Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Program Research Articles

Cardiac Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Community Cardiac Surgery Program: Are the Results Comparable?

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes in small centers are commonly considered less favorable than in large-volume centers. New ECMO protocols and procedures were established in our regional community hospital system as part of a cardiogenic shock initiative. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the outcomes of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in a community hospital system with cardiac surgery capability and assess whether protocol optimization and cannulation standards result in comparable outcomes to larger centers whether the outcomes of this new ECMO program at the community hospital setting were comparable to the United States averages. Our regional system comprises five hospitals with 1500 beds covering southwestern New Jersey, with only one of these hospitals having cardiac surgery and ECMO capability. In May 2021, the new ECMO program was initiated. Patients were screened by a multidisciplinary call, cannulated by our ECMO team, and subsequently treated by the designated team. We reviewed our cardiac ECMO outcomes over two years, from May 2021 to April 2023, in patients who required ECMO due to cardiogenic shock or as a part of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). A total of 60 patients underwent cardiac ECMO, and all were VA ECMO, including 18 (30%) patients who required ECPR for cardiac arrest. The overall survival rate for our cardiac ECMO program turned out to be 48% (29/60), with 50% (22/42) in VA ECMO excluding ECPR and 39% (7/18) in the ECPR group. The hospital survival rate for the VA ECMO and ECPR groups was 36% (15/42) and 28% (5/18), respectively. The ELSO-reported national average for hospital survival is 48% for VA ECMO and 30% for ECPR. Considering these benchmarks, the hospital survival rate of our program did not significantly lag behind the national average. With protocol, cannulation standards, and ECMO management optimized, the VA ECMO results of a community hospital system with cardiac surgery capability were not inferior to those of larger centers.

A Survey to Quantify the Number and Structure of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Retrieval Programs in the United States.

(1) Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a potentially lifesaving support for respiratory and/or circulatory failure but its availability is limited to larger medical centers. A well-organized regional ECMO center with remote cannulation and retrieval ability can offer this intervention to patients treated at hospitals without ECMO. Information regarding the number and structure of ECMO retrieval programs in the United States is limited and there are no data regarding the size and structure of existing programs and which physician specialists perform cannulations and provide management. (2) Methods: We created a survey of 12 questions that was sent out to all adult US ECMO programs registered in the ELSO database. The data for the study were collected through an online survey instrument that was developed in Survey Monkey (Monkey Headquarters, Portland, OR). (3) Results: Approximately half of the centers that received the survey responded: 136 out of 274 (49.6%). Sixty-three centers (46%) have an ECMO retrieval program; 58 of these offer both veno-arterial (V-A) and veno-venous (V-V) ECMO, while 5 programs offer V-V ECMO rescue only. Thirty-three (52%) centers perform less than 10 ECMO retrievals per year, and only five (8%) hospitals can perform more than 50 ECMO rescues per year. Cardiothoracic surgeons perform the majority of the ECMO cannulations during retrievals in 30 programs (48%), followed by intensivists in eight (13%) programs and cardiologists in three (5%) centers. (4) Conclusions: Many ECMO centers offer ECMO retrievals; however, only a minority of the programs perform a large number of rescues per year. These cannulations are primarily performed by cardiothoracic surgeons.

Utilisation and outcomes of a mobile (ambulance and air transport) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) program in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic – a retrospective, two-centres, case-series study

Utilisation and outcomes of a mobile (ambulance and air transport) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) program in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic – a retrospective, two-centres, case-series study

Implementing an Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

In response to the needs of patients infected with COVID-19, an interdisciplinary team was assembled to implement an adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program in the surgical ICU of a West Texas tertiary care hospital. Use of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines was essential to the development of this effort. The aim of this project was to develop, implement, and evaluate an adult ECMO program. A logic model was used in designing and evaluating the adult ECMO program. A 35-hour ECMO specialist training course was developed, and training began in August 2020, a month before implementation of the project began. Patient outcomes were measured between September 2020 and December 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to measure the clinical outcomes of interest. Seventeen newly trained ECMO specialists included experienced critical care nurses and respiratory therapists. Protocols were developed for the initiation of ECMO, and tracked patient outcomes included survival off ECMO, survival to discharge, major and minor complications, and length of stay. Nine patients had COVID-19 and demonstrated an 11.11% mortality rate after adult ECMO program implementation. Use of the ELSO professional guidelines to design and develop this project led to the achievement of a sustainable ECMO program. Hospital leaders can now implement adult ECMO programs amid other demands for resources that may be created by future pandemics.

An International Survey of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education and Credentialing Practices.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has grown rapidly over the past decades because of evolving indications, advances in circuit technology, and encouraging results from modern trials. Because ECMO is a complex and highly invasive therapy that requires a multidisciplinary team, optimal education, training, and credentialing remain a challenge. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence and application of ECMO education and ECMO practitioner credentialing at ECMO centers globally. In addition, we explored differences among education and credentialing practices in relation to various ECMO center characteristics. We conducted an observational study of ECMO centers worldwide using a survey querying participants in two major domains: ECMO education and ECMO practitioner credentialing. Of note, the questionnaire included ECMO program characteristics, such as type and size of hospital and ECMO experience and volume, to explore the association with the two domains. A total of 241 (32%) of the 732 identified ECMO centers responded to the survey, representing 41 countries across the globe. ECMO education was offered at 221 (92%) of the 241 centers. ECMO education was offered at 105 (98.0%) high-ECMO volume centers compared with 136 (87.5%) low-ECMO volume centers (P = 0.005). Credentialing was established at 101 (42%) of the 241 centers. Credentialing processes existed at 52 (49.5%) high-ECMO volume centers compared with 51 (37.5%) low-ECMO volume centers (P = 0.08) and 101 (49.3%) Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers compared with 1 (2.7%) non-Extracorporeal Life Support Organization center (P < 0.001). We found significant variability in whether ECMO educational curricula are offered at ECMO centers. We also found fewer than half of the ECMO centers surveyed had established credentialing programs for ECMO practitioners. Future studies that assess variability in outcomes among centers with and without standardized educational and credentialing practices are needed.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Uses in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock After Open-Heart Surgery.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the first-line therapy for temporary mechanical circulatory support allowing cardiac and pulmonary recovery or as a bridge to further therapeutic alternatives. The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes in adult patients with refractory cardiac failure after open-heart surgery undergoing ECMO in a single center with an ECMO unit in Chile. We retrospectively analyzed adults with refractory cardiac failure after open-heart surgery who required a venoarterial (VA) ECMO between 2016 and 2021. Of 16 patients with VA ECMO, 60% were men (n=10), 90% had hypertension (n=14), 69% had < 30% of left ventricular ejection fraction (n=11), and the mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score was 12 ± 11%. ECMO support with central cannulation accounts for 81% (n=13), and an intra-aortic balloon pump was used in nine patients (56%). The mean time of support was 4.7 ± 2.6 days (1.5 - 12 days). ECMO weaning was achieved in 88% of patients, and in-hospital mortality was 44% (n=7) after discharge. The freedom from all-cause mortality at one year of follow-up of the entire cohort was 38% (n=6). VA ECMO is now a well-known life-saving therapeutic option, but mortality and morbidity remain high. Implementation of an ECMO program with educational training is mandatory in order to find the proper balance between patient benefits, ethical considerations, and public health financial input in South America.

Successful Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Implementation at a Non-tertiary Medical Center: A Single-Center Experience.

The inexperience and limited resources at non-tertiary medical centers pose unique challenges to the successful development of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program. The current literature does not provide a detailed framework that addresses the unique challenges encountered at these facilities. We outline a proactive approach to developing an ECMO program and provide a retrospective analysis of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, ECMO configuration, duration of ECMO support, major adverse events, and survival to hospital discharge. Data are summarized using mean, median, percentages, standard deviation, and interquartile range. Eleven patients were cannulated between December 2021 to March 2023. The age range of the patients who received ECMO varied significantly, with the youngest being 25 years old and the oldest being 69 years old. The mean age was 38 years old, with a standard deviation of 15.9. Hypertension was the most common co-morbid condition occurring in 64% (n=7) of patients. Only one patient had a major adverse event, and survival to hospital discharge was 73% (n=8). Of the patients that survived hospital discharge, seven patients were discharged home and one to a rehabilitation facility. These findings suggest that the safe implementation of an ECMO program at a non-tertiary hospital with inexperienced staff and limited resources is feasible. Adherence to established guidelines is essential for new programs, especially with regard to patient selection. Furthermore, a proactive approach that emphasizes high-yield training techniques, patient management protocols, and strategies that mitigate adverse events may be the key to achieving survival rates that exceed those of larger academic hospitals.

Factors associated with 30-day in-hospital mortality in critically ill adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with the 30-day in-hospital mortality rate among adult patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in intensive care units. Research MethodologyRetrospective cohort study including 148 patients who underwent ECMO for at least 48 h between March 2010 and August 2021. The patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors based on their 30-day in-hospital survival. We obtained the sociodemographic information and pre- and post-ECMO data from electronic medical records. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyse the data. SettingA tertiary-care university hospital in South Korea. Main Outcome MeasuresThe 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was the principal outcome measure. ResultsThe 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 49.3% (n = 73). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that the duration of ECMO support in the 50th percentile of surviving patients was 13 days. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that new-onset renal failure, lower mean arterial pressure, and ECMO weaning failure were associated with an increased 30-day in-hospital mortality risk among patients who received ECMO. Subgroup analysis also revealed a significant association between weaning failure and 30-day in-hospital mortality after adjusting for covariates in patients undergoing veno-arterial ECMO. ConclusionClose monitoring of post-ECMO renal function and mean arterial pressure is required to minimize the risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality, especially in adults within the first two weeks of ECMO initiation. Moreover, the success of ECMO weaning should be optimized by collaboration within the ECMO team. Implications for Clinical PracticeCritical care nurses should pay close attention to patients’ response to weaning trials as well as alternations in renal function and mean arterial pressure during ECMO support. Furthermore, developing nursing care guidelines for adult patients receiving ECMO and standardized training programs for nurses in intensive care, are required in Korea.

Practice patterns in extracorporeal life support in tertiary cardiac intensive care units in north america: a survey-based analysis from the critical care cardiology trials network

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The use of veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has significantly increased in the last decade. However, there is substantial variability in practice patterns between institutions. To date, the optimal ECMO program model is unclear and possible differences between ECMO centers in staffing, organization and team structure have been poorly characterized. Purpose Our aim was to describe contemporary practices of care for patients undergoing ECMO in tertiary cardiac centers in North America. Methods An 11-question anonymous survey was sent to all participating sites in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN), a prospective registry of advanced cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) in North America, coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. The survey evaluated ECMO staffing models, decision-making processes, cannulation and longitudinal care. Results The response rate was 100% (39/39) across CCCTN centers. The decision to proceed with VA ECMO was made as a team in 79% of the cases and in 58.3% of the VV ECMO cases, rather than by an individual specialty. An ECMO consult service was used in 67% of the centers, and integrated with the cardiogenic shock team in 58%. The most common specialty participating in the ECMO service was cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) (73.1%), followed by heart failure specialists (38.5%), with critical care cardiology (CCC) in only 23.1% of the centers (Figure 1A). In the majority of centers, VA ECMO cannulation was performed by CTS alone (46.2%), Interventional cardiology (IC) and CTS (38.5%), and IC alone (7.7%, Figure 1B). Cannulation for VA ECMO was not performed by intensivists at any center. VV ECMO cannulations were performed by CTS in 51.3%, intensivists in 17.9% and IC in 2.6% of the centers. VA ECMO patients were admitted to the cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit in 64.1% of centers, with 20.5 % admitted to the CICU (Figure 1C). VV ECMO patients were admitted to the cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit in 36.8% of sites, and the medical intensive care unit in 34.2%. The most common ECMO specialist model was having a perfusionist at the bedside, followed by nurse specialist (Figure 1D). Specialty services consulted within 24-48 hours of cannulation included physical therapy in 48.7%, palliative care in 30.8%, and bioethics in only 2.6% of centers. Simulation-based ECMO training is performed in 59% of the centers. Half (51.3%) of the centers perform ECPR, while 17.9% reported plans of developing a program. Conclusions Although there is significant variability in ECMO cannulation, location of care, staffing practices in advanced CICUs in North America, a multidisciplinary team approach is common in ECMO centers, with early involvement of physical therapy and palliative care specialists. Further research to establish the optimal model for ECMO programs is of high importance.

Health Disparities in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Utilization and Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature.

To map the scope, methodological rigor, quality, and direction of associations between social determinants of health (SDoH) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization or outcomes. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for citations from January 2000 to January 2023, examining socioeconomic status (SES), race, ethnicity, hospital and ECMO program characteristics, transport, and geographic location (context) with utilization and outcomes (concept) in ECMO patients (population). Methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses scoping review extension. Two reviewers independently evaluated abstracts and full text of identified publications. Exclusion criteria included non-English, unavailable, less than 40 patients, and periprocedural or mixed mechanical support. Content analysis used a standardized data extraction tool and inductive thematic analysis for author-proposed mediators of disparities. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Of 8,214 citations screened, 219 studies were identified. Primary analysis focuses on 148 (68%) including race/ethnicity/SES/payer variables including investigation of ECMO outcomes 114 (77%) and utilization 43 (29%). SDoH were the primary predictor in 15 (10%). Overall quality and methodologic rigor was poor with advanced statistics in 7%. Direction of associations between ECMO outcomes or utilization according to race, ethnicity, SES, or payer varied. In 38% adverse outcomes or lower use was reported in underrepresented, under-resourced or diverse populations, while improved outcomes or greater use were observed in these populations in 7%, and 55% had no statistically significant result. Only 26 studies (18%) discussed mechanistic drivers of disparities, primarily focusing on individual- and hospital-level rather than systemic/structural factors. Associations between ECMO utilization and outcomes with SDoH are inconsistent, complicated by population heterogeneity and analytic shortcomings with limited consideration of systemic contributors. Findings and research gaps have implications for measuring, analyzing, and interpreting SDoH in ECMO research and healthcare.

Primary neonatal and pediatric ECMO transport: First experience in Spain.

The organization of primary Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transport is highly variable. To present the experience of the first mobile pediatric ECMO program in Spain, we designed a prospective descriptive study of all primary neonatal and pediatric (0-16years) ECMO transports carried out over 10years. The main variables recorded include demographic information, patient background, clinical data, ECMO indications, adverse events, and main outcomes. 39 primary ECMO transports were carried out with a 66.7% survival to hospital discharge. The median age was 1.24months[IQR: 0.09-96]. Cannulation was mostly peripheral venoarterial (33/39). The mean response time from the call from the sending center to the departure of the ECMO team was 4h[2.2-8]. The median inotropic score at the time of cannulation was 70[17.2-206.5], with a median oxygenation index of 40.5[29-65]. In 10% of the cases, ECMO-CPR was performed. Adverse events occurred in 56.4%, mostly related to the means of transport (40% overall). On arrival at the ECMO center, 44% of the patients underwent interventions. The median PICU stay was 20.5days[11-32]. 5 patients developed neurological sequels. Statistically significant differences between survivors and deceased patients were not found. A good survival rate, with a low prevalence of serious adverse events, suggests a clear benefit of primary ECMO transport when conventional therapeutic measures are exhausted and the patient is too unstable to undergo conventional transport. A nationwide primary ECMO-transport program must therefore be offered to all patients regardless of their location.

Implementation of a regional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program for refractory ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BackgroundeCPR, the modality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) applied in the setting of cardiac arrest, has emerged as a novel therapy which may improve outcomes in select patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). To date, implementation has been mainly limited to single academic centres. Our objective is to describe the feasibility and challenges with implementation of a regional protocol for eCPR. MethodsThe Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency implemented a regional eCPR protocol in July 2020, which included coordination across multiple EMS provider agencies and hospitals to route patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation (rVF) OHCA to eCPR-capable centres (ECCs). Data were entered on consecutive patients with rVF with suspected cardiac aetiology into a centralized database including time intervals, field and in-hospital care, survival and neurologic outcome. ResultsFrom July 27, 2020 through July 31, 2022, 35 patients (median age 57 years, 6 (17%) female) were routed to ECCs, of whom 11 (31%) received eCPR and 3 (27%) treated with eCPR survived, all of whom had a full neurologic recovery. Challenges encountered during implementation included cost to EMS provider agencies for training, implementation, and purchase of automatic chest compression devices, maintenance of system awareness, hospital administrative support for staffing and equipment for the ECMO program, and interdepartmental coordination at ECCs. ConclusionWe describe the successful implementation of a regional eCPR program with ongoing patient enrolment and data collection. These preliminary findings can serve as a model for other EMS systems who seek to implement regional eCPR programs.

Implementation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery or Perfusion Support: A Tale of Two County Hospitals.

Patients with refractory respiratory and cardiac failure may present to noncardiac surgery centers. Prior studies have demonstrated that acute care surgeons, intensivists, and emergency medicine physicians can safely cannulate and manage patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Harborview Medical Center (Harborview) and Hennepin County Medical Center (Hennepin) are both urban, county-owned, level 1 trauma centers that implemented ECMO without direct, on-site cardiac surgery or perfusion support. Both centers 1) use an ECMO specialist model staffed by specially trained nurses and respiratory therapists and 2) developed comparable training curricula for ECMO specialists, intensivists, surgeons, and trainees. Each program began with venovenous ECMO to provide support for refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure and subsequently expanded to venoarterial ECMO support. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created an impetus for restructuring, with each program creating a consulting service to facilitate ECMO delivery across multiple intensive care units (ICUs) and to promote fellow and resident training and experience. Both Harborview and Hennepin, urban county hospitals 1,700 miles apart in the United States, independently implemented and operate adult ECMO programs without involvement from cardiovascular surgery or perfusion services. This experience further supports the role of ECMO specialists in the delivery of extracorporeal life support.

Clinical practice of emergency department-initiated extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest in adults.

Clinical practice of emergency department-initiated extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest in adults.

Advanced nurse specialist-managed pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A 35-year single center experience

Aim: To investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of a solely registered nurse (RN)-managed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program in a community hospital over a 35-year period. Material and Methods: A retrospective single-center review was conducted on all patients who received at least 24 hours of ECMO support in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between August 1987 and August 2021. An integrated study of ECMO support type, ECMO duration, and patient survival to discharge was systematically performed. Results: 321 ECMO runs were initiated on 319 patients. 273 (85.0%) runs were for elective pulmonary support, 34 (10.6%) were for elective cardiac support, and 14 (4.36%) were for emergent cardiac support in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Of the 321 ECMO runs, 279 (86.9%) were performed on neonatal patients, 37 (11.5%) on pediatric patients, and 5 (1.56%) on adult patients (excluded from analysis). The median duration of ECMO was 120 hours for neonatal patients and 134 hours for pediatric patients. 69.5% of all patients on ECMO survived to discharge. ECPR was an independent predictor of poor outcomes, in which 28.6% of the 14 patients survived to discharge. Conclusion: A pediatric ECMO program fully managed by advanced nurse specialists was successfully implemented, maintained, and expanded. This model produced safe and efficacious outcomes that were comparable to data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. Such an ECMO model is feasible even in a resource-limited setting like a community hospital. Nevertheless, for the most critical patients, the support of neonatologists, intensivists, and surgeons is imperative for enhancing favorable outcomes.

Knowledge regarding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management among Brazilian pediatric intensivists: a cross-sectional survey.

To assess Brazilian pediatric intensivists' general knowledge of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including evidence for its use, the national funding model, indications, and complications. This was a multicenter cross-sectional survey including 45 Brazilian pediatric intensive care units. A convenience sample of 654 intensivists was surveyed regarding their knowledge on managing patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, its indications, complications, funding, and literature evidence. The survey addressed questions regarding the knowledge and experience of pediatric intensivists with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including two clinical cases and 6 optional questions about the management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of the 45 invited centers, 42 (91%) participated in the study, and 412 of 654 (63%) pediatric intensivists responded to the survey. Most pediatric intensive care units were from the Southeast region of Brazil (59.5%), and private/for-profit hospitals represented 28.6% of the participating centers. The average age of respondents was 41.4 (standard deviation 9.1) years, and the majority (77%) were women. Only 12.4% of respondents had taken an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation course. Only 19% of surveyed hospitals have an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program, and only 27% of intensivists reported having already managed patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Specific extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management questions were responded to by only 64 physicians (15.5%), who had a fair/good correct response rate (median 63.4%; range 32.8% to 91.9%). Most Brazilian pediatric intensivists demonstrated limited knowledge regarding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including its indications and complications. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not yet widely available in Brazil, with few intensivists prepared to manage patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and even fewer intensivists recognizing when to refer patients to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers.

Conhecimento do manejo da oxigenação por membrana extracorpórea de intensivistas pediátricos brasileiros: um inquérito transversal

OBJECTIVE: To assess Brazilian pediatric intensivists’ general knowledge of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including evidence for its use, the national funding model, indications, and complications. METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional survey including 45 Brazilian pediatric intensive care units. A convenience sample of 654 intensivists was surveyed regarding their knowledge on managing patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, its indications, complications, funding, and literature evidence. RESULTS: The survey addressed questions regarding the knowledge and experience of pediatric intensivists with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including two clinical cases and 6 optional questions about the management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of the 45 invited centers, 42 (91%) participated in the study, and 412 of 654 (63%) pediatric intensivists responded to the survey. Most pediatric intensive care units were from the Southeast region of Brazil (59.5%), and private/for-profit hospitals represented 28.6% of the participating centers. The average age of respondents was 41.4 (standard deviation 9.1) years, and the majority (77%) were women. Only 12.4% of respondents had taken an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation course. Only 19% of surveyed hospitals have an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program, and only 27% of intensivists reported having already managed patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Specific extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management questions were responded to by only 64 physicians (15.5%), who had a fair/good correct response rate (median 63.4%; range 32.8% to 91.9%). CONCLUSION: Most Brazilian pediatric intensivists demonstrated limited knowledge regarding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, including its indications and complications. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not yet widely available in Brazil, with few intensivists prepared to manage patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and even fewer intensivists recognizing when to refer patients to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers.

193: PROGRAM-WIDE TRANSITION FROM HEPARIN TO BIVALIRUDIN ANTICOAGULATION IN ADULT ECMO: A COST ANALYSIS

Introduction: Bivalirudin is becoming an increasingly popular alternative to heparin for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) anticoagulation due to its short half-life, organ-independent metabolism, thrombin inhibition without the need for a co-factor, and its ability to bind clot-bound and freely circulating thrombin. The objective of this study was to compare the cost implications of bivalirudin and heparin during adult ECMO support. Methods: A retrospective analysis of adults supported on ECMO who received heparin or bivalirudin for anticoagulation between January 2014 and January 2022 at Mayo Clinic was performed. In November 2017, the Mayo Clinic ECMO program transitioned from heparin to bivalirudin as the primary anticoagulant of choice, which separated the pre- and post-transition groups. Cost data were estimated using Wholesale Acquisition Costs and laboratory reimbursement schedules. Cost data were normalized to duration of ECMO support, compared between the pre- and post-transition groups, and were summarized in United States Dollar ($). Results: A total of 126 patients (123 heparin, 3 bivalirudin) in the pre-transition period and 275 patients (82 heparin, 193 bivalirudin) in the post-transition period were included. Antithrombin administration was more frequent in the pre-transition group (31% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001), as were number of coagulation assays per ECMO day (6.1 vs. 5.4, p = 0.0004). The post-transition group had significantly less costs from antithrombin assessments ($1.03 vs. $11.78, p < 0.0001) and antithrombin supplementation ($0 [IQR $0, $0] vs. $0 [IQR $0, $312.82], p < 0.0001) per day of ECMO support. The aggregate costs per patient were similar in the heparin ($333 vs. $248, p = 0.5690) and bivalirudin ($2723 vs $1720, p = 0.4659) groups pre- and post-transition, respectively. Survival at 28-days was greater in the post-transition group (75% vs. 64%, p = 0.0286). Conclusions: Antithrombin assessment and supplementation comprised a majority of anticoagulant-related costs in heparin-based ECMO patients, which was significantly reduced following transition to bivalirudin-based anticoagulation. When considering laboratory and drug costs in aggregate, there is a favorable association between bivalirudin and heparin anticoagulation in adult ECMO patients.

An Intensivist-Led Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Program: Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of the First Five Years.

We describe the development, implementation, and outcomes of an intensivist-led adult extracorporeal life support (ECLS) program using intensivists both to perform venovenous (V-V), venoarterial (V-A), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) cannulations, and to manage patients on ECLS throughout their ICU course. All adults supported with ECLS at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) from February 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 203 ECLS cannulations were performed in 198 patients, including 116 V-A cannulations (including 65 during ECPR) and 87 V-V cannulations (including 38 in patients with COVID-19). UNMH intensivists performed 195 cannulations, with 9 cannulation complications. Cardiothoracic surgeons performed 8 cannulations. Overall survival to hospital discharge or transfer was 46.5%. Survival was 32.3% in the ECPR group and 56% in the non-ECPR V-A group. In the V-V cohort, survival was 66.7% in the COVID-19-negative patients and 34.2% in the COVID-19-positive patients. This large series of intensivist-performed ECLS cannulations-including V-A, V-V, and ECPR modalities-demonstrates the successful implementation of a comprehensive intensivist-led ECLS program. With outcomes comparable to those in the literature, our program serves as a model for the initiation and development of ECLS programs in settings with limited access to local subspecialty cardiothoracic surgical services.

Developing a new pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program.

We aimed to critically evaluate the effectiveness of a designated ECMO team in our ECMO selection process and patient outcomes in the first 3years of our low-volume pediatric ECMO program. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received an ECMO consultation between thestart of our program in March 2015 and May 2018. Wegathered clinical and demographic information on patients who did and did not receive ECMO, and described our selection process. We reflected on the processes used to initiate our program and our outcomes in the first 3years. Sixty-nine patients received consultations, and of those, 50 patients were potential candidates. 19 (38%) of the candidates were ultimately placed on ECMO. There were statistically significant differences in oxygen saturation, paO2, oxygenation index, A-aDO2, lactate, and pH between the patients who went on ECMO and who did not. We improved our outcomes from 0% survival to discharge in 2015, to 60% in 2018, with an average of 63% survival to discharge over the first 3years of our program. In a low-volume pediatric ECMO center, having a designated team to assist in the patient selection process and management can help provide safe and efficient care to these patients, and improve patient outcomes. Having a strict management protocol and simulation sessions involving all members of the medical team yields comfort forthe providers and optimal care for patients. This study describes our novel structure, processes, and outcomes, which we hope will be helpful to others seeking to develop a new pediatric ECMO program.