Abstract
This is a non-equivalent control group before-and-after design study. It compares the educational effectiveness of nursing students' KBLS Provider and BLS Provider courses. The comparison is based on the KACPR 2020 guidelines and AHA 2020 guidelines, respectively. The study seeks to provide evidence to suggest an efficient CPR education program suitable for Korean conditions. We recruited 29 and 21 participants for the KBLS and BLS groups, respectively. The results showed a significant difference in CPR knowledge before and after KBLS and BLS training (F=10.30, p=.002) but not in CPR attitude (t=0.71, p=.479), CPR self-efficacy (U=297.50, p=.890), and attitude toward automated external defibrillator use (U=1258.50, p=.361). The findings suggest that the KBLS Provider course, based on the KBLS guidelines, should be applied to nursing students' CPR education in Korea. This course is structured according to the Korean healthcare situation, offers competitive prices, including affordable e-books and association fees, and provides the convenience of accessing the education report system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
