Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Group Research Articles

1982 TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT PROTOCOLS ON THE DEGREE OF RENAL INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL STONES RECEIVING SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) previously predominated in the surgical management of pediatric nephrolithiasis. More recently, ureteroscopy (URS) has been increasingly utilized as improvements in endoscopic instrumentation have been made. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that URS has better stone-free rates and acceptable complication rates compared to ESWL. This study examines the cost and pattern of surgical management associated with pediatric stones in two private insurer databases. METHODS: Claims from the Humana and Ingenix administrative databases were queried using appropriate current procedural terminology (CPT) and international classification of disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes between 2004 and 2012. Procedural, associated medication, outpatient, and emergency room (ER) utilization and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: 1100 procedures in 618 pediatric patients were identified (368 primary URS, 250 primary ESWL). The average total cost associated with primary URS and ESWL were $2671 95% CI [$2447,2895] and $3,709 95% CI [$3,342,$4076] respectively. ESWL had a higher procedural cost ($2861) compared with primary URS ($1637), p1⁄42.9x10-17. Secondary procedures were more common in the ESWL (19.2%) than the URS (11.4%) cohort, p1⁄40.01. ER and outpatient costs were significantly more in the primary URS group ($891) compared to the ESWL group ($689), p1⁄40.03. Medication cost were similar between the groups, $159 and $143 for ESWL and URS respectively, p1⁄40.14. Primary ESWL declined over the study period from a high of 57.7% cases in 2004 to 25.6% of primary procedures in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical management of pediatric nephrolithiasis has changed over the 8 year period of study with URS more frequently utilized. Primary ESWL is associated with higher overall cost due to higher procedural cost and increased secondary procedures, while URS is associated with increased outpatient and ER costs but a lower total cost.

Management of Urolithiasis in Live-Related Kidney Donors

To analyze our experience in management of urolithiasis in renal donors. The stones were treated either pretransplant or posttransplant. The Amsterdam forum criteria for acceptance of living donors were used for donor selection. The donors underwent the following procedures: pretransplant extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (n=5), pretransplant retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) (n=1), ex-vivo ureteroscopy (ex-vivo URS) (n=1), and ex-vivo pyelolithotomy (ex-vivo Pyl) (n=2); intraoperative Double-J stent; and observation (n=3). Data were analyzed for technical feasibility, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and stone clearance. The male and female ratio was 4:8 and average age was 52.3 years (38-71). In the pretransplant ESWL group, average of 740 shocks (600-1500) was given; the power was not ramped up beyond 12 kV. Ex-vivo URS was performed on bench with 6F pediatric cystoscope, while in the ex-vivo Pyl, a 12F nephroscope was introduced via a pyelotomy and stones were retrieved intact with a dormia basket. A postoperative ultrasound at one month revealed complete clearance of stones in all except one donor. At a mean follow-up of 36 months (10-58), there was no stone recurrence in donor or recipient. This report shows the feasibility and safety of ex-vivo URS and ex-vivo Pyl in living donors, in select cases with subcentimeter calculi, an option of conservative management with Double-J stent is safe. ESWL/RIRS can be performed safely in the pretransplant setting. Proper donor selection and follow-up are crucial to success. We propose a treatment selection algorithm for management of these donors.

Actinobaculum schaalii, a commensal of the urogenital area

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Actinobaculum schaalii is considered to be a part of the normai flora in the genital and urinary tract area. It has been associated to urinary tract infection (UTI), sepsis, osteomyelitis, endocarditis and Foumier's gangrene. So far it has mainly been isolated from urine, blood and pus, and predominantly in elderly patients. This study examined the habitat of A. schaalii by collecting samples from skin and urine in patients with kidney or ureter stones before and after treatment with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). Additionally faeces and vaginal swabs from routine specimen in patients not undergoing ESWL and without known urinary calculi were also analysed. The study does not find A. schaalii in faeces but shows it to be presents on skin and mucosa in the genital area. A. schaalii is also shown a possible pathogen in the stone-patient group undergoing ESWL. To study the habitat of Actinobaculum schaalii by examing groin swabs, faeces samples and vaginal swabs, and to determine whether it is a common uropathogen in patients with kidney or ureter stones. A quantitative real-time PCR assay was used to analyse all samples, which were collected between 2010 and 2011. A total of 38 patients (24 men and 14 women), with kidney or ureter stones and undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), provided urine samples and had groin swabs taken. In addition, 30 faecal samples and 19 vaginal swabs that had been sent for routine microbiological examinations from patients outside the ESWL group were analysed. A chi-squared test was used to analyse the differences between patient groups, studying samples from urine, faeces samples, groin swabs and vaginal swabs. Actinobaculum schaalii was found in the urine samples from 14 (37%) patients undergoing ESWL, and in both urine and groin swabs from seven (18%) patients. Actinobaculum schaalii was not found in faeces samples but it was found in six (32%) of the vaginal swabs, predominantly in patients >50 years (P = 0.06). The study indicates that A. schaalii is a commensal found on skin, urine and vaginal mucosa in the human urogenital area and supports other investigations in its finding that the elderly are at greatest risk of being colonized with A. schaalii.

Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy after obstructive pyelonephritis treatment

An obstructed, infected kidney combined with ureteral stones can be lethal, and requires urgent drainage and complete stone removal. However, the optimal method of stone removal, and its safety and efficacy have yet to be conclusively established. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of carrying out ureteroscopy after kidney drainage for septic patients with obstructing stones. From January 2004 to September 2011, 88 patients underwent stone removal by either ureteroscopy (n = 48) or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (n = 40) after drainage of obstructive pyelonephritis. Patients' characteristics were analyzed, and treatment outcomes between the ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy groups were compared. The outcomes of ureteroscopy carried out during the same period between patients with preoperative obstructive pyelonephritis and those without were also compared. Obstructed, infected kidneys were decompressed with retrograde ureteral stenting, except for two and three cases treated with nephrostomy in the ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy groups, respectively. The severity of preoperative pyelonephritis was similar in both groups. Importantly, the success rate was 67.5% for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 98% for ureteroscopy (P < 0.001). Likewise, the retreatment and auxiliary procedure rates were significantly greater in the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy group than in the ureteroscopy group (90% vs 0% and 32.5% vs 2%, respectively). Furthermore, patients treated by ureteroscopy with or without preoperative pyelonephritis had similar stone-free and ureteroscopy complication rates (97% vs 93%, and 10% vs 12%). Ureteroscopy after drainage of an obstructed infected kidney can be a safe and effective option, as it seems to not be associated with an increased risk of complications.

Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study.

ObjectiveTo discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management.Material and methodsBetween October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), ureterorenoscopy (URS) (120 cases) and open stone surgery (OSS) (22 cases).The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone–free status.ResultsIn the ESWL group, the operative time was 43.13 +22.5 min; the average number of sessions/patients was 1.5 sessions; the average number of SW/patients was 4500 SW/patients; the average energy was 16.5 kV; the average stone burden was 7.8/mm; the overall stone–free rate was 75% (36/48); and the average radiation exposure time was 3.5 min.In the URS group, the operative time was 49.21 +16.09 min; the average stone burden was 10.81mm; the overall stone–free rate was 97.5% (117/120); the average hospital stay was 3.99 days; and the average radiation exposure time was 0.75 min.In the OSS group, the operative time was 112.38 +37.1 min; the overall stone–free rate was 100% (22/22); and the average hospital stay was 9.74 days.ConclusionIn the management of patients with lower ureteral stones, URS, SWL and OSS were considered acceptable treatment options.This recommendation was based on the stone–free results, morbidity and retreatment rates for each therapy.

Tissue damage in kidney, adrenal glands and diaphragm following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

This study was designed to investigate whether exposure to short-term extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) produces histologic changes or induces apoptosis in the kidney, adrenal glands or diaphragm muscle in rats. The effect of shock waves on the kidney of male Wistar rats (n = 12) was investigated in an experimental setting using a special ESWL device. Animals were killed at 72 h after the last ESWL, and the tissues were stained with an in situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein. Microscopic examination was performed by fluorescent microscopy. Apoptotic cell deaths in the renal tissue were not observed in the control group under fluorescent microscopy. In the ESWL group, local apoptotic changes were observed in the kidney in the area where the shock wave was focused. The apoptotic cell deaths observed in the adrenal gland of the control group were similar to those observed in the ESWL groups, and apoptosis was occasionally observed around the capsular structure. Apoptotic cell deaths in the diaphragm muscle were infrequently observed in the control group. Apoptosis in the ESWL group was limited to the mesothelial cells. This study demonstrated that serious kidney, adrenal gland and diaphragm muscles damage occurred following ESWL, which necessitated the removal of the organ in the rat model. It is recognized that the ESWL complications related to the kidney, adrenal gland and diaphragm muscles are rare and may be managed conservatively.

Comparison of the effect of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones

Objective To compare the effect of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy(URL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) for ureteral stones.Methods 90 patients with ureteral stones were randomly divided into group A( URL group),group B( ESWL group),each group 45 cases.The effect of surgical treatment was compared between the two groups.Results The one-time success rate of gravel,stone free after 4 weeks of A group was significantly higher than that of group B( x2 =9.680,5.414,all P ＜0.05),but there was no significant difference in the surgical time and hospital stay of the two groups( t =1.010,0.909,all P ＞ 0.05 ).The postoperative renal colic,fever and other complications of group A were significantly lower than that of group B ( x2 =6.049,5.075,all P ＜0.05),but the gross heraturia and ureteral injury of group A was higher than that of group B(x2 =5.874,3.873,all P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusion The ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones all have good effect,but ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and stone rubble drain success rate are significantly higher than extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,and postoperative complications are relatively less than extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Key words: Ureteral stones; Ureteroscopic; Extracorporeal; Lithotripsy

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi

Ureteral stones frequently cause renal colic, and if left untreated, can lead to obstructive uropathy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy, with or without intracorporeal lithotripsy, are the most common interventions used to treat ureteral stones. ESWL treatment is less invasive than ureteroscopy, but has some limitations such as a high retreatment rate, and is not available in all centres. Recent advances in ureteroscopy have increased success rates and reduced complication rates. To examine evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the outcomes of ESWL or ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteric calculi. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2011), EMBASE (1980 to March 2011), CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings, all without language restriction. RCTs that compared ESWL with ureteroscopic retrieval of ureteric stones were included in this review. Study participants were adults with ureteric stones requiring intervention. Published and unpublished sources were considered for inclusion. Three authors independently assessed study quality, risk of bias, and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean differences (MD) for continuous data, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Seven RCTs (1205 patients) were included in the review. Stone-free rates were lower in patients who underwent ESWL (7 studies, 1205 participants: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96) but re-treatment rates were lower in ureteroscopy patients (6 studies, 1049 participants: RR 6.18, 95% CI 3.68 to 10.38. ESWL-treated patients had less need for auxiliary treatment (5 studies, 751 participants: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.74; fewer complications (7 studies, 1205 participants: RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.88); and shorter length of hospital stay (2 studies, 198 participants: MD -2.55 days, 95% CI -3.24 to -1.86).Three studies adequately described the randomisation sequence, three studies were unclear on how they randomised, while one study had a high risk of selection bias. All the studies had an unclear risk of performance bias and detection bias, while all had a low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias, or other sources of bias identified. Compared with ESWL, ureteroscopic removal of ureteral stones achieves a greater stone-free state, but with a higher complication rate and longer hospital stay.

Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in treating renal stones sizing 15-25 mm in infants <3 years. Forty-six infants with renal stones sizing 15-30 mm were treated by either ESWL (22 renal units in 22 infants) using Dornier compact delta lithotripter or MPCNL (25 renal units in 24 infants) using 14F-18F renal access under general anesthesia. The operation time, stone-free rate, re-treatment rate, and complications between the two groups were compared with the χ(2), Mann-Whitney U, and Student's t tests. No significant differences in mean age and stone size were observed between the two groups. The 1- and 3-month postoperative stone-free rates were 84 and 96% in MPCNL group and were 31.8 and 86.4% in ESWL group. The re-treatment and complication rates were significantly higher in ESWL group than in MPCNL group (50 vs. 12%, P = 0.004; 16.0 vs. 45.5%, P = 0.028). The stone recurrence rate was similar between the two groups. No significant changes of serum creatinine (Cr) level and glomerular filtration rate were observed in both groups. In conclusion, MPCNL is an effective and feasible alternative monotherapy for large renal stones (15-25 mm) in infants, with a higher stone-free rate and a lower complication rate when compared with ESWL.

Observation of efficacy of ESWL in different period in management of ureteral stones

Objective To compare the efficacy of the emergency ESWL within 24 hours after the onset of renal colic and elective ESWL at 5 ～ 14 days after the onset of renal colic in the treatment for ureteral stones.Methods 280 patients in the People's Hospital of Pingding,according to the wishes of patients with ureteral stones were admitted to our department for renal colic.All patients onset to treatment time 0.5 ～ 10h,They underwent emergency ESWL or elective ESWL with WD-ESWL Vi Guangdong Weida energy electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.Success rate of fragmentation,stone-free rate after 2 weeks of operation,pain recurrence rate,and complications were evaluated.Results The success rate of fragmentation and the stone-free rate after 2 weeks of emergency ESWL were 97.18％ and 96.60％,respectively,which were higher than those(88.75％ and 87.61％,respectively)of elective ESWL(P ＜ 0.05).The postoperative pain recurrence rate of emergency ESWL(5.12％)was lower than that (10.24％)of elective ESWL(P ＜0.05).There was no difference of total complications between emergency ESWL (3.44％)and elective ESWL(2.98％)group(P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Emergency ESWL is superior to selective ESWL and is the safe and effective method for the management of ureteral stones. Key words: Lithotripsy, Extracorporeal shock wave; Ureteral calculi

Removal of Kidney Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Is Associated with Delayed Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

PurposeThis study aimed to elucidate whether stone removal by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is associated with delayed chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 131 nephrolithiasis patients with stage 3 and 4 CKD. We collected baseline clinical and laboratory data, kidney stone characteristics, and history of receiving ESWL. We classified study patients into two groups according to whether they underwent ESWL or not (Non-ESWL group vs. ESWL group). We initially compared annual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes of Non-ESWL group with those of ESWL group before undergoing ESWL. In the next step, we sought to compare annual eGFR changes in the same patients before and after ESWL. Finally, we compared annual eGFR changes between success and failure groups among patients undergoing ESWL.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 62 years and 72.5% were male. The mean observation period was 3.2 years. Non-ESWL group and ESWL group before undergoing ESWL showed similar annual eGFR changes (-1.75±6.5 vs. -1.63±7.2 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, p=0.425). However, eGFR declined slower after undergoing ESWL than before ESWL (annual eGFR changes, -0.29±6.1 vs. -1.63±7.2 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, p<0.05). In addition, among patients in ESWL group, eGFR declined faster in the failure group than in the success group (annual eGFR change, -1.01±4.7 vs. -0.05±5.2 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, p<0.05).ConclusionOur results suggest that stone removal by ESWL is associated with delayed deterioration of renal function in CKD patients with nephrolithiasis.

Role of twinkling artifact in characterization of urinary calculi

IntroductionStone characterization is becoming important before decision of treatment such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Some studies have reported that the twinkling artifact (color-flow ultrasonography artifact) may be useful to detect urinary stones. This study aims to determine whether the presence or absence of the twinkling artifact is correlated with the chemical composition of the stones. Material and methodPatients with renal stones ≥0.5cm were included in a prospective study. Sixty patients were examined with X-ray film, intravenous pyelography, non-contrast computerized tomography, and color and spectral Doppler ultrasonography. The artifact was considered grade 1 when it occupied only one portion of the acoustic shadowing and when the artifact occupied the entire acoustic shadowing was considered grade 2. Patients with stones smaller than 2cm were treated with SWL and patients with stones larger than 2cm were treated with PCNL. ResultsNo artifact (grade 0) was detected in 11 subjects, grade 1 in 25 and grade 2 in 24. Significant relationship was found between the increase in twinkling artifact and stone size (p<0.001). When the relation between the composition of the stones and the twinkling artifact was analyzed, artifact was detected nearly in all of the calcium oxalate dihydrate and calcium phosphate stones, whereas the artifact was detected in more than half of the calcium oxalate monohydrate and uric acid stones. In ESWL group it was observed that as the grade of the twinkling artifact increases, the number of required ESWL sessions decreases (p<0.001). In PCNL group twinkling artifact was found in all the patients (100%) with roughly surfaced stones. ConclusionThe roughness of stone surface is the most important factor in terms of formation of the twinkling artifact in kidney stones. This artifact can be of use in anticipating the breakability of the stones of those patients to be treated with applied ESWL. One might anticipate that cases where the size of the stone is larger than 2cm but no twinkling artifact is detected are calcium oxalate monohydrate, which is one of the stones with highest level of breakability.

Effects of Shock Waves on Oxidative Stress, Antioxidant Enzyme and Element Levels in Kidney of Rats

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on kidney oxidative stress and trace element levels of adult rats. Twelve male Wistar albino rats were divided equally into two groups. First group was used as control. The right-side kidneys of animals in second group were treated with 2,000 18-kV shock waves under anesthesia. Localization of the right kidney was achieved following contrast medium injection through a tail vein under flouroscopy control. The animals were sacrificed 72h after the ESWL treatment, and the kidneys were taken. Malondialdehyde level was higher in the ESWL group than in the control. Reduced glutathione levels, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase activities were lower in the ESWL group than those of the control. Fe, Cu, Pb, Mn, Cd, and Ni levels were lower in the ESWL group than in the control, although Mg level was higher in the ESWL group than in the control. In conclusion, the result of the present study indicated that ESWL treatment produced oxidative stress in the kidney and caused impairments on the antioxidant and trace element levels in the kidneys of rats.

El artefacto de centelleo en la caracterización de los cálculos urinarios

Introduction Stone characterization is becoming important before decision of treatment such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Some studies have reported that the twinkling artifact (color-flow ultrasonography artifact) may be useful to detect urinary stones. This study aims to determine whether the presence or absence of the twinkling artifact is correlated with the chemical composition of the stones. Material and method Patients with renal stones > 0.5 cm were included in a prospective study. Sixty patients were examined with x-ray film, intravenous pyelography, non-contrast computerized tomography, and color and spectral doppler ultrasonography. The artifact was considered grade 1 when occupied only one portion of the acoustic shadowing and when the artifact occupied the entire acoustic shadowing was considered grade 2. Patients with stones smaller than 2 cm were treated with SWL and patients with stones larger than 2 cm were treated with PCNL. Results No artifact (grade 0) was detected in 11 subjects, grade 1 in 25 and grade 2 in 24. Significant relationship was found between the increase in twinkling artifact and stone size (p < 0.001). When the relation between the composition of the stones and the twinkling artifact was analyzed, artifact was detected nearly in all of the calcium oxalate dihydrate and calcium phosphate stones; whereas the artifact was detected in more than half of the calcium oxalate monohydrate and uric acid stones. In ESWL group it was observed that as the grade of the twinkling artifact increases, the number of required ESWL sessions decreases (p < 0.001). In PCNL group twinkling artifact was found in all of the patients (100%) with roughly surfaced stones. Conclusion The roughness of stone surface is the most important factor in terms of formation of the twinkling artifact in kidney stones. This artifact can be of use in anticipating the breakability of the stones of those patients to be treated with applied ESWL. One might anticipate that cases where the size of the stone is larger than 2 cm but no twinkling artifact is detected are calcium oxalate monohydrate, which is one of the stones with highest level of breakability.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first‐line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study

To compare extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) as first-line treatments for patients with distal ureteric stones. In all, 273 patients with single, monolateral, radiopaque, distal ureteric stones of 0.5-1.5 cm were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomized to undergo ESWL (137) or URS (136). The electromagnetic Modulith SLX lithotripter (Storz Medical, Switzerland) was used for ESWL and a semi-rigid ureteroscope was used for URS. Patients in both groups were compared for overall stone-free rates (SFRs), re-treatment rates, need for auxiliary procedures and complication rates. A subgroup analysis was performed in both groups according to stone size of ≤1 cm and >1 cm. Patients in the ESWL group achieved a 92.70% overall SFR with a 44.88% re-treatment rate and an 11.02% auxiliary procedure rate. Complications occurred in 15.32% of patients treated with ESWL. Patients in the URS group achieved a 94.85% overall SFR with a re-treatment rate of 7.75% and an auxiliary procedure rate of 18.60%. Complications occurred in 19.11% of patients treated with URS. In the ESWL group, the need for re-treatments and for auxiliary procedures as well as the incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients with stones of >1 cm. In patients with stones of ≤1 cm treated with ESWL the need for re-treatments and for auxiliary procedures as well as the incidence of complications was significantly lower than for those treated with URS. In centres where both techniques are available, ESWL should be the preferred treatment for patients with single distal ureteric stones of ≤1 cm and URS should be reserved for patients with stones of >1 cm.

Comparison of efficacy between emergency ESWL and elective ESWL in management of ureteral stones

Objective To compare the efficacy of the emergency ESWL within 24 hours after the onset of renal colic and elective ESWL at 5 - 7 days after the onset of renal colic in the treatment for ureteral stones.Method From January 2008 to October 2009, 365 patients in the Second Hospital of Nanchang, with ureteral stones were admitted to our department for renal colic. They underwent emergency ESWL or elective ESWL with HK. ESWL- 108 energy electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter. Success rate of fragmentation, stone-free rate after 2 weeks of operation, pain recurrence rate, and complications were evaluated. The data were analyzed using SPSS 15.0. Results The success rate of fragmentation and the stone-free rate after 2 weeks of emergency ESWL were 96.76% and96.21%, respectively, which were higher than those (88.33% and 87.22%, respectively) of elective ESWL ( P ＜ 0. 05). The postoperative pain recurrence rate of emergency ESWL ( 4.32 % ) was lower than that (9.44%) of elective ESWL ( P ＜0.05). There was no difference of total complications between emergency ESWL (3.24%) and elective ESWL (2.78%) group (P ＞0.05). Conclusions Emergency ESWL is superior to selective ESWL and is the safe and effective method for the management of ureteral stones. Key words: Emergency; Elective; Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Ureteral stones; Effect

Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Ureteral Stones in a Taipei City Hospital: Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopy plus Lithoclast

Aim: To compare cost-effectiveness, success rates and sat isfaction score of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with lithoclast (URSL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital. Methods: This is a retrospective study. From July 1998 to June 2000, 448 patients who underwent treatment for ureteral stones were included. The patients were divided into two treatment groups according to the initial method adopted for the management of their stone. Medical records and hospital financial records were collected for costs of implementing each treatment program. The satisfaction scores of patients (rating from 0 to 10) were collected by telephone interviews. Success was defined as complete clearance of the stone or fragmentation of stones smaller than 2 mm by plain abdominal film and complete relief of symptoms after initial treatment. Results: A total of 360 patients were in the ESWL group (including 144 upper, 48 middle and 168 lower third stones) and 88 in the URSL group (including 28 upper, 24 middle and 36 lower third stones). The range of stone size was from 0.6 to 1.9 cm. The overall treatment cost was comparable in both groups with a trend for it to be higher in the ESWL group without reaching statistical significance (TWD 20,901.5 ± 8,911.3 vs. 19,876.1 ± 4,782.2). Stratified by the location of stone, the overall treatment cost was significantly higher in the ESWL group than in the URSL group for patients with upper third ureteral stones irrespective of stone size. The efficiency quotient for ESWL and URSL was 0.62 and 0.65, respectively. The success rate was significantly higher in the URSL group than in the ESWL group (89.8 vs. 71.7%). Satisfaction scores were similar for both groups with a trend to be higher in the ESWL group without reaching statistical significance (7.97 ± 1.01 vs. 7.53 ± 1.37). Conclusions: The overall treatment cost of patients with upper third ureteral stone was significantly higher in the ESWL group than in the URSL group, but the success rate was significantly higher in the URSL group than in the ESWL group.

Estudio prospectivo que compara la litotricia extracorpórea y la ureteroscopia en el tratamiento de la litiasis de uréter distal

Purpose To compare the efficacy of ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in treating distal ureteral calculi and evaluate the best treatment alternative for this disease. Material and methods A total of 104 patients with distal ureteral calculi requiring surgical intervention were enrolled and observed in a prospective follow-up. For ESWL, a Modulix SLX Storz lithotriptor was used and for ureteroscopy, a Storz 33 cm semi-rigid ureteroscope with a diameter of 7,5 to 9,5 french and a 6-degree optic. Out of the patient total, 54 patients underwent ESWL and 50 underwent ureteroscopy. 62 patients were men and 42 women; mean age in the ESWL group was 49.72, and in the ureteroscopy group, 52,16. Mean calculus size for ESWL was 8.29mm and 8,96 mm for ureteroscopy. A P<.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Mean procedure time for ESWL was 55 minutes in men and 45 minutes in women. For ureteroscopy, procedure time was 80 minutes for men and 55 minutes for women. For ESWL, the mean hospital stay was 4.8 hours (same-day discharge for all patients). Mean hospital stay for ureteroscopy patients was 22 hours. 7% of ESWL patients experienced complications compared with 7.9% of those undergoing ureteroscopy. At the 30-day follow up, 74.3% of ESWL patients were stone free, while 92,3% of the ureteroscopy patients were stone free ( P<.05). Conclusions Based on the results of this study, ureteroscopy is a better method for treating distal ureteral calculi because of its stone free rates and because the difference in complication rates was not significant.

Clinical comparison of therapeutic methods for calculi in congenital anomalous kidneys

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic methods for stones in congenital anomalous kidneys. Methods The clinical outcomes of 126 patients(75 males and 51 females: mean age 39 years, range 12-66 years)who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL, n= 37), minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL, n = 41) or open surgery (n = 48) were retrospectively reviewed. There were 40 horseshoe kidneys(31.8%), 51 duplex kidneys(40.5%), 35 malrotated kidneys(27.8%). Seventyl calculi were located in left kidneys(55.6%)and 56 in right kid-neys(44.4%). There were 96 single stones(76.2%)and 30 complex stones(23.8%). The greatest di-ameter of stone ranged from0.8 cm to 2.2 cm(mean 1.5 cm) in ESWL group, 1.0 cm to 4.0 cm (mean 2.5 cm) in MPCNL group and 1.5 cm to 3.8 cm(mean 2.7 cm) in open surgery group. The therapeutic effects of 3 methods were compared. Results The stone-free rate at 1 session was 78.4%(29/31) in ESWL group, 85.4%(35/41) in MPCNL group and 87.5%(42/48) in open sur-gery group. No significant difference was found among the 3 groups(x2 = 1.39,P=0.50). The inci-dence of complications was 13.5% in ESWL group, 9.7% in MPCNL group and 6.3% in open sur-gery group(x2=1.28, P=0.53). Only 1 case of malrotated kidney suffered massive hemorrhage and was cured by selective embolism of renal artery. No major complications occurred in the other pa-tients. Conclusions With rigorous indication, ESWL or MPCNL is as safe and effective as open sur-gery in the management of stones in congenital anomalous kidneys. It should be considered as the pri-mary therapy. But the treatment must be individualized in terms of the type anomalous kidney, stone characteristics and obstruction. Key words: Urogenital abnormalities; Kidney calculi; Surgical procedures, elective

Shock Wave Lithotripsy Not Associated With Development of Diabetes Mellitus at 6 Years of Follow-up

To investigate the hypothesis that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) increases the incident risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). Studies have suggested that ESWL predisposes to DM. Using a mail survey, we collected data on the presence and onset of DM in 1947 patients treated with the Medstone-STS electrohydraulic lithotripter from 1999 to 2002. These patients were matched by age, sex, and body mass index to controls from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Of the 1947 patients, 4% could not be matched and were excluded, leaving 1869 for analysis, of whom 60.0% were men. The mean age was 51.9 years at ESWL and the median follow-up was 6 years. The mean body mass index at the end of the study was 28.6 kg/m(2). At ESWL, 8.67% of matched patients had a diagnosis of DM. This had increased to 13.9% at the time of survey. In the NHANES group, 8.34% had DM at the time the ESWL group underwent treatment, and this had increased to 14.1% at the NHANES survey. Therefore, the rate of new DM cases in the ESWL group was similar to that in the NHANES group (5.2% vs 5.8%, respectively; P = .47). Multivariate analysis of the patient cohort confirmed that age, sex, body mass index, and family history correlated with development of DM and that the laterality of treatment and number of treatments or shocks given were not significant predictors of DM. The results of our study have shown that patients treated with ESWL do not develop DM at a greater rate than does the general population at 6 years of follow-up.