Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy between 2% Lignocaine and 2% Mepivacaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks during Extractions and Pulpotomies of Primary Molars in Children

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context: There are few studies reported in children comparing local anesthetic agents for their efficacy during extraction and pulpotomy procedures, as well as how they affect the patient’s comfort, pain management, and postoperative outcomes. The current study was planned to assess the local anesthetic effectiveness of 2% lignocaine and 2% mepivacaine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs) during pediatric primary molar extractions and pulpotomies. Subjects and Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was carried out among 60 healthy children between the ages of 6 and 12 years who needed pulpotomies or tooth extractions of their mandibular primary molars. Traditional IANBs were performed either using 2% lignocaine or 2% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The efficacy of local anesthesia was determined by an independent, trained operator after the procedures of local anesthesia, pulpotomy, and extraction. The pain experienced and the behavior of the child were recorded. The parameters, such as the onset and duration of anesthesia, between the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. The pain rating by the child and the behavior rating by the operator were analyzed by an independent t-test and a Mann–Whitney U-test, respectively. The associated discomfort due to local anesthesia among groups was analyzed by the Fisher’s exact test and the Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The onset of anesthesia was significantly earlier for the lignocaine group (104.93 s) than the mepivacaine group (138.13 s) while performing pulpotomy (P < 0.001) and extraction (P < 0.001) procedures. The duration of action of lignocaine (173.06 min) was longer than that of mepivacaine (139.96 min). However, this comparison was statistically significant only for the extraction group (P = 0.015) but not for the pulpotomy group (P = 0.057). There was no statistically significant difference in the pain rating, their behavior, or the incidence of self-inflicted injury or discomfort between the anesthetic groups. Conclusions: The time taken for the onset of soft-tissue anesthesia was significantly shorter, and its duration was longer for 2% lignocaine when compared to 2% mepivacaine, when both the agents were given along with 1:100,000 adrenaline. Both agents were similarly effective for pulpotomy and extraction of primary molar teeth with respect to pain control and the behavior displayed by the child, which resulted in similar minor postoperative complications.