Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Drs. Faigle et al. compared the incidence rates of carotid intervention between hospitals that serve a predominantly white population (<40% racial/ethnic minority prevalence) against hospitals that serve a predominantly minority population (≥40% minority). Even after adjusting for individual self-reported race/ethnicity, insurance provider, hospital characteristics, and patient comorbidities, the investigators observed a significantly lower probability of carotid intervention in minority hospitals (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70–0.93). In a continuous model, for every 10% increase in the proportion of minority patients, the odds of carotid treatment fell by 3% (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.00). Among racial/ethnic groups, blacks seem to be most affected by this disparity in care. In response, Dr. Joshua Willey comments on the overall low rate of predicted carotid revascularization, even among white patients at white-predominant hospitals (<25%), and the potential for classification errors using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD-9 ) codes (which may have captured patients with low-grade carotid stenosis and patients with intracranial stenosis—which is known to preferentially affect certain minority groups more so than whites). The authors respond that the ICD-9 inclusion criteria were highly specific to patients with symptomatic, extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis, although they concede some patients may have had <50% stenosis. They reiterate that the novel finding is not the undertreatment of minority groups when treatment is indicated, but that hospitals serving minority communities are less likely to offer this care. Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Drs. Faigle et al. compared the incidence rates of carotid intervention between hospitals that serve a predominantly white population (<40% racial/ethnic minority prevalence) against hospitals that serve a predominantly minority population (≥40% minority). Even after adjusting for individual self-reported race/ethnicity, insurance provider, hospital characteristics, and patient comorbidities, the investigators observed a significantly lower probability of carotid intervention in minority hospitals (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70–0.93). In a continuous model, for every 10% increase in the proportion of minority patients, the odds of carotid treatment fell by 3% (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.00). Among racial/ethnic groups, blacks seem to be most affected by this disparity in care. In response, Dr. Joshua Willey comments on the overall low rate of predicted carotid revascularization, even among white patients at white-predominant hospitals (<25%), and the potential for classification errors using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD-9 ) codes (which may have captured patients with low-grade carotid stenosis and patients with intracranial stenosis—which is known to preferentially affect certain minority groups more so than whites). The authors respond that the ICD-9 inclusion criteria were highly specific to patients with symptomatic, extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis, although they concede some patients may have had <50% stenosis. They reiterate that the novel finding is not the undertreatment of minority groups when treatment is indicated, but that hospitals serving minority communities are less likely to offer this care.