ml with or without gelatin sponge) plus HAIC (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 2h, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 1h, fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 in the first 10 minutes, and fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46h) combined with donafenib 200mg bid, anti-PD-1 antibody Q3W. The median age was 58 years (IQR, 52-64). The study population was predominantly male (79.2%), and 79.2% were HBV-positive. All HCC patients are accompanied by PVTT, most of which are VP3(72.6%).The rate of patients with extrahepatic metastasis were 16.0%. All patients were classified as BCLC stage C and 84.0% were classified as CNLC stage IIIa. As of December 2023, 106 patients had received at least one imaging evaluation, 11 (10.4%), 60 (56.6%) and 28 (26.4%) of them achieved complete response, partial response and stable disease, and the overall objective response rate and disease control rate was 67.0% and 93.4% per modified RECIST criteria respectively. With 16.3 months of median follow-up time, the 12-month PFS rate was 81.3% and the 12-month OS rate was 90.1%. The median PFS and OS were not reached. 103 of all patients had at least one treatment-related AE (TRAE), and treatment-related deaths did not occur in this study. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 33 (31.1%) patients, and no grades 4 or 5 were reported. The most common Grade 3 TRAEs included aspartate transaminase increased (18.9%), platelet count decreased (14.2%) and blood bilirubin increased (8.5%). Conclusions: TACE-HAIC combined with Donafenib and immunotherapy are effective and tolerable for uHCC patients with PVTT.

A multi-center retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without TACE as a second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16147 Background: At present, there are no definitive optimal treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following first-line treatment failure. To maximize the survival benefit of patients, we compared the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with transarterial chemoem bolization (R+ICIs+TACE) versus regorafenib plus ICIs (R+ICIs) as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with advanced HCC from our multicenter who received R+ICIs+TACE or R+ICIs as a later-line therapy from June 2020 to August 2022.Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (m-PFS), and safety were evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(m-RECIST). Factors affecting PFS and OS were analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Results: A total of 78 patients were included in the study (regardless of first-line treatment), including 48 who received R+ICIs+TACE and 30 who received R+ICIs. The R+ICIs+TACE group had a significantly higher ORR (31.6% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.021), higher DCR (73.8%vs. 45.7%, P = 0.008), longer PFS (median 8.5 vs.3.6 months, P < 0.0001) and and a longer OS (14.6 vs 8.5 months, P = 0.024) than those who received R+ICIs group. Child-Pugh class A6 and B7, R+ICIs and extrahepatic metastasis were found as independent prognostic factors for poor PFS. R+ICIs, a-fetoprotein > 400 ng/mL and Child-Pugh class were noted as independent prognostic factors for poor OS.There was no notable difference in the total incidence of treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) (76.8% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.41) and the incidence of grade 3/4 serious adverse effects (6.2% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.21) between the two group. Conclusions: Regorafenib plus ICIs with TACE showed a promising efficacy with favorable safety in HCC patients with PD-1 inhibitor resistance, especially in the standard second line patients.

A real-world experience of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with type IV portal vein tumor thrombus.

e16154 Background: Clinical improvement of interventional therapy with PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus molecular targeted therapies in have been confirmed by several studies, such as EMERALD-1, CHANCE001 etc. Limited data of this treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients (pts) with type IV portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is available. This study aims to describe the efficacy and safety in uHCC pts with type IV PVTT (Vp4) who received HAIC combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib (HAIC+Tisle+Len) in the real-world setting. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of Vp4 uHCC pts treated with HAIC+Tisle+Len as first line systemic therapy between Apr 2020 and Dec 2022. Patient characteristics, treatment information, adverse events and survival data were collected. Pts received HAIC of modified FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil bolus, 400 mg/m2 on day 1; 5-fluorouracil infusion, 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h), lenvatinib (8 or 12 mg once daily for body weight, 60 or ≥60 kg), and tislelizumab (200 mg q3w). HAIC was allowed to repeat on demands. Outcomes evaluated included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: A cohort of 54 pts was identified with a median age of 55 years (range 49-59). Pts characteristics were as follows: male (90.7%), hepatitis B (79.6%), BCLC C stage (100%), Child-Pugh A (88.9%), tumor number [ = 1 (50%), = 2 (7.4%), ≥3 (42.6%)], tumor diameter ≥10 cm (42.6%), extrahepatic metastasis (7.4%), beyond up to steven status (90.7%). As of Dec 20, 2023, the median follow-up duration was 21.3 mo (95% CI, 16.1-26.0), and the median number of HAIC was 3 (range 2-4). The median PFS was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.8-12.3), while the median OS reached 16.8 months (95% CI:13.1-NR). ORR was 53.7% (3 CR, 26 PR) per RECIST 1.1; ORR was 66.7% (12 CR, 24 PR) per mRECIST. DCR was 96.3% per either RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST. Two pts received surgical treatment after conversion, one of whom underwent liver transplantation and remains tumor-free. The post-PD therapies after first-line treatment were as follows: Tisle+Len (24.1%), TACE+Tisle+Len (18.5%), Tisle+Len+Radiotherapy (7.4%), HAIC+Tisle+Regorafenib (5.6%), others (18.5%). The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were hypertension (14.8%), decrease in albumin (11.1%), anorexia (9.3%), leukopenia (9.3%), abdominal pain (7.4%) and AST/ALT elevation (7.4%). Conclusions: The combination of HAIC with tislelizumab and lenvatinib represents a promising efficacy and manageable safety for uHCC pts with Vp4, which supplements the trial data for Vp4-HCC with real world outcomes.

SCT-I10A combined with a bevacizumab biosimilar (SCT510) versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase 3 trial.

4092 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant health concern in China, and it has been a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Immunotherapy combined with anti-vascular growth therapy is the first recommended therapy. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SCT-I10A (an anti-programmed death 1 [PD-1] monoclonal antibody) combined with SCT510 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) compared to sorafenib as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial (NCT04560894) conducted in China, patients with advanced HCC who had not received prior system therapy were enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive SCT-I10A (200 mg every three weeks [Q3W]) plus SCT510 (a bevacizumab biosimilar, 15 mg/kg Q3W) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until no clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (<400ng/ml vs. ≥400ng/ml), macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs. no). The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the blinded independent central review (BICR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the full analysis set. Results: At the data cutoff for the interim analysis (November 2, 2023), a total of 346 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose (SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group, n=230; sorafenib group, n=116), and the median follow-up was 19.7 months. The SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group exhibited a significantly longer median OS than that in the sorafenib group (22.1 vs. 14.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44, 0.81; p=0.0008). Median PFS was prolonged significantly in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group compared to the sorafenib group (7.1 vs. 2.9 months; HR 0.50; 95%CI: 0.38, 0.65; p<0.0001). The objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group (32.8% [75/229]) than in the sorafenib group (4.3% [5/116]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 42.6% (98/230) of patients in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group and 33.6% (39/116) of patients in the sorafenib group. The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was hypertension (SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group vs. sorafenib group: 7.8% [18/230] vs. 4.3% [5/116]). Three drug-related deaths (unknown cause, hemorrhage intracranial, or upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 1 patient each) occurred and were related to SCT510. Conclusions: The combination of SCT-I10A and SCT510 showed substantial clinical advantages and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced HCC, thereby supporting its suitability as a first-line treatment option for HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04560894 .

Apatinib and camrelizumab plus Intravenous FOLFOX or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX for advanced HCC: A multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III trial.

TPS4193 Background: The combination of anti-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint blockade showed promising outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with apatinib and camrelizumab could augment treatment efficacy in preliminary study. But HAIC has disadvantages such as technical limitations, expensive cost, impaired liver function and poor patient comfort. Results from our previous phase II trial (NCT05412589) demonstrate that the triplet treatment of Venous Infusional FOLFOX plus camrelizumab and apatinib showed inspiring antitumor activity and acceptable safety for CNLC stage Ⅲ HCC, especially in those with main portal trunk invasion (Vp4). These results encourage us to further compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous FOLFOX with apatinib and camrelizumab versus HAIC-FOLFOX with apatinib and camrelizumab as first-line treatment in advanced HCC. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study (NCT06172205) will enroll 192 patients. Essential criteria for patient inclusion encompassed: age between 18 and 75 years; a clinical diagnosis conforms to primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); classification with in BCLC stage C; no prior anti-tumor treatment exposure; presence of at least one measurable tumor as per RECIST v1.1; ECOG performance status score of either 0 or 1; and a Child-Pugh A or B. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) into two groups. Randomization is stratified by the presence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs no), and baseline alpha-fetoprotein concentration (<400 ng/mL vs ≥400 ng/mL). There are 2 arms in the study: (1) Arm A: FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2,5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 hours; q3w; up to 6 cycles) intravenously in combination with apatinib (250 mg po qd) and camrelizumab (200 mg iv q3w). (2) Arm B: hepatic arterial infusion FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil q3w; up to 6 cycles), combined with apatinib (250 mg po qd) and camrelizumab (200 mg iv q3w). The primary endpoint is 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary outcomes encompass the Objective response rate, Disease control rate, Duration of response, PFS, Overall survival (OS), along with 12-month PFS rate, 6-month and 12-month OS rates. The additional secondary endpoints include assessment of treatment-related adverse events. With the assumption of a median 6-month PFS rate of 85% in the Arm B and 71% in the Arm A (noninferiority margin, 14%), a total of 162 patients were required under a two-sided 5% significance level and 80% power. Allowing a dropout rate of 15%, we aimed to enroll 192 patients. The trial is currently screening eligible patients. Clinical trial information: NCT06172205 .

Phase I study of C-CAR031, a GPC3-specific TGFβRIIDN armored autologous CAR-T, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

4019 Background: GPC3 is a surface antigen overexpressed in HCC and virtually absent on healthy tissues. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting GPC3 offer a promising option for advanced unresectable HCC treatment. C-CAR031 is an autologous GPC3-directed CAR-T armored with dominant negative TGF-b receptor II. Here we report the safety and preliminary efficacy of C-CAR031 in advanced HCC patients (pts). Methods: The first-in-human, open-label dose-escalation trial employs an accelerated titration plus i3+3 design. GPC3+ advanced HCC pts who failed ≥ 1 line systemic treatments received a single i.v. infusion of C-CAR031 post standard lymphodepletion. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability, others include pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by CTCAE 5.0, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) / immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were assessed per ASTCT 2019 criteria. Objective response was assessed by investigator per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of Jan 5th, 2024, a total of 24 pts received C-CAR031 infusion at 4 dose levels (DLs). All pts had BCLC stage C HCC, 83.3% (20/24) had extrahepatic metastasis. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3.5 (range 1-6), 23 (95.8%) pts received ICIs (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors). All pts were evaluable for safety. No dose-limiting toxicity and ICANS was observed. CRS was observed in 22 (91.7%) pts with only 1 (4.2%) grade (G) 3 CRS. The most common ≥G3 AEs were lymphocytopenia (100%), neutropenia (70.8%), thrombocytopenia (37.5%) and transaminase elevation (16.7%). One pt (4.2%) had G4 myelosuppression and 1 pt (4.2%) had G3 interstitial pneumonitis at DL4 caused by G3 CRS. All AEs were reversible. 22 pts were evaluable for efficacy. Tumor reductions were observed in 90.9% pts, not only in intrahepatic lesions but also extrahepatic ones with a median reduction of 44.0% (range, 3.4%-94.4%). The disease control rate was 90.9% and the objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% for pts of all DLs. In DL4, the ORR was 57.1%. Conclusions: The study showed a manageable safety profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity of C-CAR031 in heavily treated advanced HCC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05155189 . [Table: see text]

Overall survival after isolated hepatic perfusion in combination with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with uveal melanoma metastases (the SCANDIUM II trial).

9533 Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease, that commonly metastases to the liver metastases and has a very poor prognosis. In patients with metastatic UM to the liver, a one-time treatment with isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with high dose melphalan has shown response rates of 40%, while immune checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) in combination with nivolumab (1 mg/kg) (IPI3/NIVO1) has shown response rates of 11-18%. The impact of these treatments on overall survival (OS), if combined, is unclear. In the SCANDIUM II trial, we investigated the safety and tolerability of combination of IHP and IPI3/NIVO1. Methods: In this multicenter open, randomized, controlled, phase Ib trial, patients with liver dominant metastatic uveal melanoma were randomized to receive either IHP followed by combination immunotherapy (four cycles IPI3/NIVO1) (Arm A) or one cycle of IPI3/NIVO1 before IHP followed by three cycles IPI3/NIVO1 (Arm B). Thereafter, patients in both Arm A and B received monotherapy with nivolumab (480 mg q4w) for up to 1 year. Isolated hepatic perfusion was performed using melphalan 1mg/kg perfused through the liver for 60 minutes under hyperthermia (40°C). The primary endpoint was incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: In total, 18 patients were included in the trial, 9 randomized to Arm A and 9 to Arm B. 78% were treatment naïve; 28% had both hepatic and extra-hepatic metastases. Three patients did not undergo IHP as planned, one in arm A and two in arm B. Patients received a mean of 2.4 cycles of IPI/NIVO in Arm A and 3.0 cycles in Arm B. There were more IPI/NIVO related adverse events (grade I-IV) in arm B (48 vs. 86). The overall response rate was 38%, 57% in arm A and 22% in arm B, and the median duration of response was 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.2-NE, n = 6). At a minimum follow-up of 18 months, the overall survival rate was 50% (95% CI, 31.5-79.4%) in the whole study population, 56% (95% CI, 31-99%) in arm A and 44% (95% CI, 21-92%) in arm B. The median OS in arm A was 18.2 months (95% CI, 13.2-NA months) and 17.2 months (95% CI, 14.0-NA months) in arm B. The primary endpoint of adverse events has been reported previously. Conclusions: In patients with liver dominant metastatic uveal melanoma, combining IHP with IPI3/NIVO1 is a feasible treatment. One dose of IPI3/NIVO1 before IHP had no obvious benefit in response or OS, but was associated with higher rates of toxicity. There was no apparent survival advantage compared to patients in the SCANDIUM trial with IHP only, however, sample size and non-overlapping patient characteristics severely hamper comparison between the trials. The numerically higher response rate in Arm A warrants a larger randomized study that is designed to detect a difference between IPI/NIVO with or without IHP. Clinical trial information: NCT01785316 .

A phase II clinical evaluation of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with regorafenib and toripalimab in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases.

3566 Background: In several clinical studies, the combination of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies with targeted antiangiogenic agents has demonstrated clinical benefits for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, individuals with liver metastases have shown suboptimal responses. Prior preclinical study indicates a synergistic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) when employed in conjunction with immunotherapy. The study aimed to explore whether RFA combined with regorafenib and toripalimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) could provide better outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Methods: Using Simon's two-stage design, a total of 32 subjects were required for enrollment, with10 subjects included in stage 1. If there were no or less patients having response, the study would be terminated; otherwise, it would proceed to stage 2, enrolling an additional 22 subjects. The cohort consisted of 10 microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC patients with multiple liver metastases who had previously failed fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, with or without targeted therapy. RFA was performed on a single hepatic lesion, with others designated as target lesions. Treatment with regorafenib and toripalimab commenced one week post-RFA, following a 4-week cycle. Toripalimab was administered intravenously biweekly, and regorafenib was given orally at daily dose of 80 mg (three weeks on, one week off, in a 4-week period). The primary endpoint was response rate. Results: Ten patients (3 women) were enrolled in this study, with ages ranging from 26 to 76 years (median: 52 years), and 60% being 52 years or older.Seventy percent had ECOG performance status (PS) of 0; 60% had primary colon tumors; 90% presented with synchronous liver metastases, and 80% had both intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases. Half of the participants achieved stable disease; however, none exhibited confirmed partial or complete responses. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months, and the median overall survival reached 11.3 months. The median number of cycles was two (range: 0.5 to 3), with 60% undergoing at least two cycles. Adverse events (AEs) included hand-foot syndrome, liver dysfunction, fatigue, abdominal distension, and thrombocytopenia. The most frequently reported AE was hand-foot syndrome, occurring in 50% of patients. Serious AEs (grade≥3) potentially related to treatment included hand-foot syndrome and hyperbilirubinemia, each with an incidence of 10%. Notably, one patient experienced hyperprogression during immunotherapy. Conclusions: The combination of RFA, regorafenib, and toripalimab has not shown encouraging efficacy in patients with CRC liver metastases. However, the observed safety profile is acceptable. Clinical trial information: NCT05485909 .

Clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, and prognostic survival prediction in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer liver metastasis.

Extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) is a compound malignant tumor mainly consisting of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Most EBDC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage characterized by distant metastases, and the liver is one of the common sites of metastasis. Hence, the purpose of this study is to investigate the clinicopathological features, identify prognostic risk factors, and assess the long-term prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer liver metastasis (EBDCLM). We identified 1922 eligible EBDCLM patients from the SEER database.Cox regression models were used to predict independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS),and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of multivariate Cox analysis, and the predictive effect of the nomogram was evaluated. Age, surgery, chemotherapy, brain metastasis, and lung metastasis were common independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, and radiotherapy and bone metastasis were independent prognostic factors for CSS. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant increase in survival for patients aged less than or equal to 70 years, undergoing surgery and chemotherapy, and without lung metastases. The results showed that the nomogram constructed by us had good predictability and ha d strong clinical application value. Our study identified age, surgery, chemotherapy, brain metastasis, and lung metastasis as independent prognostic factors for EBDCLM patients. The nomogram can accurately predict the survival probability, which is helpful for clinicians to assess the prognosis of patients with advanced EBDC and provide personalized clinical decisions.

Long-term oral administration of Huaier granules improves survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients within Milan criteria following microwave ablation: a propensity score matching and stabilized inverse probability weighting analysis.

This study aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effects of Huaier granules on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria in patients who underwent microwave ablation (MWA). A total of 228 patients were included, with 97 in the Huaier group and 131 in the control group. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and extrahepatic metastasis survival (EMS) using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves with a log-rank test. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Stabilized Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) were performed to minimize selection and confounding biases. Following PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates in the Huaier and control groups were 83.5% vs 70.7%, 57.7% vs 42.6%, and 43.6% vs 31.9% (p = 0.030), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 98.9% vs 95.6%, 83.9% vs 72.3%, and 72.2% vs 53.7% (p = 0.023), respectively. The corresponding 1-, 3-, and 5-year EMS rates were 98.9% vs 93.4%, 91.7% vs 83.7%, and 91.7% vs 78.5% (p = 0.039), respectively. Stabilized IPTW analysis of KM curves yielded results similar to those of the PSM analysis. Additionally, administering Huaier granules for at least 6 months significantly improved PFS and OS. Huaier granules can reduce the risk of recurrence and improve the OS of patients with HCC within the Milan criteria following MWA. Administering Huaier granules for over 6 months proved beneficial.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion

Background and aimsThe prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion(MaVI)is poor, and the treatment is limited. This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), combined with lenvatinib and programmed cell death-1(PD-1) inhibitor in the first-line treatment of HCC with MaVI.MethodsFrom July 2020 to February 2022, we retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with HCC with MaVI who received hepatic arterial infusion FOLFOX(oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin)combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor. The efficacy was evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier was used to explore the overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS), and the COX regression model was used to analyze the risk factors of PFS. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to CTCAE5.0.ResultsThirty-two patients with HCC complicated with MaVI were recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Among the patients treated with HAIC combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor, ten patients (31.25%) got partial response, eighteen patients (56.25%) maintained stable disease and four patients (12.50%) suffered progressive disease during follow-up; and objective response rate was 31.25%, and disease control rate was 87.5%. The median PFS was 179 days. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis showed that the extrahepatic metastases and Child-Pugh score were independent prognostic factors of PFS. Twenty-two (68.75%) patients suffered adverse reactions. The main AEs were elevated transaminase (46.87%), thrombocytopenia (40.63%), hypoalbuminemia (28.13%), nausea and vomiting (21.88%), leukopenia (18.76%), abdominal pain (15.63%), hypertension (15.63%) and fever (15.63%). There were seven cases (21.88%) that had grade 3 or above AEs; Among them, two cases with elevated transaminase (6.25%), leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea occurred in one case respectively. Moreover, no treatment-related death was observed.ConclusionsHepatic arterial infusion of FOLFOX combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor as the first-line treatment for HCC complicated with MaVI is effective, and adverse reactions are tolerable.

Role of reimbursement and Physicians' awareness in the survival of sorafenib-eligible advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

In 2008, sorafenib became the first approved systemic therapeutic agent for advanced HCC. Although its pharmacological efficacy has been established, reimbursement for such a new, high-cost drug, as well as physicians' awareness and prescription practice, likewise contribute to its clinical effectiveness. We therefore conducted a retrospective study using 38 sorafenib-eligible, advanced HCC patients when sorafenib was approved but not yet reimbursed as a control and 216 patients during the reimbursed era. Study group showed longer survival at 8.2 months versus the control's 4.9 months (p = 0.0063 hazard ratio: 0.612 [0.431 ~ 0.868], p = 0.0059). Among the 42 (19.4%) patients who survived more than 2 years, 50% had tumor rupture, and all 32 patients with portal vein tumor thrombus and/or extrahepatic metastasis received sorafenib (p = 0.003). Furthermore, during their first 2 years of HCC management, sorafenib had been given in 29.1% of the treatment courses among survivors between 2 and 5 years while it was prescribed in 55.8% among the more than 5 years survivor group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, survival of sorafenib-eligible HCC patients significantly improved after reimbursement. Patients who underwent longer sorafenib treatment had a survival advantage, except for those with tumor rupture. Reimbursement and awareness of prescriptions for a newly introduced medication therefore improve clinical effectiveness.

Efficacy of Lenvatinib Combined with PD-1 Inhibitor versus Sorafenib and PD-1 Inhibitor with or Without TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Extrahepatic Metastasis.

Lenvatinib or Sorafenib combined with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor as recommend treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). We aimed to compared the prognosis of Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (Len+PD-1) versus Sorafenib plus PD-1 (Sora+PD-1) as an initial therapy for HCC with EHM. Incorporating a sum of 229 HCC patients with EHM were encompassed within this study, with 127 in the Sora+PD-1 group and 102 in the Len+PD-1 group. Through propensity score matching (PSM), we compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and patient safety between these two groups. The median OS were 13.0 months and 14.2 months in the Sora+PD-1 group and Len+PD-1 group. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 92.9%, 58.9% and 5.6% in Sora+PD-1 group and 93.1%, 61.8% and 22.6% in Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The Len+PD-1 group had obviously better OS than the Sora+PD-1 group (P = 0.002). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 76.4%, 27.6% and 1.6% in Sora+PD-1 group and 86.2%, 50.5% and 12.2% in Len+PD-1 group, respectively. Compared with Sora+PD-1 group, the Len+PD-1 group had obviously better PFS (P < 0.001). Analysis within subgroups showed that OS was significant in patients receiving TACE in Len+PD-1 group than Sora+PD-1 group (p = 0.003). Len+PD-1 group had longer OS and PFS than Sora+PD-1 group for patient with EHM. In addition, OS in patients received TACE was improved with Len+PD-1 treatment. For patients without TACE, there was no significance between Sora+PD-1 and Len+PD-1 groups.

Surgical treatment improves overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases after conversion therapy: a multicenter retrospective study

Systemic therapy is typically the primary treatment choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastases. Some patients may achieve partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) with systemic treatment, leading to the possibility of their primary tumor becoming resectable. This study aimed to investigate whether these patients could achieve longer survival through surgical resection of their primary tumor. We retrospectively collected data from 150 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases treated at 15 different centers from January 1st, 2015, to November 30th, 2022. We evaluated their overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) and analyzed risk factors impacting both OS and PFS were analyzed. Patients who received surgical treatment had longer OS compared to those who did not (median OS 16.5 months vs. 11.3 months). However, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups. Portal vein invasion (P = 0.025) was identified as a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients, while effective first-line treatment (P = 0.039) and surgical treatment (P = 0.005) were protective factors. No factors showed statistical significance in the analysis of PFS. Effective first-line treatment (P = 0.027) and surgical treatment (P = 0.006) were both independent protective factors for prolonging patient prognosis, while portal vein invasion was an independent risk factor (P = 0.044). HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases who achieve PR/CR with conversion therapy may experience longer OS through surgical treatment. This study is the first to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients receiving surgical treatment for HCC with extrahepatic metastases.

Drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with systemic therapy to systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). From December 2017 to December 2022, patients with unresectable CRLM who received systemic therapy with or without DEB-TACE as first-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were tumor response, conversion rate and adverse events. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in this study, including 46 patients who received systemic therapy combined with DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) and 52 patients who received systemic therapy alone (control group). The median PFS was elevated in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (12.1 months vs 8.4 months, p = 0.008). The disease control rate was increased in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (87.0% vs 67.3%, p = 0.022). Overall response rates (39.1% vs 25.0%; p = 0.133) and conversion rate to liver resection (33.8% vs 25.0%; p = 0.290) were no different between the two groups. The multivariate analysis showed that treatment options, size of liver metastasis, number of liver metastasis, synchronous metastases, and extrahepatic metastases were independent prognostic factor of PFS. Further subgroup analyses illustrated that PFS was beneficial with the DEB-TACE group in patients with age ≥ 60, male, left colon, synchronous metastases, bilobar, number of liver metastasis > 5, extrahepatic metastases, non-extrahepatic metastases, CEA level < 5 (ng/ml), and KRAS wild-type. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities related to DEB-TACE procedures were observed. In patients with unresectable CRLM, systemic chemotherapy with DEB-TACE as first-line treatment may improve progression-free survival and disease control rate outcomes over systemic chemotherapy alone with manageable safety profile.

Incidentally found parotid gland lesion in 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: remote possibility of metastatic tumor or second primary salivary gland malignancy

ObjectivesWe primarily aimed to evaluate whether parotid incidental lesion (PIL) in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) would represent a possibility of extrahepatic metastasis or second primary malignancy (SPM). Additionally, we explored the incidence of PIL in HCC patients and examined any associated risk factors.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with HCC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at our institution from 2010 to 2022. The pathological findings of PILs in HCC patients were investigated for confirmatory identification of the risk of HCC metastasis or SPM in parotid gland. Healthy controls received 18F-FDG PET/CT for health screening were also enrolled to compare the incidence of PILs with HCC patients. Various parameters associated with patient demographics and characteristics of HCC were analyzed to find the related factors of PILs.ResultsA total of 17,674 patients with HCC and 2,090 healthy individuals who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were enrolled in the analyses. Among the 54 HCC patients who underwent pathological confirmation for PILs, benign primary parotid tumor was most commonly observed (n = 43 [79.6%]); however, no malignant lesions were detected, including HCC metastasis. The incidence of PILs was higher in patients diagnosed with HCC compared with the control group (485 [2.7%] vs. 23 [1.1%], p = 0.002). Analysis for the risk factors for PILs revealed that patient age, sex, and positive viral markers were significantly associated with the incidence of PILs in patients with HCC (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that PILs are more frequently identified in patients with HCC on 18F-FDG PET/CT. However, no malignant PIL, including extrahepatic metastasis of HCC, was identified. Therefore, the presence of PIL should not impede or delay the treatment process for patients with HCC. Additionally, we suggested that for future swift and straightforward differential diagnoses of PIL, the development of additional protocols within the PET/CT imaging could be beneficial.

Organ-specific responses to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicentre, retrospective study.

Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monotherapy triggers various responses by each organ. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while extrahepatic lesions demonstrate objective response rates (ORR) of 20%-40%, only 10% of intrahepatic lesions respond. Although first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab has shown survival benefits in advanced HCC, organ-specific responses remain unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to assess organ-specific responses in patients with advanced HCC receiving atezolizumab/bevacizumab. This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients who received first-line atezolizumab/bevacizumab for advanced HCC. Patients with Child-Pugh class A, measurable tumour lesions and serial imaging available for response evaluation were eligible. Between May 2020 and June 2021, 131 patients (median age: 62) from three cancer referral institutions were included. Ninety-one had hepatitis B (69.5%), 108 were at Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C (82.4%), and 78 had extrahepatic metastasis (59.5%). After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-9.2), median overall survival remained unreached (95% CI, range unavailable) and the ORR was 29.0%. Among 270 individual tumour lesions, the liver was the most commonly involved organ (n = 158). Atezolizumab/bevacizumab induced ORR of 27.8%, 42.2%, 29.1% and 21.0% for liver, lymph nodes, lungs and other sites, respectively. The organ-specific response rate for intrahepatic tumours decreased with increasing size (35.6%: <5 cm, 15.0%: ≥ 5 cm). Unlike anti-PD-1 monotherapy, atezolizumab/bevacizumab demonstrated favourable responses in intrahepatic lesions, comparable to those in extrahepatic lesions, and may potentially overcome the immune-tolerant hepatic microenvironment in patients with advanced HCC.

Thermal ablation with and without adjuvant systemic therapy: a nationwide multicenter observational cohort study of solitary colorectal liver metastases.

Thermal ablation is routinely used for solitary colorectal liver metastases (SCLM), but the added value of adjuvant systemic therapy in SCLM remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes for SCLM treated by ablation alone (AB) versus ablation plus systemic therapy (AS). This multicenter retrospective study using nationwide data from fourteen institutions between October 2010 and May 2023, 369 patients with initial SCLM smaller than 5cm, no extrahepatic metastases, and colorectal cancer R0 resection treated by thermal ablation were included. The crude analysis was used to analyze eligible cases between the two groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) to control for potential confounders in each matched group. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify specific survival benefits. 61.2% (226/369) of eligible patients were treated with AS and 38.8% (143/369) with AB. During the median follow-up period of 8.8 years, 1-/3-/5-year DFS/OS rates did not differ between the two groups, when analyzed via PSM (P=0.52/0.08). Subgroup analysis revealed that AS was significantly associated with better OS than AB in patients with plasma CEA >5ug/L (P=0.036), T (III-IV) category of primary cancer (P=0.034), or clinical risk score (1-2) (P=0.041). In each matched group, we did find a significant difference in drug-related adverse events (P<0.001) between AS group (24.1%, 28/116) and AB group (0.0%, 0/116). For patients with plasma CEA >5ug/L, T (III-IV) category of primary cancer, or clinical risk score (1-2), thermal ablation plus systemic therapy appeared to be associated with improved overall survival. Thermal ablation was equally effective in disease-free survival for treating solitary colorectal liver metastasis, whether with or without adjuvant systemic therapy.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation for medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma: insufficient ablation is associated with intrahepatic distant metastasis and extrahepatic metastasis.

To compare the prognosis of complete and insufficient ablation of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to explore the differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups. Patients´ medical records and imaging data of patients with confirmed HCC from January 2014 to January 2022 were collected. These patients were divided into 2 groups: complete ablation (n=172) and insufficient ablation (n=171). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve and the log-rank test was used to compared. Fisher's exact test was used to compare recurrence patterns between the two groups. The median OS time was 72.8 months (95%CI:69.5-76.1) and 62.0 months (95%CI: 55.3-68.7) in the complete and insufficient ablation groups, respectively. The median PFS time in the complete ablation group was 67.8 months (95% CI: 65.2-70.4) and 38.6 months (95%CI: 29.8-47.4) in the insufficient ablation group. The OS and PFS rates of the complete ablation group were significantly better than those of the insufficient ablation group (P<0.001). In the complete ablation group, 25(41%) patients experienced local tumor progression(LTP), 36(59%) experienced intrahepatic distant progression(IDP), and 0(0%) experienced extrahepatic progression (EP). In the insufficient ablation group, 51 (32.1%) patients experienced LTP, 96 (60.4%) experienced IDP, and 12 (7.5%) experienced EP. The progression patterns of the two groups were statistically significant (P=0.039). Insufficient ablation indicates a poor survival outcome of TACE combined with RFA for medium and large HCC and can promote intrahepatic distant and extrahepatic metastasis.