Extent Of Aortic Repair Research Articles

Inner branched complex aortic repair outcomes from a national multicenter registry using the E-xtra design platform

BackgroundComplex aortic pathology still represents an open issue in contemporary endovascular management, with continuous technological advancement being introduced in practice over time aiming to improve outcomes. Thus far, the dualism between the fenestrated and branched configuration for visceral artery revascularization is yet unsolved, with each approach having its own pros and cons. The inner branched technology for endovascular aneurysm repair (iBEVAR) aims to take the best out of both strategies, offering wide applicability and stable bridging stent sealing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes obtained with a single manufacturer custom-made inner-branched endograft in a multicenter Italian experience. MethodsAll patients consecutively treated with E-xtra design devices in three Italian facilities were enrolled. Anatomic characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed. The main objective was to asses technical and clinical success after iBEVAR. Secondary end points were overall survival, aortic-related mortality, target visceral vessel (TVV) patency, and freedom from target vessel instability during follow-up. ResultsFrom 2016 to 2021, 45 patients were treated with an E-xtra design device revascularizing at least one visceral vessel through an inner branch. The mean age at the time of the procedure was 71.1 ± 9.3 years and 77.8% were males. The total number of target visceral arteries to be bridged with an inner branch was 159. The extent of aortic repair was thoracoabdominal in 91.1% of the cases. Technical success was achieved in 93.3% of the procedures (42/45) with all failures owing to a type I endoleak at final angiography. Each TVV was successfully connected to the graft’s main body as planned without complications. Following their intervention, five patients developed spinal cord ischemia and in three of these cases symptoms persisted after discharge (6.7%). At 30 days clinical success was 93.3% (42/45). No death as well as no TVV thrombosis occurred within 30 days from the primary procedures. The mean follow-up was 22.8 ± 14.2 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival and TVV patency at 36 months were 83.9% and 95.9%, respectively. ConclusionsInner branches seem to be a promising technology in the complex aortic repair landscape, with an applicability ranging from type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm to type I endoleak repair after infrarenal endografting. Whether iBEVAR could offer results comparable with those provided by fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair in terms of target vessel patency and stent stability is yet to be established and further studies are, therefore, needed.

Cerebral protection in type A aortic dissection

: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD) carries extremely high morbidity and mortality with a significantly increased risk of cerebrovascular injury following repair compared to elective arch operations. Advancement in operative and neuroprotective strategies have led to a temporal improvement in outcomes, but the incidence of cerebrovascular injury remains high and warrants continued innovation. In the setting of ATAD, stroke can occur due to malperfusion resulting from true lumen compression and compromised cerebral inflow, malperfusion from cardiogenic shock, or embolization. Therefore, stroke mitigation strategies must address vascular obstructions, hemodynamic compromise, and reduce risk of embolization. This article reviews contemporary strategies for cerebral protection in ATAD including preoperative patient evaluation, perfusion and temperature management, extent of aortic repair, utility of cerebral oximetry and neuromonitoring, and pharmacological adjuncts. In summary, patients should be evaluated preoperatively with contrast imaging to fully characterize their dissection to facilitate well-informed operative planning. Cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be safely achieved through multiple routes, but should consider patient pathology and the intended approach to cerebral perfusion. Central cannulation is feasible in most patients and allows for the most expeditious initiation of CPB. Although both deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) with retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and moderate HCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) have been shown to provide adequate cerebral protection, targeting moderate hypothermic temperatures reduces CPB times. The combination of a brief period of RCP followed by ACP during moderate HCA allows for the potential flushing of emboli from the cerebral arterial system with the superior metabolic protection of antegrade perfusion. The proximal and distal extent of arch repair should be individually tailored to patient pathology and surgeon experience, making sure to completely resect disease to prevent acute neurological complications. Cerebral oximetry and neuromonitoring are useful adjuncts, providing real-time information about the adequacy of neuroprotection. Finally, co-management by anesthesiologists and perfusionists with administration of neuroprotective agents, appropriate pH management, and maintenance of normal metabolic hemostasis and hemodynamic stability will further minimize cerebrovascular complications. Optimal cerebral protection requires a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach and implementation of multimodal strategies.

Is limited aortic resection more justified in elderly patients with type A acute aortic dissection?-insights from single center experience

BackgroundThis study compared limited aortic repair (ascending, and /or hemi-arch replacement) versus extended-arch repair (ascending, arch and proximal descending aortic replacement) used for patients aged 65 or older, who had type A acute aortic dissection (AAD), analyzing the influence of the extent of aortic repair on outcomes.MethodsFrom January, 2001 to December, 2015, 103 patients aged 65 or older underwent operation due to type A AAD in Nanjing First Hospital. The cohort was divided into two subgroups according to the surgical approaches, including limited aortic replacement (LAR, n = 41) and total arch replacement + stent elephant trunk implantation (TAR+SET, n = 62).ResultsThere was no significant difference in gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, PCI history, atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, aortic valve insufficiency (≥ moderate), shock situation before operation, and Euro-score II between the two groups except limb malperfusion and tear location. The cross-clamp time, CPB time, intubation time, ICU stay time and hospital time were all significantly less in the LAR group than in the TAR+SET group. A total of 89 patients were discharged home successfully after operation, with a difference of hospital mortality (P = 0.04). The overall survival rates at 5-year follow-up were 82.5 ± 6.0% in LAR group and 75.2 ± 5.6% in TAR+SET group, but with no difference (p = 0.151). The freedom from adverse aortic events at 5-year was 84.3 ± 6.5% in LAR group versus 97.9 ± 2.1% in TAR+SET group, with a statistical difference (p = 0.03).ConclusionThese findings support limited aortic resection is acceptable for elderly patients with type A AAD if surgical principles allow.

Regional and Temporal Trends in the Outcomes of Repairs for Acute Type A Aortic Dissections

Little information exists regarding the use of arch operations for repair of acute type A aortic dissections (AADs) despite increasing interest in this strategy and its potential impact on outcomes. We aimed to determine the relationship between extent of aortic repair, US geographic regions, and outcome. We queried The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database for patients who underwent AAD repair from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2016 and grouped patients by ascending-only operations and operations involving the arch. We identified 25,462 patients (mean age, 59.8 ± 14.2; 66.7% men) who underwent AAD repair. Operations involving the ascending aorta only were performed in 54% of patients; 46% had repair additionally involving the arch. The 30-day mortality was 18.9% for patients who underwent ascending-only operations vs 19.8% for patients who underwent arch operations (P= .09). In multivariable analysis older age (P < .001), earlier year of operation (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P < .001), severe chronic lung disease (P < .001), prior cerebrovascular disease (P < .001), and longer bypass time (P < .001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. There was regional variation in 30-day mortality (P < .001), and incidence of arch repair varied from 38.6% to 52.6% in 9 geographic regions (P < .001). In this analysis of cardiac surgical practice in the United States, repair of AADs included a portion of the aortic arch in 46% of patients. Early mortality remained high throughout the current era regardless of extent of aortic resection. Regional variation in perioperative mortality may signal an opportunity for practice improvement.

Outcomes of open distal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with chronic DeBakey type I dissection

In patients with acute DeBakey type I dissection, endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta during proximal aortic repair is an increasingly popular approach to preventing distal aortic sequelae and subsequent repair. To better define the risks and outcomes associated with these secondary operations, we examined our contemporary experience with open distal aortic repair in patients with chronic type I aortic dissection. Data were collected between January 2005 and June 2013 regarding 198 consecutive open descending thoracic (n = 27) or thoracoabdominal (n = 171) aortic repairs performed in patients with chronic type I dissection. The median interval between the dissection onset and the subsequent distal operation was 5.0 years (interquartile range, 2.4-10.5 years). A total of 110 repairs (56%) were performed in patients with genetic disorders. There were 14 early deaths (7%). Permanent paraplegia developed in 2 patients (1%), 5 patients (3%) had permanent stroke, and 9 patients (5%) had permanent renal failure. Factors associated with early death included greater age (P = .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .01), clamping proximal to the left subclavian artery (P = .004), and use of hypothermic circulatory arrest (P = .002). The use of cold renal perfusion (P < .001) was associated with early survival. Early death was not associated with genetic disorders, emergency surgery, or extent of aortic repair. There were 36 late deaths, yielding an actuarial 8-year survival of 65.6% ± 5.9%. At 7 years, freedom from repair failure was 95.7% ± 1.7%, and freedom from subsequent repair for disease progression was 84.8% ± 4.6%. In survivors of DeBakey type I aortic dissection with distal aneurysm, open repair of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta can be performed with excellent early survival, acceptable morbidity, and relatively few late aortic events.

Surgical repair of acute type a aortic dissection: continuous pulmonary perfusion during retrograde cerebral perfusion prevents lung injury in a pilot study

ObjectivePostoperative respiratory failure is a frequent and serious complication in patients with type A acute aortic dissection operated on with deep systemic hypothermia. Interaction between neutrophils and pulmonary endothelium along with ischemic insult and reperfusion are the major determinants of lung injury. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of continuous pulmonary perfusion during retrograde cerebral perfusion on lung function. MethodsTwenty-two patients referred for acute type A aortic dissection, who were free from preoperative respiratory dysfunction, were assigned prospectively and alternately to one of 2 treatment groups. Pulmonary perfusion was performed during retrograde cerebral perfusion in group B (11 patients), whereas the conventional Ueda technique was applied in group A (11 patients). Lung function was evaluated on the basis of intubation time, scoring of chest radiographs at 12 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass, and Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio assessed from immediately before the operation to 72 hours after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass. ResultsStudy groups were homogeneous for age, sex, interval between symptom onset and surgical operation, previous aortic surgery, preoperative ejection fraction and pulmonary gas exchange function, extent of aortic repair, and concomitant procedures. Cardiopulmonary bypass time, length of retrograde cerebral perfusion, operation time, need for blood substitutes, and surgical revision for bleeding did not differ between treatment groups. Postoperative Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios were higher in group B than in group A, and the difference remained statistically significant throughout the study period. The incidence of prolonged ventilator support (>72 hours) and the severity of the radiographic pulmonary infiltrate score were lower in the perfused group (18.2% vs 72.7% [P = .015] and 0.81 ± 0.75 vs 1.8 ± 0.78 [P = .028], respectively). ConclusionsContinuous pulmonary perfusion provided a better preservation of lung function in patients operated on with deep systemic hypothermia.