Use Of External Defibrillators Research Articles

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in Japan

This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes in Japan, aiming to address a critical research gap. Analyzing data from the All-Japan Utstein registry covering pediatric OHCA cases from 2018 to 2021, the study observed no significant changes in one-month survival, neurological outcomes, or overall performance when comparing the pre-pandemic (2018–2019) and pandemic (2020–2021) periods among 6765 cases. However, a notable reduction in pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during the pandemic (15.1–13.1%, p = .020) was identified. Bystander-initiated chest compressions and rescue breaths declined (71.1–65.8%, 22.3–13.0%, respectively; both p < .001), while bystander-initiated automated external defibrillator (AED) use increased (3.7–4.9%, p = .029). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with reduced pre-hospital ROSC during the pandemic. Post-pandemic, there was no noticeable change in the one-month survival rate. The lack of significant change in survival may be attributed to the negative effects of reduced chest compressions and ventilation being offset by the positive impact of widespread AED availability in Japan. These findings underscore the importance of innovative tools and systems for safe bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during a pandemic, providing insights to optimize pediatric OHCA care.

Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Before and After Legislation for Bystander CPR

The lack of evidence-based implementation strategies is a major contributor to increasing mortality due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in developing countries with limited resources. To evaluate whether the implementation of legislation is associated with increased bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use and improved clinical outcomes for patients experiencing OHCA and to provide policy implications for low-income and middle-income settings. This observational cohort study analyzed a prospective city registry of patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022. The Emergency Medical Aid Act was implemented in Shenzhen, China, on October 1, 2018. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to assess changes in outcomes before and after the law. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2023. The Emergency Medical Aid Act stipulated the use of AEDs and CPR training for the public and provided clear legal guidance for OHCA rescuing. The primary outcomes were rates of bystander-initiated CPR and use of AEDs. Secondary outcomes were rates of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to arrival at the hospital, and survival at discharge. A total of 13 751 patients with OHCA (median [IQR] age, 59 [43-76] years; 10 011 men [72.83%]) were included, with 7858 OHCAs occurring during the prelegislation period (January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2018) and 5893 OHCAs occurring during the postlegislation period (October 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022). The rates of bystander-initiated CPR (320 patients [4.10%] vs 1103 patients [18.73%]) and AED use (214 patients [4.12%] vs 182 patients [5.29%]) increased significantly after legislation implementation vs rates before the legislation. Rates of prehospital ROSC (72 patients [0.92%] vs 425 patients [7.21%]), survival to arrival at the hospital (68 patients [0.87%] vs 321 patients [5.45%]), and survival at discharge (44 patients [0.56%] vs 165 patients [2.80%]) were significantly increased during the postlegislation period. Interrupted time-series models demonstrated a significant slope change in the rates of all outcomes. These findings suggest that implementation of the Emergency Medical Aid Act in China was associated with increased rates of CPR and public AED use and improved survival of patients with OHCA. The use of a systemwide approach to enact resuscitation initiatives and provide legal support may reduce the burden of OHCA in low-income and middle-income settings.

Neurological outcome of cardiac arrest patients in mountain areas: An analysis of the Northern French Alps Emergency Network

BackgroundMountainous areas pose a challenge for the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) chain of survival. Survival rates for OHCAs in mountainous areas may differ depending on the location. Increased survival has been observed compared to standard location when OHCA occurred on ski slopes. Limited data is available about OHCA in other mountainous areas. The objective was to compare the survival rates with a good neurological outcome of OHCAs occurring on ski slopes (On-S) and off the ski slopes (OffS) compared to other locations (OL). MethodsAnalysis of prospectively collected data from the cardiac arrest registry of the Northern French Alps Emergency Network (RENAU) from 2015 to 2021. The RENAU corresponding to an Emergency Medicine Network between all Emergency Medical Services and hospitals of 3 counties (Isère, Savoie, Haute-Savoie). The primary outcome was survival at 30 days with a Cerebral Performance Category scale (CPC) of 1 or 2 (1: Good Cerebral Performance, 2: Moderate Cerebral Disability). ResultsA total of 9589 OHCAs were included: 213 in the On-S group, 141 in the Off-S group, and 9235 in the OL group. Cardiac etiology was more common in On-S conditions (On-S: 68.9% vs OffS: 51.1% vs OL: 66.7%, p < 0.001), while Off-S cardiac arrests were more often due to traumatic circumstances (OffS: 39.7% vs On-S: 21.7% vs OL: 7.7%, p < 0.001). Automated external defibrillator (AED) use before rescuers' arrival was lower in the Off-S group than in the other two groups (On-S: 15.2% vs OL: 4.5% vs OffS: 3.7%; p < 0.002). The first AED shock was longer in the Off-S group (median time in minutes: OffS: 22.0 (9.5–35.5) vs On-S: 10.0 (3.0–19.5) vs OL: 16.0 (11.0–27.0), p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, on-slope OHCA remained a positive factor for 30-day survival with a CPC score of 1 or 2 with a 1.96 adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02–3.75, p = 0.04), whereas off-slope OHCA had an 0.88 adjusted odds ratio (95% CI, 0.28–2.72, p = 0.82). ConclusionsOHCAs in ski-slopes conditions were associated with an improvement in neurological outcomes at 30 days, whereas off-slopes OHCAs were not. Ski-slopes rescue patrols are efficient in improving outcomes.

Survival Factors Associated with Toilet-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective: To identify the factors associated with a neurologically favourable survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring in toilets. Methods: We retrospectively compared neurologically favourable 1-month survival rates and survival-related factors for 330,849 non-emergency medical service-witnessed OHCAs that occurred in toilets with those that occurred elsewhere using a nationwide database. Results: Compared to outpatient or hospital admission, OHCA was more likely to be associated with toilets (crude odds ratio [cOR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]: 2.52 [2.48–2.57]). The neurologically favourable 1-month survival rate for OHCA occurring in toilets (1.8%) was significantly lower than that in other places (2.9%) (cOR [95% CI]: 0.60 [0.53–0.68]). Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use were minimal in toilets. Neither bystander CPR (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.91–1.75]) nor AED use (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 2.05 [0.65–6.41]) was associated with improved neurologically favourable 1-month survival in toilets. Conclusions: Despite the poor neurologically favourable survival rate of OHCA in toilets, the provision of bystander CPR and AED was not associated with survival. Potential contributing factors include low rates of bystander intervention and delayed patient detection. To address this issue, focusing particular attention on unwell patients who use the toilets is crucial, and preventive approaches should be promoted.

Knowledge and barriers of out of hospital cardiac arrest bystander intervention and public access automated external defibrillator use in the Northeast of England: a cross-sectional survey study.

Intervention by members of the public during an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHAC) including resuscitation attempts and accessible automated external defibrillator (AED) has been shown to improve survival. This study aimed to investigate the OHCA and AED knowledge and confidence, and barriers to intervention, of the public of North East England, UK. This study used a face-to-face cross-sectional survey on a public high street in Newcastle, UK. Participants were asked unprompted to explain what they would do when faced with an OHCA collapse. Chi-Square analysis was used to test the association of the independent variables sex and first aid trained on the participants' responses. Of the 421 participants recruited to our study, 82.9% (n = 349) reported that they would know what to do during an OHCA collapse. The most frequent OHCA action mentioned was call 999 (64.1%, n = 270/421) and 58.2% (n = 245/421) of participants reported that they would commence CPR. However, only 14.3% (n = 60/421) of participants spontaneously mentioned that they would locate an AED, while only 4.5% (n = 19/421) recounted that they would apply the AED. Just over half of participants (50.8%, n = 214/421) were first aid trained, with statistically more females (57.3%, n = 126/220)than males (43.9%, n = 87/198)being first aiders (p = 0.01 χ2 = 7.41). Most participants (80.3%, n = 338/421) knew what an AED was, and 34.7% (n = 326/421) reported that they knew how to use one, however, only 11.9% (n = 50/421) mentioned that they would actually shock a patient. Being first aid trained increased the likelihood of freely recounting actions for OHCA and AED intervention. The most common barrier to helping during an OHCA was lack of knowledge (29.9%, n = 126/421). Although most participants reported they would know what to do during an OHCA and had knowledge of an AED, low numbers of participants spontaneously mentioned specific OHCA and AED actions. Improving public knowledge would help improve the public's confidence of intervening during an OHCA and may improve OHCA survival.

Multi-phase implementation of automated external defibrillator use by nurses during in-hospital cardiac arrest and its impact on survival

ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the impact of a medical directive allowing nurses to use defibrillators in automated external defibrillator-mode (AED) on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes. MethodsWe completed a health record review of consecutive IHCA for which resuscitation was attempted using a pragmatic multi-phase before-after cohort design. We report Utstein outcomes before (Jan.2012–Aug.2013;Control) the implementation of the AED medical directive following usual practice (Sept.2013–Aug.2016;Phase 1), and following the addition of a theory-based educational video (Sept.2016–Dec.2017;Phase 2). ResultsThere were 753 IHCA with the following characteristics (Before n = 195; Phase 1n = 372; Phase 2n = 186): mean age 66, 60.0% male, 79.3% witnessed, 29.1% noncardiac-monitored medical ward, 23.9% cardiac cause, and initial ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT) 27.2%. Comparing the Before, Phase 1 and 2: an AED was used 0 time (0.0%), 21 times (5.7%), 15 times (8.1%); mean times to 1st analysis were 7 min, 3 min and 1 min (p < 0.0001); mean times to 1st shock were 12 min, 10 min and 8 min (p = 0.32); return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was 63.6%, 59.4% and 58.1% (p = 0.77); survival was 24.6%, 21.0% and 25.8% (p = 0.37). Among IHCA in VF/VT (n = 165), time to 1st analysis and 1st shock decreased by 5 min (p = 0.01) and 6 min (p = 0.23), and ROSC and survival increased by 3.0% (p = 0.80) and 15.6% (p = 0.31). There was no survival benefit overall (1.2%; p = 0.37) or within noncardiac-monitored areas (-7.2%; p = 0.24). ConclusionsThe implementation of a medical directive allowing for AED use by nurses successfully improved key outcomes for IHCA victims, particularly following the theory-based education video and among the VF/VT group.

Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a hilly area: Utstein Registry data from the Nagasaki Medical Region, Japan.

To analyze characteristics and investigate prognostic indicators of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a hilly area in Japan. A retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Utstein Registry for 4280 OHCA patients in the Nagasaki Medical Region (NMR) registered over the 10-year period from 2011 to 2020. The main outcome measure was a favorable cerebral performance category (CPC 1-2). Sites at which OHCA occurred were classified into "sloped places (SPs)" (not easily accessible by emergency medical services [EMS] personnel due to slopes) and "accessible places (APs)" (EMS personnel could park an ambulance close to the site). The characteristics and prognosis based on CPC were compared between SPs and APs, and multivariable analysis was performed. No significant improvement in prognosis occurred in the NMR from 2011 to 2020. Prognosis in SPs was significantly worse than that in APs. However, multivariable analysis did not identify SP as a prognostic indicator. The following factors were associated with survival and CPC 1-2: age group, witness status, first documented rhythm, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, use of mechanical CPR (m-CPR) device or esophageal obturator airway (EOA), and year. Both m-CPR and EOA use were associated with a poor prognosis. In a hilly area, OHCA patients in SPs had a worse prognosis than those in APs, but SPs was not significantly associated with prognosis by multivariable analysis. Interventions to increase bystander-initiated CPR and AED use could potentially improve outcomes of OHCA in the NMR.

Online platform for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator training in a rural area: a community clinical trial protocol

IntroductionSudden death resulting from cardiorespiratory arrest carries a high mortality rate and frequently occurs out of hospital. Immediate initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by witnesses, combined with automated external defibrillator...

Automated External Defibrillator Use After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Recreational Facilities

This cohort study examines bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) application and survival outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at recreational facilities in US states with and without AED legislation.

간호대학생의 KBLS 와 BLS에 대한 교육 효과 비교

This is a non-equivalent control group before-and-after design study. It compares the educational effectiveness of nursing students' KBLS Provider and BLS Provider courses. The comparison is based on the KACPR 2020 guidelines and AHA 2020 guidelines, respectively. The study seeks to provide evidence to suggest an efficient CPR education program suitable for Korean conditions. We recruited 29 and 21 participants for the KBLS and BLS groups, respectively. The results showed a significant difference in CPR knowledge before and after KBLS and BLS training (F=10.30, p=.002) but not in CPR attitude (t=0.71, p=.479), CPR self-efficacy (U=297.50, p=.890), and attitude toward automated external defibrillator use (U=1258.50, p=.361). The findings suggest that the KBLS Provider course, based on the KBLS guidelines, should be applied to nursing students' CPR education in Korea. This course is structured according to the Korean healthcare situation, offers competitive prices, including affordable e-books and association fees, and provides the convenience of accessing the education report system.

Basic life support for non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during school-supervised sports activities in children: A nationwide observational study in Japan

ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic impact of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and public-access automated external defibrillator (AED) use on non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring during school-supervised sports activities in children. MethodsFrom a nationwide database of pediatric OHCAs occurring under school supervision in Japan, data between April 2008 and December 2020 were obtained. We analyzed non-traumatic OHCAs that occurred during school-supervised sports activities among schoolchildren from elementary, junior high, high, and technical colleges. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effect of basic life support (BLS) on 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes after OHCA. ResultsIn total, 318 OHCA cases were analyzed. The 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes was 64.8% (164/253) in cases receiving both bystander-CPR and AED application, 40.7% (11/27) in cases receiving CPR only, 38.5% (5/13) in patients receiving AED application only, and 28.0% (7/25) in cases receiving no bystander intervention. Compared with cases receiving no BLS, cases receiving both CPR and AED had a significantly higher proportion of 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–11.90, p = 0.014). However, compared to cases receiving no BLS, there was no significant difference in the outcome in the cases receiving CPR only (AOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.34–5.29, p = 0.671) and the cases receiving AED application only (AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.25–6.38, p = 0.778). ConclusionThe combination of CPR and AED as BLS performed by bystanders for non-traumatic OHCA during school-supervised sports activities improved the outcomes.

Trends in community response and long term outcomes from paediatric cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study

AimThis study aimed to investigate trends over time in pre-hospital factors for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (pOHCA) and long-term neurological and neuropsychological outcomes. These have not been described before in large populations. MethodsNon-traumatic arrest patients, 1 day-17 years old, presented to the Sophia Children’s Hospital from January 2002 to December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. Favorable neurological outcome was defined as Pediatric Cerebral Performance Categories (PCPC) 1–2 or no difference with pre-arrest baseline. The trend over time was tested with multivariable logistic and linear regression models with year of event as independent variable. FindingsOver a nineteen-year study period, the annual rate of long-term favorable neurological outcome, assessed at a median 2·5 years follow-up, increased significantly (OR 1·10, 95%-CI 1·03-1·19), adjusted for confounders. Concurrently, annual automated external defibrillator (AED) use and, among adolescents, initial shockable rhythm increased significantly (OR 1·21, 95% CI 1·10-1·33 and OR 1·15, 95% CI 1·02-1·29, respectively), adjusted for confounders. For generalizability purposes, only the total intelligence quotient (IQ) was considered for trend analysis of all tested domains. Total IQ scores and bystander basic life support (BLS) rate did not change significantly over time. InterpretationLong-term favorable neurological outcome, assessed at a median 2·5 years follow-up, improved significantly over the study period. Total IQ scores did not significantly change over time. Furthermore, AED use (OR 1·21, 95%CI 1.10-1·33) and shockable rhythms among adolescents (OR1·15, 95%CI 1·02-1·29) increased over time.

Abstract 18326: The Association of s Shockable Rhythm and Automated External Defibrillator Use With Outcomes in Infants With Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Study From the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival

Introduction: Defibrillation with an automated external defibrillator (AED) is critical in the chain of survival following a cardiac arrest caused by pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. However, in 2022 the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation could not make a recommendation for or against the use of AEDs in infants. Hypothesis: We aimed to describe the association of a shockable rhythm with outcomes in infants with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and test the hypothesis that a shockable rhythm and AED use with defibrillation would be associated with improved neurologically favorable survival at hospital discharge by analyzing data from a large cardiac arrest registry in the United States Methods: We conducted an analysis of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival database. Inclusion criteria were age &lt; 1 year of age and non-traumatic OHCA from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2021. The primary outcome was neurologically favorable survival defined as a Cerebral Performance Category Scale of 1 or 2. Results: A total of 10,108 infants with OHCA were evaluated of which 308 (3%) had a shockable rhythm and 9,800 (97%) had a non-shockable rhythm. Compared to infants with non-shockable rhythms infants with shockable rhythms were more likely to be white (37.7% white, 25.6% black, 7.5% Hispanic), have a witnessed arrest (44.5% vs. 16%), a non-home/public arrest (16.9% vs. 6.7%), and bystander AED application with defibrillation (19.4% vs. 0.18%) (p&lt;0.05 for all). Neurologically favorable survival (19.2% shockable vs. 4.2% non-shockable was higher in arrests with a shockable rhythm compared to non-shockable arrests, p&lt;0.001). AEDs were applied by bystanders in 1479 (14.5%) arrests and were associated with neurologically favorable survival (11% AED with defibrillation vs. 3.5% AED without defibrillation, p=0.002) Conclusions: Although infants infrequently had an OHCA with a shockable rhythm survival outcomes were superior in arrests with a shockable rhythm and in arrests where there was bystander AED use with defibrillation. These results emphasize the importance of AED use in infants with shockable rhythms following an OHCA.

Abstract 13107: Addressing Sudden Cardiac Arrest: An Analysis of the Efficacy and Implementation of Automated External Defibrillators in New Jersey Schools

Introduction: Out of hospital sudden cardiac arrest is a major health concern with a low survival rate. Proper Automated External Defibrillator use has been shown to decrease mortality associated with OHCA. In 2014, New Jersey passed Janet’s Law to mandate automated external defibrillator access in all public and private schools. Our project surveyed NJ schools to evaluate the implementation of AEDs and to analyze their usage and outcomes. Hypothesis: Schools that were adherent to AED placement and training as outlined in Janet’s Law will likely have more positive outcomes from sudden cardiac arrests on school properties than schools that do not. Methods: An observational, cross sectional study was conducted via an online form (Redcap 12.4.2) sent to New Jersey public school nurses. Data was collected from February to June 2023 and analyzed using SAS version 9.4. Results: 301 (99.7%) responses reported having automated external defibrillators. 85.3% of schools provided AED staff training. 42 schools (14.4%) utilized an AED in a cardiac emergency, most often occurring to students in classrooms. An AED was administered by school employees 95.8% of the time. In 80.5% of cases, the patient was resuscitated on scene with no long term neurological complications. 87.2% of schools have an emergency response plan. Conclusions: Our data highlights the impact of proper AED utilization to positively influence out of hospital sudden cardiac arrest outcomes in pediatric populations. Despite Janet’s law being an unfunded mandate, we found near complete compliance among New Jersey schools. The majority of reported sudden cardiac arrests occurred in a classroom setting, necessitating available resources throughout school facilities. In these events, the percentage of positive patient outcomes in our study was significantly higher than the national average with excellent neurological recovery. This discovery may be a product of excellent response rates by trained staff as mandated in Janet’s law. Our findings highlight the need for awareness, training, and accessibility regarding AEDs.

Abstract 267: Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status Influences Rates of Pre-EMS Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of both morbidity and mortality in the United States and globally. After cardiac arrest onset, emergency medical services (EMS) might not arrive before irreversible injury takes place. Thus, pre-EMS resuscitation - including CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) use - is associated with improvements in outcomes. We sought to determine if rates of pre-EMS CPR and pre-EMS AED use vary across neighborhood socioeconomic status using a database of EMS activations throughout the United States. Methods: The National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) is a large and nationally-representative database of EMS activations populated from more than ten-thousand EMS agencies throughout the US. We examined cardiac arrests in adult patients (18+ years of age) between January 2017 and December 2019 where EMS providers documented the ZIP code of the arrest, whether CPR prior to EMS arrival was provided, and whether an AED was applied prior to EMS arrival. The ZIP code of the arrest was used to group arrests based on socioeconomic status data from the US Census Bureau. Rates of pre-EMS CPR and pre-EMS AED use were then compared, and ZIP codes with under 5% of residents below the poverty line served as benchmarks. Results: 366,280 cardiac arrests met inclusion criteria. Both Pre-EMS CPR and pre-EMS AED use were highest in ZIP Codes where less than 5% of the population is below the poverty line (p&lt; .00001). Furthermore, a consistent decrease in rates of pre-EMS interventions was seen as the percent of individuals below the poverty line increased (Figure 1). Conclusion: We found a strong relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status and pre-EMS cardiac arrest interventions. One explanation may be access to CPR training. Further studies should continue to interrogate cardiac arrest disparities that have already been reported and seek to identify new unreported disparities as well.

The Role of Automated External Defibrillator Use in the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Rate and Outcome: A Systematic Review.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a significant cause of death. The chance of survival significantly increases when immediate defibrillation with an on-siteautomated external defibrillator (AED) is available. Our aim is to systematically evaluate the impact of public access defibrillators (PAD) on the outcomes of outpatient cardiac arrest. We conducted a systematic review of the data from global studies on the role of bystander and emergency medical service (EMS) interventions, primarily focusing on the usage of AEDs, during OHCA events. The results highlight the critical significance of PADsin improving survival outcomes in OHCA settings. The majority of OHCA incidents occurred in private residences, but public spaces such as schools and airports had better outcomes, likely due to AED accessibility and trained individuals. Placing AEDs in public areas, especially high-risk zones, can boost survival chances. Timely defibrillation, particularly by bystanders, correlated with better survival and neurological conditions. The review emphasizes the importance of widespread cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AED training, strategic AED placement, and continuous monitoring of interventions and outcomes to enhance survival rates and neurological recovery after OHCAs. This systematic review showed that bystander interventions, including CPR and AED usage, significantly increased the survival rate. Overall, immediate response and accessibility to AEDs in public areas can significantly improve outcomes in OHCA events.

Sudden cardiac arrest in athletes and strategies to optimize preparedness.

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is the leading cause of death in young athletes. Despite efforts to improve preparedness for cardiac emergencies, the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in athletes remains high, and bystander awareness and readiness for SCA support are inadequate.Initiatives such as designing an emergency action plan (EAP) and mandating training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator use (AED) for team members and personnel can contribute to improved survival rates in SCA cases.This review provides an overview of SCA in athletes, focusing on identifying populations at the highest risk and evaluating the effectiveness of different screening practices in detecting conditions that may lead to SCA. We summarize current practices and recommendations for improving the response to SCA events, and we highlight the need for ongoing efforts to optimize preparedness through the implementation of EAPs and the training of individuals in CPR and AED use. Additionally, we propose a call to action to increase awareness and training in EAP development, CPR, and AED use for team members and personnel.To improve outcomes of SCA cases in athletes, it is crucial to enhance bystander awareness and preparedness for cardiac emergencies. Implementing EAPs and providing training in CPR and AED use for team members and personnel are essential steps toward improving survival rates in SCA cases.

Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests Occurring in Public Places: A National Population-Based Observational Study.

Sudden cardiac arrest, particularly out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), is a global public health concern. However, limited research exists on the epidemiology of OHCAs occurring in public places, trends and impact of bystander intervention, and influence of extraordinary circumstances. This study investigated the epidemiological factors, bystander characteristics, and outcomes of OHCAs that occurred in public places in South Korea from 2016 to 2021 and analyzed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A retrospective analysis was conducted using an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Surveillance database, including 33,206 cases of OHCA that occurred in public places. Cases with do-not-resuscitate orders or insufficient data were excluded. A steady increase in bystander-performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation over the years and a constant decrease in bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) use were observed. Survival-to-discharge rates for OHCAs remained relatively steady until a marginal decrease was observed during the pandemic (pandemic, 13.1%; pre-pandemic, 14.4%). Factors affecting survival included the presence of a shockable rhythm, witnessed arrest, cardiac arrest due to disease, use of bystander AED, and period relative to the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings emphasize the critical role of bystanders in outcomes of OHCAs and inform public health strategies on better management of OHCAs in public places.

Documented Use of Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocols is Associated with Improved Survival in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective There are over 300,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) annually in the United States (US) and despite many scientific advances in the field, the survival rate remains low. We seek to determine if return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is higher when use of emergency medical dispatch (EMD) protocols is documented for OHCA calls compared to when no EMD protocol use is documented. We also seek identify care-related processes that differ in calls that use EMD protocols. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of U.S. adults with OHCA prior to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival using 2019 National EMS Information System data. The primary exposure was EMD usage during EMS call. The primary outcome was prehospital ROSC, and secondary outcomes included automated external defibrillator (AED) use before EMS arrival, bystander CPR, and end-of-event EMS survival (survival to the end of the EMS care at transport destination). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary insurance, rurality, initial rhythm, arrest etiology, and witnessed arrest. Results Of the 96,269 OHCA cases included, EMD use was documented in 73%. Overall, 26% of subjects achieved ROSC in EMS care. EMD subjects were more likely to achieve ROSC (27.2% vs. 23.5%, uOR 1.22, 95%CI 1.18 − 1.26) even after adjusting for subject and arrest characteristics (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.08 − 1.17). EMD subjects also had higher end-of-event survival (19.1% vs. 16.4%, aOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.15 − 1.25). AED use before EMS arrival was more common in the EMD group (28.3% vs. 26.3% %diff 2.0, 95%CI 1.4 to 2.6), as was CPR before EMS arrival (63.8% vs. 55.1%, difference 8.6%, 95%CI 7.9 to 9.3%). Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, the rate of ROSC was higher in adult OHCA patients when EMD protocol use was reported compared to when it was not reported. The group with documented EMD use also experienced higher rates of bystander AED use, bystander CPR, and end-of-event survival.

Community Interventions for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Resource-Limited Settings: A Scoping Review Across Low, Middle, and High-Income Countries

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major global health challenge, characterized by poor survival outcomes worldwide. Resource-limited settings are burdened with suboptimal emergency response and worse outcomes than high-resource areas. Engaging the community in the response to OHCA has the potential to improve outcomes, although an overview of community interventions in resource-limited settings has not been provided. Objective: This review evaluated the scope of community-based OHCA interventions in resource-limited settings. Methods: Literature searches in electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials) and grey literature sources were performed. screening, full-text review, and data extraction of eligible studies were conducted independently by two reviewers. The PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework was used to assess study eligibility. Studies that evaluated community-based interventions for laypeople (Population), targeting emergency response activation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), or automated external defibrillator (AED) use (Concept) in resource-limited settings (Context) were included. Resource-limited settings were identified by financial pressures (low-income or lower-middle-income country, according to World Bank data on year of publication) or geographical factors (setting described using keywords indicative of geographical remoteness in upper-middle-income or high-income country). Results: Among 14,810 records identified from literature searches, 60 studies from 28 unique countries were included in this review. Studies were conducted in high-income (n = 35), upper-middle-income (n = 2), lower-middle-income (n = 22), and low-income countries (n = 1). Community interventions included bystander CPR and/or AED training (n = 34), community responder programs (n = 8), drone-delivered AED networks (n = 6), dispatcher-assisted CPR programs (n = 4), regional resuscitation campaigns (n = 3), public access defibrillation programs (n = 3), and crowdsourcing technologies (n = 2). CPR and/or AED training were the only interventions evaluated in low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries. Conclusions: Interventions aimed at improving the community response to OHCA in resource-limited settings differ globally. There is a lack of reported studies from low-income countries and certain continental regions, including South America, Africa, and Oceania. Evaluation of interventions other than CPR and/or AED training in low- and middle-income countries is needed to guide community emergency planning and health policies.