Extent Of Evacuation Research Articles

Abstract WMP103: Comparative Impact of Extent of Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Removal on Outcome in the MISTIE III and STICH II Trials

Introduction: The Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Phase III trial (MISTIE III) concluded that the extent of hematoma reduction confers a mortality and functional benefit. It is unclear if a minimum extent of evacuation is needed for mortality and functional outcome benefit in lobar cases with MISTIE and with open surgical interventions. Objective: We analyzed the effect of extent of lobar ICH evacuation on clinical outcome at 180 days after undergoing the MISTIE procedure and open craniotomy, in the context of the MISTIE III and STICH II clinical trials, respectively. Methods: Patients randomized to the surgical arm with lobar ICH, who underwent the procedure in the MISTIE III trial (n=84) and the STICH II trial (n=266) were analyzed, excluding cases crossing over to surgery. We assessed end of treatment ICH volume on post procedure CT scans and % hematoma evacuation, in relation to survival and likelihood of mRS 0-3. Cubic spline modeling with dichotomized outcome was used to compare the extent of hematoma evacuation on clinical outcome. Results: End of treatment volume of < 28 mL in lobar ICH MISTIE III patients and < 30 mL in STICH II trial patients showed a significantly increased probability of achieving an mRS of 0-3 at 180 days (p<0.03, p<0.006, respectively). This threshold was achieved in 83.1% of lobar cases undergoing MISTIE and in 92.1% of surgical cases in STICH II. Achieving survival benefit at 180 days trended towards improved probability with further hematoma volume reduction without a threshold value in MISTIE III, and was significant per mL reduction in STICH II (p<0.001). Analysis by percent of hematoma evacuation trended toward better probabilities of survival and improved functional outcome but were not significant. Conclusion: This analysis confirms that extent of hematoma evacuation is important in attaining the benefits of both minimally invasive and open surgical interventions in non-herniating lobar ICH patients randomized in clinical trials. Extent of ICH evacuation must be considered in the analysis of comparative effectiveness of various techniques and in the design of future trials.

Outcomes After Endoscopic Port Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematomas

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) cause significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical management strategies offer limited benefit except for the most superficial hemorrhages in select patients. Recent reports suggest that endoscopic approaches may improve outcomes, particularly for deep subcortical hemorrhages. However, the management of these patients remains controversial. We reviewed our experience using endoscopic port surgery to identify characteristics that may predict acceptable outcomes. We completed a retrospective chart and imaging review of patients who underwent endoscopic port surgery for evacuation of spontaneous ICH at a single center. Data were gathered regarding patient demographics, hemorrhage locations, operative findings, and clinical outcomes. From 2007 to 2011, 18 patients underwent evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas using an endoscopic port. The mean age in years was 62 years (range, 43-84 years). Six of 18 patients (33%) died before discharge, and 2 others (11%) died after at least 1 month of survival. Of 12 initial survivors, all were discharged to a rehabilitation or nursing facility. Complete hematoma evacuation was achieved in 7 of 18 patients, with the remaining 11 having a partial evacuation. The patients who died (n = 6) before discharge were statistically more likely to have a left-sided hemorrhage, partial evacuation, or older age than the survivors; death at least 1 month after evacuation was additionally associated with greater preoperative hematoma volumes. Our series demonstrates that endoscopic port surgery for acute intracerebral hematoma evacuation has the ability to achieve significant decompression of large and deep-seated hematomas. Patient age, extent of evacuation, laterality, and preoperative hematoma volume appear to influence patient outcome. Most overall outcomes remain poor. Future studies are necessary to determine if surgical evacuation is in fact superior to best medical treatment and if so, to validate, refute, or further identify characteristics that define surgical candidates.

Defecography: results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management.

We reviewed the medical records and defecograms in 55 consecutive patients to determine the impact of results of defecography on clinical management. Main indication for defecography was constipation, present in 40 (73%) of 55 patients. In the remaining 15 patients, indications included obstructed defecation (5), incontinence (5), and miscellaneous symptoms (5). Defecography evaluated pelvic floor motion by assessing changes in the anorectal angle (ARA) and anorectal junction (ARJ) during various maneuvers, extent of evacuation, and structural abnormalities. Patients were grouped based on results of defecography as being normal (26) or abnormal (29). Comparison of measurements of the ARA and ARJ with various maneuvers showed no significant differences between the two groups. Clinical impact was determined by analyzing therapy done following defecography and subsequent patient response. In the normal group, 15 patients were managed medically, seven surgically, and four lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (59%) of 22 patients, with similar results between medical (60%) and surgical (57%) therapy. In the abnormal group, 16 had medical management, seven surgical therapy, and six lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (57%) of 23 patients but surgical therapy showed more improvement. In conclusion, most standard measurements of the ARA and ARJ were of no value in determining abnormality. Results of defecography did not alter selection of medical or surgical therapy, and had little impact on patient response to therapy.

Defecography: Results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management

We reviewed the medical records and defecograms in 55 consecutive patients to determine the impact of results of defecography on clinical management. Main indication for defecography was constipation, present in 40 (73%) of 55 patients. In the remaining 15 patients, indications included obstructed defecation (5), incontinence (5), and miscellaneous symptoms (5). Defecography evaluated pelvic floor motion by assessing changes in the anorectal angle (ARA) and anorectal junction (ARJ) during various maneuvers, extent of evacuation, and structural abnormalities. Patients were grouped based on results of defecography as being normal (26) or abnormal (29). Comparison of measurements of the ARA and ARJ with various maneuvers showed no significant differences between the two groups. Clinical impact was determined by analyzing therapy done following defecography and subsequent patient response. In the normal group, 15 patients were managed medically, seven surgically, and four lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (59%) of 22 patients, with similar results between medical (60%) and surgical (57%) therapy. In the abnormal group, 16 had medical management, seven surgical therapy, and six lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (57%) of 23 patients but surgical therapy showed more improvement. In conclusion, most standard measurements of the ARA and ARJ were of no value in determining abnormality. Results of defecography did not alter selection of medical or surgical therapy, and had little impact on patient response to therapy.