Aim - to analyze the treatment of children with urolithiasis (urolithiasis), taking into account the location of stones in the urinary tract, their size and density, to select further individual patient management tactics. Materials and methods. The study included 48 patients with single urinary tract stones aged 6 months to 18 years. X-ray structural analysis and determination of the chemical composition was carried out with 39 stone fragments. Results. In 5 (10.4%) patients with calculi in the distal part of the ureter up to 5 mm in size, medical expulsive therapy was started. 17 (35.4%) patients with kidney and ureter calculi measuring 6-14 mm and density up to 900 HU underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. In 3 (6.3%) patients with kidney and ureter calculi 6-14 mm in size and with a density of more than 900 HU, ureterorenoscopy (URS) and extraction using a Dormia basket or forceps to capture fragments were performed. 20 (41.7%) children with kidney stones larger than 15 mm or density greater than 1200 HU underwent contact lithotripsy. Contact endovesical lithotripsy was performed in 2 (4.2%) patients with massive calculi in the urinary bladder who underwent cystoplasty for an exstrophy-epispadias malformation. Results of X-ray structural stones analysis: calcium oxalate (wevelite, wedelite) - 31 (79.5%), calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite) - 5 (12.8%), brushite - 2 (5.1%), cystine - 1 (2.6%). Conclusions. Modern minimally invasive technologies make it possible to remove calculi of any density and localization from the urinary system in a minimally traumatic, effective and sufficiently safe manner, regardless of the age of the child. In the treatment of urolithiasis in children, it is advisable to follow a personalized approach with the step-by-step use of the optimal arsenal of means to remove the stone. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the listed institution. Informed consent of children and their parents was obtained for the research. No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Read full abstract