Extracapsular Cataract Extraction Technique Research Articles

Cataract Surgery Results after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Objective. To compare clinical and refractive outcomes of cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and by extracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses in patients previously having undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK).Patients and methods. This is a retrospective study. Medical records of all patients admitted for cataract surgery between 2010 and 2018 to the King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) were reviewed and medical records of patients who underwent cataract surgery after PK were analyzed. Medical records of 95 patients (58 males and 37 females; average age 40.0 ± 19.9 years) were selected. Depending upon the type of surgical technique applied, the cases were divided into two groups: first group included 60 patients who underwent cataract surgery by phacoemulsification with implantation of different foldable intraocular lenses (IOL), the second group included 35 patients who underwent cataract surgery by extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with implantation of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOL. The choice of ECCE technique with implantation of rigid IOLs was made if the endothelial cell density after PK was less than 2200 cells/mm2 and cataracts were of 4 and 5 grades to exclude additional trauma to the endothelium by ultrasound energy. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The R statistical program and SPSS were used for data analysis. The P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results. Analysis showed that PK was performed mainly due to 4 indications: keratoconus (KC) — 77 % cases, herpetic keratopathy — 7 % cases, Eye trauma — 5 % cases, previous graft rejection — 5 % cases and Stevens–Johnson syndrome — 1 % cases. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the first group improved from 0.40 ± 0.05 to 0.80 ± 0.05 postoperatively. The mean BCVA in the second group improved from 0.30 ± 0.05 to 0.70 ± 0.05. In the late postoperative period BCVA with foldable IOLs was higher by 0.10 ± 0.05, as compared with the results obtained with the rigid IOLs. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) changed from 15.1 ± 4.9 before PK to 16.3 ± 5.3 after PK.Conclusion. KC was the most common indication for PK in Jordan. Results of our analysis showed that cataract surgery could be successfully performed in eyes after PK with favorable results and improvement in patients’ quality of life. Cataract surgery by phacoemulsification with implantation of foldable IOLs results in higher (BCVA) compared to ECCE with implantation of PMMA IOLs. Unless contraindicated otherwise, phacoemulsification technique with foldable IOL implantation should be given preference over ECCE with implantation of rigid PMMA IOLs in visual rehabilitation of cataract patients after PK.

Cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of the extracapsular cataract extraction and manual small incision cataract surgery techniques.

Blindness and visual impairment are public health problems and constitute an important socio-economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding the outcomes of cataract surgery will improve our knowledge of risk factors for poor outcomes. Previous studies have focused exclusively on the phacoemulsification technique with limited attention to the extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) techniques. To compare the cataract surgery outcomes between the ECCE and MSICS techniques. The study was an observational research design that used the LogMAR visual acuity (VA) chart, subjective refraction, slit lamp and ophthalmoscope to collect data. The participants were followed for a period of six-weeks post-surgery and outcomes were recorded. Data were presented using frequencies, percentages and means ± standard deviation. The sample included 101 participants, with a mean age of 66.32 ± 15.99 years. Fifty and 51 participants had undergone the ECCE and MSICS techniques respectively. Overall, one-hundred participants had poor pre-surgery VA and subjective refractions were generally not possible due to the severity of cataracts present. The mean aided post-surgery VA was 0.31 LogMAR and 0.13 LogMAR in the ECCE and MSICS groups respectively (p < 0.001). The mean post-surgery refractive astigmatism was similar in the ECCE (-2.06 D) and MSICS (-1.80 D) groups (p = 0.110). The spherical equivalence was approximately -0.50 D higher in the MSICS group, but not statistically significant (p = 0.330). Approximately one out of every five participants (n = 21) had post-surgery ocular complications such as corneal opacity and haziness as well as posterior capsular absence. The MSICS technique showed better post-surgery outcomes than the ECCE technique.

Sub-tenon Versus Sub-conjunctiva Anaesthesia for Intraocular Surgery.

To compare the pain relief achieved using sub-Tenon anesthesia with that of sub-conjunctival anesthesia technique in intraocular surgery at the Guinness Eye Centre Onitsha Nigeria. Consecutive adult patients who had intraocular surgery under local anesthesia were randomized into having sub-Tenon (3 mL) or sub-conjunctival (0.5 mL) injections using xylocaine ± adrenaline. The manual suture-less surgery technique was used for cataract surgery alone and cataract surgery with pterygium excision; the extra-capsular cataract extraction technique was adopted for combined trabeculectomy and cataract surgery. Surgery duration was recorded. Patient's pain perception graded as none, mild, moderate or severe. 100 patients made up 51 (51.0%) males and 49 (49.0%) females, age range was 31-88 years, median - 68 years, participated. Sub-Tenon anesthetic technique was used in 52 (52.0%) and sub-conjunctival in 48 (48.0%) participants. Seventy-eight (78.0%) patients had cataract surgery; 10 (10.0%) had trabeculectomy; 7 (7.0%) had combined trabeculectomy and cataract surgery and 5 (5.0%) had pterygium excision with cataract surgery. The mean surgery duration in the sub-Tenon anesthesia group was 31.8 ± 8.5 minutes and 30.2 ± 9.8 minutes in the sub-conjunctival group (P > 0.05). Fifty (96.2%) patients in the sub-Tenon group and 38 (79.2%) in the sub-conjunctival group experienced mild or no pains; 2 (4.2%) patients in the sub-Tenon group and 10 (20.8%) in the sub-conjunctival group experienced moderate to severe pains (P < 0.05). Both sub-conjunctival and sub-Tenon anesthetic achieved effective analgesia in intraocular surgery. But sub-Tenon anesthesia is significantly associated with lower incidence of severe pains.

Ferning, Schimer I and Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) Accuracy Test in Post-Operative Cataract Patient with Extra Capsular Cataract Extraction (ECCE) Technique

A B S T R A C TObjective: To determine the accuracy of the Ferning, Schimer I and TBUT test incataract patients after cataract surgery with the ECCE technique at the EyePolyclinic at Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang and the Special Eye HospitalPalembang Methods: Diagnostic test was undertaken at the Eye Polyclinic atMohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang and the Special Eye Hospital Palembangfrom May 2019 to January 2020. There were 42 postoperative cataract patients whomet the inclusion criteria. Ferning, Schimer I and TBUT tests were performed beforesurgery and one month after surgery. Data analysis using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS,Inc Chicago, Illinois). Results: Fourty two samples of postoperative cataract surgerywith ECCE technique obtained by female sex (57,1%) with a mean age of cataractpatients of approximately 58.09 years. The accuracy of Schimer I and TBUT is 0.952with 100% sensitivity, 50% specificity, 95% positive predictive value (PPV) and 100%negative predictive value (NPV), the accuracy of TBUT and Ferning is 0.881 with90.2% sensitivity, 0% specificity , positive predictive value (PPV) 97.4% and negativepredictive value (NPV) 0% while the accuracy of Ferning and Schimer I was 0.928with a sensitivity of 97.5%, specificity of 0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.1%and negative predictive value (NPV) 0%. Conclusion: Schimer I test is more accurateto use as a predictor of dry eye in postoperative cataract patients than Ferning andTBUT

Comparison of astigmatism after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction

Objective: To compare astigmatism after phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction technique. Method: It was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted at Zainab Medicare hospital Haroonabad from September 2018 to May 2019. A sample size of 80 patients having cataract, age 41 to 70 years was included in this study. Slit lamp examination was performed for anterior segment evaluation and astigmatism was determined with autorefraction and keratometry. Result: Phaco technique was more reliable. The means and the standard deviation of phaco post op astigmatism was 0.7860 ±.48880 and ECCE post op astigmatism was 3.6310±1.96236 which indicated that the degree of astigmatism increases after extra capsular cataract extraction technique. The significant level was 0.00 which showed that the phaco technique is highly significant. Conclusion: Corneal astigmatism was almost similar in two groups prior to surgery but after the cataract surgery the astigmatism significantly decreased after phacoemulsification group at 2 weeks follow-up, the results indicated that phaco may be considered superior to ECCE. No suturing is required in phaco and hence lesser chances of post op astigmatism.

Impact of cataract surgery on vision-related quality of life

Background: Blindness and visual impairment have been shown to reduce vision-related quality of life (VRQoL), general health and social status and increase mortality. Understanding the influence of different cataract surgery techniques on VRQoL can enhance the understanding of which technique may be most suitable to achieve the best outcomes from a patient’s perspective. Previous studies have focused exclusively on the phacoemulsification technique, with limited attention on other techniques that are common in developing countries, such as the extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) techniques. Aim: To evaluate the impact of cataract surgery on VRQoL for the ECCE and MSICS techniques. Setting: The study was conducted at the Themba Hospital in the Mpumalanga province. Methods: A case study research design was used at the Themba Hospital. Participants underwent either the ECCE or the MSICS technique and were followed for a period of 6-weeks post-surgery. The VRQoL was assessed using the 33-item Indian Vision Functioning Questionnaire (IND-VFQ-33). Data were presented using frequencies, percentages and means ± standard deviations. Results: The sample included 101 participants, with a mean age of ~66 years. Following cataract surgery, there was an increase in the frequency of the ‘not at all’ response for the majority of the questions in the IND-VQ-33 questionnaire in all three domains. There were statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05) between the pre-surgery and post-surgery mean scores for all the questions, with the exceptions being those related to problems experienced when seeing outside in bright sunlight, bright light hurting the eyes and closing the eyes because of light from vehicles. Conclusion: Individuals who underwent both the ECCE and MSICS techniques showed improvement in VRQoL in terms of general functioning, psychosocial impact and vision symptoms domains.

COMPARISON OF POST OPERATIVE CORNEAL ASTIGMATISM BETWEEN SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY (SICS) AND EXTRA CAPSULAR CATARACT EXTRACTION (ECCE)

Background&#x0D; Cataract surgery is the most common type of surgery done by ophthalmologists. There are many methods of performing cataract surgery. Each of them has its own advantages and complications. Here we want to find the outcome of both the manual small incision cataract surgery and the conventional extracapsular cataract extraction surgery. &#x0D; Objectives &#x0D; To find the degree of postoperative corneal astigmatism in both manual small incision cataract surgery and the extracapsular cataract extraction surgery and compare these outcomes in both techniques.&#x0D; Patients and Methods&#x0D; We performed an experimental study conducted from January 2016 to June 2016 in Shahid Dr.Aso hospital ophthalmology department and Best Vision private hospital, Sulemani Province/Kurdistan Region of Iraq. One hundred cases were enrolled in the study, 50 cases underwent manual small incision cataract surgery and the other 50 underwent extracapsular cataract extraction surgery. All patients had their history taken, preoperative evaluation by (Slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, indirect ophthalmoscopy for fundus examination, intraocular lens measurement, B-scan). Postoperatively; after 2 months, all cases in both groups were re-evaluated by the same measures of the preoperative examination.&#x0D; Results&#x0D; The mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity in the manual small incision cataract surgery and extracapsular cataract extraction group was 6/9 and 6/12, respectively. The mean postoperative corneal astigmatism was 1.27+0.94 in manual small incision cataract surgery compared to 2.59+1.65 in the extracapsular cataract extraction surgery.&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; Both manual small incision and extracapsular cataract extraction techniques are safe and effective for visual rehabilitation of cataract patients. However, manual small incision cataract surgery gives better uncorrected visual acuity and less induced corneal astigmatism at 8 weeks postoperatively.

Day care versus in-patient surgery for age-related cataract.

Age-related cataract accounts for more than 40% of cases of blindness in the world with the majority of people who are blind from cataract living in lower income countries. With the increased number of people with cataract, it is important to review the evidence on the effectiveness of day care cataract surgery. To provide authoritative, reliable evidence regarding the safety, feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of day case cataract extraction by comparing clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction or a combination of these in cataract operations performed in day care versus in-patient units. We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2015, Issue 7), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to August 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to August 2015), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 17 August 2015. We included randomised controlled trials comparing day care and in-patient surgery for age-related cataract. The primary outcome was the achievement of a satisfactory visual acuity six weeks after the operation. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse effects information from the trials. We included two trials. One study was conducted in the USA in 1981 (250 people randomised and completed trial) and one study conducted in Spain in 2001 (1034 randomised, 935 completed trial). Both trials used extracapsular cataract extraction techniques that are not commonly used in higher income countries now. Most of the data in this review came from the larger trial, which we judged to be at low risk of bias.The mean change in visual acuity (in Snellen lines) of the operated eye four months postoperatively was similar in people given day care surgery (mean 4.1 lines standard deviation (SD) 2.3, 464 participants) compared to people treated as in-patients (mean 4.1 lines, SD 2.2, 471 participants) (P value = 0.74). No data were available from either study on intra-operative complications.Wound leakage, intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal oedema were reported in the first day postoperatively and at four months after surgery. There was an increased risk of high IOP in the day care group in the first day after surgery (risk ratio (RR) 3.33, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.21 to 9.16, 935 participants) but not at four months (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.55, 935 participants). The findings for the other outcomes were inconclusive with wide CIs. There were two cases of endophthalmitis observed at four months in the day care group and none in the in-patient group. The smaller study stated that there were no infections or severe hyphaemas.In a subset of participants evaluated for quality of life (VF14 questionnaire) similar change in quality of life before and four months after surgery was observed (mean change in VF14 score: day care group 25.2, SD 21.2, 150 participants; in-patient group: 23.5, SD 25.7, 155 participants; P value = 0.30). Subjective assessment of patient satisfaction in the smaller study suggested that participants preferred to recuperate at home, were more comfortable in their familiar surroundings and enjoyed the family support that they received at home. Costs were 20% more for the in-patient group and this was attributed to higher costs for overnight stay. This review provides evidence that there is cost saving with day care cataract surgery compared to in-patient cataract surgery. Although effects on visual acuity and quality of life appeared similar, the evidence with respect to postoperative complications was inconclusive because the effect estimates were imprecise. Given the wide-spread adoption of day care cataract surgery, future research in cataract clinical pathways should focus on evidence provided by high quality clinical databases (registers), which would enable clinicians and healthcare planners to agree clinical and social indications for in-patient care and so make better use of resources.

A comparative study of astigmatism following manual small incision cataract surgery and conventional extracapsular cataract extraction at a tertiary centre in northern india

Objective: To compare the surgically induced astigmatism following two different techniques of cataract surgery-manual SICS (Small Incision Cataract Surgery) and standard ECCE (Extra-Capsular Cataract Extraction). Materials and Methods: Subjects consisted of patients, aged 10-80 years, from both sexes and divided into two groups of 100 each (one eye per patient). One group was operated with manual SICS and the other with standard ECCE technique. Results: The mean surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) in the SICS group during the sixth week postoperative follow up was found to be 0.66D ± 0.60 SD (Standard Deviation) compared to 2.25D ± 1.23 SD in the ECCE group. At 6th week follow up, no patient in the SICS group had SIA more than 3D whereas in the ECCE group 30% of the patients had astigmatism >3 D. The induced astigmatism between the two groups had a p-value of <0.001 which is highly significant. Conclusions: It is concluded that SICS induces less surgically induced astigmatism, less inflammation, less complications influencing the overall visual prognosis and quick stabilization of refraction, hence providing better and rapid visual rehabilitation in the postoperative period as compared to the patients in the ECCE group.

Visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract Surgery (MSICS) in a peripheral CMH

Introduction: Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is a cost-effective alternative to phacoemulsification cataract surgery for developing countries. This prospective study was carried out in Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Chittagong from October 2009 to March 2011 on 75 cataract patients who were operated by MSICS technique. Objectives: Aim of this study was to assess the visual outcome and complications of MSICS in a peripheral CMH. Methods: Seventy five cataract patients were operated by MSICS technique. All surgical procedures were performed by the principal author. Major per-operative and postoperative complications were documented. Visual outcome was assessed by Snellen’s visual acuity test 06 weeks after operation. Results: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/6 – 6/18 in 57 (76.0%) patients, &lt; 6/18 – 6/60 in 15 (20%) and &lt; 6/60 in 03 (4.0%) patients. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6-6/18 in 65 (86.7%) patients, &lt; 6/18-6/60 in 07 (9.3%) and &lt; 6/60 in 03(4.0%) patients. Visual outcome was good in 86.7% of patients according to World Health Orgnization (WHO) criteria and was not far away from the WHO expected outcome. Posterior capsule rupture was the most significant per-operative complication which was found in 7(9.3%) cases and surgically induced astigmatism was main postoperative complication that affected visual outcome. Mean postoperative astigmatism (against-the rule) was - 1.25DC. 14 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 10, No 1 (June) 2014 Conclusion: MSICS is a safe and cost-effective technique of extra-capsular cataract extraction where surgical skill and experience of the surgeon plays a significant role in the result. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v10i1.22895 Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.10(1) 2014

History of cataract operations in Hungary

The history of the cataract operations dates back to thousands of years ago. Initially, surgery was carried out using rudimentary operating techniques resulting in the loss of many eyes. Cataract surgery has evolved immersely and now it is a highly refined surgical practice. Evolution of the cataract surgery was closely linked to broadening of anatomical-pathological knowledge and to the development of the instruments applied. Although Daviel performed the first intentional cataract removal in 1747, almost one hundred years passed before the extracapsular cataract extraction method finally replaced the old couching technique. By the middle of the 20th century, with the progression of the operation techniques and instruments, different forms of intracapsular cataract extraction methods became prevalent. Introduction and widespread use of the artificial intraocular lenses from the second half of the 20th century led to the rediscovery and further perfection of the extracapsular cataract extraction technique. Today, phacoemulsification through small incision, along with the foldable intraocular lenses is the gold standard of cataract surgery. The aim of this study is to present the different cataract surgery methods applied throughout the centuries, as well as the difficulties encountered. It discusses pioneering steps of each era, in order to give a closer look at the most frequently performed surgical intervention in ophthalmology.

Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in cataract after glaucoma surgery

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of combined phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation for patients after glaucoma surgery. Methods 88 cases （90 eyes） of cataract patients after glaucoma surgery were randomly divided into treatment group （43 cases 45 eyes） and control group （45 cases 45 eyes）. Transparent cornea incision phaeoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens im- plantation were performed in the treatment group. Conventional extracapsular cataract extraction technique was used in the control group. The visual acuity and corneal astigmatism were measured at postoperative 1 week, I month and 3 months. Results The patients of uncorrected visual acuity over 0.5 in treatment group were more than that in control group 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation （P 〈 0.01 ）. 3 months af- ter surgery, there were statistical signifieant difference in the average changes of corneal astigmatism between two groups （P 〈 0.01 ）. Conclusion Transparent corneal incision phacoemulsification and foldable intraoc- ular lens implantation had good clinical efficacy after glaucoma surgery, and better visual acuity and less postoperative astigmatism can be obtained. Key words: Anti-glaucoma surgery ; Phacoemulsification; Cataract; Lens, intraoeular

Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular extraction: governmental costs

PURPOSETo evaluate the governmental costs of patients undergoing phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction at a public hospital in a developing country.METHODSA prospective study was conduced with 205 patients. The subjects were randomized for cataract surgery using either phacoemulsification or extracapsular cataract extraction techniques.RESULTSOf the 205 patients, 101 patients were submitted to phacoemulsificationand 104 patients were submitted to extracapsular cataract extraction. Brazilian Health Care System expenditures for the surgery and the postoperative period were US$ 95.49 more in the phacoemulsification group than in the extracapsular cataract extractiongroup. If we take into account Social Security expenditures, then we estimate that the average difference for the total direct cost for the government for the surgery and the postoperative period for both procedures was US$ 50.91 or approximately half of the initial difference in cost for the phacoemulsification surgery. The total cost of cataract surgery for the government (excluding social security) was estimated at US$ 258.79 for extracapsular cataract extraction and US$ 309.70 for phacoemulsification per patient. Focusing only on working patients, the total cost was US$ 342.21 for phacoemulsification and US$ 587.71 for extracapsular cataract extraction, a difference of US$ 245.50. This difference can be considered monetarily and socially justifiable when the benefits of the surgical technique are evaluated.CONCLUSIONUnder the conditions of this study, we observed that phacoemulsification was an efficient procedure with regard to the impact on public health care system, when all costs are assessed comprehensively, mainly for subjects with regular jobs.

Complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification cataract surgery at New Jersey Medical School

Aim:To describe the complications related to cataract surgery performed by phacoemulsification technique by third-year ophthalmology residents at New Jersey Medical School, who are trained to perform phacoemulsification without any prior...

Postcataract Endophthalmitis in South India: Incidence and Outcome

To determine the incidence of acute-onset postcataract endophthalmitis, identify risk factors, and determine clinical outcomes in a tertiary eye care center in South India. Retrospective, interventional, observational case series. All patients who underwent cataract extraction from January 2002 to December 2003 at Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai. The records of patients with acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery were reviewed. Acute-onset postcataract endophthalmitis, incidence rates, risk factors, organisms cultured, and visual acuity outcomes after treatment. During the study period, 36072 cataract surgeries were performed; these included 22294 cases of phacoemulsification and 9503 cases of extracapsular cataract extraction. A total of 19 eyes developed acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (average 2-year incidence, 0.05%). Ten cases were culture positive (average 2-year incidence, 0.03%). In multivariate analysis, increased risk of endophthalmitis was associated with intraoperative complications, such as posterior capsular rent and vitreous loss (relative risk [RR], 6.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-28.5; P = 0.05) for all endophthalmitis cases, age >60 years for culture-positive endophthalmitis cases (RR, 6; 95% CI, 0.7-47.8; P = 0.04), and an extracapsular cataract extraction technique for culture-positive endophthalmitis cases (RR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.2-19.3; P = 0.001). After follow-up of 37 days, 5 (29.41%) of the 17 patients achieved a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40, and the remaining 7 (32.3%) had a BCVA better than 20/200. Of the culture-positive cases, Nocardia species was the most common organism isolated, accounting for more than half of these cases (6/10 [60%]). This study found the incidence of acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery to be 0.05%. Extracapsular cataract extraction technique and the occurrence of intraoperative complications are major risk factors for developing endophthalmitis. Visual outcome after endophthalmitis was generally poor. Nocardia is a lesser-known but virulent organism causing endophthalmitis, the management of which still poses a therapeutic dilemma.

The Outcome of the Functioning Filter After Subsequent Cataract Extraction

To evaluate and compare the outcome of functioning filtration surgery followed by cataract surgery with posterior intraocular lens implantation by both phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) techniques in glaucomatous eyes. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical course of 77 eyes (68 patients) that after successful trabeculectomy, underwent cataract surgery by either phacoemulsification or ECCE techniques. We determined the frequency of partial and absolute failure following cataract surgery by either phacoemulsification or ECCE in eyes with functioning trabeculectomies. Partial failure of intraocular pressure (IOP), control after cataract extraction was defined as the need for an increased number of antiglaucoma medications or argon laser trabeculoplasty to maintain IOP < or =21mm Hg. Complete failure of IOP control after cataract surgery was defined as an IOP >21 mm Hg on at least two consecutive measurements one or more weeks apart or the performance of additional filtration surgery. Failure rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier actuarial method. Failure rates between phacoemulsification and ECCE subgroups were compared using the log rank test. The probability of partial failure by the third postoperative year after cataract surgery was 39.5% in the phacoemulsification subgroup and 37.3% in the ECCE subgroup. This small difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.48). The probability of complete failure by the fourth postoperative year after cataract surgery was 12.0% in the phacoemulsification subgroup and 12.5% in the ECCE subgroup. This difference is also not statistically significant (P = 0.77). At the 6-month follow-up visit, visual acuity of both groups improved one or more lines in 87.0% of patients, and worsened one or more lines in 3.9% of patients. Sixty-one percent achieved visual acuity of 20/40 or better. The most frequent complication was posterior capsular opacification requiring laser capsulotomy that occurred in 31.2% of patients. Cataract extraction by either phacoemulsification or ECCE following trabeculectomy surgery may be associated with a partial loss of the previously functioning filter and the need for more antiglaucoma medications to control IOP.

Cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation in patients with retinoblastoma.

To report the visual outcome and complications after extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in eyes that underwent external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of retinoblastoma. Eleven eyes of 8 patients aged 1.5 to 8.0 years at the time of surgery for irradiation-induced cataract were observed for 6 to 39 months (mean [+/-SD], 20+/-10 months). A standard technique of extracapsular cataract extraction, posterior chamber IOL implantation, pars plana posterior capsulotomy, and pars plana anterior vitrectomy was performed in 9 eyes, and secondary IOL placement was performed in 2 eyes. All eyes that underwent primary IOL implantation achieved visual acuities equal to or better than those best ever recorded prior to the development of the cataract. There were no postoperative complications, and all eyes experienced minimal postoperative inflammation. The 2 eyes that underwent secondary IOL implantation achieved their best-corrected aphakic visual acuities but experienced a prolonged course of postoperative inflammation. Intraocular lens placement in the posterior chamber of eyes with regressed retinoblastoma and irradiation-induced cataract seems to be a safe and effective method for the correction of aphakia.

Management of the Dislocated Crystalline Lens with a Perfluorocarbon Liquid

AbstractVitreoretinal surgery allows the effective removal of soft to moderately dense crystalline lens fragments, using the vitrectomy probe and the ultrasonic fragmentation probe. Hard lenses cannot be removed with these instruments. Previously described techniques for removal of hard lenses include trapping the lens anteriorly with needles, cryoextraction of the lens in an air-filled eye, and manipulation with sodium hyaluronate. These methods are difficult and dangerous in some cases. We used perfluorocarbon liquid to facilitate the safe removal of a surgically luxated hard crystalline lens. Injection of the perfluorocarbon liquid floated the lens off the retinal surface and into the anterior vitreous cavity. In this location, the lens was delivered by using standard extracapsular cataract extraction techniques. This technique allowed removal of the hard crystalline lens with minimal manipulation, and was helpful in the setting of poor media clarity.

Ophthalmic Surgery (Looseleaf and Update Service)

This book is an exciting operative atlas and update service. It contains sections covering important surgical procedures in the areas of cataract, glaucoma, cornea, ocular motility, plastic and reconstructive surgery, and lasers. Each section is subdivided into chapters, and at the end of every chapter abstracts from important ophthalmic articles are presented with comments from the authors. These abstracts are excellent additions to the text. book is enriched by the expertise of the contributors, and is nicely illustrated with clear diagrams. section on retinal surgery, however, does not cover major surgical procedures and is limited to the management of penetrating ocular injuries, retinoblastoma, and lasers. The authors have provided easy-to-follow descriptions of the surgical procedures... first section on cataract surgery covers general, regional, retrobulbar, and peribulbar anesthesia. Phaco-emulsification and intracapsular and extracapsular cataract extraction techniques are illustrated very well. management of complications of these procedures is

Lens anatomical principles and their technical implications in cataract surgery Part I: The lens capsule

Optimal fixation and position of an intraocular lens (IOL) is achieved when it is located in the capsular bag. A peripheral tear from the central opening to the lens periphery is associated with a high incidence of dislocation of at least one loop from within the capsular bag and lens decentration. A central round continuous capsulectomy (capsulorhexis), within the zonule-free area, provides long-term and balanced IOL fixation. To perform a well-controlled capsulectomy, a deep and stable anterior chamber should be maintained throughout the surgery. This is achieved by using a continuous anterior chamber maintainer that regulates the pressure in the anterior chamber. This paper reviews the clinical anatomical guidelines of the lens capsule and the anterior chamber and presents the authors' preferred technique for optimal anterior capsulectomy.