External Beam Radiotherapy Research Articles

Ophthalmologic adverse events in childhood head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma survivors treated according to four different local treatment strategies

IntroductionOphthalmological adverse events (OAEs) are known to frequently occur following local treatment for pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS). The exact nature of these OAEs and the burden they put on survivors is less well described. Moreover, it is suspected there might be differences in the prevalence and nature of OAEs depending on local treatment strategy applied: external beam radiation therapy with photons, external beam radiation therapy with protons, macroscopically radical surgery combined with brachytherapy, or microscopically radical surgery combined with external beam radiation therapy. MethodsWe cross-sectionally assessed 98 HNRMS survivors with long (median 9 years) follow-up time, according to a predefined list of OAEs based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events system. We added information from chart reviews on the nature and management of all OAEs scored grade ≥1. We describe the prevalence of OAEs for the different tumor sites and treatment strategies separately. ResultsOAEs occurred following treatment of all HNRMS sites. The most frequently observed OAEs are eyelid abnormalities, dry eyes, and cataracts. Sixty-two percent of survivors had several different OAEs simultaneously. In 27 % of survivors additional (surgical) treatment of OAEs was required during follow-up. The patterns observed suggest a possible relationship between OAE type and treatment strategy. ConclusionOAEs in HNRMS survivors confer a high burden of chronic toxicity. The simultaneous occurrence of multiple OAEs in individual survivors present a particularly challenging clinical scenario and demand specific expertise. We propose a standardized screening scheme to detect possible OAEs in asymptomatic survivors based on primary tumor localization.

Incidence of local breast cancer recurrence with delayed radiation therapy.

The purpose of this research was to examine the probability of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in individuals whose RT was delayed after the first chemotherapy and surgery. To analyze the effect of delaying RT for breast cancer patients (by more than 6weeks after treatment). A retrospective analysis comprised 136 female breast cancer patients treated at the Baghdad Centre for Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine from 2021 to May 2022. External beam radiation was started more than 6weeks after chemotherapy was finished for all patients who also had surgery. Clinical examination and ultrasound were part of the follow-up process. Patients' ages varied from 28 to 71, and the majority (83%) had a mastectomy. The majority of cases (95.5%) were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma on histopathology, with 49.6% being at stage 2 and 42.6% being at stage 3. Seventy-six percent of patients tested positive for hormones. Although 10 patients (7.35%) acquired distant metastases within 5years, only 2 (1.47%) had local recurrence because of the delay in RT. Specifically, 91.1% had complete local control with no evidence of disease spread. Delaying RT by more than 6weeks in patients with breast cancer did not substantially affect local control, according to the results of a new research, the first of its type in Iraq.

Use of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in craniopharyngioma

External beam radiation therapy is used for inoperable, residual, or recurrent disease after surgery for craniopharyngioma. At present, conventional radiotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are available options. However, there are limited data on HFRT and SRT using modern radiotherapy (RT) devices. This paper presents the findings of a retrospective study conducted at a single institution based on our long-term experiences with eight craniopharyngioma patients who had underwent RT. The median time between the operation and RT was 8.5 months (ranging from 2.6 to 11 months). Six patients were treated with CyberKnife® (CK®), and two were treated with Tomotherapy® (HT®) using the helical intensity-modulated RT technique (H-IMRT). Patients treated with HT received a mean of 50 and 55 Gy RT in 25 and 30 fractions (conventional RT scheme), respectively. Out of the six patients treated with CK, three received a mean of 22 – 25 Gy in five fractions, and the other three received a mean of 40 – 42 Gy in 15 fractions. The median follow-up was 6 years (range: 2 – 9.1 years), and no progression was observed. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 85.7% and 85.7%, respectively. OS and PFS at 5 years were likewise 85.7% and 85.7%, respectively. Of the two patients (25%) who were alive with a complete response, one received 50 Gy in 25 fractions with H-IMRT, and the other received RT through CyberKnife with five fractions. Five patients (62.5%) were alive with stable residual disease and one patient had died with a complete response. HFRT may be considered as a preferable option in the treatment of craniopharyngioma, in addition to conventional or SBRT treatment options.

Communicating prostate cancer outcomes data to consumers[sbnd] A brief communication

ObjectiveTo translate and communicate outcomes data for prostate cancer from a clinical registry data into a consumer-friendly resource. MethodsFirst, we analyzed real-world data from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative (SA-PCCOC) registry for men diagnosed from 2008 to 2018 including clinical and functional outcomes following surgery, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, hormone therapy, active surveillance and watchful waiting. These outcomes included overall survival, cancer specific survival, biochemical recurrence, decline in functional outcomes, and transition to active treatment following active surveillance. Second, we translated outcomes into a summary text and pictographic format and present in one document that consumers found easy to understand and interpret. This “Prostate Cancer Outcomes Report Card” was developed in consultation with a consumer advisory group and further improved through exploratory interviews with people affected by prostate cancer, an online survey among the general public, and clinician feedback. ResultsThe 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival rate was 97%. There is a reasonably high chance of cancer returning within 5 years (17% after surgery and 14% after radiotherapy) while 1 in 3 men on active surveillance transitioned to other treatments within 5 years. Sexual function was negatively affected following all treatment types. Men with higher risk disease had a worse prognosis, a higher chance of recurrence and greater decline in physical function. Consumers required trustworthy, comprehensive, simple and up-to-date information collated in one place, and valued having access to this resource. Data on high survival rates were considered reassuring. There were high levels of unmet psychosocial and supportive care needs, especially in relation to mental health and sexual function. The report card was well received by patients and health care workers. ConclusionsThis relatively simple and easily understandable consumer-oriented outcome report serves to better inform men with prostate cancer and facilitate patient-provider communication and shared decision-making.

Remineralization of lytic spinal metastases after radiation therapy – A retrospective cohort study comparing conventional external beam radiation therapy with stereotactic ablative body radiation

IntroductionOsteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed. Results87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05). ConclusionWe conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.

A durable response to gemcitabine monotherapy in metastatic cardiac angiosarcoma

Introduction: Primary cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare neoplasm with high rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis for which optimum treatment is poorly defined. Case Report: We present the case of a 49-year-old man with cardiac angiosarcoma with distant metastases who exhibits durable response to gemcitabine monotherapy. At initial diagnosis, he underwent complete resection with adjuvant Adriamycin and Ifosfamide for four cycles as well as external beam radiation for possible residual disease. He had recurrence with liver and bone metastases four years later. He received Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for six cycles followed by Gemcitabine monotherapy with no evidence of recurrence for the next three years. Conclusion: This patient’s consistent response to gemcitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic cardiac angiosarcoma adds to relative paucity of data regarding the management of this rare malignancy, offering insight into best practice and hope for patients afflicted with this disease.

125I seed brachytherapy for non-central pelvic recurrence of cervical cancer after external beam radiotherapy

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of 125I seed brachytherapy for non-central pelvic recurrence of cervical cancer after external beam radiotherapy, and to analyze the clinical influential factors.MethodsBetween June 2015 and April 2022, 32 patients with 41 lesions were treated with 125I seed brachytherapy. The seeds were implanted under the guidance of CT and/or 3D-printed template images at a median dose of 100 Gy (range, 80–120 Gy), and the local control rate (LCR) and survival rates were calculated. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify prognosis predictors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the optimal cut-off values.ResultsThe median follow-up was 48.52 months (range, 4–86 months), and the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LCR was 88.0%, 63.2%, and 42.1%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 36% and 33%, respectively, and the median survival time was 13.26 months. No significant adverse events occurred. Multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor diameter, tumor stage, and LCR were independent factors influencing survival. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for tumor diameter and D90 were 0.765 and 0.542, respectively, with cut-off values of 5.3 cm and 108.5 Gy.ConclusionsThe present findings indicate that 125I seed brachytherapy is feasible for treating non-central pelvic recurrence of cervical cancer after external beam radiotherapy. Further, tumor diameter < 5.3 cm and immediate postoperative D90 > 108.5 Gy were associated with better efficacy.

Re-treatment of locally recurrent uveal melanoma with repeat eye plaque I-125 brachytherapy: A single institution experience

PurposeEye plaque brachytherapy (EPBT) is the most common treatment for uveal melanoma with high local control rates of 95-100%. When local recurrences occur following EPBT, salvage options include enucleation, transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT), external beam radiation, or re-irradiation with EPBT. The purpose of this study is to report our institution's experience with EPBT re-irradiation for locally recurrent uveal melanoma. Material and MethodsPatients were included if they were previously treated for uveal melanoma with EPBT, experienced local recurrence, and were subsequently treated at our institution with EPBT from 2016- 2020. ResultsA total of 5 patients with median age 68 years were included. All patients were initially treated at an outside institution (OSI) with Iodine-125 or Ruthenium-106 EPBT. Mean time between EPBT at the OSI and EPBT at our facility was 130 months (range 28 – 231 months). Patients were re-irradiated with Iodine-125 EPBT prescribed to 85Gy over 168 hours. Median follow up after re-treatment at our center was 24 months. Local control among this cohort was 100%. Metastasis occurred in two patients after re-treatment, at 8 months and 7 months. At last follow up, all treated lesions were decreased in size. Four patients experienced worsening visual acuity. Four patients developed cataracts, while two patients developed radiation retinopathy with cystoid macular edema requiring anti-VEGF injections. One patient developed radiation retinopathy but did not require injections. No patients required enucleation. ConclusionRe-treatment of locally recurrent uveal melanomas with EPBT is a feasible alternative to enucleation with a high local control rate. Ocular toxicities have not been significant enough to require enucleation.

Outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: A single-center retrospective study

Abstract Background Temporary prostate brachytherapy, in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), is an established and evolving treatment technique for non-metastatic, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with localized intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined EBRT and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BT) at a single centre. Patients &amp; Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent EBRT and HDR-BT treatment between January 2015 and December 2020. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment outcomes (Kaplan-Meier analysis), and toxicities were analysed. Results 127 patients with intermediate (28.3%) or high-risk (71.7%) prostate cancer were included. Median follow-up was 42 months. Five-year bDFS, CSS and OS rate was 77.5%, 98.1% and 93.0%, respectively, with no significant difference between risk groups. The most frequent toxicity was acute grade 1 urinary obstruction (7.9%). One patient experienced acute and late grade 3 urinary obstruction. No grade ≥4 were observed. Conclusions Combined EBRT and HDR-BT demonstrated favourable disease control rates and manageable toxicities in patients with localized intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. The 5-year bDFS rate was consistent with previous studies, supporting the effectiveness of this treatment approach. The low incidence of toxicities highlights the conformality and biological efficiency of HDR-BT boost. This treatment strategy provides an effective, safe and convenient option for this group of patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of helical tomotherapy based intensity-modulated radiation therapy in combination with prostate HDR-BT (81.1% of cases).

Targeted Alpha Therapy for Glioblastoma: Review on In Vitro, In Vivo and Clinical Trials.

Glioblastoma (GB), a prevalent and highly malignant primary brain tumour with a very high mortality rate due to its resistance to conventional therapies and invasive nature, resulting in 5-year survival rates of only 4-17%. Despite recent advancements in cancer management, the survival rates for GB patients have not significantly improved over the last 10-20 years. Consequently, there exists a critical unmet need for innovative therapies. One promising approach for GB is Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT), which aims to selectively deliver potentially therapeutic radiation doses to malignant cells and the tumour microenvironment while minimising radiation exposure to surrounding normal tissue with or without conventional external beam radiation. This approach has shown promise in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. A review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across Medline, SCOPUS, and Embase, identifying 34 relevant studies out of 526 initially found. In pre-clinical studies, TAT demonstrated high binding specificity to targeted GB cells, with affinity rates between 60.0% and 84.2%, and minimal binding to non-targeted cells (4.0-5.6%). This specificity significantly enhanced cytotoxic effects and improved biodistribution when delivered intratumorally. Mice treated with TAT showed markedly higher median survival rates compared to control groups. In clinical trials, TAT applied to recurrent GB (rGB) displayed varying success rates in extending overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Particularly effective when integrated into treatment regimens for both newly diagnosed and recurrent cases, TAT increased the median OS by 16.1% in newly diagnosed GB and by 36.4% in rGB, compared to current standard therapies. Furthermore, it was generally well tolerated with minimal adverse effects. These findings underscore the potential of TAT as a viable therapeutic option in the management of GB.

Managing prostate cancer after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: feasibility and outcomes of single-port transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

IntroductionPatients with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (PC-IPAA) face unique challenges in managing prostate cancer due to their hostile abdomens and heightened small bowel mucosa radiosensitivity. In such cases, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is contraindicated, and while brachytherapy provides a safer option, its oncologic effectiveness is limited. The Single-Port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (SP TV-RARP) offers promise by avoiding the peritoneal cavity. Our study aims to evaluate its feasibility and outcomes in patients with PC-IPAA.MethodsA retrospective evaluation was done on patients with PC-IPAA who had undergone SP TV-RARP from June 2020 to June 2023 at a high-volume center. Outcomes and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed.ResultsEighteen patients underwent SP TV-RARP without experiencing any complications. The median hospital stay was 5.7 h, with 89% of cases discharged without opioids. Foley catheters were removed in an average of 5.5 days. Immediate urinary continence was seen in 39% of the patients, rising to 76 and 86% at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Half of the cohort had non-organ confined disease on final pathology. Two patients with ISUP GG3 and GG4 exhibited detectable PSA post-surgery and required systemic therapy; both had SVI, multifocal ECE, and large cribriform pattern. Positive surgical margins were found in 44% of cases, mostly Gleason pattern 3, unifocal, and limited. After 11.1 months of follow-up, no pouch failure or additional BCR cases were found.ConclusionPatients with PC-IPAA often exhibit aggressive prostate cancer features and may derive the greatest benefit from surgical interventions, particularly given that radiation therapy is contraindicated. SP TV-RARP is a safe option for this group, reducing the risk of bowel complications and promoting faster recovery.

What can go wrong when doing right? A pictorial review of iatrogenic genitourinary complications.

A growing number of treatments for genitourinary diseases can result in various iatrogenic complications. Multimodality imaging in the post-procedural setting is essential for early and accurate diagnosis to limit morbidity and mortality. We review common and uncommon treatment-induced pathologies affecting the genitourinary system via a case-based approach. We illustrate notable complications affecting the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra induced by percutaneous procedures, external beam radiation, immunotherapy, laparoscopic/robotic pelvic surgery, and intravesicular BCG. Finally, we provide guidance on optimal imaging techniques for diagnosis and highlight the role of image-guided interventions for mitigation of complications.

Biochemical control in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer after EBRT with and without brachytherapy boost.

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without brachytherapy boost (BTB) has not been compared in prospective studies using guideline-recommended radiation dose and recommended androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we compared modern-day EBRT with BTB in terms of biochemical control (BC) for intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer. Patients were treated for primary IR or HR prostate cancer during 1999-2019 at three high-volume centers. Inclusion criteria were prescribed ≥ 76 Gy EQD2 (α/β = 1.5 Gy) for IR and ≥ 78 Gy EQD2 (α/β = 1.5 Gy) for HR as EBRT alone or with BTB. All HR patients received ADT and pelvic irradiation, which were optional in IR cases. BC between therapies was compared in survival analyses. Of 2769 initial patients, 1176 met inclusion criteria: 468 HR (260 EBRT, 208 BTB) and 708 IR (539 EBRT, 169 BTB). Median follow-up was 49and 51months for HR and IR, respectively. BTB patients with ≥ 113 Gy EQD2Gy experienced astable, good BC outcome compared with BTB at lower doses. Patients treated with ≥ 113 Gy EQD2Gy also experienced significantly improved BC compared with EBRT (10-year BC failure rates after ≥ 113 Gy BTB and EBRT: respectively 20.4 and 41.8% for HR and 7.5and 20.8% for IR). In patients with IR and HR prostate cancer, BTB with ≥ 113 Gy EQD2Gy offered aBC advantage compared with dose-escalated EBRT and lower BTB doses.

Differential reinforcement of cGAS-STING pathway-involved immunotherapy by biomineralized bacterial outer membrane-sensitized EBRT and RNT

Radiotherapy (RT), including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and radionuclide therapy (RNT), realizes physical killing of local tumors and activates systemic anti-tumor immunity. However, these effects need to be further strengthened and the difference between EBRT and RNT should be discovered. Herein, bacterial outer membrane (OM) was biomineralized with manganese oxide (MnO2) to obtain OM@MnO2-PEG nanoparticles for enhanced radio-immunotherapy via amplifying EBRT/RNT-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD) and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) activation. OM@MnO2-PEG can react with H2O2 and then gradually produce O2, Mn2+ and OM fragments in the tumor microenvironment. The relieved tumor hypoxia improves the radio-sensitivity of tumor cells, resulting in enhanced ICD and DNA damage. Mn2+ together with the DNA fragments in the cytoplasm activate the cGAS-STING pathway, further exhibiting a positive role in various aspects of innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Besides, OM fragments promote tumor antigen presentation and anti-tumor macrophages polarization. More importantly, our study reveals that OM@MnO2-PEG-mediated RNT triggers much stronger cGAS-STING pathway-involved immunotherapy than that of EBRT, owing to the duration difference of RT. Therefore, this study develops a powerful sensitizer of radio-immunotherapy and uncovers some differences between EBRT and RNT in the activation of cGAS-STING pathway-related anti-tumor immunity.Graphical

Radiation proctitis after iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy utilizing SpaceOAR hydrogel.

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of combining the SpaceOAR (SOAR) hydrogel with prostate brachytherapy, using colonoscopy findings to assess for radiation proctitis. Among 731 patients undergoing iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), SOAR was utilized in 394 patients (53.9%). Colonoscopy was performed for 97 patients (13.3%) to assess the presence, location, condition, and treatment of radiation proctitis. We also investigated treatment factors associated with the occurrence of radiation proctitis. Radiation proctitis was observed in 57 patients (7.8%) and 17 (2.3%) were treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC). The incidence of radiation proctitis was 12.2% in the non-SOAR and 4.1% in the SOAR group (p < 0.001). In the non-SOAR group, the incidence of radiation proctitis was 6.6% for LDR-BT monotherapy and increased to 22.0% when combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (p = 0.001). However, in the SOAR group, these rates significantly decreased to 3.3% and 5.7% for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively (p = 0.035, p < 0.001). With SOAR, inflammation was observed directly above the DL in most patients (87.5%), and only one patient (6.3%) required APC. The absence of SOAR (p < 0.001, HR = 0.29) and the concurrent use of EBRT (p = 0.018, HR = 2.87) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of radiation proctitis. The use of SOAR significantly reduced the incidence of radiation proctitis in patients undergoing LDR-BT monotherapy and combined EBRT. Inflammation primarily occurred directly above the DL; further examination is necessary to clarify its cause.

Role of the gel spacer in safely delivering whole pelvic radiation therapy without central shielding in computed tomography-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer patients

BackgroundTo protect the rectum and bladder from high dose exposure, the Japanese guidelines for managing uterine cervical carcinoma recommend pelvic irradiation with central shielding (CS). Conversely, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines recommend delivering ≥ 85 Gy to high-risk clinical target volume D90 (CTVHR D90%). In this study, we investigated whether a gel spacer can enable the safe delivery of the ESTRO/ABS-recommended doses to the target while observing dose constraints for the OARs without using CS in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Materials and MethodsTwenty patients who received definitive radiation therapy without CS and were treated by brachytherapy with a gel spacer between April 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The cumulative doses of EBRT and brachytherapy expressed in the form of the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) were calculated. Treatment outcomes and incidence of adverse events were also examined. ResultsThe median cumulative CTVHR D90%, rectum D2cm3, and bladder D2cm3 were 86.6 Gy (range, 69.8–103.7), 62.9 Gy (range, 55.3–72.5), and 72.0 Gy (range, 62.9–84.1), respectively. The median follow-up was 35.9 months (range, 10.9–70.3). The 2-year local control rate was 95% (95% CI: [69–99%]). There were no CTCAE ≥Grade 3 late gastrointestinal or genitourinary adverse events. ConclusionsThe use of gel spacer can enable ESTRO/ABS-recommended dose constraints even without using CS in EBRT, with favorable outcomes and low adverse event rates.

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy following concurrent immuno-chemoradiotherapy and immune-maintenance therapy as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: A prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

5533 Background: Immunotherapy in combination with chemoradiotherapy has shown good efficacy in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We report on the efficacy of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (TP) following concurrent immuno-chemoradiotherapy and maintenance immunotherapy for LACC. Methods: Eligible participants were adults with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix (FIGO 2018 stage IIB-IVA disease), ECOG PS score 0-2, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. All pts received 2 cycles neoadjuvant camrelizumab (200 mg d1 q3w) plus TP (albumin-bound Paclitaxel 260mg/m2 d1 q3w; cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d1-3 q3w) treatment, following 5-week external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) protocol (45-50 Gy/25 fractions with concurrent triweekly camrelizumab and cisplatin) to the whole pelvis plus brachytherapy every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, and then maintenance therapy of camrelizumab (200mg q3w, up to one year). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years. PFS was evaluated when at least 13 events were observed using a stratified log-rank test with an overall one-sided significance level of 0.05. Results: 67 pts provided informed consent and 12 were excluded for not meeting eligibility. 55 pts received the investigational agent and were evaluable for safety and efficacy analyses. The median age was 54 years [IQR 50 to 60]; 51 [92.7%] were squamous cell carcinoma, and 4 [7.3%] were adenocarcinoma; 9 [16.4%] were stage IIB, 2 [3.6%] were IIIA, 5 [9.1%] were IIIB, 30 [54.5%] were IIIC1r, 6 [10.9%] were IIIC2r, and 3 [5.5%] were IVA. As of data cutoff (Jan. 15, 2024), median follow-up was 9.5 (IQR 7.1 to 10.3) months. Of the 55 pts, 1 (1.8%) pt underwent hysterectomy after EBRT because of pelvic empyema, and was excluded from response evaluation. At three months after brachytherapy, the overall remission rate was 100% (53 [98.1%] complete remission and 1 [1.9%] partial remission). We identified 3 (5.5%) pts with treatment failure (2 [3.6] distant metastasis, and 1 [(1.8%] para-aortic lymph node relapse) during follow-up; 1-year PFS was 90.6% (85.4%-95.8%). The most common clinically significant grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were decreased neutrophils (18.2%), thrombocytopenia (9.1%) and anemia (27.3%). Serious AEs occurred in 7 (12.7%), most commonly due to infectious complications. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The interim data support Camrelizumab plus TP neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy following immuno-chemoradiotherapy and Camrelizumab maintenance therapy as an active go-forward regimen in LACC. No new safety signals were observed, and most AEs were mild to moderate. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200061097.

Effect of war on radiotherapy in Ukraine and how to help.

1513 Background: The full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24th, 2022 brought the largest humanitarian disaster to the heart of Europe since the World War II. In this work, we describe the impact of the full-scale Russian invasion on the radiation therapy (RT) services in Ukraine and suggest how to help. Methods: We collected the information on operation of RT centers in Ukraine during the war. In addition, in 2023 an annual survey was conducted by Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology in Kharkiv for the IAEA DIRAC database. The survey was sent to 41 RT centers in Ukraine requesting information on equipment, staffing, and patient volume. Due to the war conditions the data provided in the survey is limited to the un-occupied territories. Results: After the initial Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014 and occupation of Crimea and parts of Donbas, Ukraine lost access to 7 RT centers with 18 external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) machines (17% of total). Just before the full-scale invasion in 2022, there were a total of 44 Co-60 machines (57%) and 33 linear accelerators (43%) in the unoccupied territories. As a result of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, almost all RT centers suspended operation in the first weeks of war. The most challenging period for RT in Ukraine was in March when Kyiv (where 20 EBRT machines are located) was partially surrounded by the occupiers. Based on the DIRAC survey, compared to 2021 data, in 2022 the number of radiation oncologists decreased on average by 2.9%, medical physicists by 6.7%, and therapists by 6.5% but there was a large variation in staffing levels depending on the region and its proximity to war. The workload in the RT centers close to the combat zone almost halved, while increasing by 10 - 60% in the western and central Ukraine. The total number of patients treated with EBRT decreased by 11% and brachytherapy by 21%. Brachytherapy services sustained the most interruption (47% decrease in LDR and 18% decrease in HDR patient volume) due to inability to perform source exchanges. Overall, approximately 5,500 less patients were treated in 2022 compared to 2021. Despite the ongoing war, Ukrainian cancer centers installed 8 new linear accelerators, with 5 linear accelerators pending installation. In addition, the Ministry of Heath of Ukraine has recently purchased 15 linear accelerators to replace the aging Co-60 machine fleet as the future source exchanges might not be possible. There is an acute need in helping Ukraine transition from Co-60 to modern IMRT/VMAT linear accelerators. Conclusions: Radiotherapy in Ukraine sustained significant damages since the 2014 Russian invasion, which was exacerbated further by the full-scale invasion in 2022. To support the vitality and absorptive capacity of RT services in Ukraine, the democratic world can help by donating equipment, hardware, software, and participating in training of Ukrainian RT professionals as they transition to modern and high-quality RT care for Ukrainian cancer patients.

Radiation Therapy in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers: An Italian Survey on Behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology

AimsThe National Palliative Care and Interventional Radiotherapy Study Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) carried out a survey whose aim was to obtain a "snapshot" of the real-world practice of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatments in Italy. Materials and methodsThe survey was conducted on SurveyMonkey's online interface and was sent via e-mail to our society Radiation Oncologists. ResultsFifty-eight Italian radiation oncologists (ROs), representing 54 centers, answered the survey. Thirteen percent of the ROs declared they treat fewer than 10 NMSC lesions annually, 36% treat between 11 and 20, and 51% treat more than 20 lesions annually. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT) was offered by 25% of the ROs, and every case was reportedly discussed by a multidisciplinary team (71%). Electrons (74%), volumetric modulated arc therapy (V-MAT) (57%), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) (43%), and IRT (26%) were the main treatment options. With external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 46 and 53 different RT schedules were treated for curative and palliative intent, respectively; whereas for IRT, there were 21 and 7 for curative and palliative intent, respectively. The most popular EBRT curative options were 50–70.95/22–35 fractions (fx) and 50–70 Gy/16-20fx and for EBRT palliative settings, 30Gy/10fx, and 20–35Gy/5fx. For IRT, the most popular curative options were 32–50Gy/8-10fx and 30–54Gy/3-5fx, whereas 30Gy/6fz was the palliative option. Less than 10 re-RT cases were reported in one year in 42.5%, 11–20 cases in 42.5%, and >20 cases annually in 15%. Electrons (61%), VMAT (49%), and BRT (25%) were the most widely used approaches: 20–40Gy in 10fx and 20–25Gy in 5fx were the recommended fractionations. ConclusionThe survey shows a variegated reality. A national registry with more detailed data could help in undercover its causes.

Disparities in Brachytherapy Utilization in Cervical Cancer in the United States: A Comprehensive Literature Review

(Abstracted from Gynecol Oncol 2024;179:79–84) Advanced cervical cancer is commonly treated with concurrent chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy (RT), followed by brachytherapy (BT) boost. Brachytherapy allows dose escalation to the central disease while limiting the dose to normal surrounding organs including the bladder, rectum, and small bowel and sigmoid colon.