Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement Research Articles

Effect of extracapsular lymph node involvement on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

According to the eighth edition of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for esophageal cancer, it is recommended that extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) is included as a registered independent variable for the disease. However, its role in the prognosis has not been clearly explained. To study the value of EC-LNI in the prognosis of esophageal cancer and attempt to explore its molecular mechanism via an enrichment analysis. A retrospective analysis was performed on 544 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent radical surgery in the department of thoracic surgery of our hospital, focusing on the relationship between EC-LNI and clinicopathological characteristics and its effect on prognosis. Additionally, the mechanism of EC-LNI in esophageal cancer was explored. Among the 271 patients with lymph node metastasis, 125 were EC-LNI (+). The degrees of tumor differentiation, location, TNM stage, vascular tumor thrombus, and nerve invasion were related to the occurrence of EC-LNI. The stage of TNM was considered an independent risk factor for the development of EC-LNI. A significant difference was found in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the EC-LNI (+) and EC-LNI (-) groups. A univariate analysis showed that the degrees of tumor differentiation, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, EC-LNI, EC-LNI number, and EC-LNI distance were significantly correlated with prognosis. A multivariate survival analysis showed that tumor differentiation, TNM stage, and EC-LNI were independent prognostic factors for OS, while TNM stage and EC-LNI were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The enrichment analysis identified the molecular targets and signaling pathways that can regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Extracapsular LNI has a high prognostic value in patients with esophageal cancer and is closely related to the stage of tumors. Our preliminary molecular mechanism research indicated that the molecular targets of EC-LNI are expected to become a new direction for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Merkel cell carcinoma: Epidemiology, disease presentation, and current clinical practice outcomes

Using the National Cancer Database, we introduce the findings of a retrospective investigation of the largest cohort of cases with Merkel cell carcinoma (N = 20,829). A decreasing proportion of stage I (P = .0004) and stage II (P = .0065) Merkel cell carcinoma among skin cancers was complemented by an increasing proportion of stage III disease (P < .0001). A predominance of non-Hispanic White (96.4%), male (62.6%) patients with a mean age of 74.5 ± 10.8 years and Medicare coverage (73.5%) was observed. Stage I was the most common presenting stage at diagnosis (29.2%), followed by stages II (12.7%), III (11.0%), and IV (3.8%). Most Merkel cell carcinoma tumors grew outside the head and neck (53.4%) and showed a nodular growth pattern (66.0%) but no extracapsular lymph node (90.5%) or lymphovascular involvement (63.8%). Narrow-margin excision and radiation therapy (RT) were used in 75.2% and 56.3% of tumors, respectively. Wide-margin excision lead to improved overall survival (P < .001) versus narrow-margin excision, particularly in stage III (difference in the median overall survival rate [ΔmOS], 23.7 months; P < .001). RT showed a significant OS benefit (P =.006), most pronounced in stage II (ΔmOS, 37.8 months) followed by stage I (ΔmOS, 16.1 months; P < .001). The survival benefit with primary-site RT (ΔmOS, 24.0 months) was higher than that with primary-site/lymph node RT (ΔmOS, 5.2 months; P < .001). Wide-margin excision independently predicted improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.577; 95% CI, 0.403-0.826; P = .003) versus narrow-margin excision and RT predicted better OS (hazard ratio, 0.608; 95% CI, 0.424-0.873; P = .007) versus no RT on multivariable analysis.

118: PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF EXTRACAPSULAR LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT AFTER GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA

Abstract Background and aim Lymph node involvement is a key prognostic indicator in gastric adenocarcinoma. Little is known of the impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) upon the prognosis of patients undergoing curative resection of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and prognostic significance of extracapsular LNI in patients undergoing a gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction in a single, high-volume U.K. centre between 2010 and 2018 were identified from contemporaneously maintained database. Patients with a pN0 status on final histology and those who died in-hospital were excluded from analysis. Factors associated with survival were studied with univariable and multivariable cox regression analysis. A P value of &amp;lt;0.05 was deemed significant. Results The study included 235 patients. A median (IQR) of 32 (24–43) lymph nodes were resected and median (IQR) 4 (1–9) lymph nodes were positive. Of them, extracapsular LNI was identified in 123 (52%) of patients. Factors associated with survival on univariable analysis were R1 resection (P = 0.001), p/ypT stage (P &amp;lt; 0.001), p/ypN stage (P &amp;lt; 0.001) and extracapsular LNI (P = 0.001). Median survival among patients who had extracapsular LNI was 19 months versus 49 months among patients who did not (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Extracapsular LNI was not an independent predictor of survival on multivariable analysis (P = 0.535). Conclusion Extracapsular LNI is associated with poor prognosis among patients undergoing a curative gastrectomy. However, it is not an independent predictor of survival among this patient cohort.

P-OGC25 Prognostic significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background Lymph node involvement is a key prognostic indicator in gastric adenocarcinoma. Little is known of the impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) upon the prognosis of patients undergoing curative resection of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and prognostic significance of extracapsular LNI in patients undergoing a gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction in a single, high-volume U.K. centre between 2010 and 2018 were identified from contemporaneously maintained database. Patients with a pN0 status on final histology and those who died in-hospital were excluded from analysis. Factors associated with survival were studied with univariable and multivariable cox regression analysis. A p value of &amp;lt; 0.05 was deemed significant. Results The study included 235 patients. A median (IQR) of 32 (24-43) lymph nodes were resected and median (IQR) 4 (1-9) lymph nodes were positive. Of them, extracapsular LNI was identified in 123 (52%) of patients. Factors associated with survival on univariable analysis were R1 resection (p = 0.001), p/ypT stage (p &amp;lt; 0.001), p/ypN stage (p &amp;lt; 0.001) and extracapsular LNI (p = 0.001). Median survival among patients who had extracapsular LNI was 19 months versus 49 months among patients who did not (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Extracapsular LNI was not an independent predictor of survival on multivariable analysis (p = 0.535). Conclusions Extracapsular LNI is associated with poor prognosis among patients undergoing a curative gastrectomy. However, it is not an independent predictor of survival among this patient population.

Is Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy Always Mandatory in Patients with Resected N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the pathologic union for international cancer control (UICC) stage IIIA is a heterogeneous entity, with different forms of N2-lymph node involvement representing different prognoses. Although a multimodality treatment approach, including surgery, systemic therapy, and/or radiotherapy, is almost always recommended, in this retrospective observational study, we sought to determine whether long-term survival might be possible in selected patients who are treated with complete surgical resection alone. Between 2013 and 2018, we retrospectively identified 24 patients with NSCLC (16 men and 8 women), who were found to have pathologic N2-lymph node involvement, and were treated with complete surgical lung resection and systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection but no neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. The most frequent reason (n = 14) for forgoing adjuvant treatment was patient refusal. The mean overall survival (OS) was 34.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 15.5-53.5 months). The mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 18 months (IQR: 4.75-46.75 months). We identified five patients who survived at least 5 years without recurrence (21%). In each of these cases, the nodal metastases were restricted to a single level and no extracapsular lymph node involvement were detected. Additionally, worse DFS was associated with pT3/4 (vs. a lower T-stage), as well as microscopic lymphovascular invasion. Although the small sample size precludes any definitive conclusions, it was possible to demonstrate that long-term survival without neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment is possible in some patients if complete tumor and nodal resection is performed.

Characterization of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics in Stage II–IIIA Lung Adenocarcinoma

The prognostic impact and clinicopathological characteristics of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ECLNI) in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unknown in the context of the eighth edition N classification. We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients with stage II-IIIA LUAD who underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. The correlations of ECLNI presence and clinicopathological profiles were analyzed. We also assessed the impact of ECLNI on the postoperative survival of pN1 and pN2 LUAD patients. ECLNI-positive status was more common in patients with high lymph node yield and in patients with multiple stations involved. The logistic regression model identified tumor spread through air spaces, micropapillary component, cribriform component, and nodal stage as predictive factors for ECLNI presence. LUAD patients with ECLNI presence had an increased risk of locoregional recurrence compared with those without (p < 0.001). Presence of ECLNI was confirmed as an independent risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) in the entire cohort. Among the 61 patients with ECLNI(+)pN2 disease, our analysis revealed that adjuvant radiation was a significant predictor of improved RFS and OS. In addition, ECLNI status provides additional precision in stratifying pN1 and pN2 patients with significantly different RFS and OS. Our data suggest that ECLNI remains a strong prognosticator of unfavorable OS and RFS for LUADs in the context of the eighth edition N classification. Adjuvant radiation should be actively considered for pN1b and pN2 LUAD patients with ECLNI presence.

The Prognostic Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The role of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ELNI) in esophageal cancer has not been fully investigated. We aim to assess its incidence and prognostic significance in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with and without neoadjuvant treatments. Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC in a single medical center was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with positive lymph node involvement were classified as either with ELNI or without ELNI (intracapsular lymph node involvement, ILNI). The impact of ELNI on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease recurrence was analyzed. A total of 336 patients, including 179 without (NCRT -) and 157 with (NCRT +) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were included. Seventy-two of 179 (40.2%) patients in NCRT - group were with positive lymph node, of whom 19 (26.4%) had ELNI, whereas 49 (31.2%) patients in NCRT + group had positive lymph node, of whom 25 (51.0%) had ELNI. In NCRT + group, patients with ELNI had worse outcome compared to those with ILNI in 5-year OS (10.4 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.008), and DFS (5.3 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.008). The presence of ELNI was also associated with more distant recurrence (p = 0.03). In contrast, there was no survival difference between patients with ELNI and ILNI in NCRT - group. Compared with ILNI, ELNI is a significant poor prognostic factor in patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant treatments, but not in those with primary surgery.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal carcinoma: how to interpret?

We thank Dr. Chao, and Dr. Luchini and Dr. Veronese for their interest in and their editorial comments (1,2) on our manuscript entitled “Impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery in carcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter study”, recently published in Annals of Surgery (3).

Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The accepted importance of a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (defined as R1 in the TNM classification) is based on histopathology of the resection specimen obtained after primary surgery in esophageal cancer patients. The aim of this study is to look for the prognostic value of CRM after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and to compare the clinical significance of a histologically CRM<1 mm from the cut margin (Royal College of Pathologists definition of R1) to a positive cut margin (College of American Pathologists definition of R1) and to≥1 mm margin (R0) resections in patients with ypT3-esophageal tumors after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Between 2000 and 2014, 458 patients who received esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy were selected. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by Cox regression analysis. There were 163 (35.9%) patients who had a ypT3 tumor; in 118 (72.4%) resection was complete (R0). In 37 (22.7%) patients a CRM<1 mm was found and 8 (4.9%) had a circumferential R1-resection. CRM involvement was inversely correlated with tumor regression grading, lymph node capsular involvement, and number of positive lymph nodes. On univariate analysis, no statistically significant difference was found between R0-resection and CRM<1 mm (P=0.103) for OS, but DFS showed a significant difference (P=0.025). Circumferential R1-resections showed a significant difference compared to R0-resections for OS and DFS (both P=0.002). In multivariate analysis, extracapsular lymph node involvement and circumferential R1-resection were withheld as independent prognosticators for OS, whereas extracapsular lymph node involvement, absence of regression on the primary tumor and circumferential R1-resection were withheld for DFS. After correcting for different variables in the multivariate model, CRM<1 mm showed no statistical difference compared to R0-resections neither for OS nor for DFS. After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, CRM is correlated with biological behavior of the tumor and with therapy response. Furthermore it is an independent prognosticator for OS and DFS. However CRM<1 mm itself is no independent prognosticator for OS nor DFS survival in multivariable analysis. These results suggest that the definition of R1-resection should be limited to true invasion of the section plane.

Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Followed by Surgery in Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Multicenter Study.

The current study aims to examine the impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) on survival for both esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) followed by surgery. Studies have demonstrated the negative prognostic value of EC-LNI in primary surgery, but its impact after nCRT remains unclear. From the databases of 6 European high-volume centers 1505 patients with R0 resections were withheld. Oncologic variables, including ypT, ypN, number of positive lymph nodes, and lymph node capsular status: EC-LNI and intracapsular lymph node involvement (IC-LNI), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards modeling. In SCC 182 patients (31.6%) had positive lymph nodes, of whom 60 (33.0%) showed EC-LNI. In AC 391 patients (42.1%) had positive lymph nodes, of whom 147 (37.6%) showed EC-LNI. Overall 5-year survival (O5YS) in SCC was 42.0%. Presence of EC-LNI meant a significantly worse O5YS than IC-LNI or pN0 (10.6%, 39.5%, and 47.4%, respectively; P < 0.05). O5YS in AC was 41.2%. No significant difference was observed between EC-LNI and IC-LNI (P = 0.322). In the multivariate analysis, among the examined possible prognosticators, presence of EC-LNI showed the highest hazard ratio (2.29, confidence interval: 1.52-3.47) as an independent prognosticator for overall survival in SCC, but it was not in AC. Based on this international multicenter study, the presence of EC-LNI after nCRT is at least as important as N-stage for survival and EC-LNI is the strongest prognosticator for overall survival in SCC but not in AC.

MP93-19 PROSTATE MRI PRIOR TO PROSTATECTOMY DOES NOT IMPACT SURGICAL OUTCOMES

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy VII1 Apr 2017MP93-19 PROSTATE MRI PRIOR TO PROSTATECTOMY DOES NOT IMPACT SURGICAL OUTCOMES Eric Kim, Joel Vetter, Michael Glamore, Seth Strope, Robert Grubb III, and Gerald Andriole Eric KimEric Kim More articles by this author , Joel VetterJoel Vetter More articles by this author , Michael GlamoreMichael Glamore More articles by this author , Seth StropeSeth Strope More articles by this author , Robert Grubb IIIRobert Grubb III More articles by this author , and Gerald AndrioleGerald Andriole More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2901AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate has been increasingly utilized for both diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Studies have suggested that pre-prostatectomy MRI is predictive of extracapsular extension and lymph node involvement. However, the impact of this additional information on surgical outcomes has not been well defined. We examined our institutional experience of prostatectomy with or without preoperative MRI. METHODS We identified patients at our institution who received prostate MRI within 6 months of prostatectomy for PCa between January 2012 and December 2015 (n=491). Using propensity scoring analysis, patients who had received MRI prior to prostatectomy were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive preoperative MRI (based on age, race, body-mass index, comorbidity, PSA, Gleason score, and surgeon performing prostatectomy). The final matched cohort included 192 patients with preoperative MRI and 192 patients without. Multivariate regression analysis was performed for operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), perioperative complication, and positive surgical margin. RESULTS When controlling for all measured variables between the propensity matched cohorts, preoperative MRI was not predictive of operative time, EBL, complications, or positive surgical margins. Operative time and EBL were significantly associated with preoperative PSA and surgeon performing prostatectomy (p<0.01). Comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index >2) was the only predictor of 30-day complication (p<0.01). The only predictor of positive surgical margin was increasing biopsy Gleason score (OR 2.3, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Although prostate MRI has become increasingly utilized in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, preoperative MRI does not impact technical prostatectomy outcomes in our institutional experience. Our findings do not support the routine use of preoperative MRI for surgical planning in patients with clinically localized PCa. Effects of preoperative MRI on patient self-reported outcomes after prostatectomy will be examined in the future. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1244 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Eric Kim More articles by this author Joel Vetter More articles by this author Michael Glamore More articles by this author Seth Strope More articles by this author Robert Grubb III More articles by this author Gerald Andriole More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy.

The significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) is unclear in patients with oesophageal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant treatment followed by oesophagectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and prognostic significance of extracapsular LNI in a large multicentre series of consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Data from a consecutive series of patients treated at two European centres were analysed. All patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by transthoracic oesophagectomy and two-field lymphadenectomy with curative intent, were included. Between January 2000 and September 2013, 704 patients underwent oesophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. A median of 28 (range 5-77) nodes per patient was recovered. Some 347 patients (49·3 per cent) had no LNI (ypN0). Of the remaining 357 patients (50·7 per cent) with LNI (ypN1-3), extracapsular LNI was found in 190 (53·2 per cent). Five-year overall survival rates were 62·7 per cent for patients with N0 disease, 44·9 per cent for patients without extracapsular spread and 14·0 per cent where extracapsular LNI was identified (P < 0·001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated the presence of extracapsular LNI as an independent prognostic factor. The presence of extracapsular LNI after neoadjuvant therapy carries a poor prognosis.

Predictors and Patterns of Local, Regional, and Distant Failure in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

To identify factors predicting for recurrence in vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. We retrospectively evaluated data of consecutive patients with squamous cell vulvar cancer treated between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2013. Basic descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were used to design predicting models influencing outcomes. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Cox model. The study included 101 patients affected by vulvar cancer: 64 (63%) stage I, 12 (12%) stage II, 20 (20%) stage III, and 5 (5%) stage IV. After a mean (SD) follow-up of 37.6 (22.1) months, 21 (21%) recurrences occurred. Local, regional, and distant failures were recorded in 14 (14%), 6 (6%), and 3 (3%) patients, respectively. Five-year DFS and OS were 77% and 82%, respectively. At multivariate analysis only stromal invasion >2 mm (hazard ratio: 4.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.17-21.1]; P=0.04) and extracapsular lymph node involvement (hazard ratio: 9.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-69.5); P=0.03) correlated with worse DFS, although no factor independently correlated with OS. Looking at factors influencing local and regional failure, we observed that stromal invasion >2 mm was the only factor predicting for local recurrence, whereas lymph node extracapsular involvement predicted for regional recurrence. Stromal invasion >2 mm and lymph node extracapsular spread are the most important factors predicting for local and regional failure, respectively. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of adjuvant treatment in high-risk patients are warranted.

Prognostic significance of classified extramural tumor deposits and extracapsular lymph node invasion in T3-4 colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.

BackgroundExtramural tumor deposits (TDs) and extracapsular lymph node involvement (ECLNI) are considered to be poor prognostic factors in patients with T3–4, N0–2, M0 colorectal cancer (CRC). Although TDs are known to have multiple origins and pleomorphic features, the prognostic significances of the different type of TDs have not yet been established.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 385 consecutive patients with T3–4, N0–2, M0 CRC who received curative resection at our institution between 2006 and 2012. We classified the TDs into two groups: invasive-type TD (iTD), which is characterized by the presence of lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, or undefined cancer cell clusters and nodular-type TD (nTD), which is characterized by a smooth or irregular-shaped tumor nodule other than an iTD. ECLNI was defined as invasion of cancer cells into capsular collagen tissues or adipose tissues beyond the capsular collagen. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the prognostic significance of iTD, ND, and ECLNI for relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and sites of recurrence.ResultsIn patients without lymph node (LN) metastasis, the incidences of iTD and nTD were both in the range of 2–3 %. Conversely, in patients with LN metastasis, the incidences of iTD, nTD, and ECLNI were 31, 22, and 34 %, respectively. iTD, nTD, and ECLNI were all significant independent adverse factors for RFS in rectal cancer, and were all associated with pT, pN, and LN ratio. iTD was a significant independent adverse prognostic factor for DSS in rectal cancer, metastasis to the liver in colorectal cancer, and distant LN metastasis in colon cancer. ECLNI was a significant independent prognostic factor for RFS in colon cancer.ConclusionsClassifying TDs and assessing ECLNI may help establish significant prognostic factors for patients with T3–4, N0–2, M0 CRC.

International Multicenter Study on the Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Primary Surgery Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus on Overall Survival and Staging Systems.

The current pathological lymph node (pN) staging is based on the number of positive lymph nodes but does not take into consideration characteristics of the involved lymph nodes itself. The current study aims to examine the prognostic value of extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) and intracapsular lymph node involvement (IC-LNI) for esophageal adenocarcinoma treated by primary surgery. From the databases of five European high volume centers, 1639 adenocarcinoma patients with primary R0-resection were withheld after excluding 90-day mortality. Oncologic variables, including number of resected lymph nodes, number of resected positive lymph nodes, and EC-LNI/IC-LNI were examined. The Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) 7th edition prognostic staging was used as baseline staging system. Statistical analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards modeling and verified using the Random Survival Forest technique. EC-LNI showed significantly worse overall 5-year survival compared with IC-LNI overall (13.4% vs 37.2%, P < 0.0001), including in each pN-category [16.4% vs 45.6% in pN1 (P < 0.0001), 16.1% vs 23.8% (P = 0.047) in pN2 (P = 0.065), and 8.7% vs 26.3% in pN3 categories, respectively]. pN1 IC-LNI patients show a 5-year overall survival comparable (P = 0.92) with stage IIB (ie, pT3N0). Reclassifying the UICC prognostic stages according to these findings into an adapted staging model showed a significant (P < 0.0001) increase in homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity compared with the original UICC TNM 7th edition prognostic staging. These data suggest that lymph node capsular status is an important prognostic factor and should be considered for the future edition of the TNM staging system for esophageal cancer.

PTH-157 The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy

<h3>Introduction</h3> In patients with oesophageal cancer, little attention has been paid to the biological significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment followed by oesophagectomy. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the incidence, extent of extracapsular LNI and prognostic significance in a consecutive multicenter series of patients with cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-esophageal junction (GOJ) who underwent neoadjuvant chemo (radio) therapy followed by surgery. <h3>Method</h3> From a prospectively collected database, a consecutive series of patients in two high volume centres in Europe was analysed. All patients with potentially curable adeno- or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus or GOJ were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by transthoracic oesophagectomy and two-field lymphadenectomy. <h3>Results</h3> Between January 2000 and September 2013 a consecutive series of 704 patients underwent an oesophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. A median number of 28 (5–77) nodes was resected and identified. 347 (49.3%) patients had no evidence of lymph node metastases (ypN0). There were 357 (50.7%) patients with positive nodes (ypN1-N3). Extracapsular LNI was identified in 190 (53.2%) of lymph node positive patients. Five-year overall survival rates were 63% for N0 patients, 45% for patients with intracapsular LNI and 14% for patients with extracapsular LNI (p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that a higher ypT-stage, a higher ypN-stage, the presence of extracapsular LNI male gender, and a microscopically irradical resection were all independent prognostic factors. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The presence of extracapsular LNI after neoadjuvant chemo (radiation) therapy identifies a subgroup of patients with a significantly worse long-term survival. Extracapsular LNI reflects a particularly aggressive biologic behaviour and has significant prognostic potential and should be considered for the future edition of the TNM staging system for oesophageal cancer. <h3>Disclosure of interest</h3> None Declared.

The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy .

4058 Background: In patients with esophageal cancer, little attention has been paid to the biological significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients who underwent neoadjuvan...

Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.

Active surveillance (AS) has become an accepted alternative for patients with low risk prostate cancer. The purpose of AS is to defer definitive therapy in these patients to avoid treatment-related complications. Our aim was to determine the pathological features of the surgical specimen from potential AS candidates that underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). We retrospectively reviewed a group of patients submitted to RP who met criteria for AS: Gleason score (GS) ≤ 3+3 = 6, PSA ≤ 10ng/mL, T1c - T2a,< 1/3 of positive cores, < 50% of involvement in any core and PSA density < 0.15. We determined the concordance between GS in biopsy and RP specimen (RPS). Other pathological features of the RPS were also analyzed, including surgical margins, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicles and lymph node involvement. We identified 167 patients subjected to RP that met the criteria for AS. Fifty two patients (31.1%) had a GS > 6 in the RPS (GS 7 n = 49; GS 8 n = 3). Extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle and lymph node involvement was found in 6.1%, 3.1% and 1.2% of the specimens, respectively. In this study a significant proportion of potential candidates for AS showed features of aggressive and/or high-risk tumors in the RPS. Therefore, before considering a patient for an AS protocol, a proper and strict selection must be performed, and informed consent is crucial for these patients.

Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement is Associated With Colorectal Liver Metastases and Impact Outcome After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Metastases

Hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the treatment of choice for patients after resection of the primary CRC. However, some patients do not benefit from immediate resection because of rapidly progressive disease. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic value of extracapsular invasion (ECI) of lymph node (LN) metastasis of CRC with liver metastases following liver resection. All patients who underwent resection for CRC with liver metastases between 1995 and 2011 were reviewed. All of those with metastasis from primary CRC were included in this study. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data, including primary tumor pathology results, were retrospectively reviewed. All resected LNs from primary CRC were re-examined to assess ECI. Associations between clinicopathologic factors, survival, and the nodal findings were evaluated. ECI was identified in 47 (48%) patients. ECI was correlated with the number of positive LNs (p = 0.0022), timing of liver metastasis (p = 0.0238), and number of liver metastases (p = 0.0001). Univariate analysis indicated that the number of positive LNs (p = 0.0014), ECI (p = 0.0203), and adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0423) were significant prognostic factors. Patients with ECI had a significantly worse survival (p = 0.0024) after liver resection than patients with LN-negative and ECI-negative groups. In patients with hepatic CRC metastases, ECI in regional LNs reflects a particularly aggressive behavior, such as a greater number of liver metastases. In CRC patients with liver metastases, ECI in regional LNs might be correlated with poor prognosis following liver resection.

Impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement on tumor progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and effects on lymph nodes induced by chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy

Background Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery can improve long-term survival and reduce local recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Extracapsular lymph node involvement (ECLNI) reflects tumor progression in gastrointestinal malignancies. The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation between ECLNI and clinical outcome in ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy.