Extraction Of Primary Molars Research Articles

Effect of Preemptive Analgesia on Pain Perception in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Efforts have been made to minimize pain, prevent the development of needle fear, and promote positive experiences for children. The present study is designed to evaluate the effect of premedication with Ibugesic Plus before the administration of local anesthesia and extraction in children. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of preemptive analgesia on pain perception during local anesthesia administration and extraction in pediatric patients. A total of 104 patients aged 7-10 years were selected who needed primary molar extraction. Group -Ibugesic Plus syrup was given 30 minutes prior to extraction. Group II-Placebo solution (B-Folcin syrup) was given 30 minutes prior to extraction. Pain level, pulse rate, and SpO2 were assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFS) and pulse oximeter after injection, after extraction, and postoperatively. The highest scores of pain were recorded after the time of injection and extraction. The patients who received preemptive analgesics (group I) reported significantly less pain than the placebo group (group II) at the time immediately after injection, after extraction, and 2 hours after extraction. The present study showed that preemptive analgesic administration may be considered a routine and rational pain management strategy in primary tooth extraction procedures in children. Preemptive analgesia can be given to patients prior to dental procedures to reduce postoperative pain. Virda M, Panda A, Kataria K. Effect of Preemptive Analgesia on Pain Perception in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):913-917.

Assessment of Dentists' Knowledge of Space Maintainer Indications After Primary First Molar Extraction: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Space maintainer appliances can potentially reduce the need for extensive orthodontic treatment in the future for children. However, they can also lead to various complications, such as an increased risk of dental caries and gingival diseases. It is crucial for dentists to carefully evaluate a decision each child's specific situation before deciding whether to apply a space maintainer or not. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of dentists at Damascus University, both at undergraduate and specialist levels, regarding when space maintainers should be recommended. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 158 dentists (151 at the undergraduate level and seven at the specialist level). The questionnaire included 13 questions, covering demographic information and self-assessment, and 10 scenarios that are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Results The response rate was 50%. A majority of the participants (85, 53.8%) demonstrated inadequate knowledge. No significant correlations were found between knowledge level and gender (P = 0.853), practice experience (P = 0.171), or self-assessment (P = 0.383). Conclusions Most dentists exhibited a lack of knowledge about space maintainers, with no correlation identified between knowledge level, gender, practice experience, and self-assessment. It is recommended that educational curricula be updated to ensure that clinicians have a better understanding of when to use space maintainers in children.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Effects of Local Anesthesia Before Tooth Extraction Procedures under General Anesthesia on Physiologic Parameters and Postoperative Bleeding in Children

Background: Studies have been conducted to evaluate changes in hemodynamics, postoperative bleeding, and pain in pediatric dental patients receiving general anesthesia (GA). However, a limited number of studies have evaluated the effects of local anesthetics (LA) on tooth extraction procedures during GA. There is no consensus in the literature regarding LA application in the perioperative period for dental treatments performed within the scope of GA. Aim: This study aimed to determine the retrospective physiologic effects of fluctuations in vital signs and postoperative bleeding in children who did or did not receive LA for tooth extraction under GA. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 77 patients aged 5.16 ± 1.85 years who had the extraction of primary posterior teeth with or without LA under GA were reviewed in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) for postoperative bleeding and the effects of intraoperative LA on fluctuations in postoperative parameters such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and the end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). These were compiled from the patient records of the procedures. Results: Significant differences between the baseline and peak MAP (P < 0.001), HR (P = 0.011), and EtCO2 (P = 0.002) were noted in children without LA compared to those who had LA. In addition, substantial variations were observed between the baseline and peak values for MAP (P < 0.001) and HR (P = 0.037) in children who had tooth extraction in the mandibular region. Statistically significant differences were noted between the baseline and peak values for patients who did not receive LA before the extraction of the first primary molar in terms of MAP (P < 0.02) and EtCO2 (P = 0.032). Similarly, significant differences in MAP (P < 0.02) and EtCO2 (P = 0.034) were noted in the extraction of the second primary molar. In addition, there was a significant difference in bleeding based on the number of tooth extractions in those who did not receive LA (P = 0.020). Conclusion: This study showed that in children who underwent tooth extraction under GA, additional LA application minimized changes in HR, MAP, and EtCO2, whereas a lack of LA application produced significant fluctuations from baseline to peak values of HR, MAP, and EtCO2. In addition, LA application reduced postoperative bleeding.

Effectiveness of combined design nance/transpalatal arch appliance in maintaining arch dimensions after premature extraction of primary molars (A randomized controlled clinical trial)

Effectiveness of combined design nance/transpalatal arch appliance in maintaining arch dimensions after premature extraction of primary molars (A randomized controlled clinical trial)

Effect of low-level laser therapy in wound healing of primary molar teeth extraction

IntroductionTooth extraction in children requires attention to wound healing and pain management, which are influenced by patient-related factors and behavioral guidance. Aim of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of LLLT on healing sockets in pediatric patients with bilateral primary molar teeth extraction and determine its impact on pain management.Methods6–10 years of age, systemically healthy, and with atraumatic extraction indications of bilateral primary molar teeth were included in the study (n = 40). In the first session, randomly selected teeth were extracted under local anesthesia. In the control group, only clot formation in the socket was observed and photographed. The other group extractions were performed 2 weeks later. The low-level laser therapy (LLLT) group was treated with a 980 nm wavelength, in a continuous emission mode, 0.5 W power, 300 J of energy, 400 µm tip, 60 s diode laser and photographed. Nonepithelialized surface measurements were performed using ImageJ. Pain assessment was performed using the Wong-Baker Pain Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the Wong-Baker values in 3rd day (p < 0.05). In soft tissue healing on the 3rd and 7th day, the nonepithelialized surface of the laser socket was smaller than that of the control group, and the measurement results were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough LLLT was not found to be very effective in reducing postoperative discomfort after extraction of primary molars, it provided better wound healing in extraction sockets.

Is it possible to extract primary maxillary molars without palatal injection?: a controlled clinical trial

ObjectivesThe absolute necessity of a palatal injection for the extraction of primary maxillary molars has never been explored, despite the fact that it is widely known that children do not tolerate local anesthetic injections into the palatal tissue well. The aim of this study was to compare separately the perception of pain in the absence of palatal injection after anesthesia and maxillary primary molar tooth extraction using different anesthetic solutions and different post-anesthetic waiting times.Materials and methodsA single-blinded randomized controlled study was conducted in 78 participants (26 patients with palatal anesthesia (the control groups), and 26 patients with 5 min and 26 patients with 8 min post-anesthetic waiting time without palatal anesthesia (the study groups)). Subjective experiences of pain were evaluated separately after anesthesia and tooth extraction using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBS).ResultsIn terms of VAS scores obtained following administration of anesthesia, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p<0.05). VAS pain scores were reported to be lower in the groups without palatal anesthesia than in the groups with palatal anesthesia. No statistically significant difference was observed in VAS and Wong-Baker scores after tooth extraction between the groups with and without palatal anesthesia (P>0.05).ConclusionsWhile the pain reported following administration of anesthesia was found to be higher in the groups receiving palatal anesthesia, no difference was found between the groups in the pain reported after tooth extraction.Clinical relevanceExtraction of maxillary primary molars is possible without palatal injection by injecting 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine into the buccal vestibule of the tooth with a waiting time of 5 or 8 min.

Prevalence of Extraction of Primary Mandibular Second Molar in 3 to 5 Year Old Children

Introduction: Tooth extraction is done based on a variety of reasons, the most common reason being the tooth becoming unrestorable as a result of dental caries, trauma to the tooth or periodontal disorder. The tooth indicated for extraction is usually associated with pain except in some cases where the tooth is removed for orthodontic treatment. Dental caries is a chronic disease of the tooth which is represented by demineralisation and destruction of the organic matter of the tooth. It is the most common cause of dental extraction. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of extraction of primary mandibular second molars in children treated under general anesthesia from a private dental hospital.&#x0D; Materials and method: This study is a single centered retrospective study in which the data was collected from a private dental college and hospital in Chennai, India. Patient details were collected from the hospital management system and a total of 47 samples were collected. The data was tabulated using Excel and then statistically analyzed using the latest version of SPSS software.&#x0D; Results and discussion: Prevalence of extraction of primary mandibular second molar in 3 to 5 year old children wasstudied. The primary mandibular right second molar was found to be extracted the most. Also, primary mandibular second molar was extracted more in males and in the age group of 5.&#x0D; Conclusion: In the study conducted, the primary mandibular right second molar was the most extracted tooth.

Comparison of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Infiltration Anesthesia Techniques for Pain Control in Primary Mandibular Molar Extractions in pediatric patients

Comparison of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Infiltration Anesthesia Techniques for Pain Control in Primary Mandibular Molar Extractions in pediatric patients

Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy between 2% Lignocaine and 2% Mepivacaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks during Extractions and Pulpotomies of Primary Molars in Children

ABSTRACT Context: There are few studies reported in children comparing local anesthetic agents for their efficacy during extraction and pulpotomy procedures, as well as how they affect the patient’s comfort, pain management, and postoperative outcomes. The current study was planned to assess the local anesthetic effectiveness of 2% lignocaine and 2% mepivacaine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs) during pediatric primary molar extractions and pulpotomies. Subjects and Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was carried out among 60 healthy children between the ages of 6 and 12 years who needed pulpotomies or tooth extractions of their mandibular primary molars. Traditional IANBs were performed either using 2% lignocaine or 2% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The efficacy of local anesthesia was determined by an independent, trained operator after the procedures of local anesthesia, pulpotomy, and extraction. The pain experienced and the behavior of the child were recorded. The parameters, such as the onset and duration of anesthesia, between the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. The pain rating by the child and the behavior rating by the operator were analyzed by an independent t-test and a Mann–Whitney U-test, respectively. The associated discomfort due to local anesthesia among groups was analyzed by the Fisher’s exact test and the Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. A value of P &lt; 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The onset of anesthesia was significantly earlier for the lignocaine group (104.93 s) than the mepivacaine group (138.13 s) while performing pulpotomy (P &lt; 0.001) and extraction (P &lt; 0.001) procedures. The duration of action of lignocaine (173.06 min) was longer than that of mepivacaine (139.96 min). However, this comparison was statistically significant only for the extraction group (P = 0.015) but not for the pulpotomy group (P = 0.057). There was no statistically significant difference in the pain rating, their behavior, or the incidence of self-inflicted injury or discomfort between the anesthetic groups. Conclusions: The time taken for the onset of soft-tissue anesthesia was significantly shorter, and its duration was longer for 2% lignocaine when compared to 2% mepivacaine, when both the agents were given along with 1:100,000 adrenaline. Both agents were similarly effective for pulpotomy and extraction of primary molar teeth with respect to pain control and the behavior displayed by the child, which resulted in similar minor postoperative complications.

Influence of second premolar extractions on the volume of the oral cavity proper: a control comparative cone-beam computed tomography volumetric analysis study.

To compare the pre- and postorthodontic treatment volumetric changes of the oral cavity proper (OCP) in extraction and nonextraction patients and to identify influencing variables. Pre- and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed labial appliances and who satisfied the inclusion criteria were individually landmarked. Linear, angular, and volumetric measurements were determined. Descriptive statistics, repeated measure analyses of variance, correlations, and stepwise regression statistical analyses were applied. The CBCT scans of 54 patients who underwent the extraction of second premolars and/or extraction of second primary molars associated with agenic second premolars, and 59 nonextraction patients matched for crowding, were assessed. The mean age for both groups was 15 years. There was a statistically significant increase in the volume of the OCP for both the extraction and nonextraction groups, with the nonextraction group demonstrating a larger increase in the volume of the OCP. Gender, age, changes in mandibular and maxillary arch length, and changes in mandibular and maxillary intermolar width all influenced the change in the OCP volume. The volume of the OCP increased in growing patients with and without the extraction of the second premolars and/or extraction of second primary molars associated with agenic second premolars. Patients who did not have extractions as part of their orthodontic treatment demonstrated a greater overall increase in OCP volume.

Effectiveness of buccal infiltration anaesthesia compared to inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia in primary mandibular molar extractions: a randomised controlled study.

Aim The current study assessed the efficiency of buccal infiltration (BI) and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during the extraction of deciduous mandibular molars.Subjects and method A total of 112 children aged between 5-8 years with mandibular molar indicated for extraction were divided into two groups at random. The BI group was injected with 4% articaine using BI, while the IANB group was injected with 2% lidocaine using IANB. The effectiveness of both techniques was examined using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (W-BFPRS); Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale; and pulse oximetry.Results Using the W-BFPRS scale, success rates were 83.9% and 75.0% for the BI group and 82.1% and 71.4% for the IANB group during the injection and extraction, respectively, while using the FLACC scale, success rates were 83.9% and 92.9% for the BI group and 78.6% and 89.3% for the IANB group. In terms of pulse rate and oxygen saturation, there was no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions BI with articaine is as efficient as IANB with lidocaine in the extraction of deciduous mandibular molars.

Efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and intraligamentary anesthesia in the extraction of primary mandibular molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial

ObjectiveThe study aims to compare the effectiveness and quality of intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for primary mandibular molar extraction. MethodsThis prospective, randomized clinical study included patients aged 5 to 13 years scheduled for primary mandibular molar extraction. A total of 208 participants were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 104 each group), IANB and ILA, who were administered 2% lignocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. Patients rated their pain during injection and extraction (VAS pain score). Frankl’s behavior rating score, quality of anesthesia as perceived by clinician, and duration of procedure were recorded. Demographic and other variables were analysed using Pearson x2 test, Pearson correlation coefficient, Fisher exact test, or an analysis of variance, as appropriate. ResultsIn patients who received IANB, the clinician reported a slightly better quality of anesthesia (p = 0.19) than those who received ILA (VAS score 1.3 ± 0.7 Vs 1.6 ± 0.4). Mean (±SD) score for pain during extraction were found be 1.7 (±0.6) for the IANB group and 1.8 (±0.5) for the ILA group. The clinician observed 46.2% of patients in the IANB group and 39.4% of patients in the ILA group had no discomfort during extraction. Frankl’s behavior score was negatively correlated with the quality of anesthesia and the time taken to complete the extraction (p = 0.017 and p = 0.053, respectively). ConclusionThe efficacy of conventional ILA was similar to IANB, and thus ILA might be a good alternative to the IANB while extracting primary mandibular molars.

Clinical evaluation of feasibility and effectiveness using a virtual reality device during local anesthesia and extractions in pediatric patients.

Pediatric dentistry requires more than routine dental knowledge and skills in executing quality dental care. The quality of dental treatment is indirectly proportional to a child's anxiety and fear. The recent distraction technique, the use of virtual reality (VR) devices has intrigued many researcher's minds. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of the VR device in reducing pain and anxiety in pediatric patients during mandibular primary molar extraction. This research trial had 30 healthy children between the ages of 6 and 12 who required mandibular primary molar extraction. The subjects were divided into two groups using a simple randomization method. In the study group (n = 15), extraction was carried out using a VR device, whereas, in the control group (n = 15), extraction was carried out without the use of a VR device. Pre- and post-extraction anxiety levels were measured by Venham's picture test (VPT) and the heart rate. After the procedure, pain and behavior were evaluated by the Wong-Bakers Faces pain rating scale (WBS) and FLACC Scale respectively. The pre-extraction values of the VPT and heart rate showed no statistically significant difference. This indicates that participants of both groups had a similar level of anxiety at baseline. There was a statistically significant increase (p = 0.028) between pre- and post-heart rates in the control group, with no significant change in the study group. The use of a virtual reality device in children can reduce anxiety during primary molar extractions as evaluated by heart rate. Virtual reality devices might be an adjunct to high-quality dental care and to other behavior managementmethods. Definitive outcomes can be attained by encouraging studies overcoming the present limitations, and considering salivary biochemical indicators for the assessment of these devices.

Effect of treatment with dental space maintainers after the early extraction of the second primary molar: a systematic review.

Early loss of second primary molars may lead to different malocclusions, mainly caused by the mesial migration of the first permanent molar. To prevent space loss in the dental arch, different types of space maintainers (SM) are used. The main objective of this systematic review is to examine the evidence in the literature regarding the effect of SM, including the clinical effect, risk of developing caries and periodontal disease, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness after the premature loss of the second primary molar in children. The present systematic review was made according to PRISMA. The literature search was performed using four databases (last search 30/8/2022): PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science. The studies included were randomized controlled trials, economic evaluations, and non-randomized clinical studies with a defined control group. Data collected by the two authors were in regard to reports, studies, participants, research designs, and interventions. The assessment of the risk of bias was made using the ROBINSON-I tool. The search yielded 1058 articles after the removal of duplicates. Two studies were included in the final review with a moderate risk of bias, and measured space changes in the dental arch and the periodontal status of patients treated with SM. The main results indicate that treatment with SM can preserve arch length, but also cause an increase in plaque accumulation and other periodontal parameters. However, there is an overall lack of scientific evidence regarding the effect of the treatment. No studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were found on cost-effectiveness, risk of caries development, and patient satisfaction. The scientific evidence is lacking regarding the clinical effect, cost effect, and side-effects such as caries and periodontal disease when using SM in children with a premature loss of the second primary molar. PROSPERO Registration (CRD 42021290130).

Do the various interceptive treatment modalities improve the position of palatally displaced permanent canines? A meta-analysis.

Removal of maxillary primary canines and other interceptive treatment modalities in the mixed dentition have been suggested as methods used to increase the rate of normal eruption of palatally displaced permanent canines (PDCs). However, the information on the overall effect on PDCs' position has been inconclusive. To assess whether this practice improves the position of PDCs and to investigate the quality of the evidence. Unrestricted searches in 7 databases and manual searching of the reference lists in relevant studies were performed up to June 2022 (Medline via PubMed, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest Dissertations, and Theses Global). We looked for data on the positional changes of PDCs (mesial inclination, vertical position, canine crown cusp tip to midline) from randomized controlled trials assessing the various interceptive treatment modalities. Following study retrieval and selection, relevant data were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Exploratory synthesis and meta-regression were conducted using the random effects model and the overall quality of the available evidence was assessed with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Five studies (3 at low risk of bias) were identified, involving 238 individuals, followed for up to 18 months post-intervention with OPG (orthopantomogram) or CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography). Exploratory data synthesis showed that PDCs' position improved more in the extraction sites compared to non-extraction. Analysis of the studies at low risk confirmed the above observations (6- and 12-month). Improvements were observed in patients using headgear after extraction of primary canines compared to extraction alone, but not in patients with double extraction of primary canines and first molars. The quality of available evidence was rated at best as moderate. Interceptive treatment modalities in the mixed dentition may improve the position of PDCs. However, more studies are necessary in order to determine the clinical significance of the changes. PROSPERO (CRD42015029130).

Is there a better interceptive treatment for unerupted palatally displaced canines? A network meta-analysis.

This systematic review aimed to investigate if there is a better interceptive treatment for palatally displaced canines (PDC) in the mixed dentition stage. The PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized clinical trials related to the research topic. The gray literature and reference lists were also assessed. Network meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the effects of different approaches on PDC eruption. The surface under the cumulative ranking area was calculated to rank the treatments. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Of the 892 eligible studies, 18 were selected for full-text analysis and 9 for meta-analysis, involving 506 participants and 730 PDC, to compare 9 approaches. The proportion of erupted PDC was significantly higher for all interceptive treatments compared with control (no intervention). Furthermore, the proportion of erupted PDC was higher in patients subjected to rapid maxillary expansion (RME) than those who underwent double extraction of primary canine and primary molar (relative risk (RR) = 2.68 ICr95%: 1.12-9.35). A higher proportion of erupted PDC was found for RME (RR = 3.07 ICr95%: 1.31-10.67), RME plus use of transpalatal arch (TA) plus extraction of primary canine(s) (EC) (RR = 1.43 ICr95%: 1.09-1.95), EC plus use of cervical pull headgear (RR = 1.38 ICr95%: 1.11-1.79), and EC plus use of TA (RR = 1.36 ICr95%: 1.00-1.9) than for EC. RME was most likely to be considered as the best interceptive treatment. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was considered low due to imprecision and indirectness. In conclusion, no intervention in the mixed dentition stage is the worst choice for PDC.

Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Alexadricaine Versus 2% Mepecaine-L For Infiltration Anaesthesia in Extraction of Maxillary First Primary Molars in Children: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Alexadricaine Versus 2% Mepecaine-L For Infiltration Anaesthesia in Extraction of Maxillary First Primary Molars in Children: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Eruption Guidance of Distally Displaced Mandibular Second Premolar by the Hemisection of Primary Second Molar: Two Case Reports

Distal displacement of the tooth germ of the mandibular second premolar (MnP2) leads to its impaction and obturation of the eruption path of the mandibular first molar delaying its eruption. The present case report describes the treatment of 2 cases of eruption guidance for distally displaced developing MnP2 that caused delayed eruption of the mandibular first molar. Intentional extraction of primary predecessor results in the mesial shift of the displaced MnP2. However, unfavorable distal ectopic eruption of the mandibular first premolar after the premature loss of primary second molar has been previously reported. Hemisection and sequential extraction of the mandibular primary second molar were performed to mesially shift the distally displaced MnP2, while preventing unfavorable distal ectopic eruption of the mandibular first premolar.

Clinical Effectiveness of Egyptian Articaine (4% Artpharmadent) Versus Imported Articaine (4% Artinibsa) in Extraction of Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Effectiveness of Egyptian Articaine (4% Artpharmadent) Versus Imported Articaine (4% Artinibsa) in Extraction of Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial

Evaluation of requirement of extraction of a second maxillary primary molar in 3 to 5-year-old children

Background: The extraction of primary teeth is a major problem in developing countries. They are given little or no attention because they are thought to shed off on their own, resulting in significant difficulties such as crowding and malocclusion. Aim: The current aim of this study is to study the requirement of extraction of the second maxillary primary molar in 3 to 5-year-old children. Materials and Methods: A total of 136 children from the age group of 3-5 years who had undergone extraction of the second maxillary primary were collected from the DIAS record. The data were clubbed together and the results were analyzed using SPSS software the Pearson Chi-square test was done to find the sign where the p-value was kept &lt;0.05 as the significance level. Results: The results show that 48.62% requirement for extraction is due to caries, 15.42% due to trauma, 15.02% due to mobility, 7.15% due to root resorption, and 13.44% due to other reasons. Conclusion: The study concludes that despite the improvement in pediatric oral health, caries are found to be the main reason for extraction.