Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Research Articles

Standby extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a better strategy for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

The incidence of cardiac arrest (CA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is relatively rare. However, when it does occur, the mortality rate is extremely high. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has shown promising survival rates for in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA), with low-flow time being an independent prognostic factor for CA. However, there is no definitive answer on how to reduce low-flow time. This retrospective study, conducted at a single center, included 39 patients who underwent ECPR during PCI between January 2016 and December 2022. The patients were divided into two cohorts based on whether standby extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was utilized during PCI: standby ECPR (SBE) (n = 13) and extemporaneous ECPR (EE) (n = 26). We compared the 30-day mortality rates between these two cohorts and investigated factors associated with survival. Compared to the EE cohort, the SBE cohort showed significantly lower low-flow time (P < 0.01), ECMO operation time (P < 0.01), and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (P = 0.017), as well as peak lactate (P < 0.01). Stand-by ECMO was associated with improved 30-day survival (p = 0.036), while prolonged low-flow time (p = 0.004) and a higher SYNTAX II score (p = 0.062) predicted death at 30 days. Standby ECMO can provide significant benefits for patients who undergo ECPR for CA during PCI. It is a viable option for high-risk PCI cases and may enhance the overall prognosis. The low-flow time remains a critical determinant of survival.

Outcomes in pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A single-center retrospective study from 2007 to 2022 in China

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). MethodsThe retrospective study included a total of 77 pediatric cases (7 neonates and 70 children) who underwent ECPR after in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between July 2007 and December 2022. Primary endpoints were complications, while secondary endpoints included all-cause in-hospital mortality. ResultsAmong the 45 cases experiencing complications, 4 neonates and 41 children had multiple simultaneous complications, primarily neurological issues in 25 cases. Additionally, organ failure occurred in 11 cases, and immunodeficiency was present in two cases. Furthermore, 9 cases experienced bleeding events, and 13 cases showed thrombosis. Patients with complications had lower weight, shorter ECMO durations, and longer CPR durations. Non-survivors had longer CPR durations and shorter durations of ECMO, ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation compared to survivors. Complications were more prevalent in non-survivors, particularly organ failure and bleeding events. ConclusionWeight, CPR duration, and ECMO duration were associated with complications, suggesting areas for treatment optimization. The higher occurrence of complications in non-survivors underscores the importance of early detection and management to improve survival rates. Our findings suggest clinicians consider these factors in prognostic assessments to enhance the effectiveness of ECPR programs.

The link between carotid artery stenosis and outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BackgroundMortality of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains high. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has revolutionized OHCA treatment, but our understanding of the ECPR responder’s clinical profile is incomplete. Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a well-established cardiovascular disease risk factor. The impact of CAS on OHCA outcomes remains unelucidated. ObjectiveTo assess whether CAS burden affects the outcomes of OHCA patients treated with ECPR. MethodsThis study included patients with OHCA admitted for ECPR consideration, who had carotid ultrasonography performed. A numeric scale was applied to the plaque to create a CAS burden numeric scale. The primary outcome of the study was survival at discharge, compared among the different degrees of CAS. Neurologically intact survival and surrogate markers of neurologic injury were the secondary study endpoints. To assess the independent effect of CAS burden on survival to hospital discharge, we conducted a logistic regression analysis. ResultsBetween 2019 and 2023, carotid ultrasonography was performed on 163 patients who were admitted for refractory OHCA. CAS burden was equally distributed between the right and left carotid arteries. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the CAS burden was significantly associated with both overall and neurologically intact survival at discharge (p = 0.004). A linear relationship between the CAS burden and neuron-specific and S-100 levels was identified. Patients with normal carotids were significantly less likely to have encephalopathy on electroencephalograms. ConclusionCAS burden independently predicts the risk for worse survival and neurologic outcomes in patients suffering refractory OHCA who are treated with ECPR.

Door-to-Needle Time for Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Study.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an option for refractory cardiac arrest, and immediate initiation after indication is recommended. However, the practical goals of ECPR preparation (such as the door-to-needle time) remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the association between the door-to-needle time and neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This is a post hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter study on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with ECPR at 36 institutions between 2013 and 2018 (SAVE-J [Study of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan] II study). Adult patients without hypothermia (≥32 °C) in whom circulation was not returned at ECPR initiation were included. The probability of favorable neurological function at 30 days (defined as Cerebral Performance Category ≤2) was estimated using a generalized estimating equations model, in which institutional, patient, and treatment characteristics were adjusted. Estimated probabilities were then calculated according to the door-to-needle time with 3-minute increments, and a clinical threshold was assumed. Among 1298 patients eligible for this study, 136 (10.6%) had favorable neurological function. The estimated probability of favorable outcomes was highest in patients with 1 to 3 minutes of door-to-needle time (12.9% [11.4%-14.3%]) and remained at 9% to 10% until 27 to 30 minutes. Then, the probability dropped gradually with each 3-minute delay. A 30-minute threshold was assumed, and shorter door-to-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/low-flow time and fewer adverse events related to cannulation were observed in patients with door-to-needle time <30 minutes. The probability of favorable functions after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest decreased as the door-to-needle time for ECPR was prolonged, with a rapid decline after 27 to 30 minutes. URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041577; Unique identifier: UMIN000036490.

Low-flow time and outcomes in hypothermic cardiac arrest patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a secondary analysis of a multi-center retrospective cohort study

BackgroundIn out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), the association between low-flow time and outcomes in accidental hypothermia (AH) patients compared to those of patients without AH has not been fully investigated.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of the retrospective multicenter registry in Japan. We enrolled patients aged ≥ 18 years who had been admitted to the emergency department for OHCA and had undergone ECPR between January, 2013 and December, 2018. AH was defined as an arrival body temperature below 32 °C. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Cubic spline analyses were performed to assess the non-linear associations between low-flow time and outcomes stratified by the presence of AH. We also analyzed the interaction between low-flow time and the presence of AH.ResultsOf 1252 eligible patients, 105 (8.4%) and 1147 (91.6%) were in the AH and non-AH groups, respectively. Median low-flow time was 60 (47–79) min in the AH group and 51 (42–62) min in the non-AH group. The survival discharge rates in the AH and non-AH groups were 44.8% and 25.4%, respectively. The cubic spline analyses showed that survival discharge rate remained constant regardless of low-flow time in the AH group. Conversely, a decreasing trend was identified in the survival discharge rate with longer low-flow time in the non-AH group. The interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between low-flow time and AH in survival discharge rate (p for interaction = 0.048).ConclusionsOHCA patients with arrival body temperature < 32 °C who had received ECPR had relatively good survival outcomes regardless of low-flow time, in contrast to those of patients without AH.

Acute brain injury risk prediction models in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients with tree-based machine learning: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry analysis

ObjectiveWe aimed to determine if machine learning can predict acute brain injury and to identify modifiable risk factors for acute brain injury in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. MethodsWe included adults (age ≥18 years) receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry (2009-2021). Our primary outcome was acute brain injury: central nervous system ischemia, intracranial hemorrhage, brain death, and seizures. We used Random Forest, CatBoost, LightGBM, and XGBoost machine learning algorithms (10-fold leave-1-out cross-validation) to predict and identify features most important for acute brain injury. We extracted 65 total features: demographics, pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/on-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation laboratory values, and pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/on-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation settings. ResultsOf 35,855 patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nonextracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) (median age of 57.8 years, 66% were male), 7.7% (n = 2769) experienced acute brain injury. In venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nonextracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation), the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves to predict acute brain injury, central nervous system ischemia, and intracranial hemorrhage were 0.67, 0.67, and 0.62, respectively. The true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, false-negative, positive, and negative predictive values were 33%, 88%, 12%, 67%, 18%, and 94%, respectively, for acute brain injury. Longer extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration, higher 24-hour extracorporeal membrane oxygenation pump flow, and higher on-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation partial pressure of oxygen were associated with acute brain injury. Of 10,775 patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (median age of 57.1 years, 68% were male), 16.5% (n = 1787) experienced acute brain injury. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for acute brain injury, central nervous system ischemia, and intracranial hemorrhage were 0.72, 0.73, and 0.69, respectively. Longer extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration, older age, and higher 24-hour extracorporeal membrane oxygenation pump flow were associated with acute brain injury. ConclusionsIn the largest study predicting neurological complications with machine learning in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, longer extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration and higher 24-hour pump flow were associated with acute brain injury in nonextracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Leukocyte filtration and leukocyte modulation therapy during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is emerging as a feasible and effective rescue strategy for prolonged cardiac arrest (CA). However, prolonged total body ischemia and reperfusion can cause microvascular occlusion that prevents organ reperfusion and recovery of function. One hypothesized mechanism of microvascular “no-reflow” is leukocyte adhesion and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. In this study we tested the hypothesis that a leukocyte filter (LF) or leukocyte modulation device (L-MOD) could reduce NETosis and improve recovery of heart and brain function in a swine model of prolonged cardiac arrest treated with ECPR. Thirty-six swine (45.5 ± 2.5 kg, evenly distributed sex) underwent 8 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation CA followed by 30 min of mechanical CPR with subsequent 8 h of ECPR. Two females were later excluded from analysis due to CPR complications. Swine were randomized to standard care (Control group), LF, or L-MOD at the onset of CPR. NET formation was quantified by serum dsDNA and citrullinated histone as well as immunofluorescence staining of the heart and brain for citrullinated histone in the microvasculature. Primary outcomes included recovery of cardiac function based on cardiac resuscitability score (CRS) and recovery of neurologic function based on the somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) N20 cortical response. In this model of prolonged CA treated with ECPR we observed significant increases in serum biomarkers of NETosis and immunohistochemical evidence of microvascular NET formation in the heart and brain that were not reduced by LF or L-MOD therapy. Correspondingly, there were no significant differences in CRS and SSEP recovery between Control, LF, and L-MOD groups 8 h after ECPR onset (CRS = 3.1 ± 2.7, 3.7 ± 2.6, and 2.6 ± 2.6 respectively; p = 0.606; and SSEP = 27.9 ± 13.0%, 36.7 ± 10.5%, and 31.2 ± 9.8% respectively, p = 0.194). In this model of prolonged CA treated with ECPR, the use of LF or L-MOD therapy during ECPR did not reduce microvascular NETosis or improve recovery of myocardial or brain function. The causal relationship between microvascular NETosis, no-reflow, and recovery of organ function after prolonged cardiac arrest treated with ECPR requires further investigation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of an ambulance service-operated specialised cardiac vehicle with mobile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation capacity for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Queensland, Australia.

Extracorporeal CPR (E-CPR) has been primarily limited to the in-hospital setting. A few systems around the world have implemented pre-hospital mobile E-CPR in the form of a dedicated cardiac vehicle fitted with specialised equipment and clinicians required for the performance of E-CPR on-scene. However, evidence of the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of mobile E-CPR remain to be established. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical mobile E-CPR vehicle operated by Queensland Ambulance Service in the state of Queensland, Australia. We adapted our published mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of pre-hospital mobile E-CPR relative to current practice. In the model, a specialised cardiac vehicle with mobile E-CPR capability is deployed to selected OHCA patients, with eligible candidates receiving pre-hospital E-CPR in-field and rapid transport to the closest appropriate centre for in-hospital E-CPR. For comparison, non-candidates receive standard ACLS from a conventional ambulance response. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as Australian dollars ($, 2021 value) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Pre-hospital mobile E-CPR improves outcomes compared to current practice at a cost of $27 323 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness of pre-hospital mobile E-CPR is sensitive to the assumption around the number of patients who are the targets of the vehicle, with higher patient volume resulting in improved cost-effectiveness. Pre-hospital E-CPR may be cost-effective. Successful implementation of a pre-hospital E-CPR programme requires substantial planning, training, logistics and operational adjustments.

Assessing feasibility of proposed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation programmes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Scotland via geospatial modelling

BackgroundExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can improve survival for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We sought to assess the feasibility of a proposed ECPR programme in Scotland, considering both in-hospital and pre-hospital implementation scenarios. MethodsWe included treated OHCAs in Scotland aged 16–70 between August 2018 and March 2022. We defined those clinically eligible for ECPR as patients where the initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, or pulseless electrical activity, and where pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation was not achieved. We computed the call-to-ECPR access time interval as the amount of time from emergency medical service (EMS) call reception to either arrival at an ECPR-ready hospital or arrival of a pre-hospital ECPR crew. We determined the number of patients that had access to ECPR within 45 min, and estimated the number of additional survivors as a result. ResultsA total of 6,639 OHCAs were included in the geospatial modelling, 1,406 of which were eligible for ECPR. Depending on the implementation scenario, 52.9–112.6 (13.8–29.4%) OHCAs per year had a call-to-ECPR access time within 45 min, with pre-hospital implementation scenarios having greater and earlier access to ECPR for OHCA patients. We further estimated that an ECPR programme in Scotland would yield 11.8–28.2 additional survivors per year, with the pre-hospital implementation scenarios yielding higher numbers. ConclusionAn ECPR programme for OHCA in Scotland could provide access to ECPR to a modest number of eligible OHCA patients, with pre-hospital ECPR implementation scenarios yielding higher access to ECPR and higher numbers of additional survivors.

C.4 Neurologic injury in pediatric patients cannulated for rescue extracorporeal life support

Background: Historical literature suggests the risk of neurologic injury in children supported by extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is between 10-20%, however recent studies suggest the incidence may be much higher. Methods: The Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACH) Rescue ECLS program cannulates patients who are then transferred to the partner program at Stollery Children’s Hospital. Data was systematically collected from all patients cannulated for Rescue ECLS at ACH October 2011 and May 2023. Neuroimaging (CT, MR) performed after cannulation was reviewed for evidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the Rescue ECLS cohort. Median age at cannulation was 1.74 years (range 0-17.6 years, 51% female). Survival to hospital discharge was 65%. Primary indication for ECLS included cardiac (42%), respiratory (33.3%), extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR; 23.2%) and trauma (1.4%). Seventy four percent of the cohort underwent neuroimaging, of whom 67% had evidence of neurologic injury including stroke (ischemic 67%; hemorrhagic 50%) or hypoxic-ischemic injury (33%). Risk of neurologic injury did not differ by indication for ECLS. Conclusions: Neuroimaging abnormalities are present in most pediatric patients imaged post-cannulation for Rescue ECLS. Further research into modifiable risk factors for specific ECLS-related brain injuries may help to improve outcomes for survivors.

Prognostic Impact of Heart Rhythm Shockability Trajectory in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

This study aimed to investigate the association between the temporal transitions in heart rhythms during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This was an analysis of the prospectively collected databases in 3 academic hospitals in northern and central Taiwan. Adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest transported by emergency medical service between 2015 and 2022 were included. Favorable neurological recovery and survival to hospital discharge were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Time-specific heart rhythm shockability was defined as the probability of shockable rhythms at a particular time point during CPR. The temporal changes in the time-specific heart rhythm shockability were calculated by group-based trajectory modeling. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between the trajectory group and outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined the effects of extracorporeal CPR in different trajectories. The study comprised 2118 patients. The median patient age was 69.1 years, and 1376 (65.0%) patients were male. Three distinct trajectories were identified: high-shockability (52 patients; 2.5%), intermediate-shockability (262 patients; 12.4%), and low-shockability (1804 patients; 85.2%) trajectories. The median proportion of shockable rhythms over the course of CPR for the 3 trajectories was 81.7% (interquartile range, 73.2%-100.0%), 26.7% (interquartile range, 16.7%-37.5%), and 0% (interquartile range, 0%-0%), respectively. The multivariable analysis indicated both intermediate- and high-shockability trajectories were associated with favorable neurological recovery (intermediate-shockability: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.98 [95% CI, 2.34-10.59]; high-shockability: aOR, 5.40 [95% CI, 2.03-14.32]) and survival (intermediate-shockability: aOR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.44-4.18]; high-shockability: aOR, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.20-6.38]). The subgroup analysis further indicated extracorporeal CPR was significantly associated with favorable neurological outcomes (aOR, 4.06 [95% CI, 1.11-14.81]) only in the intermediate-shockability trajectory. Heart rhythm shockability trajectories were associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, which may be a supplementary factor in guiding the allocation of medical resources, such as extracorporeal CPR.

Prehospital Ground and Helicopter-Based Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Reduce Barriers to ECPR: A GIS Model

Introduction Evidence suggests that Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) can improve survival rates for nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, when ECPR is indicated over 50% of potential candidates are unable to qualify in the current hospital-based system due to geographic limitations. This study employs a Geographic Information System (GIS) model to estimate the number of ECPR eligible patients within the United States in the current hospital-based system, a prehospital ECPR ground-based system, and a prehospital ECPR Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS)-based system. Methods We constructed a GIS model to estimate ground and helicopter transport times. Time-dependent rates of ECPR eligibility were derived from the Resuscitation Outcome Consortium (ROC) database, while the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry determined the number of OHCA patients meeting ECPR criteria within designated transportation times. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response time, ECPR candidacy determination time, and on-scene time were modeled based on data from the EROCA trial. The combined model was used to estimate the total ECPR eligibility in each system. Results The CARES registry recorded 736,066 OHCA patients from 2013 to 2021. After applying clinical criteria, 24,661 (3.4%) ECPR-indicated OHCA were identified. When considering overall ECPR eligibility within 45 min from OHCA to initiation, only 11.76% of OHCA where ECPR was indicated were eligible in the current hospital-based system. The prehospital ECPR HEMS-based system exhibited a four-fold increase in ECPR eligibility (49.3%), while the prehospital ground-based system showed a more than two-fold increase (28.4%). Conclusions The study demonstrates a two-fold increase in ECPR eligibility for a prehospital ECPR ground-based system and a four-fold increase for a prehospital ECPR HEMS-based system compared to the current hospital-based ECPR system. This novel GIS model can inform future ECPR implementation strategies, optimizing systems of care.

Organ donation after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BackgroundLimited data are available on organ donation practices and recipient outcomes, particularly when comparing donors who experienced cardiac arrest and received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) followed by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation, versus those who experienced cardiac arrest without receiving ECPR. This study aims to explore organ donation practices and outcomes post-ECPR to enhance our understanding of the donation potential after cardiac arrest.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japan Organ Transplant Network database, covering all deceased organ donors between July 17, 2010, and August 31, 2022. We included donors who experienced at least one episode of cardiac arrest. During the study period, patients undergoing ECMO treatment were not eligible for a legal diagnosis of brain death. We compared the timeframes associated with each donor’s management and the long-term graft outcomes of recipients between ECPR and non-ECPR groups.ResultsAmong 370 brain death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 26 (7.0%) received ECPR and 344 (93.0%) did not; the majority were due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The median duration of veno-arterial ECMO support after ECPR was 3 days. Patients in the ECPR group had significantly longer intervals from admission to organ procurement compared to those not receiving ECPR (13 vs. 9 days, P = 0.005). Lung graft survival rates were significantly lower in the ECPR group (log-rank test P = 0.009), with no significant differences in other organ graft survival rates. Of 160 circulatory death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 27 (16.9%) received ECPR and 133 (83.1%) did not. Time intervals from admission to organ procurement following circulatory death and graft survival showed no significant differences between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. The number of organs donated was similar between the ECPR and non-ECPR groups, regardless of brain or circulatory death.ConclusionsThis nationwide study reveals that lung graft survival was lower in recipients from ECPR-treated donors, highlighting the need for targeted research and protocol adjustments in post-ECPR organ donation.

Advanced life support interventions during intra-operative cardiac arrest among adults as reported to the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.

Few existing resuscitation guidelines include specific reference to intra-operative cardiac arrest, but its optimal treatment is likely to require some adaptation of standard protocols. We analysed data from the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists to determine the incidence and outcome from intra-operative cardiac arrest and to summarise the advanced life support interventions reported as being used by anaesthetists. In the baseline survey, > 50% of anaesthetists responded that they would start chest compressions when the non-invasive systolic pressure was < 40-50 mmHg. Of the 881 registry patients, 548 were adult patients (aged > 18 years) having non-obstetric procedures under the care of an anaesthetist, and who had arrested during anaesthesia (from induction to emergence). Sustained return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 425 (78%) patients and 338 (62%) were alive at the time of reporting. In the 365 patients with pulseless electrical activity or bradycardia, adrenaline was given as a 1 mg bolus in 237 (65%). A precordial thump was used in 14 (3%) patients, and although this was associated with return of spontaneous circulation at the next rhythm check in almost three-quarters of patients, in only one of these was the initial rhythm shockable. Calcium (gluconate or chloride) and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate were given to 51 (9%) and 25 (5%) patients, but there were specific indications for these treatments in less than half of the patients. A thrombolytic drug was given to 5 (1%) patients, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was used in 9 (2%) of which eight occurred during cardiac procedures. The specific characteristics of intra-operative cardiac arrest imply that its optimal treatment requires modifications to standard advanced life support guidelines.

Predicting survival with scales for in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a rescue option in cardiac arrest (CA) refractory to advanced life support. Patient selection is challenging, and anecdotal scores are specific to this situation. Purpose Our objective was to analyse the usefulness of different scales used in shock and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) support in in-hospital ECPR. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive ECPR cases in a referal center. The ECPR alert includes in-hospital cardiologist/intensivist, on-call interventional cardiologist/cardiac surgeon for cannulation, and on-call perfusionist. We analysed hospital survival based on our own and other literature-based mortality scales calculated prior to VA-ECMO implantation: SCAI, INTERMACS, CardShock, CSS, SAVE-ECMO, RESCUE-IHCA. Results Out of 222 VA-ECMO implanted, we included 66 ECPR cases between 2014-oct 2023. Baseline, admission and ECPR characteristics are collected in the table. Overall in-hospital survival was 16.7% (n=11) (cerebral performance cathegory 1-2). We developed a sumative mortality scale including factors related to survival in our population and the literature (lactate &amp;gt;10.05, &amp;gt;60 minutes CA, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and on-call time for ECPR alert activation) (figure A). This scale was significantly related to survival to discharge (figure A). Regarding the scales and their association with survival, only RESCUE-IHCA showed a trend towards statistical significance (16 [15] points in survivors vs 19 [15] in died patients, p=0.096). The remaining scores showed no relationship with survival to discharge: SAVE-ECMO -15,73±4.8 in survivors vs -14,07±4.1 in died patients (p= 0.301), CSS 10,09±1.9 vs 10.40±2.7 (p=0.651), CardShock 4.82±1.3 vs 5.27±1.2 (p=0.287). INTERMACS (all patients 1) and SCAI classification (all patients stage E) are not valid for discriminating survival in this situation. We compared the scales using the ROC curve for hospital survival, and we found that our own scale had the best discriminatory ability (Figure B). Conclusions Scales developed for shock or VA-ECMO support were not significantly related to survival in patients undergoing in-hospital ECPR. The specific ECPR scale RESCUE-IHCA, and our own scale developed in this population showed better discriminatory ability in survival to discharge.Table.Baseline, admission and ECPRFigure.A: Own scale. B: ROC curves

Risk of sepsis after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock from the RESCUE registry

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Objectives It is known that the incidence of sepsis is higher in patients receiving extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). In particular, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is performed in emergency situations, which may increase the likelihood of non-aseptic management compared to routine procedures. So, we investigated the association of ECPR and incidence of sepsis in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Background Pre- and post-ECPR sepsis are associated with increased mortality, and it is known that the occurrence of sepsis after ECPR is higher than in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, it is not well known whether ECPR has a higher incidence of sepsis than ECMO insertion in non-CPR conditions. Method The SMART-RESCUE study is a multi-center, retrospective and prospective registry of patients that presented with CS. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 1,247 patients with CS were enrolled from 12 major centers in Korea. The incidence of sepsis was compared by dividing into two groups according to whether or not ECPR was performed. Patients with ECMO duration less than 48 hours were excluded. Result Total of 231 patients(mean age 59.46 years, men 67.70%, mead follow-up duration 136.5 days) were analyzed into ECPR group(n=95, 60.7 ± 13.0 years, men 75.8%) and non-ECPR group(n=136, 58.6 ± 15.5 years, men 65.4%) respectively. ECPR group showed lower SBP, lower DBP, lower HR, more shock caused by ischemia, more smoking, lower LVEF, higher Hb, higher serum Na, lower AST, higher Peak troponin I, higher vasoactive inotropic score, higher ICMP portion. After 1:1 propensity score matching corrected for height, SBP, DBP, Hb, initial pump flow, Na, ICMP, vasoactive inotropic score, difference remained in SBP, DBP, HR, cause of shock. Sepsis incidence was 7.4%. The risk for sepsis incidence was not different between two groups(7.4% vs 6.3%, adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.38-3.65, p=0.774). Conclusion ECPR procedure does not increase sepsis compared to ECMO insertion not in CPR state in patients with cardiogenic shock. Keyword: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sepsis, cardiogenic shockBaseline characteristicsAdjusted outcomes

Treatment strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with traumatic brain injury: A case series

IntroductionCollapse after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can cause severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies for patients with OHCA and TBI. MethodsWe analyzed a consecutive cohort of patients with intrinsic OHCA retrospectively treated between January 2011 and December 2021 at a single critical care center, and presented a case series of seven patients. Patients with collapse-related TBI were examined for the causes and situations of cardiac arrest, laboratory data, radiological images, targeted temperature management (TTM), coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). ResultsOf the 197 patients with intrinsic OHCA, 7 (3.6%) had TBI (age range: 49–70 years; 6 men). All seven patients presented with ventricular fibrillation in the initial electrocardiograms, with four refractory cases treated with ECPR. All patients underwent CAG under heparinization, and four underwent PCI with antiplatelet administration. Initial head computed tomography indicated an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in three patients. ICH appeared or was exacerbated in six patients after CAG with or without PCI, except in one who underwent delayed PCI. All patients displayed elevated plasma D-dimer levels, and four underwent neurosurgical procedures. Four patients survived (three with cerebral performance category [CPC] 2, one with CPC 3) and three died; two had hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and one had severe TBI. ConclusionDelayed ICH occurred frequently. Individualized management is required based on the extent of brain and cardiac damage, including optimal TTM, PCI procedures, and antiplatelet medications. Early detection of ICH and emergency treatment are critical for multi-disciplinary collaboration.

Real-world clinical outcome related to veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenator: a single-center experience

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenator (VA-ECMO) is one of the most powerful devices that rapidly restore sufficient organ perfusion in patients with cardiogenic shock. Despite abundant experiences of successful resuscitation with VA-ECMO, evidences for clinical benefit of VA-ECMO are still lacking. Purpose We summarised clinical outcomes related to VA-ECMO and investigated predictors regarding survival at discharge. Methods Patients who treated with peripheral VA-ECMO between 2006 and 2022 were included from a Hospital in South Korea. Eligible patients were analysed in stratification with ECMO initiation year (year 2006–2010, year 2011–2016, and year 2017–2022). Survival status at discharge were investigated. Results Among total of 693 patients included, 223 (32.2%) were survived at discharge. Survivors had stayed in hospital for median 28 (19–52) days. The overall volume of ECMO initiation (86 runs vs. 250 runs vs. 357 runs) and the rate of extracorporeal CPR (3.5% vs. 18.4% vs. 38.1%) have increased over time. The median duration of VA-ECMO treatment has increased over time (52.6 hours vs. 63.6 hours vs. 85.8 hours). The serum lactate test has been performed more frequently over time (15.1% vs. 79.6% vs. 99.2%). Among 470 patients who died in the index hospitalization, 154 (32.8%) patients died in the first 24 hours after initiation of VA-ECMO. In a multivariate regression model, age over 70 (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.89), extracorporeal CPR (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24–0.71), and lactate level ≥8.0 mmol/L (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.15–0.37) were associated with unfavorable outcome while hemoglobin was a predictor of favorable clinical outcome (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07–1.25). Conclusion The volume of VA-ECMO has increased and clinical severity has also become higher than before. The rate of survival at discharge after VA-ECMO treatment remains stable; however, the rate of patients who died in the first 24 hours is still high. Age, extracorporeal CPR, hemoglobin and lactate levels were predictors of clinical outcome after VA-ECMO treatment.

The Role of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pediatric Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest

The Role of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pediatric Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest

Management and outcome of high-risk pulmonary embolism in intensive care units: results from a retrospective single-center analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients are exposed to hemodynamic/multiorgan compromise including hypotension, cardiogenic shock and/or cardiac arrest (CA). Few data exist on management and outcome in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with high-risk PE. Purpose We sought to analyse the epidemiology, management and outcome of patients admitted to ICU due to high-risk PE. Methods Retrospective monocentric analysis of adult patients with high-risk PE admitted from 2017 to 2023; COVID-19 patients were excluded. Demographic, clinical presentation, management and outcome data have been collected. Descriptive analysis comparing means adjusted for organ involvement severity and Cox regression were performed. Results 85 patients (55 male, 63±12 years old, BMI 29.06± 6) were included in the analysis. All patients received the diagnosis through the computed tomography angiography except 4 of them who underwent extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) and the diagnosis was made with trans-oesophageal echocardiography. Overall mortality was 32%, eCPR rate was 9%. 92% were treated with adrenergic drugs (norepinephrine 78%, dobutamine 65%, epinephrine 35%); 7 patients required VA-ECMO due to CA. 42 patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) during the first 12 hours; those patients had higher rate of CS (p &amp;lt;0.001), higher lactates (mean difference 1.45±3.2; p &amp;lt;0.001), higher SOFA and SAPS II scores (respectively, mean difference 12.5±0.49 and 7.9±3.4; p 0.004). 75 patients underwent systemic thrombolysis. 10 patients with contraindication to systemic thrombolysis, underwent catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT); in 6 cases CDT was preceded by mechanical suction thrombectomy. Patients undertaking CDT had higher SOFA score at admission (mean difference 2.45±1.6; p 0.04), worsen creatinine (p &amp;lt;0.001), lower PaCO2 (mean difference -0.54±5.3; p 0.01), higher PaO2 (mean difference 28.7±6.5; p 0.009), higher bilirubin (mean difference 3.2±1.6; p &amp;lt;0.001) and lower systolic blood pressure (mean difference -6.8±3.36; p 0.01). At the Cox regression, higher lactates (HR 1.45 [0.40-0.99], p 0.004, panel A), lower glomerular filtration rate (HR 1.1 [1.02-1.09], p 0.001, panel B), higher bilirubin (HR 2.6 [1.20-6.03,] p 0.016), higher ALT (HR 1.07 [0.95-0.99], p 0.04), lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio (HR 1.1 [0.97-0.99], p 0.024, panel C), MV (HR 1.1 [0.78-7.58], p 0.04, panel D) and VA-ECMO (HR 2.5 [1.25-3.54], p 0.002) were associated with increased mortality; CDT was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.82 [0.68-1.89], p 0.04). Conclusions High-risk PE was burdened by high mortality. Signs of worsen organ failure and respiratory and mechanical support are associated with increased mortality. In this monocentric population the use of CDT was performed when systemic thrombolysis contraindicated and it was associated with favourable outcome, although the small sample (10%) should warn contextualization in results’ interpretation.