CYP2D6 Extensive Metabolizers Research Articles

Clinical response to eliglustat in treatment-naïve patients with Gaucher disease type 1: Post-hoc comparison to imiglucerase-treated patients enrolled in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry

Eliglustat is a recently approved oral therapy in the United States and Europe for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 who are CYP2D6 extensive, intermediate, or poor metabolizers (>90% of patients) that has been shown to decrease spleen and liver volume and increase hemoglobin concentrations and platelet counts in untreated adults with Gaucher disease type 1 and maintain these parameters in patients previously stabilized on enzyme replacement therapy. In a post-hoc analysis, we compared the results of eliglustat treatment in treatment-naïve patients in two clinical studies with the results of imiglucerase treatment among a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with comparable baseline hematologic and visceral parameters in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry. Organ volumes and hematologic parameters improved from baseline in both treatment groups, with a time course and degree of improvement in eliglustat-treated patients similar to imiglucerase-treated patients.

Minimization of CYP2D6 Polymorphic Differences and Improved Bioavailability via Transdermal Administration: Latrepirdine Example.

Transdermal delivery has the potential to offer improved bioavailability by circumventing first-pass gut and hepatic metabolism. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of oral immediate release and transdermal latrepirdine in extensive and poor CYP2D6 metabolizers (EM/PM). Latrepirdine transdermal solution was prepared extemporaneously. The solution was applied with occlusive dressing to upper or middle back for 24h. Each subject received a single dose of 8.14mg oral, 5mg transdermal, and 10mg transdermal (EMs only) latrepirdine free base in a fixed sequence. Twelve EMs and 7 PMs (50-79years) enrolled and completed the study. Latrepirdine was well tolerated following both routes of administration. Dose-normalized latrepirdine total exposures were approximately 11-fold and 1.5-fold higher in EMs and PMs, respectively following administration of transdermal relative to oral. Differences between EM and PM latrepirdine exposures were decreased, with PMs having 1.9- and 2.7-fold higher peak and total exposures, respectively, following transdermal administration compared to 11- and 20-fold higher exposures, respectively, following oral administration. Transdermal delivery can potentially mitigate the large intersubject differences observed with compounds metabolized primarily by CYP2D6. Transdermal delivery was readily accomplished in the clinic using an extemporaneously prepared solution [NCT00990613].

Atomoxetine: A Review of Its Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics Relative to Drug Disposition.

Atomoxetine is a selective norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children (≥6 years of age), adolescents, and adults. Its metabolism and disposition are fairly complex, and primarily governed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 (CYP2D6), whose protein expression varies substantially from person to person, and by race and ethnicity because of genetic polymorphism. These differences can be substantial, resulting in 8-10-fold differences in atomoxetine exposure between CYP2D6 poor metabolizers and extensive metabolizers. In this review, we have attempted to revisit and analyze all published clinical pharmacokinetic data on atomoxetine inclusive of public access documents from the new drug application submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The present review focuses on atomoxetine metabolism, disposition, and genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 as they specifically relate to atomoxetine, and provides an in-depth discussion of the fundamental pharmacokinetics of the drug including its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion in pediatric and adult populations. Further, a summary of relationships between genetic variants of CYP2D6 and to some degree, CYP2C19, are provided with respect to atomoxetine plasma concentrations, central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics, and associated clinical implications for pharmacotherapy. Lastly, dosage adjustments based on pharmacokinetic principles are discussed.

Is It Truly the Answer? Personalized Oxycodone Dosing Based on Pharmacogenetic Testing and the Corresponding Pharmacokinetics

Dear Editor, It is with great interest that we read the article by Linares and colleagues, “Personalized oxycodone dosing: using pharmacogenetic testing and clinical pharmacokinetics to reduce toxicity risk and increase effectiveness”, published in the April 2014 issue of Pain Medicine [1]. In this study, a randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation was conducted, with a total of 15 healthy male subjects phenotyped as CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM), extensive metabolizer (EM), or poor metabolizer (PM) to obtain mean plasma oxycodone concentrations at each time point in each phenotype, and subsequently to be used to generate the phenotype-specific drug clearance parameter, in an attempt to “develop a frame for integrating pharmacogenetics with clinical pharmacokinetics for personalized oxycodone dosing based on a patient’s CYP2D6 phenotype.” The authors utilized a plethora of complicated computational formulae in advanced pharmacokinetics, and applied them to the subjects whose CYP2D6 polymorphisms were known, via genetic testing, to determine the target therapeutic plasma oxycodone concentrations, and finally determined the personalized oxycodone dose with the utilization of “phenotype-specific clinical pharmacokinetics” after repeated pharmacokinetic computations. The authors concluded that “By expressing a patient’s CYP2D6 phenotype pharmacokinetically, a clinician (at least theoretically) can improve the safety and efficacy of oxycodone and decrease the risk for iatrogenically induced overdose or death”. We respect the painstaking effort of the Linares and colleagues devoted to this highly technical 16-page work …

Impact of fraction unbound, CYP3A, and CYP2D6 in vivo activities, and other potential covariates to the clearance of tramadol enantiomers in patients with neuropathic pain.

The pharmacokinetics of tramadol is characterized by a large interindividual variability, which is partially attributed to polymorphic CYP2D6 metabolism. The contribution of CYP3A, CYP2B6, fraction unbound, and other potential covariates remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of in vivo activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 3A as well as other potential covariates (CYP2B6 genotype to the SNP g.15631G>T, fraction unbound, age, body weight, creatinine clearance) to the enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol. Thirty patients with neuropathic pain and phenotyped as CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers were treated with a single oral dose of 100 mg tramadol. Multiple linear regressions were performed to determine the contribution of CYP activities and other potential covariates to the clearance of tramadol enantiomers. The apparent total clearances were 44.9 (19.1-102-2) L/h and 55.2 (14.8-126.0) L/h for (+)- and (-)-tramadol, respectively [data presented as median (minimum-maximum)]. Between 79 and 83% of the overall variation in apparent clearance of tramadol enantiomers was explained by fraction unbound, CYP2D6, and CYP3A in vivo activities and body weight. Fraction unbound explained 47 and 41% of the variation in clearance of (+)-tramadol and (-)-tramadol, respectively. Individually, CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities were shown to have moderate contribution on clearance of tramadol enantiomers (11-16% and 11-18%, respectively). In conclusion, factors affecting fraction unbound of drugs (such as hyperglycemia or co-administration of drugs highly bound to plasma proteins) should be monitored, because this parameter dominates the elimination of tramadol enantiomers.

Individualized Hydrocodone Therapy Based on Phenotype, Pharmacogenetics, and Pharmacokinetic Dosing

(1) To quantify hydrocodone (HC) and hydromorphone (HM) metabolite pharmacokinetics with pharmacogenetics in CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM), extensive metabolizer (EM), and poor metabolizer (PM) metabolizer phenotypes. (2) To develop an HC phenotype-specific dosing strategy for HC that accounts for HM production using clinical pharmacokinetics integrated with pharmacogenetics for patient safety. In silico clinical trial simulation. Healthy white men and women without comorbidities or history of opioid, or any other drug or nutraceutical use, age 26.3±5.7 years (mean±SD; range, 19 to 36 y) and weight 71.9±16.8 kg (range, 50 to 108 kg). CYP2D6 phenotype-specific HC clinical pharmacokinetic parameter estimates and phenotype-specific percentages of HM formed from HC. PMs had lower indices of HC disposition compared with UMs and EMs. Clearance was reduced by nearly 60% and the t1/2 was increased by about 68% compared with EMs. The canonical order for HC clearance was UM>EM>PM. HC elimination mainly by the liver, represented by ke, was reduced about 70% in PM. However, HC's apparent Vd was not significantly different among UMs, EMs, and PM. The canonical order of predicted plasma HM concentrations was UM>EM>PM. For each of the CYP2D6 phenotypes, the mean predicted HM levels were within HM's therapeutic range, which indicates HC has significant phenotype-dependent pro-drug effects. Our results demonstrate that pharmacogenetics afford clinicians an opportunity to individualize HC dosing, while adding enhanced opportunity to account for its conversion to HM in the body.

CYP2D6 Genotype and Risk of Recurrence in Tamoxifen Treated Breast Cancer Patients

Despite consistent pharmacogenetic effects of CYP2D6 on tamoxifen exposure, there is considerable controversy regarding the validity of CYP2D6 as a predictor of tamoxifen outcome. Understanding the current state of evidence in this area and its limitations is important for the care of patients who require endocrine therapy for breast cancer. A total of 101 patients with breast cancer who received tamoxifen therapy for at least 3 years, were genotyped for common alleles of the CYP2D6 gene by nested-PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism PCR. Patients were classified as extensive or poor metabolizers (PM) based on CYP2D6*4 alleles in 3 different groups according to the menopause, Her2-neu status, and stage 3. The mean age of the patients with the disease recurrence was 50.8±6.4 and in non recurrent patients was 48.2±6.8. In this study 63.3% (n=64) patients were extensive metabolizers and 36.6% (n=37) were poor metabolizers. Sixty four of the 101 patients (63.3%) were Her2-neu positive. For tamoxifen- treated patients, no statistically significant difference in rate of recurrence observed between CYP2D6 metabolic variants in stage 3 and post-menopausal patients. However, there was a significant association between CYP2D6 genotype and recurrence in tamoxifen-treated Her2-neu positive patients. Compared with other women with breast cancer, those with Her2-neu positive breast cancer and extensive metabolizer alleles had a decreased likelihood of recurrence. This study for the first time demonstrated significant effects of CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer alleles on risk of recurrence in Her2-neu positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Therefore, CYP2D6 metabolism, as measured by genetic variation, can be a predictor of breast cancer outcome in Her2-neu positive women receiving tamoxifen.

Effect of CYP2B6*6 on Steady-State Serum Concentrations of Bupropion and Hydroxybupropion in Psychiatric Patients

The clinical effect of bupropion is mediated by its active metabolite hydroxybupropion. Previous studies have reported conflicting impact of the CYP2B6*6 variant allele on the formation of hydroxybupropion from bupropion. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of CYP2B6*6 and secondarily CYP2D6 genotype on steady-state serum concentrations of bupropion and hydroxybupropion in a large population of psychiatric patients. Retrospective information about dose-adjusted serum concentrations (C/D ratios) of bupropion and hydroxybupropion, CYP2B6 genotype (ie, data on the 2B6*6 polymorphisms 516G>T and 785A>G) and CYP2D6 genotype, was obtained from a therapeutic drug monitoring database (n = 132 patients). C/D ratios of bupropion and hydroxybupropion, and metabolic ratios, were compared between CYP2B6 genotype subgroups by multivariate mixed-model analyses (2B6*1/*1 was defined as control group). In the analyses, CYP2D6 genotype was also included as a covariate. Homozygous 2B6*6 carriers (n = 7) had significantly lower C/D ratios of hydroxybupropion compared with controls (n = 79), that is, estimated mean 5.8 versus 13.0 nmol·L·mg (P < 0.001). C/D ratio of hydroxybupropion in heterozygous *6 carriers (12.1 nmol·L·mg; n = 46) did not significantly differ compared with controls (P = 0.32). The hydroxybupropion/bupropion metabolic ratios in heterozygous and homozygous 2B6*6 carriers were significantly lower than in controls (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CYP2D6 genotype did not significantly alter the hydroxybupropion C/D ratio, but higher bupropion values were observed in poor versus extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers (P = 0.020). This study shows that the CYP2B6*6 variant allele is associated with significantly reduced formation of the active bupropion metabolite in psychiatric patients. Our findings suggest that dose-adjusted serum concentrations of hydroxybupropion at steady state is approximately halved in homozygous CYP2B6*6 carriers, which might imply risk of reduced clinical response in this patient subgroup. The CYP2D6 genotype does not affect hydroxybupropion concentrations and is therefore unlikely to impact bupropion treatment.

CYP2D6 genotype- and endoxifen-guided tamoxifen dose escalation increases endoxifen serum concentrations without increasing side effects.

Breast cancer patients with absent or reduced CYP2D6 activity and consequently low endoxifen levels may benefit less from tamoxifen treatment. CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers may need a personalized increased tamoxifen dose to achieve effective endoxifen serum concentrations, without increasing toxicity. From a prospective study population of early breast cancer patients using tamoxifen (CYPTAM: NTR1509), 12 CYP2D6 poor and 12 intermediate metabolizers were selected and included in a one-step tamoxifen dose escalation study during 2 months. The escalated dose was calculated by multiplying the individual’s endoxifen level at baseline relative to the average endoxifen concentration observed in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers by 20 mg (120 mg maximum). Endoxifen levels and tamoxifen toxicity were determined at baseline and after 2 months, just before patients returned to the standard dose of 20 mg. Tamoxifen dose escalation in CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers significantly increased endoxifen concentrations (p < 0.001; p = 0.002, respectively) without increasing side effects. In intermediate metabolizers, dose escalation increased endoxifen to levels comparable with those observed in extensive metabolizers. In poor metabolizers, the mean endoxifen level increased from 24 to 81 % of the mean concentration in extensive metabolizers. In all patients, the endoxifen threshold of 5.97 ng/ml (=16.0 nM) reported by Madlensky et al. was reached following dose escalation. CYP2D6 genotype- and endoxifen-guided tamoxifen dose escalation increased endoxifen concentrations without increasing short-term side effects. Whether such tamoxifen dose escalation is effective and safe in view of long-term toxic effects is uncertain and needs to be explored.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3562-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Eliglustat: A Review in Gaucher Disease Type 1.

Oral eliglustat (Cerdelga®) is approved in several countries for the long-term treatment of adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) who are cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs), intermediate metabolizer (IMs) or poor metabolizers (PMs) [these three CYP categories encompass >90 % of individuals]. Eliglustat is a potent, selective inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of certain glycosphingolipids, and thus, reduces the rate of biosynthesis of glycosphingolipids to counteract the catabolic defect (i.e. substrate reduction therapy). In the 9-month phase 3 ENGAGE trial, eliglustat significantly improved haematological endpoints and reduced organomegaly compared with placebo in treatment-naive adults with GD1, with the bone marrow burden score (a marker of Gaucher cell infiltration) and GD1 biomarkers also improving from baseline in eliglustat recipients. After 12 months in the phase 3 ENCORE trial, oral eliglustat was noninferior to intravenous imiglucerase [an enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)] in maintaining disease stability in adults who had stable disease after receiving ERT for ≥3 years. During long-term treatment with eliglustat (≤4 years) in the extension period of each of these pivotal trials and a phase 2 trial, patients experienced sustained improvements in visceral, haematological and skeletal endpoints, with no new safety concerns identified. Further clinical experience will help to more definitively establish the position of eliglustat treatment in adults with GD1. In the meantime, with its convenient oral regimen, eliglustat is an emerging alternative therapy to ERT for the long-term treatment of adults with GD1 who are CYP2D6 EMs, IMs or PMs.

Serum flecainide S/R ratio reflects the CYP2D6 genotype and changes in CYP2D6 activity

The aims of this study were to clarify whether the ratio of S- to R-flecainide (S/R ratio) in the serum flecainide concentration was associated with the stereoselectivity of flecainide metabolism, and to investigate the effects of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype and CYP2D6 inhibitor on the serum flecainide S/R ratio. In vitro studies using human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed CYP isoforms suggested that variability in the serum flecainide S/R ratio was associated with the stereoselectivity of CYP2D6-mediated flecainide metabolism. We examined the serum flecainide S/R ratio in 143 patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. The S/R ratio was significantly lower in intermediate metabolizers and poor metabolizers (IMs/PMs) than in extensive metabolizers (EMs) identified by the CYP2D6 genotype. The cut-off value for the S/R ratio to allow the discrimination between CYP2D6 EMs and IMs/PMs was 0.99. The S/R ratio in patients with co-administration of bepridil, a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, was lower than 0.99, regardless of the CYP2D6 genotype status. Other factors, including age, sex, body weight, and renal function, did not affect the serum flecainide S/R ratio. This study suggests that the serum flecainide S/R ratio reflects the CYP2D6 genotype and changes in CYP2D6 activity on co-administration of a CYP2D6 inhibitor.

The influences of CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine: exploring predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes.

Two biomarkers: concentration ratio of O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine and concentration sum of venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine were adopted to indicate venlafaxine responses, but neither is validated. To evaluate the ability of two biomarkers in reflecting venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations, and to further examine their relationship with venlafaxine treatment outcomes. Two well-defined influencing factors: CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions were enriched into a three-period crossover study to produce venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations: In each period, healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM group; n = 12) and CYP2D6*10/*10 intermediate metabolizers (IM group; n = 12) were pretreated with clarithromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor), or nothing (control), or clarithromycin + paroxetine (CYP3A4 + CYP2D6 inhibitors), before administration of a single-dose of 75mg venlafaxine. Both biomarkers were evaluated (1) for their relationship with the influencing factors in healthy volunteers and (2) for their relationships with the venlafaxine responses/adverse events reported in two patient studies. Significant venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations were observed between the EM and IM groups (geometric mean ratio [95% CI] of area under the curve, 3.0 [1.8-5.1] in the control period), and between the control and clarithromycin + paroxetine periods (4.1 [3.5-4.7] and 2.0 [1.7-2.4] in the EM and IM group, respectively). O-Desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine was superior to venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine to reflect the influencing factors. In the patient studies, O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine > 4 showed high precision in predicting venlafaxine responders/partial-responders (92%) and patients without venlafaxine-related adverse events (88%); the O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 and venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine > 400ng/ml combination showed higher precision (100%) than O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 alone (65%) in predicting venlafaxine non-responders. We propose using O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine for CYP2D6 phenotyping, and O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine with venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine for predicting venlafaxine treatment outcomes in future prospective studies.

Prediction of Metabolic Interactions With Oxycodone via CYP2D6 and CYP3A Inhibition Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Evaluation of a potential risk of metabolic drug–drug interactions (DDI) is of high importance in the clinical setting. In this study, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed for oxycodone and its two primary metabolites, oxymorphone and noroxycodone, in order to assess different DDI scenarios using published in vitro and in vivo data. Once developed and refined, the model was able to simulate pharmacokinetics of the three compounds and the DDI extent in case of coadministration with an inhibitor, as well as the oxymorphone concentration variation between CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) and poor metabolizers (PM). The reliability of the model was tested against published clinical studies monitoring different inhibitors and dose regimens, and all predicted area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) ratios were within the twofold acceptance range. This approach represents a strategy to evaluate the impact of coadministration of different CYP inhibitors using mechanistic incorporation of drug-dependent and system-dependent available in vitro and in vivo data.

Relative bioavailability and safety of aripiprazole lauroxil, a novel once-monthly, long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotic, following deltoid and gluteal administration in adult subjects with schizophrenia

Aripiprazole lauroxil is a linker lipid ester of aripiprazole for extended-release intramuscular (IM) injection. This multicenter, randomized, open-label study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), relative bioavailability, and tolerability of a single IM deltoid or gluteal injection of aripiprazole lauroxil in adult subjects with chronic stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Forty-six subjects were randomized 1:1 to aripiprazole lauroxil 441mg IM in the deltoid or gluteal muscle. Samples were collected through 89days post-dose to measure levels of aripiprazole lauroxil, N-hydroxymethyl aripiprazole, aripiprazole, and dehydro-aripiprazole. Forty-three (93.5%) subjects completed all study assessments; most were CYP2D6 extensive or immediate metabolizers (96%); two (4%) were poor metabolizers. The PK of aripiprazole following aripiprazole lauroxil was characterized by a steady rise in plasma concentrations (Tmax 44–50days), a broad peak, and prolonged exposure attributable to the dissolution of aripiprazole lauroxil and formation rate-limited elimination of aripiprazole (t1/2=15.4–19.2days). Deltoid vs. gluteal administration resulted in slightly higher Cmax aripiprazole concentrations [1.31 (1.02, 1.67); GMR 90% CI]; total exposure (AUCinf) was similar between sites of administration [0.84 (0.57, 1.24)]. N-hydroxymethyl-aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole exposures were 10% and 33–36%, respectively, of aripiprazole exposure following aripiprazole lauroxil. The most common adverse events were injection site pain in 20 subjects (43.5%) and headache in 6 subjects (13.0%) of mild intensity occurring at a similar rate with deltoid and gluteal administration. Exposure ranges with deltoid and gluteal administration overlapped, suggesting that these sites may be used interchangeably. Despite a higher incidence of adverse events, deltoid muscle provides a more accessible injection site and could facilitate patient acceptance.

Concomitant use of tamoxifen and endoxifen in postmenopausal early breast cancer: prediction of plasma levels by physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling.

PurposeTo overcome cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) mediated tamoxifen resistance in postmenopausal early breast cancer, CYP2D6 phenotype-adjusted tamoxifen dosing in patients with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism and/or the application of endoxifen, the most potent tamoxifen metabolite, are alternative treatment options. To elucidate both strategies comprehensively we used a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach.MethodsFirstly simulation of increasing tamoxifen dosages was performed by a virtual clinical trial including populations of CYP2D6 poor (PM), intermediate (IM) and extensive metabolizers (EM) (N = 8,000). Secondly we performed PBPK-simulations under consideration of tamoxifen use plus concomitant increasing dosages of endoxifen (N = 7,000).ResultsOur virtual study demonstrates that dose escalation of tamoxifen in IMs resulted in endoxifen steady-state plasma concentrations similar to CYP2D6 EMs whereas PMs did not reach EM endoxifen levels. Steady-state plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, N-desmethyl-tamoxifen, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and endoxifen were similar in CYP2D6 IMs and PMs versus EMs using once daily dosing of 20 mg tamoxifen and concomitant CYP2D6 phenotype-adjusted endoxifen dosing in IMs and PMs (1 mg/d and 3 mg/d, respectively).ConclusionIn conclusion, we suggest that co-administration of endoxifen in tamoxifen treated early breast cancer women with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism is a promising alternative to reach plasma concentrations comparable to CYP2D6 EM patients.

Impact of age on serum concentrations of venlafaxine and escitalopram in different CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype subgroups.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of age on venlafaxine and escitalopram serum concentrations in various cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype subgroups. Serum concentration measurements from CYP-genotyped patients treated with venlafaxine (n = 255) or escitalopram (n = 541) were collected retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring database. Patients were divided into three CYP2D6 (venlafaxine) or CYP2C19 (escitalopram) phenotype subgroups according to inherited genotype, i.e., poor metabolizers (PMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (HEMs), and extensive metabolizers (EMs), and subsequently distributed into three age groups, i.e., <40 (control), 40-65, and >65 years. The effect of age on dose-adjusted serum concentrations (i.e., nmol/L/mg/day) of venlafaxine and escitalopram in each of the phenotype subgroups was evaluated by separate multivariate mixed model analyses. In CYP2D6 PMs, the mean dose-adjusted serum concentration of venlafaxine was 8-fold higher in patients >65 years compared with those <40 years (p < 0.001). In comparison, the respective age-related differences in mean dose-adjusted serum concentrations of venlafaxine were much less pronounced in CYP2D6 HEMs and EMs (<2-fold differences between age groups). A similar genotype-related effect of age was not observed for escitalopram (<1.5-fold age differences in all CYP2C19 subgroups). This study suggests that the effect of age on serum concentration of venlafaxine is dependent on CYP genotype, in contrast to escitalopram. Thus, to prevent potential side effects, it might be particularly relevant to consider CYP2D6 genotyping prior to initiation of venlafaxine treatment in older patients.

Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of vortioxetine in healthy individuals.

The objective was to describe the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine and evaluate the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in the healthy population. Data from 26 clinical pharmacology studies were pooled. A total of 21,758 vortioxetine quantifiable plasma concentrations were collected from 887 subjects with corresponding demography. The doses ranged from 2.5 to 75 mg (single dose) and 2.5–60 mg (multiple QD doses). The pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine was best characterised by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption, lag-time and linear elimination, with interindividual error terms for absorption rate constant, oral clearance and central volume of distribution. The population mean was 32.7 L/hr for oral clearance and 1.97·103 L for the central volume of distribution. The average elimination half-life was 65.8 hr. CYP2D6 inferred metabolic status (ultra, extensive, intermediate or poor metabolisers) and age on oral clearance and height on central volume of distribution were identified as statistically significant covariate–parameter relationships. For CYP2D6 poor metabolisers, CL/F was approximately 50% to that seen in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers. The impact of height on V2/F and age on CL/F was low and not considered to be clinically relevant. The final model was found to be reliable, stable and predictive. A reliable, stable and predictive pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterise pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine in the healthy population.

Personalized Oxycodone Dosing: Using Pharmacogenetic Testing and Clinical Pharmacokinetics to Reduce Toxicity Risk and Increase Effectiveness

To develop a framework for integrating pharmacogenetics with clinical pharmacokinetics for personalized oxycodone dosing based on a patient's CYP2D6 phenotype. Randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Subjects were genotyped as CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizer, extensive metabolizer, or poor metabolizer phenotypes. Five subjects from each phenotype were randomly selected for inclusion in our study. Studies were performed in silico. The subjects were male, age 26 years, height 181.2 cm, and weight 76.3 kg. They were healthy without comorbidities, and their medical examinations were normal. The trajectories of phenotype-specific plasma oxycodone concentration-time profiles were analyzed using weighted nonlinear least-squares regression with WinSAAM software. A global two-stage population-based model data analysis procedure was used to analyze the studies. Clinical pharmacokinetics were calculated using the R package cpk, eliminating the need to perform hand-calculations. Our study shows how clinicians can reduce risk and increase effectiveness for oxycodone dosing by (1) determining the patient's likely metabolic response through testing a patient's CYP2D6 phenotype, and (2) calculating clinical pharmacokinetics specific to the patient's CYP2D6 phenotype to design a personalized oxycodone dosing regimen. Personalized oxycodone dosing is a new tool for a clinician treating chronic pain patients requiring oxycodone. By expressing a patient's CYP2D6 phenotype pharmacokinetically, a clinician (at least theoretically) can improve the safety and efficacy of oxycodone and decrease the risk for iatrogenically induced overdose or death. Pharmacokinomics provides a general framework for the integration of pharmacogenetics with clinical pharmacokinetics into clinical practice for gene-based prescribing.

Effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol enantiomers in patients with neuropathic pain phenotyped as cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive metabolizers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of poorly controlled type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of tramadol enantiomers in patients with neuropathic pain. Nondiabetic patients (control group, n = 12), patients with T1DM (n = 9) or T2DM (n = 9), all with neuropathic pain and phenotyped as cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive metabolizers, received a single oral dose of 100 mg racemic tramadol. Serial blood samples were collected over a 24-h period. Patients with T1DM showed reduced Cmax of both tramadol enantiomers. The plasma concentrations of the active (+)-M1 were significantly reduced in T1DM (area under the curve plasma concentration versus time (AUC∞ ): 313.1 ng·h/ml) when compared with nondiabetic patients (AUC∞ : 1246.6 ng·h/ml). The fraction unbound of (+)-M1 was increased in patients with T1DM. Patients with T1DM and T2DM showed reduced AUC and increased fraction unbound of (-)-M1. The reduced total plasma concentrations of the active (+)-M1 in patients with T1DM may not be of clinical relevance because they are counterbalanced by the increased fraction unbound.

Adjusting the dose of tamoxifen in patients with early breast cancer and CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype

BackgroundCYP2D6 is a key enzyme in tamoxifen metabolism, transforming it into its main active metabolite, endoxifen. Poor CYP2D6 metabolizers (PM) have lower endoxifen plasma concentrations and possibly benefit less from treatment with tamoxifen. We evaluated tamoxifen dose adjustment in CYP2D6 PM patients in order to obtain plasma concentrations of endoxifen comparable to patients with extensive CYP2D6 metabolism (EM). Patients and methodsComprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping and plasma tamoxifen metabolite concentrations were performed among 249 breast cancer patients in adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen. Tamoxifen dose was increased in PM patients to 40 mg and to 60 mg daily for a 4-month period each, repeating tamoxifen metabolite measurements on completion of each dose increase. We compared the endoxifen levels between EM and PM patients, and among the PM patients at each dose level of tamoxifen (20, 40 and 60 mg). ResultsEleven PM patients (4.7%) were identified. The mean baseline endoxifen concentration in EM patients (11.30 ng/ml) was higher compared to the PM patients (2.33 ng/ml; p < 0.001). In relation to the 20 mg dose, increasing the tamoxifen dose to 40 and 60 mg in PM patients significantly raised the endoxifen concentration to 8.38 ng/ml (OR 3.59; p = 0.013) and to 9.30 ng/ml (OR 3.99; p = 0.007), respectively. These concentrations were comparable to those observed in EM patients receiving 20 mg of tamoxifen (p = 0.13 and p = 0.64, respectively). ConclusionIn CYP2D6 PM patients, increasing the standard tamoxifen dose two-fold or three-fold raises endoxifen concentrations to levels similar to those of patients with EM phenotype.