Abstract Background The morbidity and mortality of Cardiogenic Shock(CS) remain high despite the advance in management these years1.As acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is considered to be the most common reason for cardiogenic shock,Non-AMI related CS is excluded from the majority of CS studies and remains largely understudied2. Considering its inherent complexity and hemodynamically multiplicity, it is needed to focusing on these patients to identify specific risk factors, which may be conducive to the promotion of critically CS patients with early decision and timely intervention. Purpose In this study,we sought to investigate the variables which are predictive of in hospital mortality in non AMI related CS patients, developed and validated a practical nomogram for risk quantification. Methods 1298 patients and 548 patients with cardiogenic shock from the MIMIC-IV (version 1.0) and MIMIC-III(version1.4) databaes were included in the study after excluding acute myocardial infarction. We used in-hospital death and 30 day survival as the end points. Lasson and logistic regression analysis were used to identify statistically significant predictors which were finally involved in the nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and calibration after comparing with commonly used ICU scores for in-hospital death.Lastly, we plotted Kaplan-Meier curves of three subgroup classified by the identified cutoff values of the nomogram to further assess the discriminative ability of the prognosis. Results The in-hospital mortality of patients with non-AMI related CS is about 36.6%.After the analysis of regression, age, heart rate, wbc, albumin, lactic acid, GCS score, urine volume, using vasopressor were identified as the most critical factors for the in-hospital death. Based on the these results, a nomogram for predicting in-hospital death was established.The calibration plot also shows good consistency between nomogram prediction and actual in-hospital mortality.In addition, compared with other scores, the AUC value of nomogram was 0.806 (95% CI = 0.799-0.831) in the training queue, 0.814 (95% CI = 0.771-0.852) in the internal validation queue and 0.730 (95% CI = 0.690-0.767) in the external validation set, which was significantly higher than other commonly used ICU scoring systems(SAPSII, APSIII and SOFA).Also, three risk subgroups were created using two boundary points (303 and 339) of the nomogram score and the survival curve shows that there were significant differences in the 30 day survival of each subgroup. Conclusion A prognostic nomogram and risk stratification system of non-AMI related CS were established and verified, which can provide a practical tool for individualized clinical management of patients.Workflow of the study.Nomogram for non-AMI related CS patients
Read full abstract